Widget Image
Follow PPD Social Media
Saturday, February 1, 2025
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 238)

President Donald Trump speaks to Dave Burritt of U.S. Steel Corporation during a meeting with steel and aluminum executives in the Cabinet Room of the White House, Thursday, March 1, 2018, in Washington. (Photo: AP)

President Donald Trump speaks to Dave Burritt of U.S. Steel Corporation during a meeting with steel and aluminum executives in the Cabinet Room of the White House, Thursday, March 1, 2018, in Washington. (Photo: AP)

President Donald Trump issued proclamations exercising his authority under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, imposing tariffs on foreign steel and aluminum.

The executive action starts a 15-day clock before a 25% tariff on imported steel and 10% tariff on imported aluminum go into effect. The White House said “the President recognizes that Canada and Mexico present a special case” and included a clause granting them a roughly 30-day grace period to avoid being impacted.

“Our factories were left to rot and to rust all over the place,” President Trump said, flanked by steelworkers and union representatives. “Thriving communities were turned into ghost towns.”

“Those who poured their souls into building this great nation were betrayed. But that betrayal is now over.”

Assistant to the President Peter Navarro, who also serves as the Director of the White House National Trade Council and Director of Trade and Industrial Policy, is widely popular with the president’s economic nationalist base. However, he terrifies globalists in D.C. and on Wall Street.

“Canada and Mexico are going to be given an opportunity to negotiate a fair trade deal for NAFTA,” Mr. Navarro told Charles Payne shortly before the ceremony at the White House. “If we get that, they won’t receive the tariffs.”

“Tomorrow, bottom line, is gonna be a good day for America.”

It’s rumored that Mr. Navarro is a top candidate to replace Gary Cohn, who as People’s Pundit Daily (PPD) reported has resigned. The resignation came as President Trump plans to return to the message of economic nationalism that fueled the greatest political upset in modern U.S. political history.

The former New York businessman-turned-President of the United States ran for the highest office in the land vowing to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and withdraw the U.S. from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).

Shortly after taking office, President Trump signed an executive order making good on the latter and moving to renegotiate NAFTA on a bilateral basis.

“I’m delivering on a promise I made during the campaign,” President Trump said, adding “and I’ve been making it for a good part of my life.”

Mr. Cohn was constantly in opposition to the platform of economic nationalism that resulted in the cracking of the Blue Wall in November of 2016. President Trump became the first Republican presidential candidate to carry Pennsylvania and Michigan since 1988 and the first to carry Wisconsin since 1984.

He said on Monday that he would reconsider proposed tariffs on imported steel and aluminum if and when a “new and fair NAFTA agreement is signed.”

President Trump left the door open for other individual countries to potentially modify or remove the tariff “under certain conditions.”

“Modification or removal of the tariffs would be possible if alternative means are agreed upon to ensure imports from a country no longer threaten to impair our national security,” the White House said.

United States Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer is responsible for negotiations with countries that seek an alternative means to the steel and aluminum tariffs. He personally supports including an exemption for NAFTA nations if the trade deal can be retooled.

“There’s no love-loss between me and the President,” said Stewart Acuff, a leading labor official, socialist and former AFL-CIO official. “But he’s right this time.”

A little-reported review recently conducted by the U.S. Commerce Department found steel import levels and global excess capacity are weakening the U.S. economy and are threatening national security. The report concluded that excess levels of foreign steel imports are displacing domestic production.

U.S. producers face more competition from foreign imports as other countries continue to increase their exports and further their own economic interests.

What Industry Is Saying

U.S. Steel Corporation (NYSE: X) CEO David Burritt said during the meeting that the new tariffs on steel and aluminum imports are “vital to the interests of the United States.”

“This is vital to the interests of the United States. This is our moment, and it’s really important that we get this right,” Mr. Burritt said. “We believe that the leadership that this administration has shown on tax reform is simply outstanding. The elimination of bureaucracy is simply outstanding. We trust your judgment on this issue.”

Nucor Corporation (NYSE: NUE) President and CEO John Ferriola mirrored those sentiments and praised the Trump Administration for taking further action to protect U.S. industry. Nucor is now the largest steel producer in America.

“We believe very strongly that it’s time for decisive and meaningful action to stem the flow of illegally traded imports into this country,” added Mr. Ferriola. “And we are counting on the administration to fulfill the promises that were made and to give us that level playing field to compete.”

President Donald Trump issued proclamations exercising his

U.S. President Donald J. Trump (C), flanked by Gary Masino (L) of the Sheet Metal Workers Union, Telma Mata (2nd R) of the Heat and Frost Insulators Allied Workers Local 24 and United Brotherhood of Carpenters General President Doug McCarron (R), holds a roundtable meeting at the White House on Jan. 27. 2017. (Photo: Reuters)

U.S. President Donald J. Trump (C), flanked by Gary Masino (L) of the Sheet Metal Workers Union, Telma Mata (2nd R) of the Heat and Frost Insulators Allied Workers Local 24 and United Brotherhood of Carpenters General President Doug McCarron (R), holds a roundtable meeting at the White House on Jan. 27. 2017. (Photo: Reuters)

President Donald Trump thanked Gary Cohn for his service as economic advisor during a Cabinet meeting Thursday, joking that he still likes him even though he’s a globalist.

“This is Gary Cohn’s last cabinet meeting. He’s been terrific,” President Trump said. “He may be a globalist, but I still like him.”

The president said in one way he is a nationalist because he loves his country.

“I have a feeling you’ll be back.”

As People’s Pundit Daily (PPD) reported, Mr. Cohn’s resignation comes as President Trump plans to return to the message of economic nationalism that fueled by greatest political upset in modern U.S. political history. It’s a victory for the average working class voter who supported President Trump in the 2016 election.

In a statement released by the White House, the free-trader former Goldman Sachs executive said it had been “an honor to serve my country.”

“It has been an honor to serve my country and enact pro-growth economic policies to benefit the American people, in particular the passage of historic tax reform,” Mr. Cohn said in a statement. “I am grateful to the President for giving me this opportunity and wish him and the Administration great success in the future.”

The former New York businessman-turned-President of the United States ran for the highest office in the land vowing to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and withdraw the U.S. from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Shortly after taking office, President Trump signed an executive order making good on the latter and moving to renegotiate NAFTA on a bilateral basis.

Mr.Cohn was constantly in opposition to the platform of economic nationalism that resulted in the cracking of the Blue Wall in November of 2016. President Trump became the first Republican presidential candidate to carry Pennsylvania and Michigan since 1988 and the first to carry Wisconsin since 1984.

He was expected to make a formal announcement this week about his administration’s intention to impose a 25% tariff on imported steel and 10% tariff on imported aluminum. At the meeting, President Trump also said he’ll make a trade announcement following his afternoon meeting.

He said on Monday that he would reconsider proposed tariffs on imported steel and aluminum if and when a “new and fair NAFTA agreement is signed.”

At the Cabinet meeting, he said that the U.S. will reserve the right to increase, decrease or eliminate the tariffs altogether depending on national security and fairness.

“We’re going to be very fair, we’re going to be very flexible,” President Trump said. “But we’re going to protect the American worker.”

President Donald Trump thanked Gary Cohn for

U.S. President Barack Obama greets outgoing U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder at Holder's portrait unveiling ceremony at The Department of Justice in Washington, DC, February 27, 2015. (Photo: AP)

U.S. President Barack Obama greets outgoing U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder at Holder’s portrait unveiling ceremony at The Department of Justice in Washington, DC, February 27, 2015. (Photo: AP)

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has decided to turn over long-sought documents related to the Fast and Furious gun-running scandal under the Obama Administration. The scandal, which was the first among many for the previous administration, resulted in the death of Border Patrol agent Brian Terry in 2010.

The settlement agreement, filed in federal court in Washington D.C., ends six years of litigation against the Obama Administration and their seven-year attempt to stonewall the committee.

“The Department of Justice under my watch is committed to transparency and the rule of law,” Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement on the decision. “This settlement agreement is an important step to make sure that the public finally receives all the facts related to Operation Fast and Furious.”

Operation Fast and Furious was supposedly established to “win the drug war” by deliberately walking more than two thousand guns across the southern border to Mexico. However, the program ended up arming the drug lord king pins it was allegedly aiming to entrap. Gun store owners and federal agents objected strongly and whistle-blowers revealed the Obama Administration deliberately violated federal.

When the guns began to show up at crime scenes, to include the gun fight that claimed the life of Mr. Terry, the coverup began.

Estimates peg the number of deaths as a direct result of the gun-running scheme — which evidence indicates was intentional — at a staggering 200 or more. In Fast and Furious: Barack Obama’s Bloodiest Scandal and Its Shameless Cover-Up, Townhall editor Katie Pavlich made the compelling case that former President Barack Obama and then-Attorney General Eric Holder “did willfully and knowingly sanction the program in order to advance their anti-second amendment agenda.”

Mr. Holder became the first top cop to be held in contempt of Congress for his role in the coverup. The U.S. House voted 223 to 217 to hold him in contempt after he perjured himself and later successfully lobbied Barack Obama to claim executive privilege.

When Mr. Holder claimed executive privilege, which was later reversed by a federal judge, he lied to Congress about the quantity of relevant documents. He had claimed there were only several hundred, though persistent efforts have uncovered the existence of thousands of documents related to the gun-running scheme.

In 2014, U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson ordered the Obama Administration to provide Congress with a slew of documents Mr. Holder had long-tried to keep from Congress. Judge Berman, who was ironically an Obama appointee, set a deadline to produce the list to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

The government watchdog committee at the time was headed up by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., who said he has no doubt that the decision by Attorney General Sessions does not bode well for Mr. Holder.

“They will show what we already know. That Eric Holder was directly involved in the cover up. He is a lawyer and should be disbarred,” Rep. Issa said. “Eric Holder has systematically obstructed justice not just against the Senate and House but against the Terry family’s legitimate right to know. And then he lied to me personally about all the documents that were necessary to be fully compliant with our requests.”

“A new search is going to allow us to get some of those documents we requested to begin with.”

One of the few claims in connection with the scandal Mr. Holder made that turned out to be true was that guns illegally supplied to drug cartels as part of the gun-running scandal would continue to show up at crime scenes “for years to come.”

In 2014, People’s Pundit Daily (PPD) reported on previously undiscovered documents revealing a 2013 gang-style assault in Phoenix, Ariz., was perpetrated by assailants armed with AK-47s traced to Fast and Furious.

Kent Terry, the brother of the slain Border Patrol agent, tweeted to President Donald Trump on Saturday, asking him to “reopen the books” and get to the bottom of the scandal that cost his brother his life.

“Sir it’s been 7 yrs .my family ask you reopen Obama’s gun scandal that cost my brother his life,” he tweeted. “I talk to you back on the campaign trail here in Michigan and you offered to reopen the books into this senseless scandal .thank you.God bless.”

“We need to find out the truth, exactly what happened, how it happened, why it happened,” Mr. Terry recently said on Fox & Friends” Tuesday. “We need Mr. Trump, President Trump, to unseal the documents, reverse executive privilege so that we know what happened, and that we can hold the people accountable that are responsible.”

(Correction: A previous version of this article quoted Rep. Issa’s comment spelling Terry as Terri. It has been corrected.)

Attorney General Jeff Sessions said the Justice

President Donald J. Trump delivers remarks on tax reform at the state fairgrounds in Indianapolis, Indiana, on Wednesday September 27, 2017. (Photo: PPD)

President Donald J. Trump delivers remarks on tax reform at the state fairgrounds in Indianapolis, Indiana, on Wednesday September 27, 2017. (Photo: PPD)

Under President Donald Trump, the percentage of Americans rating their quality of life where they live as good or excellent is at the highest level since tracking began in 2006. More Americans began to give higher marks to their quality of life than is historically normal in July.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 78% of American adults rate the quality of life where they live as good or excellent, the highest level of satisfaction in their regular survey.

Just five percent (5%) rate their quality of life as poor.

The percentage of Americans who gave a positive rating for their quality of life has maintained in the high 60s for the last 10 years. However, it rose to 74% in July and the increased satisfaction is measurable across the board.

Thirty-eight percent (38%) of American adults say they live in a suburb, 34% in a city, and 27% say they live in a rural area. Yet, where they live has little to no impact on their quality of life and happiness.

At least three-quarters of Americans in all areas rate their quality of life positively.

Of those who live in a suburb, 36% rate their quality of life as excellent and another 44% rate it as good. Twenty-six percent (26%) of Americans who live in cities say their quality of life is excellent and another 49% say it’s good. In rural areas, 29% say their quality of life is excellent and another 48% say it is good.

The same is true of race.

An excellent quality of life is rated by 33% of whites, 25% of blacks and 26% of all other races. In that order, another 48%, 45%, and 45% rate their quality of life as good.

The survey of 1,000 American adults in the U.S. nationwide was conducted on March 1 and 4, 2018 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence.

The percentage of Americans rating their quality

A coffee shop displays signs for Visa, MasterCard and Discover, in Washington, May 1, 2013. (Photo: Reuters)

A coffee shop displays signs for Visa, MasterCard and Discover, in Washington, May 1, 2013. (Photo: Reuters)

U.S. consumers added another $92.2 billion in credit card debt during 2017 and outstanding balances surpassed $1 trillion for the first time ever, according to WalletHub’s latest Credit Card Debt Study. That’s the most for a single year since 2007 and 105% above the post-recession average.

Only 4 times in the past 30 years have U.S. consumers spent so much in a year, which might sound like a net positive for consumer spending and gross domestic product (GDP). But worth noting, in each of those four years, the charge-off rate – currently hovering near historical lows – increased the following year.

The $67.6 billion in credit card debt U.S. consumers added in the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2017 is the highest quarterly accumulation in the last 30 years. It’s also 68% higher than the post-Great Recession average.

Average Credit Card Debt per Household

Q4 2017 Q4 2016 Percentage Change
Average Credit Card Debt per Household $8,600 $8,131 +6%
Total Credit Card Debt $1008.5 billion $950.20 billion +6%
Quarter Net Increase $67.6 billion $58.20 billion +16%

The average credit debt per household rose 6% to $8,600, which is $138 higher than the level WalletHub identified as being sustainable. Total credit card debt also rose 6% to a total of $1,008,500,000.00, up from $950,200,000,000.00 in Q4 2017.

The research study is based on Federal Reserve data released Wednesday afternoon.

U.S. consumers added another $92.2 billion in

The People’s Pundit Rich Baris joined “Quite Frankly” for a rare extended interview Tuesday night, in which he told Republican voters “it’s healthy to worry” about voter complacency ahead of elections.

PPD’s editor-in-chief and director of Big Data Poll, the most accurate pollster of 2016, said polling does show “some signs of complacency with the [Republican] base” but that it’s way too early for Big Media to honestly discuss the possibility of a “blue wave” in the November midterms.

“Well, I’m not an alarmist. But it’s healthy to worry. We do see some signs of complacency in the Republican base and the independents are being finicky. There going back and forth and back and forth. Just to stick your head in the sand doesn’t help,” he said. “I see a lot of that on Twitter. I get a lot of that from people out there telling me it’s too early, and it is. We’ll get a much better picture around Labor Day of what’s really happening.”

“So, the average voter, especially an average Trump voter, is not paying attention 24/7. That kind of voter tunes out the news,” he said. “They don’t care about special elections. But Republican voters do and they’re depressed.”

The People’s Pundit identified the party’s failure to repeal ObamaCare last summer as the genesis of Republican voter frustration. But he’s still not ready to subscribe to the belief that Democrats will take back control of the U.S. House in November.

“I’m just not there yet. Basically, what I see with these elections is that there are no big, significant percentages of mind-changers out there,” he added. “I’m not there yet because I’m not seeing evidence of mind-changing.”

He noted that Democrats need to carry districts in which they’ve been unable to make considerable gains. He specifically pointed to the special election in Georgia’s 6th Congressional District as “a perfect example” of their failure to win among demographic blocs who gave Republicans their House majority.

The People's Pundit Rich Baris joined "Quite

President Donald J. Trump speaks during a celebratory bill passage event following the final passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act by Congress. (Photo: AP)

President Donald J. Trump speaks during a celebratory bill passage event following the final passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act by Congress. (Photo: AP)

The New York Times recently published an “analysis” on how the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) would impact a hypothetical couple named Samuel and Felicity Taxpayer. They made a major accounting mistake in their initial article and, after some pushback, issued a correction that still did not clear up their errors.

The imaginary family consisted of two children and an elderly parent living in the household.

“Both Samuel and Felicity earn income, she as an employee of a design firm and he as a self-employed engineering consultant,” the Times wrote, adding “their total income for 2017 was $183,911, but after deductions, their taxable income is $88,293. In 2018, it would be $116,097.”

Initially, the Times claimed the couple would see a $3,896 increase in their taxes as a result of the TCJA, the first overhaul to the U.S. tax code in roughly 31 years. Last Friday, the Times published a correction:

Correction: March 2, 2018

An earlier version of this article incorrectly described the probable effect of the new tax law on a hypothetical couple’s 2018 tax bill. The TurboTax “What-If Worksheet” that generated the projection for their 2018 taxes failed to indicate that the couple would probably be entitled to claim a sizable deduction for income earned from consulting. As a result of that deduction, the amount they would likely owe on taxes would decline by $43, not rise by $3,896.

Putting aside that this correction results in an enormous revision to the imaginary couple’s tax liability, there are two big issues with the article that remain problematic.

First, the Times blamed the TurboTax “What-If Worksheet” instead of admitting the writers of the article apparently were unqualified to write it. Tax preparation software isn’t responsible for someone not knowing whether a couple qualifies for the earned income credit or other deductions for various forms of income.

Second, their revisions are still incorrect. The couple still didn’t claim nonrefundable credits for their dependents. The imaginary couple have two children, Luke and Heidi. They also have a dependent parent, Sydney. They are entitled to a $500 credit for each, for a total of $1500 in credits under the TCJA.

So, to sum up, the leftwing Times incorrectly calculated the couple’s tax situation not once but twice. In reality, President Donald Trump’s signature tax reform overhaul saved Samuel and Felicity Taxpayer $1543.00, not $43. And it certainly did not raise their tax burden by nearly $4,000.00.

If this was meant to be analysis or independent reporting, it was sloppy. Unfortunately, this isn’t the first time major media outlets and newspapers have incorrectly calculated the impact of this administration’s proposals, including the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA).

Daniel J. Mitchell, a Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute and PPD’s resident expert on tax reform and supply-side tax policy, recently corrected the Times and The Washington Post on Medicaid reforms. He’s written extensively about the impact of the TCJA, which resulted in less than 5% of taxpayers experiencing an increase in their tax burden. They are mostly higher-earning taxpayers, while roughly 85% of the country got a cut and the remainder experienced no change.

UPDATE: We received this via email from the Republican National Committee (RNC). Daniel Hemel is no rightwing economist. He is a liberal assistant professor at the University of Chicago Law, where he teaches on the subjects of tax law, administrative law and torts.

“Still don’t see why Samuel & Felicity aren’t claiming nonrefundable dependent credits of $500 for their children Luke & Heidi and their parent Sydney, for additional tax savings of $1500 under the new law,” he tweeted.

Thank you, Professor Hemel.

The New York Times made a major

Cargo containers sit idle at the Port of Los Angeles as a back-log of over 30 container ships sit anchored outside the Port in Los Angeles, California, February 18, 2015. (Photo: Reuters)

Cargo containers sit idle at the Port of Los Angeles as a back-log of over 30 container ships sit anchored outside the Port in Los Angeles, California, February 18, 2015. (Photo: Reuters)

The U.S. trade deficit widened to $56.6 billion in January, up $2.7 billion from $53.9 billion in December and more than even the deepest estimate. The median economic forecast called for the trade gap to widen to $55.1 billion.

Exports were $200.9 billion in January, $2.7 billion less than December. Imports were $257.5 billion, down less than $0.1 billion from December imports.

The trade deficit is a net negative for first-quarter (1Q) economic growth as measured by gross domestic product (GDP).

The U.S. has trade surpluses in billions of dollars with Hong Kong ($2.6), South and Central America ($2.4), Singapore ($0.9), Brazil ($0.5), and United Kingdom ($0.3). However, they are easily offset by trade deficits in the billions of dollars with China ($35.5), the European Union ($15.0), Germany ($6.3), Mexico ($5.6), Japan ($5.6), Italy ($2.8), OPEC ($2.5), India ($1.8), Taiwan ($1.5), Canada ($1.5), South Korea ($1.5), France ($1.4), and Saudi Arabia ($0.6).

The politically-sensitive U.S. trade deficit with China rose $1.5 billion as exports decreased $1.3 billion to $10.5 billion and imports increased $0.2 billion to $46.0 billion. The deficit with members of OPEC increased $2.0 billion as exports fell $1.2 billion to $4.1 billion and imports rose $0.7 billion to $6.6 billion.

Only the trade deficit with the European Union fell. It narrowed by $2.1 billion as exports decreased $0.4 billion to $24.7 billion and imports decreased $2.5 billion to $39.7 billion.

The U.S. trade deficit widened to $56.6

Job seekers wait to meet with employers at a career fair in New York City, October 24, 2012. (Photo: Reuters)

Job seekers wait to meet with employers at a career fair in New York City, October 24, 2012. (Photo: Reuters)

The ADP National Employment Report said the U.S. private sector created 235,000 jobs in February, easily beating the 205,000 median forecast. Digging deeper into the data, the report indicates private sector job creation in higher-wage industries and sectors, as well as small business hiring strength.

“The labor market continues to experience uninterrupted growth,” Ahu Yildirmaz, vice president and co-head of the ADP Research Institute said. “We see persistent gains across most industries with leisure and hospitality and retail leading the way as consumer spending kicked up. At this pace of job growth employers will soon become hard-pressed to find qualified workers.”

The goods-producing sector added 37,000 jobs during the month of February and that included continued strength in both construction (+21,000) and manufacturing (+14,000). Natural resources and mining added 2,000 jobs, though all three sub-sectors have reversed a negative trend of losses since the more business-friendly Trump Administration.

“The job market is red hot and threatens to overheat,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody’s Analytics. “With government spending increases and tax cuts, growth is set to accelerate.”

Small businesses, gauged by those with 49 employees or less, added a solid 68,000 jobs. Medium-sized businesses with 50-499 employees added 97,000 jobs and large businesses with 500 employees or more added 70,000.

ADP National Employment Report: Private Sector Employment Increased by 235,000 Jobs in February

[caption id="attachment_55308" align="aligncenter" width="1200"] Job seekers wait

Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf speaks to the liberal press on January 19, 2018, in Oakland, Calif.

Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf speaks to the liberal press on January 19, 2018, in Oakland, Calif.

The U.S. Justice Department (DOJ) is considering legal action against Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf for warning illegal immigrants about a pending raid by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). A new survey finds voters want her charged with obstruction of justice.

A Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds 47% of likely voters in the U.S. think the Trump DoJ should seek obstruction of justice charges against the “mayor of a major city” who “recently notified illegal immigrants in her city that federal immigration authorities were about to conduct operations there.”

That includes 48% of white voters, 37% of black voters and a majority (52%) of all other races. Fifty-one percent (51%) of men and 44% of women agree. Seventy-three percent (73%) of Republicans, 28% of Democrats and 44% of voters not affiliated with either party, also agree.

Only thirty-six percent (36%) oppose prosecuting the mayor and 16% are undecided. Only 18% of voters think illegal immigrants have the same legal rights and protections that U.S. citizens have, while an overwhelming 71% disagree and just 11% are not sure.

Even among voters who oppose prosecuting the mayor of Oakland mayor, just 26% believe illegal immigrants have the same legal rights and protections as U.S. citizens.

It’s important to note that the question did not specify the city or name the mayor associated with the warning. The full question was worded as follows:

Q: The mayor of a major city recently notified illegal immigrants in her city that federal immigration authorities were about to conduct operations there. Should the U.S. Justice Department seek obstruction of justice charges against this mayor?

The survey of 1,000 likely voters in the U.S. nationwide was conducted on March 1 and 4, 2018 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence.

A new survey finds voters want Oakland

People's Pundit Daily
You have %%pigeonMeterAvailable%% free %%pigeonCopyPage%% remaining this month. Get unlimited access and support reader-funded, independent data journalism.

Start a 14-day free trial now. Pay later!

Start Trial