Widget Image
Follow PPD Social Media
Sunday, January 12, 2025
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 128)

Mass street protest against French President Emmanuel Macron in Paris, France. (Photo: Jeanne Menjoulet/https://flickr.com/photos/96925387@N00/23768004778)
Mass street protest against French President Emmanuel Macron in Paris, France. (Photo: Jeanne Menjoulet/https://flickr.com/photos/96925387@N00/23768004778)

My multi-part series on Socialism in the Modern World has featured Venezuela, the Nordic nations, and Greece.

But no discussion of dirigiste policy would be complete without a look at France.

After all, not only does France have a history of imposing 100-percent-plus tax rates, it also hold the dubious honor of being Europe’s biggest welfare state.

And it has the highest overall burden of government spending.

These are not good numbers, especially when you consider the demographic changes that are happening in Europe.

Sadly, there’s a long history of French statism. Andras Toth of the Carl Menger Institute explained some of the France’s grim economic history.

If there is an example of a dirigiste, interventionist state, then that is France in Europe. France was the birthplace of the mercantilist, absolutist monarchy in the early modern period. …the practice of mercantilist protection and monopolization of key industries, including the state-mandated “industrial development policies” …Under the rule of the famous finance minister, Jean-Baptiste Colbert… France sank into a series of crises and lost her preeminent position in Europe. …The modern French state is the stepchild of the political culture of the Bourbons. It is the prime example of dirigisme. It redistributes as much as 56 percent of annual GDP and imposes the highest tax burden in Europe. The French state directly manages key industries and sustains one of the largest welfare states in Europe. It also imposes complicated bureaucratic red tape on economic actors, trailing way behind the Scandinavian states and Germany as far as ease of business is concerned.

Though he also explains that the current president seems to understand that France needs less government and more economic freedom.

Macron was the first French politician to build his election campaign on reform and competitiveness in order to keep up France’s position in the world. Those who voted for him knew what to expect. As a member of Hollande’s team, he proposed increasing the work week from 35 to 37 hours to lessen the tax burden on higher incomes, and the competitiveness package he developed aimed to lessen the protection of workers and companies in order to promote growth. …France is again at a crossroads: She has to choose between the policies of Jean-Baptiste Colbert and those of Anne-Robert-Jacques Turgot, the great French liberal economist who was the economic minister of France between 1774 and 1776 and who argued for free trade, less taxation, and less regulation.

I also sympathize with what Macron is trying to achieve, at least with regard to domestic reforms.

But I fear it may be too little and too late.

Especially since the New York Times reports that Macron is increasingly unpopular.

…attacks…that Mr. Macron is a self-seeking servant of society’s fortunate… The undisguised hostility has made clear that, less than a year into this new presidency, anti-Macron sentiment is emerging as a potent force. It is being fueled by a pervasive sense that Mr. Macron is pushing too far, too fast in too many areas — nicking at the benefits of pensioners and low earners, giving dollops to the well-off and slashing sacred worker privileges.

Though he does deserve some of his unpopularity. He imposed green taxes late last year that triggered nationwide riots from motorists and other unhappy citizens.

But he’s also unpopular for some of his good policies, which leads me to fear that France may be past the tipping point, meaning that genuine and meaningful reform no longer is possible because too many voters are on the government teat.

I hope that’s not the case. France used to be one of the most wealthy and powerful nations in the world. But now its living standards are barely average according to the OECD’s AIC numbers.

Because of the ongoing debate about what the term actually means, it’s unclear whether France’s tepid economic performance can be blamed on socialism.

But we shouldn’t doubt that the country is paying a considerable price for having too much government.

In Part I of this series, we

Digital composite of the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) building and the American flag. (Photo: AdobeStock)
Digital composite of the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) building and the American flag. (Photo: AdobeStock)

The U.S. Supreme Court announced Friday it will expeditiously decide whether the Trump Administration can ask a citizenship question to U.S. residents interviewed for the 2020 census.

According to the Justice Department (DOJ), which will argue on behalf of the Trump Administration, the census questionnaire must to be completed by June to be printed on schedule.

The justices said they will hear the case in late April.

Historically, the U.S. asked a citizenship question from 1820 to 1950. The U.S. Commerce Department also noted that the citizenship question would be the same as the one posed in the annual American Community Survey (ACS).”

But that didn’t stop a liberal federal judge in New York from ruling Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross committed “egregious” legal violations when he decided to once again pose the citizenship question.

U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman in Manhattan disregarded history in the case, and ruled that he believed Mr. Ross’s motivations wasn’t the real reason.

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). (Photo: AdobeStock/bbourdages)
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). (Photo: AdobeStock/bbourdages)

The U.S. Commerce Department uses the 10-year questionnaire to collects population data. The data is in turn used to determine representation in the U.S. House of Representatives. the number of electoral votes each state will have in the Electoral College, and to allocated roughly $600 billion in federal funding.

The only major difference between the census and the ACS is the sample size, with the ACS being a much smaller percentage of households than the actual census.

Still, for proponents of the proposal, the Court’s previous record offers mixed signals on how they might rule. Last year, the justices denied a request by the Trump Administration to block the trial in Manhattan from going forward.

However, they also blocked the plaintiffs from deposing Secretary Ross under oath.

A divided Supreme Court upheld a revised version of President Trump’s ban on travelers from several Muslim-majority nations, ruling it was “squarely within the scope of presidential authority.”

In December, a split court refused a request by the Trump Administration to reinstate a ban on asylum claims by immigrants who cross the southern U.S. border illegally.

Worth noting, two-thirds (66%) of American adults support the government posing a citizenship question on the U.S. Census, a recent survey found. Only 23% disagreed, and 11% are undecided.

An overwhelming majority, at 89%, think it’s important for the government to get as accurate a count of the U.S. population as possible in the Census, including 67% who say it’s Very Important.

Just seven percent (7%) say an accurate count of the population is not very or Not At All Important.

The U.S. Supreme Court announced Friday it

Key with business words and rig equipment graphic icons relative to the oil and gas industry. (Photo: PPD/AdobeStock/JEGAS RA)
Key with business words and rig equipment graphic icons relative to the oil and gas industry. (Photo: PPD/AdobeStock/JEGAS RA)

The Baker Hughes North American Rig Count for February 15 was down 14 rigs from 1289 to 1275, as declines for Canada offset U.S. gains.

The U.S. rig count was up 2 rigs to 1051, a gain of 76 from one year ago. Rigs classified as drilling for oil rose 3 to 857 rigs, while those classified as drilling for natural gas fell by 1 rig to 194.

But the Canadian rig count fell by 16 rigs to 224, down 94 rigs from one year ago. Rigs classified as drilling for oil fell by 6 rigs to 152, while those classified as drilling for natural gas fell by 10 to 72.

The Baker Hughes North American Rig Count tracks the weekly change in the number of rigs classified as drilling for oil and gas. Components in the data are the United States (U.S.) and Canada, with a separate count for the Gulf of Mexico, a subset of the U.S. total.

The Gulf of Mexico saw their rig count increase by 2 rigs to 21.

The Baker Hughes North American Rig Count

Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras. (Photo: Courtesy of the Greek Government)
Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras. (Photo: Courtesy of the Greek Government)

In Part I of this series, we examined the horrific tragedy of Venezuelan statism, and in Part II of this series, we looked at the Scandinavian “free-market welfare state.”

Today, Part III will look at the ongoing deterioration of Greece.

I’ve written many times about how the mess in Greece was caused by an ever-rising fiscal burden.

Let’s look at two charts, drawing from the government spending section of Our World in Data, that confirm my argument.

This first chart shows the overall burden of government spending starting in 1880. As you can see, spending generally consumed a bit more than 20 percent of the nation’s economy (other than during wars) all the way from 1880 to the mid-1960s.

And then the spending burden exploded.

What drove that unfortunate increase in the spending burden?

We get that answer in our next chart, which shows that redistribution outlays have skyrocketed in recent years.

In other words, the welfare state is 100-percent responsible for the Greek fiscal crisis, whether you look at short-run data or these long-run numbers.

Has all this additional spending generated any good results?

Hardly.

As government has become larger and crowded out the private sector, that has dampened hopes for the Greek people. As reported by the Washington Post, they are responding with fewer children and more emigration.

During the country’s deep and prolonged crash, which began in late 2009 and worsened in 2011 and beyond, an already low birthrate ticked down further, as happened throughout the troubled economies of southern Europe. Greece was also hit by a second factor, with half a million people fleeing the country, many of them young potential parents. …Greece’s fertility rate, of about 1.35 births per woman, is among the lowest in Europe, and well below the rate of 2.1 needed for a stable population… In 2009, just before the fiercest parts of the crisis, there were 117,933 births in Greece. The number has since fallen steadily, becoming well eclipsed by the number of deaths. The birth total in 2017, 88,553, was the lowest on record.

This chart from the story is amazing, though in a very grim way.

This demographic implosion might not be a big problem if Greece was like Hong Kong and had a privatized system for Social Security.

But that’s obviously not the case. Instead, Greece is a morass of expensive entitlements.

Notwithstanding all the bad news, special interests in Greece continue to lobby for more spending and favors.

And they have allies in Europe, as indicated by this report in the EU Observer.

Dunja Mijatovic, the CoE’s commissioner for human rights, told EUobserver that Greeks are still suffering from the aftermath of international bailouts and imposed economic structural reforms. …Her comments follow the publication of her 30-page report on the impact of austerity measures in Greece, which says the fallout has violated people’s right to health, enshrined in the European Social Charter, and eroded the quality of schools. …Mijatovic, who toured Greece over the summer, says she was struck at the large cuts in areas like maternal and child health services.

Though I want to be fair.

There is occasional progress in the country, as indicated by another story from the EU Observer.

Greece has taken one step closer to the separation of church and state by removing 10,000 church employees off the public payroll. A deal agreed between prime minister Alexis Tsipras and archbishop Ieronymos II also includes a settlement of a decade-old property dispute between the Greek state and the Orthodox Church – which is one of the country’s largest real estate owners.

I consider this a small step in the right direction.

The Israeli government may even want to learn something from this reform.

And there are other hopeful signs, as illustrated by this story from Der Spiegel.

Olga Gerovasili, …administrative reform minister…is overseeing an administrative overhaul that could transform the country like nothing else has since Greece joined the EU. She wants to abolish Greek clientelism. …For centuries, the Greek administration was little morethan an excuse for legal nepotism. …Relationships were more important than skills for filling official positions. …Job appointments are no longer to be in the hands of powerful local politicians… The aim of the system is also to use it to remove incompetent officials. …Another revolution. The Greek administration was legendarily labyrinthian. Files could travel for years through dozens of official offices. When bureaucrats aren’t hired for their skills, they need to justify their existence by signing as many things as possible. …Much like the nepotism, this is also to become a thing of the past.

I hope these reforms are real and permanent.

After all, a bloated and inefficient bureaucracy is one of the primary causes of excessive spending in Greece. But time will tell.

After all, it’s not easy taking away goodies from an entitled population.

“Greece finally needs to open its markets — that’s the most important thing,” says Aristides Hatzis, 51, a law professor at the University of Athens. Hatzis has written one of Greece’s most surprising bestsellers of the past few years: an introduction to laissez-faire thinking. It’s surprising because economic liberalism doesn’t have any deep roots in Greece. …”In the past decades, the governments have so overwhelmingly failed that Greeks blame everything that goes wrong on the state,” says Hatzis. …”It’s difficult to take away the privileges of influential lobby groups.” As long as that doesn’t happen, he says, the country won’t recover.

Having looked at the evolution of Greece’s economy, let’s now look at how the nation’s politicians have been responding to the crisis.

Are they liberalizing, or are they digger the hole deeper? In other words, are the good reforms larger than the backsliding, or vice-versa?

Naomi Klein will be happy with the answer. Here are two more charts, based on numbers from Economic Freedom of the World, both of which show that Greece is moving in the wrong direction.

First, we see that Greece’s score has dropped over the past 10 years.

And why has economic freedom declined?

The main cause is that fiscal policy has become much worse, thanks in large part to the IMF and various bailouts (which actually were designed to bail out irresponsible banks in nations such as France and Germany).

In any event, the nation’s politicians gladly accepted bad advice and used bailout money as an excuse to impose higher taxes, followed by higher taxes, and then decided to push taxes even higher.

The bottom line is that it is difficult to be optimistic about Greece.

Yes, there are some signs of hope. More and more people realize that big government has been bad for Greece.

But it’s not easy to get good reforms in a nation where most voting-age adults are directly or indirectly mooching off taxpayers.

In Part I of this series, we examined

Cut fence and an American flag as a 3D concept illustrating Illegal immigration. (Photo: AdobeStock)
Cut fence and an American flag as a 3D concept illustrating Illegal immigration. (Photo: AdobeStock)

President Donald Trump on Friday announced executive action to declare a national emergency in response to what he called “an invasion” of drugs and criminals at the U.S. southern border with Mexico.

“Today I am announcing several critical actions that my administration is taking to confront a crisis,” the president said in the Rose Garden. “We are going to confront the national security crisis on the southern border not because it was a campaign promise, but because we have to do it.”

“We’re talking about an invasion of our country, with drugs and human traffickers and all types of criminals and gangs.”

He slammed Democrats for not prioritizing border security in the budget bill, and for minimizing the flow of drugs and human trafficking.

“When you listen to certain politicians, particularly Democrats, it’s all a lie. They say walls don’t work. They say it’s all about the ports of entry. It’s all a lie,” the president said. “Everyone knows that walls work.”

“Nancy knows it. Chuck knows it. It’s all a big lie.”

Mark Morgan, who served as Border Patrol chief under Barack Obama, has also sided with President Trump, who thanked and defended those who defend the border.

“Our border agents are doing such incredible work. Our military has been incredible. I want to thank them,” he said. “ICE has been abused by our press and by the Democrats.”

President Trump recognized Angel Moms and Angel Families who have lost their children to violent illegal immigrants for their support, and told several of them in attendance to stand and be recognized.

“These are great people who are fighting for their children who have been killed by illegal immigrants who should never have been in this country,” he said of the victims’ families. “Our country, those who love our country, they love you.”

As People’s Pundit Daily (PPD) recently reported, the Justice Department (DOJ) confirmed a notorious Mexican sex trafficking organization “frequently” relies on the U.S. southern border to smuggle their victims.

For over a decade, the Rendon-Reyes Trafficking Organization, based in Tenancingo, Tlaxcala, Mexico, has used the insecurity and lawlessness at the southern border to smuggle young women and girls to the U.S. from Mexico and Central America.

“By signing a national emergency, something that has been signed many times, we want to stop criminal cartels and gangs from coming into our country,” he continued.

“I ran on a very simple slogan: Make America Great Again. If you are going to have drugs pouring across the border, gangs pouring across the border, then it’s very difficult to make American great again.”

Notably, the president addressed criticisms surrounding the early period of his administration, and insinuated his biggest mistake was trusting Republican leaders in Congress.

“I was a little new to the job, and a lot of people didn’t step up,” he said in a not-so veiled reference to former House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wisconsin.

At the beginning of the president’s term, House Republicans controlled both chambers of the U.S. Congress. The White House wanted to prioritize immigration and tax reform over repealing and replacing ObamaCare.

Then-Speaker Ryan insisted the GOP conference was behind a consensus plan, but they failed. Exit polls and voter analysis files indicated voters perceived the repeal attempt as a threat against protections for preexisting conditions.

It cost the Republican Party control of the lower chamber in 2018.

In the end, the president did sign the first overhaul to the U.S. tax code in more than 30 years, but Congressional Republicans never prioritized immigration.

President Trump compared the expected court challenge to the national emergency declaration to the travel ban. Democrats and opponents of the executive order “judged-shopped” in liberal courts, most notably the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court of Appeals.

Federal judges in California and Hawaii issued national injunctions that prevented the administration from implementing the order. Ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the order, ruling it was “squarely within the scope of presidential authority.”

The president expects the High Court to have the final say on this order, as well, and anticipates legal victory given the law.

“If you don’t have a border, you don’t have a country. We fight all over the world to create borders for other countries. But we don’t have a border.”

President Trump announced executive action to declare

Sale, consumerism and people concept - happy family with child and shopping cart buying food at grocery store or supermarket. (Photo: PPD/AdobeStock/Syda Productions)
Sale, consumerism and people concept – happy family with child and shopping cart buying food at grocery store or supermarket. (Photo: PPD/AdobeStock/Syda Productions)

The Survey of Consumers preliminary reading on consumer sentiment shows a rebound in confidence, beating the high end of the forecast range.

The Index of Consumer Sentiment came in at 95.5, higher than the 93.0 consensus forecast. Economic forecasts ranged from a low of 90.0 to a high of 94.5.

Current Economic Conditions remained elevated at 110.0, but declined from 108.8 in January. The Index of Consumer Expectations rebounded significantly from 79.9 to 86.2.

The early February gains reflect the end of the partial government shutdown as well as a more fundamental shift in consumer expectations due to the Fed’s pause in raising interest rates. The lingering impact of the shutdown was responsible for some of the negative economic evaluations, and, at the time that these interviews were conducted, uncertainty about whether a second shutdown would occur continued to have a slight depressing impact on confidence. Although the majority of consumers expected some additional rate hikes during the year ahead, that proportion has shrunk to the smallest level in the past two years. Perhaps more importantly, consumers’ long term inflation expectations fell to the lowest level recorded in the past half century. While nominal income expectations remained at modest levels, consumers more frequently expected gains in their inflation-adjusted incomes in early February than at any other time in more than fifteen years (see the chart). The data indicate that personal consumption expenditures will remain the strongest sector in the national economy in 2019–up by 2.7% compared with a GDP gain of 2.2%. The data suggest that the Fed will find it even harder to justify another rate hike given the record low inflation expectations; the data will also add to the debate about the evolving relationship between unemployment and inflation as consumers now anticipate lower inflation and higher unemployment.

Richard Curtain, Chief Economist for Survey of Consumers

The Survey of Consumers preliminary reading on

New York Manufacturing Firms Report Solid, Sustainable Growth

The Empire State Manufacturing Survey rebounded in February to beat the consensus forecast, as both the general and expectations gauges indicate solid growth.

 The headline general business conditions index doubled from the month prior, rising 5 points to 8.8. The new orders index rose 4 points to 7.5.

Thirty-two percent (32%) of respondents said conditions had improved over the month of February, while 23% reported that they had worsened. 

The shipments index came in at 10.4, indicating a solid and sustainable pace of growth, even though the index fell 8 points to its lowest level in well over a year.

Overheating has been a real concern with the Empire State Manufacturing Survey, as well as the Philadelphia Fed’s Manufacturing Index.

Unfilled orders held steady, inventories were little changed, and delivery times were slightly longer.

The six-month outlook was far more optimistic in February than in the prior month. The index for future business conditions soared 15 points to 32.3.

The indexes for future new orders and shipments climbed to similar levels and firms expect employment and hours worked to increase at a solid pace.

The capital expenditures index jumped 11 points to 29.3, and the technology spending index ticked higher to 22.1.

The Empire State Manufacturing Survey rebounded in

Industry production 4.0 and technology concept, depicting factory production on a conveyor belt with factory operational workers in uniform. (Photo: AdobeStock)
Industry production 4.0 and technology concept, depicting factory production on a conveyor belt with factory operational workers in uniform. (Photo: AdobeStock)

The Federal Reserve said industrial production fell 0.6% in January after rising 0.1% in December, missing the consensus forecast.

Forecasts ranged from -0.3% to 0.4%, with the consensus coming in at 0.1%.

In January, manufacturing production declined 0.9%, largely fueled by a big decline in motor vehicle assemblies. Factory output excluding motor vehicles and parts fell 0.2%.

Worth noting, U.S. Light Auto Vehicle Sales declined to the lowest level since August 2017 in the most recent report.

For manufacturing, economic forecasts ranged from -0.5% to 0.2%, with a 0.1% consensus. Manufacturing output is still 2.9% higher than a year earlier.

The indexes for mining and utilities moved up 0.1% and 0.4%, respectively. Utilities helped moderate weakness in the report, but mining stole the show with a 15.3% increase for the year-on-year.

At 109.4 percent of its 2012 average, total industrial production was 3.8% higher in January than it was a year ago.

Capacity utilization for the industrial sector decreased 0.6 percentage point in January to 78.2%, lower than the 78.8% consensus forecast. That is 1.6 percentage points below its long-run (1972–2018) average.

The Federal Reserve said industrial production fell

California Senator Kamala Harris, D-Calif., speaks during a committee hearing.
California Senator Kamala Harris, D-Calif., speaks during a committee hearing.

Please, spare us the fabricated tales of when you smoked weed in college, while listening to rappers who didn’t even record an album yet. Defenders, I’m sure she was replying to another interviewer who was not asking about her taste in music.

Nobody cares about youthful indiscretions involving weed use, and haven’t cared since Bill Clinton claimed he “didn’t inhale,” and then-candidate Barack Obama admitted he was a member of the “choom gang.”

It is more troubling for a candidate to demonstrate a complete lack of understanding of basic economics, or a propensity to obfuscate and prevaricate in the pursuit of political gain.

Claiming tax cuts and refunds are lower than in the previous years, is one such example. Ryan Ellis at the Washington Examiner explained without misdirection:

People may have gotten their tax cut in their weekly paychecks, and not as much from their usual tax refund. People who e-file this early (which means they have nothing more than wage income and simple financial and family setups) have received the bulk of their tax cut already in the form of higher take-home pay throughout the course of last year.

Kamala Harris’ blatant appeal to identity politics, specifically lighting a fire under black’s sensitivities, has no place in the Office of President of the United States.

Clearly, Team Harris has determined being a person of color will alone earn her the black vote in Southern primaries, and that she can pivot to whatever passes for a center among the radical progressive left.

For the record, she is not an African American with roots in the nation’s slavery history, but rather a woman of mixed East Indian and Jamaican heritage.

Her plan may very well succeed, as some polls suggest she is now in second place behind former Vice President Joe Biden. She is clearly the favorite among progressives in the media blogosphere and Twittersphere, and more importantly among leftwing opinion purveyors in Big Media.

If the exploitation of sectionalism, balkanization and racial animus were not enough to cause them to reconsider Senator Harris for the presidency, consider her repeated rush to judgements for blatant racial appeal.

When the alleged “attack” on Jussie Smollet was initially reported, she tweeted the following:

It was initially claimed and reported the “Empire” actor was attacked by people wearing MAGA hats who taunted him with racist and homophobic slurs, before putting a “lynching rope” around his neck and dousing him with a chemical agent “which may have been bleach.”

UPDATE: Jussie Smollet appears to have staged the attack. The Chicago Police Department has pushed back on elements of the report, though they raided the home of two actors of two Nigerian descent. At least one appeared on the show “Empire” as a stand-in.

Lynching is a dark and despicable part of our nation’s history, yet it is still not a federal hate crime. Passing a federal anti-lynching law must be a priority for this new Congress.

Surveillance cameras have shown no such attack.

But they did show Mr. Smollett eating a Subway sandwich subsequent to this alleged hate crime. He still refuses to turn over his cell phone to the police, after claiming he was using it during the attack.

Now, it may be that Mr. Smollet made the whole thing up, or it may turn out that his statements about what allegedly happened to him were correct.

But that is not the point.

The point is that a leading candidate for President of the United States used a totally unverified and racially-charged story for blatant political purposes, without first waiting for police confirmation.

That such a person could take this sort of rush-to-judgement attitude to the office of the presidency, is frightening. That such a person could use race to divide the nation when there has been a period of slow and steady healing, is morally criminal.

Kamala Harris must not win the presidency for the betterment of all races.

From bogus weed-smoking stories to unverified hate

The U.S. Senate on Thursday voted largely along party lines to confirm William Barr to be the 85th U.S. Attorney General. He will immediately replace Acting-Attorney General Matt Whitaker.

“Today is a great day for the Department of Justice with the confirmation of William Barr to be the next Attorney General,” Senator Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee said in a statement.

“He is a steady hand at a time of turmoil and he will bring much needed reform to the Department of Justice.”

In August 1991, Mr. Barr took over the Justice Department (DOJ) as Acting Attorney General after Richard Thornburgh resigned to campaign for the U.S. Senate.

William "Bill" Barr served as the 77th Attorney General of the United States and was nominated to serve as the nation's top cop again by President Donald Trump on December 7, 2018.
William “Bill” Barr served as the 77th Attorney General of the United States and was nominated to serve as the nation’s top cop again by President Donald Trump on December 7, 2018.

Only 3 days later, 121 Cuban inmates awaiting deportation to Cuba seized 9 hostages at Talladega federal prison. He directed the FBI’s Hostage Rescue Team to assault the prison and end the hostage crisis.

The result was a best-case scenario, with agents rescuing all hostages without loss of life. Mr. Barr cites this decision as his greatest accomplishment at DOJ, and it earned him bipartisan praise.

President George H.W. Bush was impressed with his management of the hostage crisis and, a few weeks later, nominated him to be the nation’s top cop.

The Senate Judiciary Committee, then-led by former Senator Joe Biden, D-Del., approved his nomination unanimously by a vote of 14 to 0. He was confirmed by voice vote by the full U.S. Senate just 36 days after the nomination was announced, and was sworn in as Attorney General on November 26, 1991.

In December 2018. President Donald J. Trump announced he would nominate Mr. Barr to replace Jeff Sessions at the helm of the Justice Department (DOJ). Despite a decades-long history of bipartisan praise for the nominee, Democrats resisted.

Last week, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted 12 to 10 along party lines to advance the nomination to the floor of the U.S. Senate. He was confirmed this time by a 54 to 45 vote margin.

“I look forward to working with Mr. Barr on the many issues facing the men and women of the Department of Justice and our nation as a whole,” Chairman Graham added. “An outstanding choice by President Trump.”

The U.S. Senate on Thursday voted 54

People's Pundit Daily
You have %%pigeonMeterAvailable%% free %%pigeonCopyPage%% remaining this month. Get unlimited access and support reader-funded, independent data journalism.

Start a 14-day free trial now. Pay later!

Start Trial