Connect With PPD
Follow Us:
Sections: Politics

Veto-Proof Majority in House Puts a “Pause” on Middle East Refugees from Syria, Iraq

House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy of Calif., left, and House Majority Whip Steve Scalise of La., stride from the House chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Nov. 18, 2015, as House Republicans work on legislation aimed at increasing screenings for Syrian and Iraqi refugees before they enter the U.S., including a new requirement for FBI background checks. (Photo: AP/J. Scott Applewhite)

The House overwhelming passed a bill to harden screening for Syrian and Iraqi refugees, with 47 Democrats joining Republicans to defy a White House veto threat. In a 289-137 vote, the House provided enough votes to override a presidential veto, the first of Obama’s tenure if it gets to that point.

President Obama, while speaking in Turkey and the Philippines during a multi-stop overseas trip, all but called lawmakers and governors opposing his Syrian refugee program bigots and xenophobes. His comments came despite confirmations that at least one of the terrorists in the Paris attacks entered Europe posing as a Syrian refugee with a fake passport.

“The idea that somehow they pose a more significant threat than all the tourists who pour into the United States every single day just doesn’t jive with reality,” Mr. Obama said. “So my expectation is after the initial spasm of rhetoric, the people will settle down, take a look at the facts, and we’ll be able to proceed.”

His comments didn’t sit well with Republicans, particularly the new speaker.

“I’m really surprised the president is using such rhetoric,” House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said on Thursday after the vote. “We know there are gaps in this program and we have to keep the country safe, and that is why this pause is necessary.”

However, despite overwhelming support in the House and among the American people, the fate of the American Security from Foreign Enemies Act still remains uncertain. It now heads to the Senate, where its it would require Democratic support to overcome a filibuster. Thus far, there are not enough public commitments to guarantee that it would have s

READ FULL STORY

SubscribeSign In
PPD Staff

People's Pundit Daily delivers reader-funded data journalism covering the latest news in politics, polls, elections, business, the economy and markets.

Share
Published by
PPD Staff

Recent Posts

Media’s Worst Russian Collusion Sins May Soon Be Repeated

The most damning journalistic sin committed by the media during the era of Russia collusion…

1 year ago

Study: Mask-Mandates and Use Not Associated With Lower Covid-19 Case Growth

The first ecological study finds mask mandates were not effective at slowing the spread of…

3 years ago

Barnes and Baris on Big Tech’s Arbitrary Social Media Bans

On "What Are the Odds?" Monday, Robert Barnes and Rich Baris note how big tech…

3 years ago

Barnes and Baris on Why America First Stands With Israel

On "What Are the Odds?" Monday, Robert Barnes and Rich Baris discuss why America First…

3 years ago

Personal Income Fell Significantly in February, Consumer Spending Weaker than Expected

Personal income fell $1,516.6 billion (7.1%) in February, roughly the consensus forecast, while consumer spending…

4 years ago

Study: Infection, Vaccination Protects Against Covid-19 Variants

Research finds those previously infected by or vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 are not at risk of…

4 years ago

This website uses cookies.