The largely-leftist moderators at the 2016 Republican presidential debates posed pointed questions, to say the least. That was to be expected given their network employers.
Megyn Kelly commenced the decorum with her question to then-candidate Donald Trump, “You’ve called women fat pigs, dogs, slobs, disgusting animals.”
Others moderators followed up with such gems as, “Will you accept the election results?” Ironically, that scenario was only ever considered to apply to President Trump, never to Hillary Clinton, who in turn was never asked.
Trump was the only one to raise his hand when asked, “Raise your hand if you will not pledge to endorse the eventual nominee,” which undoubtedly helped him secure the nomination, as the public was tired of equivocating, lying politicians running for, to and fro a broken Washington, D.C.
They saw a man who would say what he meant no matter how “unpopular” it may be with the media and political class.
Though the numbers of declared candidates as of this writing has hit 14, it is without a doubt that the public will not see the same tenor of questions hurled at Democrats in 2020. That this is manifestly unfair is of course obvious, but a fact of modern American political life.
The various Democratic candidates will get softball questions and will be free to run through their various talking points that differentiate them from their rivals, while attacking President Trump.
However, if by chance a conservative, a rare beast known as an honest journalist with ethics, or even one who wants to make a name for themself ends up on a moderator panel, I have listed a few possible questions below. They are based on actual policies or are significant matters of public concern, which deserve to be aired.
Now, it is highly unlikely that any of these valid and pertinent questions will ever see the light of day. Given nearly of the likely moderators share a political ideology with the Democratic Party, it is arguably more likely the candidates will be given softball questions in advance.
But I put them out there as a public service, and in the faint hope that one might have conscience enough to dare to ask even one.
The most damning journalistic sin committed by the media during the era of Russia collusion…
The first ecological study finds mask mandates were not effective at slowing the spread of…
On "What Are the Odds?" Monday, Robert Barnes and Rich Baris note how big tech…
On "What Are the Odds?" Monday, Robert Barnes and Rich Baris discuss why America First…
Personal income fell $1,516.6 billion (7.1%) in February, roughly the consensus forecast, while consumer spending…
Research finds those previously infected by or vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 are not at risk of…
This website uses cookies.
View Comments
Please, please stop calling them, the leftist socialists "Democratic". They are anything but. They are Democrats and there is nothing "democratic" about them or their party. They are not "liberals" and they are not "democratic" so please use the correct words when describing this evil known as the Democrat Party.
I would ask the WOMEN candidates : As a MOTHER, which one of YOUR children would you NOW? Or would abort if YOUR party took a drastic step forward and passed a Law to allow abortion ANYTIME even years after birth??
A 11-year old girl in Argentina gave birth.
Father was gone long ago.
Mother lost custody and the girls lived with her grandmother.
The BF of the grandmother, 65, raped the girl.
The girls wanted to "Get out the thing the old man put in me".
However, she is a minor, and can not decide on her abortion.
Mother can not give a consent, and neither can the grandmother, cause she is associated with her BF.
So, the girl gave birth. The child was not expected to survive.
THIS is where your anti-abortion laws lead to. And to the clothangers.
Mr. Sheppard, would you by chance know in which web link I would be able to submit a question to both a Republican and Democratic Presidential candidate in an open debate? Appreciate your help.
Question for future Democratic debate: if you see that the "numbers" aren't there in a timely manner,will you encourage your followers to vote for another candidate to prevent splitting the Democratic pool like Sanders did in 2016 ?__