Widget Image
Follow PPD Social Media
Saturday, February 1, 2025
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 223)

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announces the indictment of 13 Russian nationals for election meddling among other crimes on February 16, 2018. Mr. Rosenstein noted there was "no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announces the indictment of 13 Russian nationals for election meddling among other crimes on February 16, 2018. Mr. Rosenstein noted there was “no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election.

Facing impeachment, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein was forced to allow Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., to view the memo that served as the genesis of the Russia probe. Mr. Nunes, the Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), threatened to hold Mr. Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray in contempt and begin impeachment proceedings if they did not comply with a subpoena issued by the committee in August 2017.

“Although the subpoenas issued by this Committee in August 2017 remain in effect, I’d like to thank Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein for his cooperation today,” Nunes responded.

Fox News first reported that Mr. Nunes, Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., and committee staffers were permitted to view a 2-page memo with relatively few redactions. The source described those redactions as “minimal and justified.”

Now we know what Mr. Rosenstein was trying to hide.

The man behind the memo that served as the justification for the counterintelligence investigation into contacts between Russia and the Trump campaign was none other than Peter Strzok, Chairman Nunes confirmed on Wednesday. Mr. Strzok is the corrupt counterintelligence agent at the Federal Bureau of Investigation who, along with his extra-marital lover Lisa Page, played a key role in the sham investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server.

Further, multiple sources confirm the redactions are meant to “protect” the “the names of a foreign country and a foreign agent” who were involved in the scheme.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller hired both Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page. They were two members of a team characterized as an “ethically-challenged Democratic hit squad” before he fired them last summer in an attempt to avoid media criticism.

It had become clear the text messages were going to be public as a result of Mr. Horowitz’s investigation. Text messages between the two clearly indicate that they harbored deeply anti-Trump bias, and plotted to reverse the election outcome.

As People’s Pundit Daily (PPD) previously reported, the messages uncovered by DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz show Mr. Strzok had a personal relationship with U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras, who presided over the case against former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.

The unethical conflict of interest, which is clear from a batch of text messages between Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page, has only recently been discovered after Judge Contreras recused himself. The relationship is noteworthy given that FBI and DOJ officials used an unverified opposition research document — otherwise known as the Steele dossier — to illegally obtain a secret warrant to spy on members of Team Trump.

Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) allows intelligence agencies to collect information on foreign targets abroad. However, it has been “routinely” abused and misused to spy on domestic targets, including President Trump, his associates and other U.S. citizens.

The government is prohibited from using unverified third-party information in the FISA court.

“Rudy is on the FISC! Did you know that?” Ms. Page texted Mr. Strzok on July 25, 2016. “Just appointed two months ago.”

“I did,” Mr. Strzok replied. “We talked about it before and after. I need to get together with him.”

Judge Contreras, referred to in the text messages by his first name, was appointed to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) in 2016.

The Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) paid the shadowy smear firm Fusion GPS more than $10 million for the Steele dossier. Fusion GPS in turn hired Christopher Steele, a former MI6 British Intelligence Officer, to be the research-gatherer. He almost exclusively used Kremlin sources to put it together.

The nonprofit Campaign Legal Center (CLC) has filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) alleging both the Clinton campaign and the DNC violated campaign finance law by failing to accurately disclose payments for the dossier.

Facing impeachment, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt speaks during an interview for Reuters at his office in Washington, U.S., July 10, 2017. (Photo: Reuters)

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt and his family have received “unprecedented” death threats ranging from social media, email, postcard and phone calls. While they also range in severity and credibility, one included a man threatening to “put a bullet between your eyes.”

Administrator Pruitt is under fire for numerous accusations, including those derived from a report by the Associated Press (AP) claiming his 20-member full-time security detail “approached $3 million when pay is added in travel expenses.”

However, EPA spokesman Jahan Wilcox defended the detail and said Administrator Pruitt has faced “unprecedented” threats.

According to a report from August 2017, which covers the period from October 2016 to August 2017, the EPA Office of Inspector General detailed 13 death threats. Several of them were deemed serious enough to refer to the Justice Department (DOJ).

“Pruitt, I’m gonna find you and put a bullet between your eyes,” one of the more serious threats flagged by investigators stated. “Don’t think I’m joking. I’m planning this.”

The report also reveals that the administrator’s daughter received a death threat on Facebook.

Meanwhile, Democrats are trying to cast doubt on the seriousness of threats made to Administrator Pruitt.

Patrick Sullivan, the assistant inspector general for investigations at the EPA, sent an email to the agencies “Threat Coordination Group” describing an incident that occurred on March 6, 2018. A trespasser gained entry to EPA headquarters and identified himself as a student attending a “Microsoft event.”

“The personal asked about Scott Pruitt and wanted to know where Pruitt’s office was and if Pruitt ever walked in the hallway outside the room,” Mr. Sullivan wrote.

While he was escorted out of the EPA, he called the desk phone of an employee and left voicemails following the intrusion claiming “he can gain entry into EPA space anytime he wants.”

EPA says they’ve since changed protocols for entry into the building.

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt and his family

Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R-WI) speaks during a press briefing on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., May 23, 2017. (Photo: Reuters)

Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R-WI) speaks during a press briefing on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., May 23, 2017. (Photo: Reuters)

BREAKING: House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., told Republicans this morning that he will not run for re-election in November. A recent poll finds just 30% of Republicans think it would be bad for the country if Speaker Ryan stepped down from his position or retired.

“After nearly twenty years in the House, the speaker is proud of all that has been accomplished and is ready to devote more of his time to being a husband and a father,” Brendan Buck, counselor to the speaker, said in the statement. “While he did not seek the position, he told his colleagues that serving as speaker has been the professional honor of his life, and he thanked them for the trust they placed in him.”

Speaker Ryan, 48, was first elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in the 1st Congressional District back in 1998. The seat was vacated by Republican Mark Neumann, a two-term incumbent who made an unsuccessful bid for the U.S. Senate. He defeated 29-year-old pianist Michael J. Logan of Twin Lakes in the Republican primary and Democrat Lydia Spottswood in the general election.

At the time, he was the second-youngest member of the U.S. House. Ultimately, he has been reelected 8 times and has never received less than 55% of the vote in Wisconsin’s 1st Congressional District. President Donald Trump carried the district against Hillary Clinton in 2016, 52% to 42%.

It has been reported that President Trump was a factor in his decision. To be clear, he was never a strong supporter of the president. But when asked at a press conference later Wednesday morning, he rebuffed those reports.

“I thank the President for giving us this chance to do big things and get this country back on track,” he said. “So, I am grateful to him.”

In 2012, he was chosen by his friend Mitt Romney to be the Republican vice presidential nominee.

It is widely known that he has long wanted to run for president and friends still say that he could announce a White House run in the future. But for now, multiple sources tell People’s Pundit Daily (PPD) the announcement has sparked fears that donors will see this as a concession of the U.S. House and the money could dry up.

BREAKING: House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., told

U.S. President Donald Trump and Russia's President Vladimir Putin talk during the family photo session at the APEC Summit in Danang, Vietnam November 11, 2017. (Photo: Reuters)

U.S. President Donald Trump and Russia’s President Vladimir Putin talk during the family photo session at the APEC Summit in Danang, Vietnam November 11, 2017. (Photo: Reuters)

President Donald Trump warned Russia not to retaliate against U.S. strikes on Syria in response to another deadly chemical weapons attack.

“Russia vows to shoot down any and all missiles fired at Syria. Get ready Russia, because they will be coming, nice and new and ‘smart!'” he tweeted. “You shouldn’t be partners with a Gas Killing Animal who kills his people and enjoys it!”

President Trump’s remarks come after the Russian ambassador to Lebanon reportedly told a Hezbollah television station that Russia would shoot down U.S. missiles fired at Syrian targets.

“If there is a strike by the Americans, then the missiles will be downed and even the sources from which the missiles were fired,” Ambassador Alexander Zasypkin told Hezbollah’s al-Manar television station.

Russia vetoed a U.S.-drafted resolution at the United Nations (UN) Security Council on Tuesday that would have condemned the chemical attack in a Damascus suburb, which is believed to have been carried out by the Syrian regime led by President Bashar al-Assad.

The resolution in the 15-member UN Security Council failed with 12 votes in favor. Russia and Bolivia opposed it and China abstained. It was the 12th time Russia has vetoed a resolution involving Syria and the 6th veto specifically related to chemical weapons.

“Our relationship with Russia is worse now than it has ever been, and that includes the Cold War. There is no reason for this,” President Trump tweeted. “Russia needs us to help with their economy, something that would be very easy to do, and we need all nations to work together. Stop the arms race?”

President Trump also harshly criticized Democrats and former Obama Administration officials who pushed the collusion narrative for harming U.S.-Russian relations. The investigation, which was started using false and paid-for research, has hindered the commander-in-chief’s ability to improve relations with the nuclear power.

Worth noting, there has been no evidence of collusion found after more than a year of investigations. Special Counsel Robert Mueller has not charged anyone in President Trump’s orbit of a Russian collusion-related crime.

President Donald Trump warned Russia not to

US President Donald Trump signs an executive order on Implementing an America-First Offshore Energy Strategy after signing it in the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington, DC, April 28, 2017. (Photo: Reuters)

US President Donald Trump signs an executive order on Implementing an America-First Offshore Energy Strategy after signing it in the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington, DC, April 28, 2017. (Photo: Reuters)

President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at reducing poverty by promoting opportunity and economic mobility. The White House laid out 9 “Principles of Economic Mobility” as a guide to agencies to effectively reform the welfare system.

“We can lift our citizens from welfare to work, from dependence to independence, and from poverty to prosperity,” President Trump said in a statement.

Unemployment under the Trump Administration has fallen to and remained at historic lows, including all-time lows for African-Americans and Hispanics. The unemployment rate nationwide has remained at the very low 4.1% for 3 straight months.

Yet, the rising trend in welfare enrollment for able-bodied adults in America under the Obama Administration led to record high levels. For instance, more than 16 million able-bodied adults in 2016 were enrolled in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), better known as food stamps.

In January 2018, more than 74 million Americans were enrolled in Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). That represents a 29% increase over the 2013 baseline period. Currently, there are a record 28 million able-bodied adults on Medicaid and, since 2000, the number of able-bodied adults on Medicaid has quadrupled.

President Trump’s executive order is meant to address the “need of further reform and modernization in order to increase self-sufficiency, well-being, and economic mobility.”

“Unfortunately, many of the programs designed to help families have instead delayed economic independence, perpetuated poverty, and weakened family bonds,” the order states.

Executive Order Reducing Poverty in America by Promoting Opportunity and Economic Mobility

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and to promote economic mobility, strong social networks, and accountability to American taxpayers, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1.  Purpose.  The United States and its Constitution were founded on the principles of freedom and equal opportunity for all.  To ensure that all Americans would be able to realize the benefits of those principles, especially during hard times, the Government established programs to help families with basic unmet needs.  Unfortunately, many of the programs designed to help families have instead delayed economic independence, perpetuated poverty, and weakened family bonds.  While bipartisan welfare reform enacted in 1996 was a step toward eliminating the economic stagnation and social harm that can result from long-term Government dependence, the welfare system still traps many recipients, especially children, in poverty and is in need of further reform and modernization in order to increase self-sufficiency, well-being, and economic mobility.

Sec2.  Policy.  (a)  In 2017, the Federal Government spent more than $700 billion on low-income assistance.  Since its inception, the welfare system has grown into a large bureaucracy that might be susceptible to measuring success by how many people are enrolled in a program rather than by how many have moved from poverty into financial independence.  This is not the type of system that was envisioned when welfare programs were instituted in this country.  The Federal Government’s role is to clear paths to self-sufficiency, reserving public assistance programs for those who are truly in need.  The Federal Government should do everything within its authority to empower individuals by providing opportunities for work, including by investing in Federal programs that are effective at moving people into the workforce and out of poverty.  It must examine Federal policies and programs to ensure that they are consistent with principles that are central to the American spirit — work, free enterprise, and safeguarding human and economic resources.  For those policies or programs that are not succeeding in those respects, it is our duty to either improve or eliminate them.

(b)  It shall be the policy of the Federal Government to reform the welfare system of the United States so that it empowers people in a manner that is consistent with applicable law and the following principles, which shall be known as the Principles of Economic Mobility:

(i)     Improve employment outcomes and economic independence (including by strengthening existing work requirements for work-capable people and introducing new work requirements when legally permissible);

(ii)    Promote strong social networks as a way of sustainably escaping poverty (including through work and marriage);

(iii)   Address the challenges of populations that may particularly struggle to find and maintain employment (including single parents, formerly incarcerated individuals, the homeless, substance abusers, individuals with disabilities, and disconnected youth);

(iv)    Balance flexibility and accountability both to ensure that State, local, and tribal governments, and other institutions, may tailor their public assistance programs to the unique needs of their communities and to ensure that welfare services and administering agencies can be held accountable for achieving outcomes (including by designing and tracking measures that assess whether programs help people escape poverty);

(v)     Reduce the size of bureaucracy and streamline services to promote the effective use of resources;

(vi)    Reserve benefits for people with low incomes and limited assets;

(vii)   Reduce wasteful spending by consolidating or eliminating Federal programs that are duplicative or ineffective;

(viii)  Create a system by which the Federal Government remains updated on State, local, and tribal successes and failures, and facilitates access to that information so that other States and localities can benefit from it; and

(ix)    Empower the private sector, as well as local communities, to develop and apply locally based solutions to poverty.

(c)  As part of our pledge to increase opportunities for those in need, the Federal Government must first enforce work requirements that are required by law.  It must also strengthen requirements that promote obtaining and maintaining employment in order to move people to independence.  To support this focus on employment, the Federal Government should:

(i)   review current federally funded workforce development programs.  If more than one executive department or agency (agency) administers programs that are similar in scope or population served, they should be consolidated, to the extent permitted by law, into the agency that is best equipped to fulfill the expectations of the programs, while ineffective programs should be eliminated; and

(ii)  invest in effective workforce development programs and encourage, to the greatest extent possible, entities that have demonstrated success in equipping participants with skills necessary to obtain employment that enables them to financially support themselves and their families in today’s economy.

(d)  It is imperative to empower State, local, and tribal governments and private-sector entities to effectively administer and manage public assistance programs.  Federal policies should allow local entities to develop and implement programs and strategies that are best for their respective communities.  Specifically, policies should allow the private sector, including community and faith-based organizations, to create solutions that alleviate the need for welfare assistance, promote personal responsibility, and reduce reliance on government intervention and resources.

(i)   To promote the proper scope and functioning of government, the Federal Government must afford State, local, and tribal governments the freedom to design and implement programs that better allocate limited resources to meet different community needs.

(ii)  States and localities can use such flexibility to devise and evaluate innovative programs that serve diverse populations and families.  States and localities can also model their own initiatives on the successful programs of others.  To achieve the right balance, Federal leaders must continue to discuss opportunities to improve public assistance programs with State and local leaders, including our Nation’s governors.

(e)  The Federal Government owes it to Americans to use taxpayer dollars for their intended purposes.  Relevant agencies should establish clear metrics that measure outcomes so that agencies administering public assistance programs can be held accountable.  These metrics should include assessments of whether programs help individuals and families find employment, increase earnings, escape poverty, and avoid long-term dependence.  Whenever possible, agencies should harmonize their metrics to facilitate easier cross-programmatic comparisons and to encourage further integration of service delivery at the local level.  Agencies should also adopt policies to ensure that only eligible persons receive benefits and enforce all relevant laws providing that aliens who are not otherwise qualified and eligible may not receive benefits.

(i)   All entities that receive funds should be required to guarantee the integrity of the programs they administer.  Technology and innovation should drive initiatives that increase program integrity and reduce fraud, waste, and abuse in the current system.

(ii)  The Federal Government must support State, local, and tribal partners by investing in tools to combat payment errors and verify eligibility for program participants.  It must also work alongside public and private partners to assist recipients of welfare assistance to maximize access to services and benefits that support paths to self-sufficiency.

Sec3.  Review of Regulations and Guidance Documents.  (a)  The Secretaries of the Treasury, Agriculture, Commerce, Labor, Health and Human Services, Housing and Urban Development, Transportation, and Education (Secretaries) shall:

(i)    review all regulations and guidance documents of their respective agencies relating to waivers, exemptions, or exceptions for public assistance program eligibility requirements to determine whether such documents are, to the extent permitted by law, consistent with the principles outlined in this order;

(ii)   review any public assistance programs of their respective agencies that do not currently require work for receipt of benefits or services, and determine whether enforcement of a work requirement would be consistent with Federal law and the principles outlined in this order;

(iii)  review any public assistance programs of their respective agencies that do currently require work for receipt of benefits or services, and determine whether the enforcement of such work requirements is consistent with Federal law and the principles outlined in this order;

(iv)   within 90 days of the date of this order, and based on the reviews required by this section, submit to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget and the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy a list of recommended regulatory and policy changes and other actions to accomplish the principles outlined in this order; and

(v)    not later than 90 days after submission of the recommendations required by section 3(a)(iv) of this order, and in consultation with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget and the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, take steps to implement the recommended administrative actions.

(b)  Within 90 days of the date of this order, the Secretaries shall each submit a report to the President, through the Director of the Office of Management and Budget and the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, that:

(i)    states how their respective agencies are complying with 8 U.S.C. 1611(a), which provides that an alien who is not a “qualified alien” as defined by 8 U.S.C. 1641 is, subject to certain statutorily defined exceptions, not eligible for any Federal public benefit as defined by 8 U.S.C. 1611(c);

(ii)   provides a list of Federal benefit programs that their respective agencies administer that are restricted pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1611; and

(iii)  provides a list of Federal benefit programs that their respective agencies administer that are not restricted pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1611.

Sec4.  Definitions.  For the purposes of this order:

(a)  the terms “individuals,” “families,” and “persons” mean any United States citizen, lawful permanent resident, or other lawfully present alien who is qualified to or otherwise may receive public benefits;

(b)  the terms “work” and “workforce” include unsubsidized employment, subsidized employment, job training, apprenticeships, career and technical education training, job searches, basic education, education directly related to current or future employment, and workfare; and(c)  the terms “welfare” and “public assistance” include any program that provides means-tested assistance, or other assistance that provides benefits to people, households, or families that have low incomes (i.e., those making less than twice the Federal poverty level), the unemployed, or those out of the labor force.

Sec5.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,

April 10, 2018.

President Donald Trump signed an executive order

The U.S. Capitol Building in Washington D.C.

The U.S. Capitol Building in Washington D.C.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) just released its annual Economic and Budget Outlook, and almost everyone in Washington is agitated. Or, at least they’re pretending to be agitated about annual deficits exceeding $1 trillion starting in the 2020 fiscal year.

All that red ink isn’t good news, but I’m much more concerned (and genuinely so) about this line from CBO’s forecast. In just 10 years, the burden of federal spending is going to jump from 20.6% of GDP to 23.6%!

 

Simply stated, we’ve entered the era of baby boomer retirement. And because we have some very poorly designed entitlement programs, that means the federal budget – assuming we leave it on autopilot – is going to consume an ever-growing share of our national economic output.

The bottom line is that Washington is violating my Golden Rule.

Let’s look at the underlying numbers. Federal spending is projected by CBO to grow by an average of about 5.5 percent per year over the next decade while nominal GDP is estimated to grow by just 4.0  percent annually.

And that unfortunate trend isn’t limited to the nest 10 years. CBO’s latest long-run forecast, which I discussed last year, shows a never-ending deterioration of America’s fiscal position.

Hello Greece.

Fortunately, there is a solution to this mess.

A modest amount of spending restraint can quickly reverse our fiscal troubles and put us on a path to a balanced budget. More importantly, limits on the growth of spending can slowly reduce the size of the federal government relative to the private sector.

Here’s a chart, based on CBO’s numbers, that shows how much Uncle Sam is spending this year (a bit over $4.1 trillion), along with a blue line showing projected tax revenues over the next 10 years (blue line). And I’ve shown what happens if spending is “only” allowed to increase by either 2 percent annually (orange line) or 3 percent annually (grey line) over the next decade.

 

This chart is basically everything you need to know. It shows that our fiscal situation is not hopeless. All we have to do is make sure government is growing slower than the productive sector of the economy.

A good rule of thumb, as suggested in the chart title, is that government shouldn’t grow faster than the rate of inflation.

And we’ve done it before.

  • During the Clinton years, the United States enjoyed a multi-year period of spending restraint. We got a balanced budget because of that frugality. More important, spending fell as a share of GDP.
  • During the Obama years, we benefited from a five-year de facto spending freeze. Deficits dropped dramatically and the nation experienced the biggest drop in the relative burden of spending since the end of World War II.

And many other nations also have also managed multi-year periods of spending restraint.

Let’s close with a video I narrated which illustrates how modest spending discipline generates good outcomes. It’s from 2010, so the numbers are no longer relevant, but otherwise the analysis applies just as strongly today.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released its

President Donald Trump delivers his first State of the Union address as Vice President Mike Pence, left, and House Speaker Paul Ryan, right, stand for applause.

President Donald Trump delivers his first State of the Union address as Vice President Mike Pence, left, and House Speaker Paul Ryan, right, stand for applause.

Sixty-one percent (61%) of Americans say it is very or somewhat likely that today’s young people will have a better life than their parents did. The latest reading from Gallup marks a stark improvement since the low of 44% in 2011, though is still short of the 66% measured in February 2008.

The highest reading was recorded in July 1999 and December 2001, when 71% of Americans said it was likely young people would live better than their parents. But optimism fell during the 2007-2009 recession, hitting a low in 2011.

While People’s Pundit Daily (PPD) has been critical of Gallup for not being verifiable — meaning, their accuracy is no longer measurable now that they’ve stopped polling elections — the trend is noteworthy.

There are clear relationships that can be extrapolated from the data.

Unsurprisingly, party affiliation has an impact.

Gallup measured a 29-percentage-point surge in positivity among Republicans and Republican leaners (to 70%) as Barack Obama’s second term ended and President Donald Trump took office. Meanwhile, Democrats’ and Democratic leaners’ optimism about the next generation’s chances at success fell 13 points (to 55%).

Secondly, Americans’ views about the state of the economy have a significant impact, which likely explains the disparity between the parties. Democrats are reacting to positive economic indicators, i.e. the improvement of their own economic conditions.

Americans are generally feeling optimistic about the direction of the economy, and recent Gallup polling suggests that Americans still think the American dream is alive. Just as a healthy majority of Americans now think it is possible to get ahead through hard work, so too, do they believe it is likely that today’s young people will have a better life than their parents did.

SURVEY METHODS

Results for this Gallup poll are based on telephone interviews conducted March 19-25, 2018, on the Gallup U.S. Poll, with a random sample of 1,503 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. For results based on the total sample of national adults, the margin of sampling error is ±3 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. All reported margins of sampling error include computed design effects for weighting.

Each sample of national adults includes a minimum quota of 70% cellphone respondents and 30% landline respondents, with additional minimum quotas by time zone within region. Landline and cellular telephone numbers are selected using random-digit-dial methods.

View survey methodology, complete question responses and trends.

Learn more about how the Gallup U.S. Poll works.

Sixty-one percent (61%) of Americans say it

Angie Chirino told supporters in Miami over the weekend that children are “the most precious resource this world has” and her candidacy is all about “making American great again for them.”

The daughter of Cuban pop icon Willie Chirino is running for the Republican nomination in Florida’s 27th Congressional District.

“As you may have noticed, there’s a recurring theme in my agenda. Everything I stand for is deeply rooted in a love for our children,” she said during a speech at the Big Five Club in Miami on Saturday. “There’s no more powerful love than the love that most of us feel for our children. There’s nothing more precious than the possibility that exists in each and every one of them.”

Ms. Chirino, herself an accomplished singer-songwriter, is clearly an outsider in the crowded race. The daughter of Cuban political refugees spent her life in the music industry before devoting herself to at-risk children.

“I think about how young my parents were when they came to this country, how my grandparents had to leave everything they worked so hard for behind. But they did it so that their children would not be swallowed up by a dangerous ideology,” Ms. Chirino said. “We are seeing that here today. Children are being exploited to promote a message that spreads a similiar ideology, that threatens to separate us from our rights.”

Angie Chirino, a Republican candidate for Florida's 27th Congressional District, laughs during a speech at Big Five Club in Miami on Saturday, April 7, 2018. (Photo: Laura Baris/People's Pundit Daily/PPD)

Angie Chirino, a Republican candidate for Florida’s 27th Congressional District, laughs during a speech at Big Five Club in Miami on Saturday, April 7, 2018. (Photo: Laura Baris/People’s Pundit Daily/PPD)

“I will not allow the sacrifices my grandparents made so that my parents could live in freedom to be in vain.”

In 2000, she won a Latin Grammy for “Song of the Year” after working with Jennifer Lopez, Gloria Estefan and Celia Cruz. She also worked with Marc Anthony on his biggest hit, “I Need to Know.”

Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla., who was first elected in 1988, announced on April 30, 2017 that she would not seek re-election in 2018. The open-seat race to replace the longtime Republican incumbent is considered one of the best Democratic pickup opportunities in the 2018 midterm elections.

The central-Miami district has leaned more Democratic, a trend propelled by demographic changes. Republican candidates were having a difficult time raising money and, before Ms. Chirino entered the race, were about as establishment-boring as they come.

Miami-Dade County Commissioner Bruno Barreiro was widely believed to be Rep. Ros-Lehtinen’s choice for a successor. But she hasn’t made her support very public since he first announced his candidacy.

Former Vice Mayor of Doral Bettina Rodriguez Aguilera, another declared candidate, publicly claimed she was abducted by aliens. Miami broadcast journalist Maria Elvira Salaza also entered the race in March.

Angie Chirino, a Republican candidate for Florida's 27th Congressional District, delivers a speech to supporters at Big Five Club in Miami on Saturday, April 7, 2018. (Photo: Laura Baris/People's Pundit Daily/PPD)

Angie Chirino, a Republican candidate for Florida’s 27th Congressional District, delivers a speech to supporters at Big Five Club in Miami on Saturday, April 7, 2018. (Photo: Laura Baris/People’s Pundit Daily/PPD)

Ultimately, Republican voters will decide who will appear on the general election ballot in November.

Ms. Chirino is a volunteer Guardian ad Litem and proudly spoke about the time she has spent with the Voices For Children Foundation, an organization that serves children in foster care in Miami Dade County. Those positively impacted by her work came to the event to show their support and their stories were the highlight of her speech.

“We have to make sure that the messages we send to our children build them, not break them,” Ms. Chirino said. “Let’s make America great again for them.”

“I will fight in Washington so that we have a country that they can grow happily in, peacefully in, safely in, and most importantly, freely in.”

Angie Chirino told supporters in Miami that

A worker stacks boxes of television sets after they have been assembled, checked and repackaged, before moving them to the warehouse at Element Electronics in Winnsboro, South Carolina May 29, 2014. (Photo: Reuters)

A worker stacks boxes of television sets after they have been assembled, checked and repackaged, before moving them to the warehouse at Element Electronics in Winnsboro, South Carolina May 29, 2014. (Photo: Reuters)

The U.S. Census Bureau released new wholesale trade statistics for February and a build in inventories bodes well for first-quarter (1Q) gross domestic product (GDP) in 2018. Wholesale inventories were also revised higher for January.

Sales

February 2018 sales of merchant wholesalers, except manufacturers’ sales branches and offices, after adjustment for seasonal variations and trading-day differences but not for price changes, were $495.9 billion.

That’s up 1.0% (±0.5%) from the revised January level and are now up 6.8% (±0.7%) from the February 2017 level. The December 2017 to January 2018 percentage change was revised from the preliminary estimate of down 1.1% (±0.7%) to down 1.5% (±0.7%).

Inventories

Total inventories of merchant wholesalers, except manufacturers’ sales branches and offices, after adjustment for seasonal variations but not for price changes, were $625.6 billion at the end of February.

That’s up 1.0% (±0.2%) from the revised January level and total inventories are up 5.5% (±0.9%) from the revised February 2017 level. The January 2018 to February 2018 percentage change was revised from the advance estimate of up 1.1% (±0.2%) to up 1.0% (±0.2%).

Inventories/Sales Ratio

The February inventories/sales ratio for merchant wholesalers, except manufacturers’ sales branches and offices, based on seasonally adjusted data, was 1.26. The February 2017 ratio was 1.28.

[caption id="attachment_56640" align="aligncenter" width="1200"] A worker stacks

Indiana State Representative Mike Braun, District 63. (Photo: Campaign Website)

Indiana State Representative Mike Braun, District 63. (Photo: Campaign Website)

Mike Braun, a Republican candidate for U.S. Senate in Indiana, will air a new 60-second advertisement during Tuesday night’s episode of “Roseanne” on ABC. The comedian, a supporter of President Donald Trump on and off television, was rewarded for taking advantage of the contempt Hollywood has shown for Middle America.

Now, the former businessman from Jasper sees a golden opportunity to take advantage of her success.

The ad “Throwback” will target the Fort Wayne, South Bend, Terre Haute and Evansville media markets. In the Indianapolis media market, the ad spot will air immediately before “Roseanne” at approximately 7:58pm EST.

“Roseanne is the perfect place for me to release my own ‘throwback’ ad, and is proof positive that the Hollywood elites do NOT know best,” Mr. Braun said in a statement Monday. “My opponents count themselves among the Washington chattering class with their long careers in politics, but I have a different story to tell, which I’d urge Roseanne viewers to keep an eye out for tomorrow night!”

Mr. Braun faces two primary challengers, who are both sitting congressman– Representatives Todd Rokita and Luke Messer. Rep. Rokita, arguably the frontrunner, has billed himself as the true Trump supporter in the race. He has referred to Rep. Messer as a RINO — a “Republican In Name Only” — and has criticized Mr. Braun for voting in Democratic primaries up until 2012.

However, Rep. Rokita has used some rather unflattering words to describe President Trump during an interview in February of 2016. The interview recently resurfaced after the AP ran a story about his remarks.

“When you see Marco contrasted with Donald Trump — I mean someone who is vulgar, if not profane,” Rep. Rokita told the Indianapolis-based WXIN TV. “At some point you have to be presidential. People expect that and you see that in Marco Rubio.”

Mr. Braun is clearly trying to draw a parallel between himself and President, both of whom were success businessmen before entering politics.

The premiere of “Roseanne” boasted a record 25 million-plus viewers including delayed, a rating that climbed to 7.3. For the second week, ratings remained impressive at an initial 15.4 million viewers.

The eventual Republican nominee for U.S. Senate will go on to face the very vulnerable Democratic incumbent, Senator Joe Donnelly. In 2012, Mr. Donnelly faced an extremely flawed Republican nominee. With Indiana’s rightward shift and zero-percent ticket splits across the nation in 2016, he faces an uphill battle for reelection.

The race for the U.S. Senate in Indiana is rated SLIGHTLY REPUBLICAN on the PPD Election Projection Model.

Mike Braun, a Republican candidate for U.S.

People's Pundit Daily
You have %%pigeonMeterAvailable%% free %%pigeonCopyPage%% remaining this month. Get unlimited access and support reader-funded, independent data journalism.

Start a 14-day free trial now. Pay later!

Start Trial