According to President Obama, as reported by the New York Times, the U.S. is slated to receive 10,000 Muslim Syrian “refugees” in 2015 between September and December.
The Refugee Resettlement Program, which was started under President Jimmy Carter through the Refugee Act of 1980, defines a refugee as follows:
…any person who is outside any country of such person’s nationality or, in the case of a person having no nationality, is outside any country in which such person last habitually resided, and who is unable or unwilling to return to, and is unable or unwilling to avail himself or herself of the protection of, that country because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.
Today, it is of special importance to read this definition. Basically, the 1980 definition of a refugee is a) any person who is outside any country and b) who is unable or unwilling to return, c) because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution.
Do the Syrian Refugees slated to be received by the U.S. meet this definition? Do they meet the three conditions?
Those persons who are coming from areas threatened by or currently under control of the Islamic State have no reason to fear persecution if they do not meet any of the 6 conditions listed above. The Islamic State would not persecute or cause fear of persecution otherwise.
Most of those slated to be received by America as “refugees” do not qualify as refugees under the 1980 definition, simply because they have no reason to fear persecution. Why then are these persons being classified as refugees?
Persons coming to America under the Syrian Refugee title have been labeled as refugees by the United Nations, but they also define refugee as one fleeing persecution. Interestingly, the page with the UN definition of refugee also has much to say about migration. Foremost, that refugees and migrants “are fundamentally different, and for that reason are treated very differently under modern international law.”
Why has the Office of Refugee Resettlement left the historical legal definition behind? This question alone brings reason to close the Refugee Resettlement Program today until a full evaluation of its expenditures and laxness is evaluated and exposed.
[mybooktable book=”civilization-jihad-and-the-myth-of-moderate-islam” display=”summary” buybutton_shadowbox=”true”]
The most damning journalistic sin committed by the media during the era of Russia collusion…
The first ecological study finds mask mandates were not effective at slowing the spread of…
On "What Are the Odds?" Monday, Robert Barnes and Rich Baris note how big tech…
On "What Are the Odds?" Monday, Robert Barnes and Rich Baris discuss why America First…
Personal income fell $1,516.6 billion (7.1%) in February, roughly the consensus forecast, while consumer spending…
Research finds those previously infected by or vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 are not at risk of…
This website uses cookies.