Widget Image
Follow PPD Social Media
Saturday, February 1, 2025
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 214)

U.S. President Donald Trump, left, speaks about tax reform on Wednesday September 27, 2017. Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, right, speaks in a campaign rally for May 19, 2017.

U.S. President Donald Trump, left, speaks about tax reform on Wednesday September 27, 2017. Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, right, speaks in a campaign rally for May 19, 2017.

President Donald Trump announced plans to withdraw the U.S. from the “defective” Iran nuclear deal, saying it failed to prevent Tehran’s nuclear ambitions. Speaking in the Diplomatic Room of the White House, President Trump said the agreement negotiated with the previous administration “was a lie.”

“I am announcing today the United States will withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal,” he said, “The Iran deal is defective at its core.”

Sources tell People’s Pundit Daily (PPD) that the decision will start a 90-day countdown to the restoration of sanctions, though it was unclear which sanctions lifted will be restored. Regardless, immediately after the sanctions are re-imposed, the U.S. effectively would be out of the deal.

“At the heart of the Iran deal was a giant fiction, that a murderous regime desired only a peaceful, nuclear energy program,” President Trump added. “Today, we have definitive proof that this Iranian promise was a lie.”

If the President takes a more limited approach over imposing strict sanctions, it could leave French President Emmanuel Macron and other U.S. allies more opportunity to remain in the agreement. Mr. Macron tried to convince Mr. Trump to remain in the nuclear deal, which his predecessor touted as a great achievement.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last week a huge archive of stolen plans for the Iranian nuclear program. He accused Iran of lying for years about its efforts to build a nuclear weapon. Israeli spies seized the documents from a secret warehouse in Tehran during an overnight raid in January.

Iranian leaders had deceived the international nuclear agency when they insisted their nuclear program was for peaceful purposes, a senior Israeli official said. However, even with this deception, the deal is such that the Iranians didn’t technically violate it.

“In theory, the so-called Iran deal was supposed to protect the United States and our allies from the lunacy of an Iranian nuclear bomb, a weapon that will only endanger the survival of the Iranian regime,” President Trump said. “In fact, the deal allowed Iran to continue enriching uranium and over time reach the brink of a nuclear breakout.”

Once sanctions are re-imposed, the U.S. effectively would be out of the deal.

President Donald Trump announced plans to withdraw

U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions addresses the National Law Enforcement Conference on Human Exploitation in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S., June 6, 2017. (Photo: Reuters)

U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions addresses the National Law Enforcement Conference on Human Exploitation in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S., June 6, 2017. (Photo: Reuters)

Attorney General Jeff Sessions said the Justice Department (DOJ) has implemented a “zero tolerance” policy for illegal immigration at the Southwest Border. The new initiative aims to refer 100% of illegal Southwest Border crossings for federal prosecution, as well as those who aide them.

During remarks to the Association of State Criminal Investigative Agencies 2018 Spring Conference on Monday in ScottsdaleAriz., Attorney General Sessions said the U.S. is experiencing “a massive influx of illegal aliens across our Southwest Border,” a number that tripled in April year-over-year.

“But we’re not going to stand for this.  We are not going to let this country be invaded. We will not be stampeded. We will not capitulate to lawlessness,” the attorney general said. “President Trump has made that clear to every agency and to Congress – and we need a wall.”

Mr. Sessions announced that last month he put in place a “zero tolerance” policy for illegal entries on our Southwest border referred by the Department of Homeland Security. The initiative was rolled out last month and, as of Monday, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) partnering with DOJ.

“And the Department of Justice will take up as many of those cases as humanly possible until we get to 100 percent. If you cross this border unlawfully, then we will prosecute you.  It’s that simple,” he said. “If you smuggle illegal aliens across our border, then we will prosecute you.”

The moves comes in response to a wave of illegal immigration in the form of caravans of migrants, consisting mostly of Honduran nationals. Groups such as Pueblo Sin Fronteras, or People Without Borders, organize the roughly 1,000-strong caravans with the explicit intention of illegally crossing the U.S.-Mexico border to claim asylum.

But DOJ is now taking the position that those claims are fraudulent. Many ignored the Mexican government’s offer to for asylum in clear defiance of U.S. law and of the wishes of the American people.

Attorney General Sessions also warned that parents will be held responsible for illegally crossing the border with a child. He said parents will be separated from their child if they decide to break federal immigration law.

“If you are smuggling a child, then we will prosecute you and that child will be separated from you as required by law,” he added. “If you don’t like that, then don’t smuggle children over our border.”

As People’s Pundit Daily (PPD) has reported, the Justice Department under Mr. Sessions has prosecuted those who make false statements in their effort to obtain a favorable immigration status.

In April, DOJ denaturalized a child sex abuser and 4 Somali nationals who gamed the Diversity Immigrant Visa (DV) Program. Olugbenga Omopariola, 61, engaged in sexual contact with a 7-year-old minor, which he admitted and was later convicted of, making him ineligible for applying for U.S. citizenship.

However, he concealed his legal history during the naturalization process.

Mr. Sessions made it clear that the same actions will be taken and the same efforts will be made at the Southwest Border.

“If you make false statements to an immigration officer or commit fraud in our system to obtain an immigration benefit, that’s a felony,” he said. “We will put you in jail.”

“If you help others to do so, that’s a felony, too.”

Attorney General Jeff Sessions said the Justice

President Donald Trump hosts a meeting with business leaders in the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington on Monday January 23, 2017. (Photo: Reuters)

President Donald Trump hosts a meeting with business leaders in the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington on Monday January 23, 2017. (Photo: Reuters)

The Small Business Optimism Index rebounded to record-high levels by rising to 104.8 in April, driven by record-high earnings. Never in the 45-year history of the NFIB Small Business Economic Trends Survey have respondents reported earnings this high.

This is now the 17th consecutive month of historically high readings in the survey by the National Federation of Independent Businesses. Further, the number of small businesses reporting poor sales fell to a near record low.

“Never in the history of this survey have we seen profit trends so high”, said NFIB President and CEO Juanita Duggan. “The optimism small businesses owners have about the economy is turning into new job creation, increased wages and benefits, and investment.”

The frequency of positive profit trends rose 3 points in April, with respondents citing gains in operating productivity, stronger sales and the implementation of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA).

Capital outlays also gained 3 points this month and now sits at 61%, a strong indication that small businesses are confident enough to make investments. Of those businesses making expenditures, 43% are spending on new equipment (+4 points), while 27% are acquiring vehicles (+3 points).

In December 2017, President Donald Trump signed the TCJA, his signature piece of legislation and the first overhaul to the U.S. tax code in more than 31 years. Coupled with deregulation, the Trump agenda is dominating the respondents’ lists of reasons to be optimistic.

“There is no question that small business is booming,” said NFIB Chief Economist Bill Dunkelberg. “Consumer spending, the new tax law, and lower regulatory barriers are all supporting the surge in optimism across all small business industry sectors.”

A net 21% of small business owners expect higher sales volumes, up one point from the previous survey. These numbers are particularly high in the construction and manufacturing industries, as was indicated by private job creation.

The percentage of small business owners who are hiring or trying to hire rose 4 points to 57%, and new job creation remains at historically strong levels. A net 16% of owners are planning to create new jobs.

Significantly more new small businesses are opening rather than closing, which represents a reversal in the trend under the previous administration.

The Small Business Economic Trends Survey also identified continued gains in worker compensation, which remain at the highest level since 2000. A net 33% reported increased compensation and average family saw wages and salaries grow last year.

Gains are expected to continue to increase for many families this year due to tax cuts.

The data on wages from the Small Business Economic Trends Survey is mirrored by reports on Personal Income and Outlays, which show wages and salaries gained for the fifth straight month. In fact, the wages and salaries component drove the last two increases in personal income and the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) specifically cited tax reform.

The Small Business Optimism Index rebounded to

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman speaks regarding New York State's participation in Volkswagen AG's more than $15.3 billion settlement with U.S. regulators over pollution caused by its diesel vehicles, in New York, U.S., June 28, 2016. (Photo: Reuters)

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman speaks regarding New York State’s participation in Volkswagen AG’s more than $15.3 billion settlement with U.S. regulators over pollution caused by its diesel vehicles, in New York, U.S., June 28, 2016. (Photo: Reuters)

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman has resigned after four women made allegations of sexual and physical assault. Mr. Schneiderman, a liberal Democrat who has long claimed to be a champion of women’s rights, is also a political enemy of President Donald Trump.

Four women have accused Mr. Schneiderman of “nonconsensual physical violence,” including two who have gone on the record to The New Yorker with the hope it “could protect other women.”

The New York attorney general recently was an outspoken figure in the #MeToo movement against sexual harassment, and was prosecuting Harvey Weinstein.

“It’s been my great honor and privilege to serve as Attorney General for the people of the State of New York. In the last several hours, serious allegations, which I strongly contest, have been made against me,” Mr. Mr. Schneiderman said in a statement. “While these allegations are unrelated to my professional conduct or the operations of the office, they will effectively prevent me from leading the office’s work at this critical time.”

“I therefore resign my office, effective at the close of business on May 8, 2018.”

Michelle Manning Barish and Tanya Selvaratnam told The New Yorker that he repeatedly hit them, often after drinking, frequently in bed and never with their consent. They did not report their allegations to the police at the time, but claim they eventually did seek medical attention after he slapped them hard across the ear and face, and also choked.

Ms. Selvaratnam said that Mr. Schneiderman warned her he could have her phones tapped, followed and and both women alleged that he threatened to kill them if they broke off their relationship with him.

Mr. Schneiderman’s spokesperson said that he “never made any of these threats.”

Another one of the women who did not go on the record claimed that he slapped her across the face with enough force to leave a mark after she rebuffed his advances. She asked to remain unidentified, but shared a photograph of the injury with The New Yorker.

The Manhattan District Attorney’s Office said Monday night it was opening a probe into the allegations.

“Our office has opened an investigation into the recently reported allegations concerning Mr. Schneiderman,” a spokesman for District Attorney Cy Vance said.

The now-former attorney general in The Empire State also attended at least one meeting with the rogue officials at the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), who sought to derail the presidency of Mr. Trump.

These same officials also handled the investigations into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server and the Clinton Foundation.

In October 2016, People’s Pundit Daily (PPD) ran an exclusive story examining tax returns and regulatory filings from Clinton family charities, which were in clear violation of New York law governing contributions by foreign governments.

Title 13 (13 CRR-NY 91.5) – the Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and regulations of the State of New York governing charitable organizations – states charities must publicly and annually “list the name of each agency” and “the amount of each contribution” received from any “government agency.”

Mr. Schneiderman’s office claimed to believe the Clinton family charities were “in step” with state laws, even though the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) ignored this requirement.

Mr. Schneiderman, who endorsed Hillary Clinton for President and donated to the campaign, did not require compliance.

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman has resigned

An exhibit booth for firearms manufacturer Smith & Wesson is seen on display at the International Association of Chiefs of Police conference in Chicago, Illinois, in this October 26, 2015 file photo. (Photo: Reuters)

An exhibit booth for firearms manufacturer Smith & Wesson is seen on display at the International Association of Chiefs of Police conference in Chicago, Illinois, in this October 26, 2015 file photo. (Photo: Reuters)

I’ve periodically featured folks on the left who have rejected gun control.

  • In 2012, Jeffrey Goldberg admitted gun ownership reduces crime.
  • In 2013, Justin Cronin explained how he became a left-wing supporter of gun rights.
  • In 2015, Jamelle Bouie poured cold water on Obama’s gun control agenda.
  • Last year, Leah Libresco confessed that gun control simply doesn’t work.

Now it’s time to look at another person who has changed his mind.

Here are some excerpts from a column in the Des Moines Register written by a long-time supporter of gun control.

I was 14 years old when John Lennon was killed — it affected me deeply and it was the biggest event that led to my anti-gun feelings. As I got older, my heroes were JFK, RFK and MLK, which furthered my anti-gun sentiments. …I thought the Second Amendment was not relevant to our modern-day society and it should be repealed. …In 2012 I tweeted: “@BarackObama please repeal the 2nd amendment and stop the @nra.” …I was a lifelong Democrat. In the 2016 presidential debates I watched…Hillary Clinton… I voted for her. …I was a little turned off by…the NRA.

But he began to change his mind as the election was happening.

I decided to leave San Francisco and to build a house in Washington. …as my house was being built I started wondering what I would do in the event of a home invasion. I knew right away becoming a gun owner was going to be the best way to defend myself.

Sounds like he’s part of the 22 percent in my poll who support the 2nd Amendment because of concerns about crime.

But he also enjoyed the process of becoming proficient.

I gave it a lot of thought and decided I was going to purchase a gun and learn to shoot… I started going to the range and discovered that I really enjoyed target shooting.

His philosophical shift apparently wasn’t because he was convinced by the NRA, but rather because he grew increasingly concerned about the left’s radical opposition to private firearms (something I’ve noticed as well).

I gradually came around to see how extremely anti-gun, anti-Second Amendment the left was. For a large portion of them, their ultimate goal is a full gun ban and to repeal the Second Amendment — I know I was one of them.

And even though he no longer considers himself on the left, he doesn’t want his friends on that side of the debate to misinterpret his views.

To my easily confused friends on the left — no, I am not calling for violence; no, I am not a terrorist, no, I am not racist. Peace.

Since the author’s overall perspective has changed, I guess he doesn’t belong on my “honest leftists” archive, but his shift on gun rights is nonetheless worth noting.

Hopefully he’s now sufficiently “woke” on guns that he would be part of the resistance if his former fellow travelers on the left ever tried a gun ban.

To close on a humorous note. Here’s the visual version of my IQ test on guns.

Other examples of gun control satire can be found here, along with a bonus David Hogg edition.

When his house was being built, he

Education spending and teacher pay has become a big issue in certain states.

Unfortunately, not for the right reason. In an ideal world, taxpayers would be demanding systemic reform because government schools are getting record amounts of money (higher than any other nation on a per-student basis) while producing sub-par results.

public school trends

Source: CATO

Instead, we live in a surreal parallel universe where teacher unions are pushing a narrative that taxpayers should cough up more money because teachers supposedly are underpaid.

Let’s look at the data.

An article in City Journal debunks the claim that teachers are underpaid.

…protests across the country have reinforced the perception that public school teachers are dramatically underpaid. They’re not: the average teacher already enjoys market-level wages plus retirement benefits vastly exceeding those of private-sector workers. Across-the-board salary increases, such as those enacted in Arizona, West Virginia, and Kentucky, are the wrong solution to a non-problem. …At the lowest skill levels—a GS-6 on the federal scale—teachers earn salaries about 26 percent higher than similar white-collar workers. …The average public school teaching position rated an 8.8 on the federal GS scale. After adjustment to reflect the time that teachers work outside the formal school day, the BLS data show that public school teachers on average receive salaries about 8 percent above similar private-sector jobs. …Data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation show that teachers who change to non-teaching jobs take an average salary cut of about 3 percent. Studies using administrative records in Florida, Missouri, Georgia, and Montana showed similar results. …public-employee retirement and health benefits are bleeding dry state and local budgets. Neither the public nor teachers fully appreciates the costs of these programs. We forget the value of benefits when considering how teacher pay compares with private-sector work.

And keep in mind those lavish pensions are woefully underfunded, so taxpayers are paying too much now and they’ll have to pay even more in the future.

But I think the key factoid from the above article is that teachers take a pay cut, on average, when they leave the profession. Along with the “JOLTS” data, that’s real-world evidence that teachers are getting paid more than counterparts in the economy’s productive sector.

Allysia Finley of the Wall Street Journal also punctures the false claims of the union bosses.

Teachers unions… They’re using misleading statistics… They conflate school funding and state education spending. In Oklahoma, unions proclaimed that per pupil school spending fell by 28.2% over the past decade. That refers to the inflation-adjusted state’s general funding formula. But total per pupil outlays increased by 16% in nominal terms between 2006 and 2016… They use elevated spending baselines. Teachers unions nearly always compare school spending and teacher salaries today with peak levels before the great recession, which were inflated like housing prices. Between 2000 and 2009, average per pupil spending across the country increased 52%…per pupil spending ticked up by 7.5% between 2012 and 2015. School spending growth…increased faster than the consumer price index. …They don’t account for other forms of compensation. Since 2000, per pupil spending on employee benefits has doubled. …pensions and health benefits are the fastest-growing expenses for many school districts, and most of the money goes to retired teachers. …the unions are lying with statistics.

In a column for the Denver Post, a parent showed that his state’s teachers are getting above-average compensation.

Teachers are…mostly paid via a union “salary schedule,” meaning they get pay raises based on only two factors: the number of college degrees and certificates they earn, and how many years they’ve been on the job. That makes a pretty lousy incentive structure… We keep hearing Colorado is 49th in the country for educational spending. That lie is repeated so often it becomes legend. Funding for Colorado schools are split between the local school district and the state. So, if you compare only the state funding part to states that have no local match, yep, ours looks low. But when you look at total funding, which can be counted in different ways, the picture doesn’t look so dire. …According to the Colorado Department of Education, the average salary for teachers here is $52,728. But that’s only one piece of the compensation. The school year is about 180 days, or 36 weeks. So, the pay is $1,465 for every week a teacher is teaching. Vacation time? Well, 52 weeks in a year, minus 36 weeks in the classroom, that’s 16 weeks off, roughly 4 months! Compare that to someone who only gets 2 weeks off but still gets paid $1,465 a week when working, that’s the equivalent of $73,233. And let’s count the present-cost value of their retirement benefits. …Not bad for a system where you can retire at 58.

Let’s close with some excerpts from Jason Riley’s column in the Wall Street Journal.

The nation’s K-12 schools are…turning into hotbeds of political activism. …teachers are demanding higher pay, better benefits and more education funding overall. …The American Federation of Teachers and the National Education Association have thousands of state and local affiliates. They are among the richest and best-organized pressure groups in the country. And they are on a roll.That’s good news for their members but not necessarily for children, parents and taxpayers. …Teachers unions support work rules that prevent the most capable teachers from being sent to low-performing schools, that shield teachers from meaningful evaluations, and that require instructors to be laid off based on seniority instead of performance. …those rules do nothing to address the needs of students. …politicians love to highlight education outlays. It helps them win votes and ward off union agitators. But the connection between school spending and educational outcomes is tenuous. …total spending per pupil at the state level rose, on average, by an inflation-adjusted 18%. During this period, it fell in Arizona… Yet on 2015 federal standardized exams, Arizona made more progress than any other state. New York, by contrast, boasts the highest spending per pupil and teacher pay in the country, but you wouldn’t know it from the test results.

For what it’s worth, the final few sentences in the above excerpt should be main issue being discussed in state capitals. Lawmakers should be asking why more and more money never produces better outcomes.

But that’s really not the problem. It’s the symptom of the problem.

Our primary challenge in education is that we rely on government monopolies that are captured by special interests. We need school choice so that competitive forces can be unleashed to generate better results. There’s strong evidence that choice produces good outcomes in the limited instances where it is allowed in the United States.

And in that kind of system, we may actually wind up with better teachers that are paid just as much. Or maybe even more.

Teacher unions are pushing a narrative that

When I did a poll earlier this year, asking which state would be the first to suffer a fiscal crisis, I wasn’t terribly surprised that Illinois wound up in first place.

But I was surprised by the margin. Even though there’s a good case to be made for basket-case jurisdictions such as New JerseyCalifornia, and Connecticut, Illinois not only got a plurality of votes, it received an absolute majority.

Based on what’s happening in the Land of Lincoln, it appears that state politicians want to receive a supermajority of votes. There’s pressure for ever-higher taxes to finance an ever-more-bloated bureaucracy.

And taxpayers are voting with their feet.

The Wall Street Journal editorialized about the consequences of the state’s self-destructive fiscal policy.

Democrats in Illinois ought to be especially chastened by new IRS data showing an acceleration of out-migration. The Prairie State lost a record $4.75 billion in adjusted gross income to other states in the 2015 tax year, according to recently IRS data released. That’s up from $3.4 billion in the prior year. …Florida with zero income tax was the top destination for Illinois expatriates… What’s the matter with Illinois? Too much for us to distill in one editorial, but suffice to say that exorbitant property and business taxes have retarded economic growth. …Taxes may increase as Democrats scrounge for cash to pay for pensions. …Illinois’s unfunded pension liabilities equalled 22.8% of residents’ personal income last year, compared to a median of 3.1% across all states and 1% in Florida. …Illinois’s economy has been stagnant, growing a meager 0.9% on an inflation-adjusted annual basis since 2012—the slowest in the Great Lakes and half as fast as the U.S. overall. This year nearly 100,000 individuals have left the Illinois labor force.

Here’s a chart showing a very depressing decline in the state’s labor force.

By the way, I wonder whether the chart would look even worse if government bureaucrats weren’t included.

The Chicago Tribune has a grim editorial about what’s happening.

From millennials to retirees, …Illinois is losing its promise as a land of opportunity. Government debt and dysfunction contribute to a weak housing market and a stagnant jobs climate. State and local governments face enormous pension and other obligations. Taxes have risen sharply; many Illinois politicians say they must rise more. People are fleeing. Last year’s net loss: 33,703.

In an editorial for the Chicago Tribune, Kristen McQueary correctly worries about the trend.

It’s one thing to harbor natural skepticism toward government. It’s quite another to take the dramatic step of moving your family, your home, your livelihood to another state to escape it. But it’s happening. The naysayers and deniers blame the weather. They eye-roll the U-Haul rebellion. They downplay the dysfunction. Good riddance to those stingy taxpayers, they trumpet. But that is a shallow, ignorant and elitist viewpoint that dismisses the thoughtful and wrenching decisions thousands of once-devoted Illinoisans have made. For four years in a row, Illinois has lost population in alarming numbers. In 2017, Illinois lost a net 33,703 residents, the largest numerical population decline of any state. That’s the size of St. Charles or Woodridge or Galesburg. Wiped off the map. In one year. …Policy choices have consequences. …People are fleeing Illinois. And still, Democratic leaders in Chicago and Cook County, and their supporters, generally deny that high taxes, underfunded pensions, government debt and political dysfunction are the reasons for the exodus — or that it’s acute.

Newspapers in other states have noticed, as evinced by this editorial from the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

When the progressive political class preaches equality and prosperity, but bleeds productive citizens dry by treating them as little more than human ATMs, there should be little surprise when those same citizens take themselves (and their green) to greener pastures. Perhaps no state in the nation is seeing a bigger such exodus than Illinois. …On the flip side, all of the states surrounding Illinois saw their populations increase… Illinois is experiencing a self-inflicted storm of fiscal distress. …While state income taxes in Illinois don’t reach they level impose in states such as New York and California, that’s not for a lack of trying. The state raised its rate by 32 percent over the summer, and Democrats want to even more progressive tax rates to pay for all the goodies they’ve promised to Big Labor in order to grease their re-elections. …Illinois is a financial basket case — which is what you get when you combine political patronage with powerful public-sector unions that control leftist politicians. The state should be a case study for other jurisdictions on how not to conduct public policy. After all, who will pay the bills when the taxpayers flee?

Steve Chapman, in a column for Reason, expects more bad news for Illinois because of pressure for higher taxes.

With the biggest public pension obligations, the slowest personal income growth, and the biggest population loss of any state, it has consistently recorded achievements that are envied by none but educational to all. The state is in the midst of a debilitating fiscal and economic crisis. …Illinois has endured two income tax increases in the past seven years. In 2011, the flat rate on individual income jumped from 3 percent to 5 percent. In 2015, under the original terms, it fell to 3.75 percent—a “cut” that left the rate 25 percent above what it was in 2010. Then last year, over Gov. Bruce Rauner’s veto, the legislature raised the rate to 4.95 percent. None of these changes has ended the state’s economic drought, and it’s reasonable to assume they actually made it drier. …well-paid people can’t generally leave the country to find lower tax rates. They can leave one state for another, and they do. …A 2016 poll by the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute at Southern Illinois University found that nearly half of residents would like to leave the state—and that “taxes are the single biggest reason people want to leave.”

The Wall Street Journal opined on the state’s slow-motion suicide.

The only…restraint…on public union governance in Illinois…the state’s flat income tax. …Democrats in Springfield have filed three constitutional amendments to establish a graduated income tax… Democrats are looking for more revenue to finance ballooning pension costs, which consume about a quarter of state spending. …Connecticut and New Jersey provide cautionary examples. Democrats in both states have soaked their rich time and again, and the predictable result is that both states have fewer rich to soak. Economic growth slowed and revenues faltered. This vicious cycle is already playing out in Illinois amid increasing property, income and business taxes. Over the last four years, Illinois GDP has risen a mere 0.9% per year, half the national average and the slowest in the Great Lakes region. Between 2012 and 2016, Illinois lost $18.35 billion in adjusted gross income to other states. …Democrats claim a progressive income tax will spare the middle-class, but sooner or later they’ll be the targets too because there won’t be enough rich to finance the inexorable demands of public unions. …Once voters approve a progressive tax, Democrats can ratchet up rates as their union lords dictate.

While a bloated and over-compensated bureaucracy (especially unfunded promises for lavish retiree benefits) is the top fiscal drain, the state also loves squandering money in other ways.

Here are some excerpts from a piece in the Belleville News-Democrat.

Illinois is the dependency capital of the Midwest. No other state in the region has more of its population dependent on food stamps… So what’s driving the state’s dependency crisis? State bureaucrats using loopholes and gimmicks to keep more people dependent on welfare. According to the Illinois Department of Human Services, nearly 175,000 able-bodied childless adults are on the program. These are adults in their prime working years — between the ages of 18 and 49 — with no dependent children and no disabilities keeping them from meaningful employment. …the state has relied upon loopholes and gimmicks to trap more and more able-bodied adults in dependency. Federal law allows states to seek temporary waivers of the work requirement in areas with unemployment rates above 10 percent or with a demonstrated lack of job opportunities in the region. …the Illinois Department of Human Services…used old data and it gerrymandered the request in whatever way was necessary to keep more able-bodied adults on welfare. …State bureaucrats have gamed the system and as a result, thousands of able-bodied adults will remain trapped in dependency, with little hope of better lives.

Let’s close with some excerpts from a very depressing column in the Chicago Tribune by Diana Sroka Rickert.

…this is a state government that has been broken for decades. It is designed to reject improvement in every form, at every level. …The Thompson Center…is a near-perfect representation of state government. It is gross, rundown, and nobody cares. …there is a disturbing sense of entitlement among some state employees. …Underperformers aren’t fired; they’re simply transferred to different positions, shuffled elsewhere on the payroll or tucked away at state agencies. …this is a state government that is ranked last by almost every objective and measurable standard. A state government that fails every single one of its residents, day after day — and has failed its residents for decades. A state government that demands more and more money each year, to deliver increasingly less value.

Keep in mind, incidentally, that all this bad news will almost certainly become worse news thanks to last year’s tax reform. Restricting the state and local tax deduction means a much smaller implicit federal subsidy for high-tax states.

Illinois state politicians want to receive a

The J. Edgar Hoover Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Building is seen in Washington, U.S., February 1, 2018. (Photo: Reuters)

The J. Edgar Hoover Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Building is seen in Washington, U.S., February 1, 2018. (Photo: Reuters)

Jim Baker and Lisa Page, two FBI officials who worked closely with fired former director James Comey have resigned from the agency.

Baker, who worked as a lawyer for the FBI, has been the subject of an investigation conducted by the Justice Department (DOJ) Office of Inspector General. He was reassigned in late 2017 after information uncovered indicated he was leaking classified information about the so-called “Trump dossier.”

It was also revealed that he had ties to a journalist who wrote about the debunked, unverified opposition research document that sparked allegations claiming the Trump campaign had connection to Russia.

He is reportedly considering a job at the Brookings Institution, a left-leaning Washington D.C. think tank.

Lisa Page, whose electronic communications with another FBI employee drew accusations of political bias, “resigned” Friday to “pursue other opportunities,” an FBI spokesperson said. She and her extramarital lover Peter Strzok were at the center of a brewing scandal surrounding the handling of the Clinton email investigation and the Russia probe.

Jim Baker and Lisa Page, two FBI

Paul Manafort, left, at the Four Seasons Hotel in New York City, U.S., June 9, 2016. Former FBI Director Robert Mueller, right, arrives at an installation ceremony at FBI Headquarters in Washington, D.C. on Monday, Oct. 28, 2013.

Paul Manafort, left, at the Four Seasons Hotel in New York City, U.S., June 9, 2016. Former FBI Director Robert Mueller, right, arrives at an installation ceremony at FBI Headquarters in Washington, D.C. on Monday, Oct. 28, 2013.

A federal judge scolded the prosecution in the case against Paul Manafort, stating Special Counsel Robert Mueller just wants to oust President Donald Trump from office. President Trump has repeatedly called the investigation a “witch hunt,” and District Judge T.S. Ellis was at least skeptical himself.

“You don’t really care about Mr. Manafort’s bank fraud,” Judge Ellis told Michael Dreeben, adding the special counsel wants to squeeze Mr. Manafort to provide material that would lead to President Trump’s “prosecution or impeachment.”

“That’s what you’re really interested in.”

During the hour-long court hearing, the judge repeatedly made known his suspicion of the prosecution.

“We don’t want anyone in this country with unfettered power. It’s unlikely you’re going to persuade me the special prosecutor has power to do anything he or she wants,” Judge Ellis told Mr. Dreeben. “The American people feel pretty strongly that no one has unfettered power.”

Mr. Manafort and his longtime aide Rick Gates were indicted by the special counsel last October. Mr. Gates is cooperating with investigators but the indictment surrounded lobbying efforts long before his brief time on the Trump campaign.

He was hired for being one of only two people alive with experience in a convention floor fight for delegates, which at the time appeared likely.

Mr. Manafort lobbied the Clinton Department and Capitol Hill Democrats through The Podesta Group on behalf of the then-pro Russian government in Ukraine. Neither he nor The Podesta Group, which was founded by former Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and his brother, were registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA).

Mr. Mueller’s team did interview several witnesses about the role The Podesta Group played in advancing Russian interests at the State Department under Hillary Clinton. However, despite uncovering potential wrongdoings, Mr. Mueller and his team did not charge anyone from the formerly most powerful liberal D.C. lobbying group.

Judge Ellis was not satisfied with Mr. Dreeben’s answer to a relevant question about why the charges dated back to before the Trump campaign.

“None of that information has to do with information related to Russian government coordination and the campaign of Donald Trump.”

The judge ordered Mr. Mueller’s prosecutors to turn over a full, unredacted version of the August 2 memo that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein used to describe the criminal allegations the special counsel could investigate. He said that he’ll make a decision at a later date about whether the case against Mr. Manafort’s could even move forward.

Judge Ellis was born in Bogota, Columbia and earned an Ivy League education in America. He was also a pilot in the U.S. Navy before he was appointed by President Ronald Reagan.

A federal judge scolded the prosecution in the

U.S. President Donald Trump waves at the Celebrate Freedom Rally in Washington, U.S. July 1, 2017. (Photo: Reuters)

U.S. President Donald Trump waves at the Celebrate Freedom Rally in Washington, U.S. July 1, 2017. (Photo: Reuters)

Only 26% of likely voters think the eventual Democratic nominee can defeat President Donald Trump in 2020, a new poll finds. That’s down from 31% in the previous Rasmussen Reports national survey conducted four months ago.

Forty-one percent (41%) now think President Trump will be reelected in 2020, up from 34% in late December

Democrats intend to impeach President Trump if they wrest back control of Congress in the 2018 midterm elections, but only just 15% of believe focusing on impeachment is a better campaign strategy for Democratic congressional candidates. Seventy percent (70%) think focusing on policy disagreements is a better political strategy.

Fifteen percent (15%) are not sure, but even Democrats don’t want to talk impeachment. By party, 22% of Democrats and 11% of voters not affiliated with either party think impeachment should be a focus.

Only 25% believe the president will be impeached before serving his first full term in office, which is down from 29% in the previous survey.

The survey of 1,000 likely voters in the U.S. was conducted on May 2-3, 2018 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. See methodology.

Only 26% of likely voters think the

People's Pundit Daily
You have %%pigeonMeterAvailable%% free %%pigeonCopyPage%% remaining this month. Get unlimited access and support reader-funded, independent data journalism.

Start a 14-day free trial now. Pay later!

Start Trial