Watch Live 10:00 AM EST (PPD) — On Inside The Numbers, we discuss the ever-changing electoral map in the context of Republicans remaining reactive, not proactive.
NY Fed Empire State Manufacturing Survey Climbed Nearly 80 Points in Two Months
New York, N.Y. (PPD) — The New York Federal Reserve Empire State Manufacturing Survey rose 48 points in June to -0.2, and optimism soared to the highest level in over a decade. The result in May was the second worst reading in the survey’s history, but off the all-time low in April.
Forecasts ranged from a low of -35.0 to a high of -20.0. The consensus forecast was -30.0. Worth noting, Democratic New York Governor Andrew Cuomo extended the lockdown until the end of June.
The headline general business activity index has now climbed nearly 80 points over the past two months. Thirty-six percent (36%) reported that conditions had improved in June, and an equal percentage reported that conditions had worsened.
The new orders index rose 42 points to a level of around zero, indicating that the quantity of orders was unchanged from last month. The shipments index also climbed 42 points to 3.3, pointing to a slight increase in shipments. Delivery times and inventories both held steady.
The future business conditions index rose 27 points to 56.5, its highest level in more than a decade. That level hasn’t been matched or exceeded since October 2009, when it was 56.8.
Democratic Governor Roy Cooper Refused To Communicate Social Distancing Guidelines Despite Positive Data
Gainesville, Fla. (PPD) — The 2020 Republican National Convention (RNC) has been relocated to Jacksonville, Florida, Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel confirmed Thursday. The decision to change the host city from Charlotte, North Carolina, came after Democratic Governor Roy Cooper refused to end strict social distancing guidelines.
“We are thrilled to celebrate this momentous occasion in the great city of Jacksonville,” said Chairwoman McDaniel. “Not only does Florida hold a special place in President Trump’s heart as his home state, but it is crucial in the path to victory in 2020.”
“We look forward to bringing this great celebration and economic boon to the Sunshine State in just a few short months.”
Governor Ron DeSantis and Jacksonville Mayor Lenny Curry welcomed the celebration to re-nominate President Donald J. Trump with open arms. In Florida, 64 of 67 counties entered Phase One on May 4.
“Florida is honored to host this special event where we will celebrate the re-nomination of President Donald J. Trump,” said Florida Governor Ron DeSantis. “Jacksonville is a great city that will showcase Florida’s energy, facilities, entrepreneurship and commitment to bring together the delegates of the Republican Party at a historic time in our nation’s history.”
As People’s Pundit Daily (PPD) has previously reported, the data don’t warrant extending lockdowns, if ever. Lockdowns designed to slow the spread of coronavirus (COVID-19) most failed to “alter the course of the pandemic,” according to a statistical analysis by JPMorgan Chase.
“Unlike rigorous testing of potential new drugs, lockdowns were administered with little consideration that they might not only cause economic devastation but potentially more deaths than COVID-19 itself,” stated Marko Kolanovic, a quantitative strategist at JPMorgan Chase.
“Today’s announcement is a huge win for the City of Jacksonville to host the celebration of President Trump’s acceptance of the nomination,” said City of Jacksonville Mayor Lenny Curry. “The opportunity to highlight all our city has to offer and the tremendous economic impact is one I enthusiastically welcome, and we look forward to hosting an exciting event for all delegates and guests to enjoy.”
The 2020 Republican National Convention will take place at the VyStar Veterans Memorial Arena. The RNC said more details will be released in the coming weeks.
Ann Arbor, Mich. (PPD) — The Survey of Consumers preliminary reading on consumer sentiment rose from 72.3 in May to 78.9 in June, easily beating the consensus forecast. Forecasts for the headline index ranged from a low of 72.0 to a high of 78.0, and the consensus forecast was 75.0.
“Consumer sentiment posted its second monthly gain in early June, paced by gains in the outlook for personal finances and more favorable prospects for the national economy due to the reopening of the economy,” said Chief Economist for Surveys of Consumers, Richard Curtin. “The turnaround is largely due to renewed gains in employment, with more consumers expecting declines in the jobless rate than at any other time in the long history of the Michigan surveys.”
Worth noting, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported the U.S. economy added 2.5 million jobs in May, the largest gain ever recorded. The NFIB Small Business Optimism Index also rebounded strongly 3.5 points in May to 94.4, up from 90.9 and beating the consensus forecast.
Small business owners expect the recession to be short-lived. Fifty-two percent (52%) reported capital outlays in the last six months.
Still, concerns over a resurgence in the spread of coronavirus (COVID-19) — which big media have pushed in recent weeks — are holding back greater levels of optimism. It is the most often cited cause of a renewed downturn and the financial damage from sustained high unemployment is the most often cited cause of a slow economic recovery.
Jobless Claims Slightly Beat Forecast, Continue to Trend Down for 10th Straight Week
Washington, D.C. (PPD) — The U.S. Labor Department (DOL) reported initial jobless claims came in slightly less than expected at 1,542,000 for the week ending June 6, due to the mitigation efforts to slow the spread of the coronavirus (COVID-19). That’s a decrease for the tenth straight week and of 355,000 from the previous week’s upwardly (+20,000) revised 1,897,000.
Forecasts ranged from a low of 1,100,000 to a high of 1,750,000. The consensus forecast was 1,565,000. The 4-week moving average fell to 2,002,000, a decline of 286,250 from the previous week’s upwardly revised (+4,250) average of 2,288,250.
Roughly 45 million Americans filed initial claims for unemployment benefits as a result of the efforts to slow the spread of coronavirus (COVID-19). However, millions now appear to have returned to work given lagging data.
Lagging Jobless Claims Data
The advance seasonally adjusted insured unemployment rate fell 0.2% to 14.4% for the week ending May 30. The previous week’s rate was revised down by 0.2% from 14.8% to 14.6%.
The insured unemployment rate hit the first high of the current crisis at 8.2% for the week ending April 4. The all-time high prior to that was 7.0%, recorded in May of 1975. On April 11, it rose to 11.0% and 12.4% on April 25.
Under the Trump Administration, this rate had fallen to an all-time low 1.1% and remained at 1.2% just weeks ago, as recently as March 14. But that was before coronavirus (COVID-19) mitigation efforts.
The advance number for seasonally adjusted insured unemployment during the week ending May 30 was 20,929,000, a decrease of 339,000 from the previous week’s revised level. The previous week’s level was revised down by 219,000 from 21,487,000 to 21,268,000.
The 4-week moving average was 21,987,500, a decrease of 404,750 from the previous week’s revised average. The previous week’s average was revised down by 54,000 from 22,446,250 to 22,392,250.
The total number of people claiming benefits in all programs for the week ending May 23 was 29,505,027, down a total 662,143 from the previous week. There were 1,545,606 persons claiming benefits in all programs in the comparable week in 2019.
During the week ending May 23, Extended Benefits were available in the following 30 states: Alaska, California, Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.
The highest insured unemployment rates in the week ending May 23 were in Maine (26.9), Nevada (24.3), Michigan (21.7), Hawaii (20.1), Puerto Rico (19.0), New York (18.7), Pennsylvania (17.5), Georgia (17.2), Massachusetts (16.8), and Rhode Island (16.6).
As People’s Pundit Daily (PPD) reported, two of three metro divisions that suffered the largest over-the-year percentage declines in employment for April during the coronavirus (COVID-19) shutdown, were in Michigan.
The largest increases in initial claims for the week ending May 30 were in Florida (+32,296), California (+25,372), Oklahoma (+16,662), and Mississippi (+158), while the largest decreases were in New York (-107,161), Michigan (-25,284), Texas (-21,040), Pennsylvania (-18,050), and Washington (-17,507).
Of Top 3 Metropolitan Divisions for Job Losses in April, Two Were in Michigan
Washington, D.C. (PPD) — Two of three metro divisions that suffered the largest over-the-year percentage declines in employment for April during the coronavirus (COVID-19) shutdown, were in Michigan. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) report reveals the extent to which more strict social distancing guidelines caused led to more severe economic damage.
The largest over-the-year percentage declines in employment during the shutdowns in April were in Warren-Troy- Farmington Hills, MI (-25.9%), Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI (-22.2%), and Nassau County-Suffolk County, NY (-21.7%).
In Florida, 64 of 67 counties entered Phase One on May 4. As People’s Pundit Daily (PPD) previously reported, the data make a strong argument for less strict social distance guidelines such as those blanket imposed in Michigan.
As PPD also has previously reported, the data indicated decisions by Governor Whitmore and others to extend the lockdowns were not warranted. Most economic shutdowns designed to slow the spread of COVID-19 failed to “alter the course of the pandemic,” according to a statistical analysis by JPMorgan Chase.
“Unlike rigorous testing of potential new drugs, lockdowns were administered with little consideration that they might not only cause economic devastation but potentially more deaths than COVID-19 itself,” stated Marko Kolanovic, a quantitative strategist at JPMorgan Chase.
The Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims Report for the week ending May 30 showed the insured unemployment rate in Michigan at 22.9%, the third highest and far above the 14.8% national rate. The highest rate was in Nevada (24.9%) followed by Maine (22.9%), both under strict social distancing guidelines.
The Wolverine State (+7,859) also saw the third largest increases in initial claims for the week ending May 23. The largest was in Maine (+11,941) followed closely by Oklahoma (+10,274).
Washington, D.C. (PPD) — The Small Business Optimism Index rebounded strongly 3.5 points in May to 94.4, up from 90.9 and beating the consensus forecast. Eight of the 10 index components improved and small business owners expect the recession to be short-lived.
Forecasts ranged from a low of 85.0 to a high of 92.4. The consensus forecast was 92.0.
“As states begin to reopen, small businesses continue to navigate the economic landscape rocked by COVID-19 and new government policies,” said NFIB’s Chief Economist Bill Dunkelberg. “It’s still uncertain when consumers will feel comfortable returning to small businesses and begin spending again, but owners are taking the necessary precautions to reopen safely.”
The NFIB Uncertainty Index rose 7 points to 82, though expected business conditions in the next six months gained 5 points to a net 34% after a 24-point decline in April.
Fifty-two percent (52%) reported capital outlays in the last six months. Of those, 35% reported spending on new equipment, 20% acquired vehicles, 15% improved or expanded facilities, 5% acquired new buildings or land for expansion and 10% spent money for new fixtures and furniture.
As far as hiring plans, a net seasonally adjusted 8% reported they plan to create new jobs in May. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported the U.S. economy added 2.5 million jobs in May, the largest gain ever recorded.
And he’s now comfortably ahead in the political betting markets as well as public polling. If Biden wins in November, what does that mean for the nation’s economic policy?
According to folks on the left, a Biden presidency means bigger government and more statism.
For instance, opining for The New York Times, Jamelle Bouie applauds Biden’s leftist agenda.
…if the goal is to move America to the left…then a Biden candidacy…represents an opportunity. …If Biden goes on to win the White House, there’s real space for the pro-Sanders left to work its will on policy. …It can fulfill some of its goals under the cover of Biden’s moderation, from raising the minimum wage nationally to pushing the American health care system closer to single-payer. …Biden…is a creature of the party. He doesn’t buck the mainstream, he accommodates it. He doesn’t reject the center, he tries to claim it. …the center of the Democratic Party as far left as it’s been since before Ronald Reagan, then Biden is likely to hew to that center, not challenge it.
His colleague at The New York Times, Michelle Goldberg, is similarly enthused about the prospects for bigger government under a Biden Administration.
Biden’s proposals go far beyond his call for a $15 federal minimum wage — a demand some saw as radical when Sanders pushed it four years ago. While it’s illegal for companies to fire employees for trying to organize a union, the penalties are toothless. Biden proposes to make those penalties bite and to hold executives personally liable. …should Biden become president, progressives have the opportunity to make generational gains. …To try to unite the party around him, he’s making serious progressive commitments. …he’s moving leftward. Biden recently came out for tuition-free college for students whose families earn less than $125,000. He endorsed Elizabeth Warren’s bankruptcy plan…His climate plan already went beyond any of Barack Obama’s initiatives, and he’s pledged to make it even more robust.
According to (supposedly) neutral analysts, a Biden presidency means bigger government and more statism. In an article for Newsweek, Steve Friess discusses Biden’s shift to the left.
Being stuck running for the presidency from the basement of his home in Wilmington, Delaware, had given the former vice president a lot of time to think, he told them, and he wanted bigger ideas. Go forth, he urged his financial brain trust, and bring back the boldest, most ambitious proposals they’d ever dreamed of to reshape the U.S. economy… Biden began issuing a raft of new proposals that move his positions closer to the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, with a promise to unveil an even more transformative economic plan this summer. …It’s a yes to adding $200 a month to Social Security benefits and lowering the qualifying age for Medicare from 65 to 60. Yes to trillions in new spending, yes to new regulations on banks and industry, yes to devil-may-care deficits. …the leader he most often invokes—in interviews, in public addresses, on his podcast—is no longer Barack Obama but Franklin Delano Roosevelt. …Biden has already made a series of significant leftward policy shifts since effectively sewing up the nomination in March.
Perry Bacon, in a piece for fivethirtyeight, analyzes Biden’s statist agenda.
…if Biden is elected in November, the left may get a presidency it likes after all…if American politics is moving left, expect Biden to do the same. …Biden’s long record in public office suggests that he is fairly flexible on policy — shifting his positions to whatever is in the mainstream of the Democratic Party at a given moment. …Biden is likely to be a fairly liberal president, no matter how moderate he sounded in the primaries. …Biden’s 2020 primary platform…adopted fairly liberal policies…more liberal than his pre-campaign record suggested. The Democratic Party is more liberal now than it was when Bill Clinton took office, or even when Obama was inaugurated, and Biden’s platform reflects that shift. …Biden and his advisers are now…rolling out more liberal policy plans, speaking in increasingly populist terms and joining forces with the most progressive voices in the party. …“Joe Biden is running on the most progressive platform of any Democratic nominee in recent history. But given the pandemic, he has to look at the New Deal and Great Society traditions in the Democratic Party and go bigger,” said Waleed Shahid, the communications director for Justice Democrats, a left-wing group aligned with Ocasio-Cortez.
Writing for The Washington Post, Sean Sullivan documents Biden’s leftward drift.
Joe Biden sought to appeal to liberal supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders on Thursday with a pair of new proposals to expand access to health care and curtail student loan debt. Biden proposed lowering the eligibility age for Medicare coverage from 65 to 60. He also came out in favor of forgiving student loan debt for people who attended public colleges and universities and some private schools and make up to $125,000 a year. …In another peace offering to liberals, Biden proposed paying for his student debt plan by repealing a provision in the recent coronavirus legislation that Congress passed and President Trump enacted. “That tax cut overwhelmingly benefits the richest Americans and is unnecessary for addressing the current COVID-19 economic relief efforts,” he wrote… Biden endorsed a bankruptcy plan put forth by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), another rival who ran to his left.
And, according to more market-friendly sources, a Biden presidency means bigger government and more statism. The Wall Street Journal editorialized about Biden’s leftist agenda.
Already Medicare is scheduled to be insolvent by 2026. …In 1970, life expectancy in the U.S. was 70.8. Now it’s about eight years longer. By lowering the age of eligibility instead, Mr. Biden would begin shifting Medicare’s focus from seniors to everybody else. Don’t worry about the funding, he insists, since the extra costs would be “financed out of general revenues.” …Mr. Biden’s new left turn on student loans is equally sharp. …Cancel all federal undergraduate tuition debt for many borrowers who went to public schools, including four-year universities. This forgiveness would be given to anyone who earns $125,000 a year or less. …How much would it cost? There’s no explanation.
Jeff Jacoby analyzed Biden in a column for The Boston Globe.
Biden…is running on a platform far more progressive — i.e., far less moderate — than any Democratic presidential nominee in history. …on issue after issue, Biden has veered sharply from Obama’s path. On health insurance, for example, Obama rejected a public option as part of the Affordable Care Act and repeatedly stressed the importance of maintaining private coverage. But Biden favors a public option open to everyone… Biden supports government-funded health care even for unauthorized immigrants, something Obama never came close to proposing. …No Democratic presidential nominee ever endorsed anything like the radical Green New Deal, with its price tag in the tens of trillions of dollars and its goal of eliminating the use of all fossil fuels. But Biden does. No Democratic nominee ever called for a national minimum wage of $15 an hour. But Biden does. …Sanders may not end up on the November ballot, but it will unmistakably reflect his influence. For he and his band of progressives have pushed their party to the left with such success that even the “moderate” in the race would be the most liberal Democrat ever nominated for president.
Here’s some of what Peter Suderman wrote for Reason.
Biden is a moderate compared to Sanders, but he is notably to the left of previous Democratic standard-bearers. …Biden has proposed a significant expansion of the Affordable Care Act that his campaign estimates would cost $750 billion over a decade… Biden has proposed a $1.7 trillion climate plan that is similar in scope to many candidates on his left and a $750 billion education plan… He favors an assault weapons ban and other gun control measures, a national $15 minimum wage, and a raft of subsidies, loans, and other government-granted nudges designed to promote rural economies. Has proposed $3.4 trillion worth of tax hikes—more than double what former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton proposed when she ran in 2016. …Biden’s leftward drift is thus the party’s leftward shift…, a big-government liberal, a candidate whose current incarnation was shaped and informed by progressive politics, if not wholly captured by them.
The Tax Foundation examined the former Vice President’s tax plan and the results are not encouraging.
Former Vice President Joe Biden would enact a number of policies that would raise taxes, including individual income taxes and payroll taxes, on high-income individuals with income above $400,000. …According to the Tax Foundation’s General Equilibrium Model, the Biden tax plan would reduce GDP by 1.51 percent over the long term. …The plan would shrink the capital stock by 3.23 percent and reduce the overall wage rate by 0.98 percent, leading to 585,000 fewer full-time equivalent jobs. …On a dynamic basis, we estimate that Biden’s tax plan would raise about 15 percent less revenue than on a conventional basis over the next decade. …That is because the relatively smaller economy would shrink the tax base for payroll, individual income, and business income taxes. …The plan would lead to lower after-tax income for all income levels.
Here’s a table summarizing the findings.
So what does all this mean?
At the risk of oversimplifying, Biden unquestionably would move tax policy to the left. He actually said higher taxes are patriotic — even though he engages in aggressive tax avoidance — and the same thing would happen on regulatory issues.
His spending agenda is terrible, though it’s worth noting that Democrat presidents usually don’t spend as much as Republicans, with the admirable exception of Reagan.
I went back to those same sources an put together this comparison of Biden and some other well-known Democrats (scores on a 0-100 scale, with zero being statism and 100 being libertarian).
Moreover, a lifetime average of zero from the Club for Growth is rather horrifying. His average from the National Taxpayers Union isn’t quite so bad, but the trend is in the wrong direction. Biden’s post-2000 average was less than 10, while his score for the preceding years averaged more than 23.
That being said, my two cents on this topic is that Biden is a statist, but not overly ideological.
His support for bigger government is largely a strategy of catering to the various interest groups that dominate the Democratic Party.
The good news is that he’s an incrementalist and won’t aggressively push for a horrifying FDR-style agenda if he gets to the White House.
The bad news is that he will probably allow Nancy Pelosi and other statist ideologues to dictate that kind of agenda if he wins the presidency.
Do you want to understand the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) pernicious role in the global economy?
Here’s a simple analogy that will tell you everything you need to know. Let’s say you have two friends.
Friend A, who continuously gets in financial trouble because of compulsive gambling and alcoholism.
Friend B, who continuously gets in financial trouble because he loses money by giving loans to Friend A.
Assuming you’re a good person, you will scold both your friends for irresponsible and imprudent behavior. And you certainly won’t aid and abet their recklessness.
But if that’s your attitude, you’ll never get a lucrative — and tax-free — job at the IMF.
That’s because the role of the IMF is enabling bad fiscal policy by governments (i.e., Friend A) and then providing bailouts so that the institution that lend money to those governments (i.e., Friend B) are insulated from their foolish choices.
To make matters worse, the IMF usually imposes “conditionality” on bailouts so that governments – for all intents and purposes – are bribed or extorted to impose higher taxes. Sort of akin to giving Friend A — the alcoholic gambler — access to more cash.
All of which explains why we see a lather-rinse-repeat cycle of nations making the same mistakes over and over again.
It’s so predictably destructive that I was only half joking when I told an audience in El Salvador that they should ban all flights containing IMF bureaucrats.
In an article for National Review, Professor Steve Hanke explains why the IMF should be shuttered. But what makes his column especially interesting is that he digs into the history of the bureaucracy.
We learn, for instance, that the IMF supposedly existed to help countries abide by the post-WWII system of fixed exchange rates. So when that system disappeared in the early 1970s, the IMF should have gone away as well.
Established as part of the 1944 Bretton Woods agreement, the IMF was designed to be primarily responsible for extending short‐term, subsidized credits to countries experiencing balance‐of‐payments problems under the post-war, international, pegged‐exchange-rate system. In 1971, however, Richard Nixon, then U.S. president, closed the gold window, triggering the 1973 collapse of the Bretton Woods agreement and, logically, the demise of the IMF. It was then that the IMF should have been mothballed.
Like any self-interested bureaucracy, the IMF figured out new reasons to exist.
And new reasons to expand.
The oil crises of the 1970s were the first to allow the IMF to reinvent itself. Those shocks were deemed to “require” more IMF lending to facilitate, yes, balance‐of‐payments adjustments. …with the onset of the Mexican debt crisis, more IMF lending was “required” to contain the crisis and prevent U.S. bank failures. …Then came the collapse of the Soviet Union. What a “jobs for the boys” bonanza that was! And, the list goes on and on with every crisis providing yet another opportunity for the ineffective IMF to pump out more credit… Today, things have become so politicized that even an international organization, like the IMF, has been able to grant itself a license to meddle in what used to be none of its business… While the IMF’s protean attributes are truly breathtaking, its most recent meddling gives yet another reason to put an end to it.
Steve is right.
But let’s conclude by contemplating the biggest reason to support his conclusion.
Should we abolish the IMF because it’s repugnant that big banks and other lenders are the main beneficiaries of the bailouts?
Should we abolish the IMF because it’s disgusting that corrupt politicians in poor nations get more opportunities to impose bad policy?
Should we abolish the IMF because it’s tragic that the bureaucracy lowers global growth by enabling the misallocation of capital?
Those are all good reasons, but I think the strongest argument for abolishing the IMF is that the bureaucracy perpetuates poverty. Look at this table, also prepared by Professor Hanke, which shows the nations that have received the most bailouts.
Are any of these nations economic success stories?
Hardly.
Instead, this is primarily a list of nations that have been mired in a sad cycle of poverty thanks in part to wasteful and corrupt governments that were aided and abetted by the IMF.
The bottom line is that the people of the United States should no longer be underwriting this awful organization.
You have %%pigeonMeterAvailable%% free %%pigeonCopyPage%% remaining this month. Get unlimited access and support reader-funded, independent data journalism.