Secretary of State John Kerry on Wednesday signed a controversial UN arms treaty, leading U.S. lawmakers to vow the Senate will not ratify the agreement. Ahead of the signing, a State Department official said the treaty would “reduce the risk that international transfers of conventional arms will be used to carry out the world’s worst crimes,” while simultaneously protecting gun rights.
“The treaty builds on decades of cooperative efforts to stem the international, illegal, and illicit trade in conventional weapons that benefits terrorists and rogue agents,” the official said.
U.S. lawmakers have long admitted the treaty would lead to new gun control measures, without even addressing the stated goals. They note the U.S. Senate has final say on whether to approve the agreement.
Sen. Bob Corker R-TN, in a letter to President Obama, urged the administration not to take any action to implement the treaty without the consent of the Senate. He wrote the treaty raises “fundamental issues” concerning “individual rights protected by the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution.”
Sen. Jim Inhofe R-OK, one of the most vocal opponents of the treaty, also sent a letter to Kerry declaring the treaty “dead in the water,” since a majority of senators has gone on record against the agreement.
“The administration is wasting precious time trying to sign away our laws to the global community and unelected U.N. bureaucrats,” he wrote. Kerry, who is now in New York attending the U.N. General Assembly session, announced earlier this year that the administration planned to sign the treaty.
The treaty would require countries that ratify to establish national regulations to control the transfer of conventional arms and components and to regulate arms brokers, but it supposedly will not explicitly control the domestic use of weapons in any country.
Gun-rights supporters on Capitol Hill warn the treaty could be used as the basis for additional gun regulations inside the U.S. and have threatened not to ratify. Over the summer, 130 members of Congress signed a letter to President Obama and Kerry urging them to reject the measure for this and other reasons.
The chance of the Senate ratifying the treaty is next to nil at this point. A two-thirds majority would be needed in the Senate to ratify, and they simply do not have the votes. They could easily bring the treaty up in a subsequent Congress if Democrats win more seats in the future, however. A GOP-controlled Senate would have legislative procedures to use as tools to prevent ratification in the future, as well.
What impact the treaty will have in curbing the estimated $60 billion global arms trade also remains to be seen. Even the more optimistic reports have not been rousing. The U.N. treaty will take effect after 50 countries ratify it, and much will depend on which ones ratify and which ones don’t, and how stringently it is implemented.
The Control Arms Coalition, which includes hundreds of non-governmental organizations in more than 100 countries that promoted an Arms Trade Treaty, has said it expects many of the world’s top arms exporters – including Britain, Germany and France – to sign alongside emerging exporters such as Brazil and Mexico. It said the United States is expected to sign later this year.
The coalition notes that more than 500,000 people are killed by armed violence every year and predicted that “history will be made” when many U.N. members sign the treaty, which it says is designed “to protect millions living in daily fear of armed violence and at risk of rape, assault, displacement and death.”
Many violence-wracked countries, including Congo and South Sudan, are also expected to sign. The coalition said their signature – and ratification – will make it more difficult for illicit arms to cross borders.
The treaty covers battle tanks, armored combat vehicles, large-caliber artillery systems, combat aircraft, attack helicopters, warships, missiles and missile launchers, and small arms and light weapons.
It prohibits states that ratify it from transferring conventional weapons if they violate arms embargoes or if they promote acts of genocide, crimes against humanity or war crimes. The treaty also prohibits the export of conventional arms if they could be used in attacks on civilians or civilian buildings such as schools and hospitals.
In addition, the treaty requires countries to take measures to prevent the diversion of conventional weapons to the illicit market. This is among the provisions that gun-rights supporters in Congress are concerned about.
The most damning journalistic sin committed by the media during the era of Russia collusion…
The first ecological study finds mask mandates were not effective at slowing the spread of…
On "What Are the Odds?" Monday, Robert Barnes and Rich Baris note how big tech…
On "What Are the Odds?" Monday, Robert Barnes and Rich Baris discuss why America First…
Personal income fell $1,516.6 billion (7.1%) in February, roughly the consensus forecast, while consumer spending…
Research finds those previously infected by or vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 are not at risk of…
This website uses cookies.
View Comments
This is really cool. I have joined your rss feed and look ahead to in the hunt for more of your fantastic post. Additionally, I've shared your web site in my social networks.