Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney announced Friday he has officially decided not to run for president in 2016. While the 2012 Republican nominee said he believes he had the best chance at winning the nomination and beating likely Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, Romney said it is time to pass the torch to younger leaders.
“I’ve decided it is best to give other leaders in our party the opportunity to become our nominee,” Mitt Romney said in a statement.
Romney told supporters in a conference call Friday that he thought the contest would be a slog, but that he could emerge victorious. He even mentioned the latest FOX Poll showing him comfortably ahead of his closest rival for the nomination and head-to-head with Hillary Clinton.
“I feel that it is critical that America elect a conservative leader to become our next president,” Romney said. “You know that I have wanted to be that president. But I do not want to make it more difficult for someone else to emerge who may have a better chance of becoming that president. You can’t imagine how hard it is for Ann and me to step aside, especially knowing of your support and the support of so many people across the country. But we believe it is for the best of the Party and the nation.”
However, in the three weeks it has been to the day since he announced he was thinking of a third bid, GOP power-brokers have been moving toward former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, the son of former President George H.W. Bush and brother to G. W. Bush. Even Romney’s top advisor in Iowa, Dave Kochel, signed on with Jeb in the lead-off caucus state.
“He was testing the waters,” said Larry Sabato of the Center for Politics at UVA. “And he found the waters chilly.”
Ultimately, Romney said it was time for others to take the lead.
“I believe that one of our next generation of Republican leaders, one who may not be as well known as I am today, one who has not yet taken their message across the country, one who is just getting started, may well emerge as being better able to defeat the Democrat nominee,” Romney added. “In fact, I expect and hope that to be the case.”
In truth, recent polling may have reflected name recognition only, as is the case with Jeb Bush.
A slew of recent polls show that a majority of voters – including Republicans – think the 2016 GOP president field should be filled with fresh faces, not old ones. A new Rasmussen Reports survey finds that 64 percent of likely voters say Republicans should “look for a fresh face to run for president in 2016,” while just 10 percent say they should get behind a candidate who has run in the past.
“While Republicans have a certain lingering affinity for Mitt Romney, the truth is that GOP voters want someone new,” says PPD’s senior political analyst Richard Baris. “He only had one way to go — down — and while Bush is helped by Romney’s decision, it may be likely he has found his ceiling, as well. The real winner is Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker.”
Behind the scenes, those in the Romney camp said he believed Bush was a weak candidate. Further, he hasn’t run since 2002 and definitely conflicts with the party base on immigration and education. Walker, on the other hand, took activists and donors by storm when he spoke Saturday in Iowa. With Romney out of the race, Bush and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie will vie for the establishment money and vote, leaving a candidate like Walker an enormous opportunity.
Gov. Bush did not attend the event.
“To all my supporters, friends and family who worked both tirelessly and loyally to support my campaigns in the past, I will always be deeply appreciative,” Romney said. “What you have already done is a tribute to your patriotism. We are overwhelmed and humbled by your loyalty to us, by your generosity of spirit, and by your friendship. God bless you all.”
The most damning journalistic sin committed by the media during the era of Russia collusion…
The first ecological study finds mask mandates were not effective at slowing the spread of…
On "What Are the Odds?" Monday, Robert Barnes and Rich Baris note how big tech…
On "What Are the Odds?" Monday, Robert Barnes and Rich Baris discuss why America First…
Personal income fell $1,516.6 billion (7.1%) in February, roughly the consensus forecast, while consumer spending…
Research finds those previously infected by or vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 are not at risk of…
This website uses cookies.
View Comments
THIS IS THE FINAL CHANCE TO BLOCK KING OBAMA’S ILLEGAL ALIEN
AMNESTY?
THE COST IS UNIMAGINABLE FOR TAXPAYERS? HE MUST BE
IMPEACHED.
The peculiar Lies behind the Establishment GOP Border Bill
Rep. Mike McCaul border bill is another phony show vote that does not
deport one illegal alien or even implement current law to build a fence to
secure the southern border. Get the details here and then call your
Representative and Senators and tell them you want real border security, not
phony show votes, from the new Republican Majority. I learned my lesson AND
WILL NEVER VOTE FOR A GOP ELITIST as JEP BUSH, although I will add my name for
a TEA PARTY conservative, as Rubio, Cruz or Carson or others.
Are House
Republicans Starting To Get What Conservatives Call "Immigration Reform”?
here’s an
ever so slight glimmer of hope that at least some Republicans in the House are
starting to understand what real “reform” might look like, and it means
closing, not opening the loopholes in the immigration system that Barack Obama
has been using to allow millions of illegal aliens to stay in the United
States.
Don’t be fooled by the respite Washington, thinking you can sit
back patiently and do—nothing? We urge you to call your Representative and
Senators (the Capitol Switchboard is 1-866-220-0044) and ask them to keep up
the pressure on their state and federal lawmakers. CALL YOUR MEMBER OF CONGRESS
OR STAND ASIDE FOR AMERICAN PATRIOTS. Every time an illegal alien slips past our
unsecured border, we, the taxpayer must support them. Learn more at NumbersUSA
or Alipac on this toxic subject. If neither party will seal the border, than
agriculture, big business and all the special interests should be forced to
pay—not Taxpayers?