Widget Image
Follow PPD Social Media
Thursday, January 30, 2025
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 174)

Import, Export, Logistics concept - Map global partner connection of Container Cargo freight ship for Logistic Import Export background (Photo: AdobeStock/Elements of this image furnished by NASA)

Import, Export, Logistics concept – Map global partner connection of Container Cargo freight ship for Logistic Import Export background (Photo: AdobeStock/Elements of this image furnished by NASA)

The U.S. trade deficit widened to $50.1 billion in July, up $4.3 billion from $45.7 billion in June, slightly less than the consensus. The forecasts ranged from $51.2 billion to $44.8 billion, with a $50.2 billion consensus.

The U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis joint report said exports came in at $211.1 billion, a decline of $2.1 billion from June. The gain in the deficit reflected an increase in the goods deficit of $4.2 billion to $73.1 billion and a decrease in the services surplus of $0.1 billion to $23.1 billion.

Year-to-date, the goods and services deficit rose 7% or $22.0 billion from the same period in 2017. Exports increased $115.7 billion, or 8.6%. Imports increased $137.7 billion, or 8.3%.

The July report shows surpluses, in billions of dollars, with South and Central America ($3.4), Hong Kong ($2.5), Brazil ($0.6), United Kingdom ($0.4), and Singapore ($0.2).

Deficits were posted, in billions of dollars, with China ($34.1), European Union ($14.5), Mexico ($6.4), Germany ($6.2), Japan ($4.9), Canada ($3.2), OPEC ($3.0), Italy ($2.7), India ($1.6), France ($1.4), South Korea ($1.3), Taiwan ($1.0), and Saudi Arabia ($1.0).

The U.S. trade deficit widened to $50.1 billion

American Manufacturing Sector Graphic Concept. (Photo: AdobeStock)

American Manufacturing Sector Graphic Concept. (Photo: AdobeStock)

The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) manufacturing index (PMI) came in at a very strong 61.3% in August, indicating an acceleration in sector growth. The reading easily beat the 57.7 consensus forecast, which was computed from a 56.5 to 58.1 range.

“Comments from the panel reflect continued expanding business strength,” Timothy R. Fiore, Chair of the ISM Manufacturing Business Survey Committee. “Demand remains strong, with the New Orders Index at 60 percent or above for the 16th straight month, and the Customers’ Inventories Index remaining low.”

The New Orders Index came in at 65.1%, an increase of 4.9% from July, while the Production Index rose 4.8% to 63.3%. The Employment Index registered at 58.5%, a 2-point gain.

Of the 18 manufacturing industries, 16 reported growth in August. The two industries reporting contraction in August were Wood Products and Primary Metals.

“The Backlog of Orders Index continued to expand, at higher levels compared to the previous month,” Mr. Fiore added. “Consumption improved, with production and employment continuing to expand, at higher levels compared to July, despite shortages in labor and materials.”

The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) manufacturing

New residential homes are shown under construction in Carlsbad, California September 19, 2011. (Photo: Reuters)

New residential homes are shown under construction in Carlsbad, California September 19, 2011. (Photo: Reuters)

Construction spending was estimated at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $1,315.4 billion in July, 0.1% higher than the revised estimate for June of $1,314.2 billion. That’s still 5.8% higher than the July 2017 estimate of $1,242.8 billion.

The forecast range was 0.1% to 2.3%, with the consensus calling for a 0.4% gain.

During the first 7 months of this year, construction spending amounted to $740.5 billion, or 5.2% higher than the $703.7 billion for the same period in 2017. The previous month was revised higher from -1.1% initially reported to -0.8%.

Private Construction

Spending on private construction was at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $1,010.9 billion, 0.1% below the revised June estimate of $1,011.9 billion. Residential construction was at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $560.1 billion in July, which is still 0.6% above the revised June estimate of $556.7 billion.

Nonresidential construction was at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $450.9 billion in July, 1.0% below the revised June estimate of $455.3 billion.

Public Construction

In July, the estimated seasonally adjusted annual rate of public construction spending was $304.5 billion, 0.7% above the revised June estimate of $302.3 billion. Educational construction was at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $71.6 billion, 2.1% above the revised June estimate of $70.1 billion.

Highway construction was at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $94.2 billion, which is 0.4% higher than the revised June estimate of $93.8 billion

Construction spending was estimated at a seasonally

U.S. President Donald Trump and his nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court Judge Brett Kavanaugh talk during an announcement event in the East Room of the White House in Washington, U.S., July 9, 2018. (Photo: Reuters)

U.S. President Donald Trump and his nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court Judge Brett Kavanaugh talk during an announcement event in the East Room of the White House in Washington, U.S., July 9, 2018. (Photo: Reuters)

The Senate Judiciary Committee will begin holding hearings for the confirmation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds more than two-thirds of voters see his confirmation as likely.

While 69% think it’s at least somewhat likely that Judge Kavanaugh will be confirmed, that includes 38% who think it’s very likely. Another 31% think it’s somewhat likely.

Democrats have demanded, and received, more than 400,000 documents to vet the nominee. That’s more than any other Court nominee before him, and five times more than the previous 3 combined. But 21 Democrats, including 5 on the Senate Judiciary Committee, already announced their opposition before hearings even began.

The survey of 1,000 U.S. Likely Voters was conducted August 30 and September 2, 2018.

A new poll finds more than two-thirds

Cartoon workingman reluctantly paying taxes. (Photo: AdobeStock/PPD/Adiano)

Cartoon workingman reluctantly paying taxes. (Photo: AdobeStock/PPD/Adiano)

American citizens are just now starting to see some real benefits of ‘making America great again’. Americans still have a long way to go, though.

Last year the United States Treasury was forced to borrow over a trillion dollars. That’s just to pay for entitlements to the large percentage of Americans now receiving some sort of federal assistance to live their lives. This is not counting the millions of dollars also spent by states to prop up Medicaid, educational services and other social services that Americans now receive on a daily basis.

All along, the Democrats have been calling for more services (and a few Republicans too) and programs to help people get along. With that call for benefits, you hear a lot of stories about people who didn’t get help they needed because there wasn’t enough money spent, or services that didn’t cover enough people. The media pundits write stories about some guy that didn’t get a taxpayer sponsored heart transplant due to cuts, or the woman who is eating cat food because she went bankrupt since she became ill without health insurance.

What they aren’t telling you, are the stories about people who are being driven into poverty by the cost of those services, or are being denied their safety net in order to pay for someone else who might be less deserving.

Government can’t pay for everyone’s needs despite what the Democrats say, and despite their best efforts to bankrupt our government. It’s a vicious trap, a ball and chain to the taxpayers of the nation at large. The sad thing is, we most certainly have enough wealth to take care of those who helped build the system that is footing the bill for everyone else who didn’t.

Who speaks for the American that pays for these things?

Who speaks for the veteran who is being denied a kidney transplant? He is too old now to qualify and is told there aren’t enough to go around, but that illegal immigrant who arrived here 3 months ago got one, thus reducing the available amount of kidneys in the transplant pool.

Who speaks for the old widow whose husband worked and provided for her in her old age who gets too small a Social Security check, while precious Social Security fund go to the guy faking the bad back? Or more truthfully, would have had more money in the bank had she been able to keep more of her paycheck every week through lower taxation?

Who speaks for the working stiff that pays a third of their paycheck every week in taxes, then another third on groceries to feed his family, while the loafer gets a social services department food stamps debit card every month because he chose not to work at all?

Who speaks for the wives of men we send off to war who are forced to live on meager paychecks while their husbands get shot at every day; while we provide free cell phones and subsidized housing to families who decide that living on the dole is easier than getting a job?

How many people would be more productive Americans if they could have larger take home paychecks? How many businesses could afford to hire more people if they didn’t have to also pay the government more than a third of their employee’s paychecks to cover unemployment, Social Security and Medicare fees? Or now provide free health insurance or pay off the government not to have to do so?

President Obama greatly expanded and extended the unemployment insurance program. When will we begin to start reducing it back to where it supports itself again?

How many people struggle to make their mortgage payment because they have to pay extra taxes to give others get a free bailout to a brokerage firm that played it fast and loose but donated money to the politician in charge?

Who speaks for them?

Americans need to understand that for every service we provide, we lose jobs and income. For every person that gets a free bailout, illegal immigrant who gets an educational subsidy or food stamp card is issued, or welfare check cut, there is someone else that is struggling to make ends meet to pay for it.

The pundits love to talk about the hard luck cases but ignore the millions of middle class Americans that forgo any semblance of a productive life struggling daily, living paycheck to paycheck, simply to pay for all the free stuff people are getting. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez recently tweeted out about NYC’s fourth driver suicide. She said

“Yellow cab drivers are in financial ruin due to the unregulated expansion of Uber. What was a living wage job now pays under minimum.”

I wonder how many Americans commit suicide daily because of paying too much in taxes.

Who speaks for the millions of middle class workers who pass from this world to the next working their knuckles to the bone and now are going without in their golden years so that teeming throngs of inner city drug dealers, pimps and frauds can get their benefits?

Or worse, there is some child being born into a system that makes them either a payer or debtor to the ever present state, that decides in its indifferent and callous disregard for human rights, who is to receive and who is to not.

Who speaks for them?

Listen to “Justice by Popular Demand: LNS 08/30/18 Show Vol. 5–#141” on Spreaker.

Who speaks for the working stiff paying

SUV parts are fabricated in the stamping facility at the General Motors Assembly Plant on June 9, 2015. (Photo: Reuters)

SUV parts are fabricated in the stamping facility at the General Motors Assembly Plant on June 9, 2015. (Photo: Reuters)

The MNI Chicago Business Barometer scaled back to a three-month low of 63.6 in August, down 1.9 points from July’s 65.5. However, the elevated reading still does indicate continued strength.

The MNI Chicago Business Barometer continues to signal solid business sentiment, despite easing for the first time in five months, with growth in output and demand holding up well,” said Jamie Satchi, Economist at MNI Indicators.

“Inflationary pressures look set to continue, potentially bleeding into consumer prices, with over 60% of firms reporting that they have passed on higher input costs to customers in recent months, and others foreseeing doing so in the near future,” Mr. Satchi added.

The MNI Chicago Business Barometer scaled back

Watch Live: Senator John McCain III will lie in state in the U.S. Capitol Rotunda on Friday at 11:00 a.m. EST. The late senator, who spent 5 years as a prisoner of war in Vietnam, passed away last week after he chose to discontinue medical treatment for brain cancer.

Family, members of Congress, and the vice president will all gather for a service to pay their respects. But at 1:00 p.m. EDT, the U.S. Capitol Rotunda will be opened to the public for a viewing line.

Watch Live: Senator John McCain III will

U.S.-China trade concept graphic. (Photo: Scott Maxwell via AdobeStock/PPD License)

U.S.-China trade concept graphic. (Photo: Scott Maxwell via AdobeStock/PPD License)

Equity investors had nothing going in their favor Thursday. Emerging markets woke up to the one-two punch of the Argentine Peso falling another 10% and a heightened level of ineptitude from the Turkish Central Bank. The very tail end of Q2 earnings treated us to a few spectacular earnings disasters: DLTR -14%, PVH -13%, ANF -16%.

Followed by a new round of tariffs for China.

By 2:00 PM EST, the market had done a yeoman’s job of cutting the deficit on the Dow Jones Industrial Average (INDEXDJX: .DJI) in half, bringing the S&P 500 (INDEXCBOE: .INX) back within 2 points of unchanged, and pushing the NASDAQ Composite (INDEXNASDAQ) through the 8100 level.

All of that trading, only to get smacked in the face by reports that the Trump administration is ready to slap an additional $200 billion of tariffs on China as early as next week.

Within 15 minutes the DJIA had tripled its losses, the S&P 500 was down 10 handles and the teflon NASDAQ composite had turned negative.

Just to put an Explanation Point on the extent of the carnage done to the market, by 3:00 PM, even Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN) was down on the day. Not to worry Amazonians, by day’s end your stock had regained the $2000 price level for the first time ever.

The timing of the “announcement” on heightened Chinese tariffs was priceless!!

With the U.S. – Mexico – Canada trade negotiations 24 to 36 hours from being reaching a successful conclusion, and the big beautiful stock market 8½ trading hours from posting all time weekly and monthly highs for nearly every major stock market index known to man.

How could you NOT sweep all of those chips off that table, walk over to the table where the Chinese are and quadruple that table limit! Haven’t you been paying attention? Didn’t anybody read that book?

Seriously, we’ve seen this movie so many times. The tariff shock headline trade has become the single most predictable market event since they moved the opening bell at the NYSE from 10:00 AM to 9:30 AM in the mid 1980s. 24 to 48 hours later, everything will be fine. Never mind that it might cost people a few basis points on their monthly performance, it’s been a great month of August by any metric.

It may even have motivated a few people to come to work on the Friday going into a long weekend.

The tariff shock headline trade has become

Whether I’m writing about a rich country or a poor country, my research starts with a visit to Economic Freedom of the World. Published by the Fraser Institute in Canada, EFW uses five major factors (fiscal, regulatory, monetary, trade, and quality of governance) to rank nations based on the overall amount of economic liberty.

The rankings go as far back as 1970, so you can see how a country has changed over time, and the good news is that scores have improved in most nations.

Today, let’s look at a history of the freest nations. We’ll start with the table from 1970.

Unsurprisingly, Hong Kong was at the very top. But who would have guessed that Luxembourg would be second? Canada ranked #3 and the United States was in 4th place, followed by Japan and four European nations.

Perhaps the most shocking bit of news is that Venezuela was ranked #10.

All the more reason that Venezuela’s last-place status in the most-recent edition is so depressing. That must be a record for the biggest-ever decline for a country.

If we look at the data for 1975, 1980, and 1985. Luxembourg continues to get very high scores, along with Hong Kong and the United States.

Panama and Guatemala ranked amazingly high in 1975, while the United Kingdom finally appears in 1985 (thanks to Margaret Thatcher’s reforms).

Here’s the data for 1990, 1995, and 2000. You’ll notice that New Zealand and Australia enter the top 10 while Luxembourg begins to drop (at least relatively speaking) and Singapore begins to climb.

Now let’s look at what has happened this century.

Hong Kong and Singapore have a lock on the top-two slots, with New Zealand and Switzerland controlling the third and fourth positions. Luxembourg, meanwhile, has vanished.

In 2010 and 2015, we see some nations appear from the developing world and the post-communist world. Most notably, ChileEstonia, and Georgia.

For a policy wonk, these are fascinating numbers. I enjoy looking how relative rankings have changed, as well as what’s happening to absolute scores.

It’s such good source of data that I’ve always wished there were pre-1970 numbers as well.

Well, my wish has been granted. Ryan Murphy and Robert Lawson, two of the scholars who put together Economic Freedom or the World, have cranked out estimates for the entire post-World War II era.

Based on their retroactive assessment, they show that the United States had the world’s freest economy back in 1950.

Switzerland was in second place, followed by a bunch of European and Anglosphere nations.

If you want to understand why Luxembourg, Belgium, Norway, and Sweden are rich today, notice that they have a history of being among the world’s most pro-market nations.

Incidentally, due to inadequate data, Singapore wasn’t included in the retroactive data until 1960 and Hong Kong is complete absent from this historical dataset.

We don’t have top-10 lists for the other years, but the authors shared a table with all their numbers, so I created my own versions for 1955, 1960, and 1965.

As you can see, congratulations to Switzerland and Luxembourg (twice). The United States and Canada get very high marks. And Belgium and the Netherlands get good scores as well.

There are so many implications to this data, but I’ll close with three simple observations.

  • First, these numbers help to explain why Europe is a relatively rich continent. European nations traditionally have dominated the top-10 rankings. It’s not a good continent for fiscal policy, but those countries dominate the scores in other policy areas.
  • Second, you can fall behind by standing still. If you take a close look at data for Luxembourg, Belgium, and the Netherlands, you’ll notice their absolute scores haven’t really changed. But all of those nations have dropped out of the top 10 because other countries improved.
  • Third, global economic liberty is increasing. The top scores in the 1950s and 1960s wouldn’t get a country into the top 10 this century.

P.S. A Spanish academic also has produced some very interesting historical estimates for economic freedom, but his numbers are only averages for western nations.

Some economies such as Hong Kong have

President Donald J. Trump speaks on the phone with Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto on Jan. 27, 2017.

President Donald J. Trump speaks on the phone with Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto on Jan. 27, 2017.

The U.S. and Mexico have tentatively agreed to a new trade deal while renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

“It’s a big day for trade, a big day for our country,” President Trump said in the Oval Office on Monday. “A lot of people thought we’d never get here.”

President Donald Trump spoke on the phone with outgoing Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto, and will hold a formal ceremony with him in the near future. A new deal with Canada could also be announced as early as week’s end.

Voters approve of President Trump’s decision to renegotiate NAFTA and think the new U.S. trade deal with Mexico is better for America, a new Rasmussen Reports poll finds.

Fifty-one percent (51%) of likely voters favor the Trump administration’s decision to renegotiate NAFTA, while just 35% oppose it and 14% are undecided.

Worth noting, only 9% think the decision to renegotiate and replace NAFTA with a new trade deal is better for Mexico, while 29% say it’s better for the United States. Thirty-eight percent (38%) say both countries benefit about the same, while 23% are not sure.

The trend is headed in the right direction for the president and his supporters. Those results compare to the 34% of voters who said in January of last year that NAFTA was a better deal for Mexico. Only 12% thought it was better for the United States.

Twenty-nine percent (29%) believe the U.S. relationship with Mexico will be better a year from now, while just as many (29%) think it will be worse. Still, even that represents an improvement since President Trump first took office in 2017.

At that time, 49% believed the U.S. relationship with Mexico would be worse in a year’s time.

The survey of 1,000 U.S. Likely Voters was conducted August 28-29, 2018 by Rasmussen Reports. The sampling error is +/- 3% at a 95% Confidence Level.

A majority of voters approve of President

People's Pundit Daily
You have %%pigeonMeterAvailable%% free %%pigeonCopyPage%% remaining this month. Get unlimited access and support reader-funded, independent data journalism.

Start a 14-day free trial now. Pay later!

Start Trial