Widget Image
Follow PPD Social Media
Monday, February 3, 2025
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 307)

Jake LaMotta, right, finds Algerian Marcel Cerdan wide open and sends a right in third round action of their world middleweight championship title bout in Briggs Stadium, Detroit, Mich., June 16, 1949. LaMotta knocked out Cerdan in the tenth round to become the new world middleweight champion. (AP Photo)

Jake LaMotta, right, finds Algerian Marcel Cerdan wide open and sends a right in third round action of their world middleweight championship title bout in Briggs Stadium, Detroit, Mich., June 16, 1949. LaMotta knocked out Cerdan in the tenth round to become the new world middleweight champion. (AP Photo)

Boxing legend and former middle champion Jake LaMotta died Tuesday at a Miami-area hospital from complications of pneumonia, his fiancee Denise Baker confirmed. He was 95.

The Bronx Bull, as he was known during his fighting career from 1941 to 1954, held an 83-19-4 record with 30 knockouts. His life and career was immortalized by the movie “Raging Bull,” in which Robert De Niro played the champion.

“Rest in Peace, Champ,” De Niro said in a statement.

He was best known for handing the great Sugar Ray Robinson his first defeat of his boxing career, and the 5 more fights the two would go on to have.

He would go on to lose the middleweight title to Robinson in a boxing classic rematch that took place on February 14, 1951. Robinson stopped him in the 13th round in Chicago during a fight that would come to be known as the St. Valentine’s Day Massacre. The two men gave as good as each got in first few rounds, but then LaMotta took a tremendous beating.

But he would not go down.

LaMotta was known for his chin, meaning he not only dished out punishment but could also take it more than most. In 106 fights, he was knocked out only once in 1952, when he lost to light-heavyweight Danny Nardico.

In the fight before the Robinson rematch, LaMotta was all but set to lose his title to Laurent Dauthuille, who held a comfortable advantage on the judges’ scorecards. But the Bronx Bull knocked him out with only 13 seconds left in the fight.

In the second match with Sugar Ray, which took place on February 5, 1943, in New York, LaMotta won a 10-round decision. It was Robinson’s his first defeat in 41 fights.

LaMotta was born July 10, 1921, on New York City’s Lower East Side, though he was raised in the Bronx. He retired from boxing in 1954, and spent much of that retirement at a nightclub he owned in Miami. He also hosted at a topless nightclub in New York during the 1970s and appeared in a few television commercials.

He had 6 children and lost both his sons. Jake LaMotta Jr., 51, died from cancer in February, while Joe LaMotta, was killed in plane crash off Nova Scotia in September at age 49.

A funeral in Miami and a memorial service in New York City are being planned, Baker said.

Boxing legend and former middle champion Jake

Senator Bill Cassidy, R-La., speaks to reporters outside the U.S. Senate Chamber in the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. (Photo: AP)

Senator Bill Cassidy, R-La., speaks to reporters outside the U.S. Senate Chamber in the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. (Photo: AP)

Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., responded to accusations leveled by Jimmy Kimmel on his late show, claiming the doctor-turned-lawmaker lied to his face. Kimmel said Sen. Cassidy had in the past promised coverage for all, with no discrimination based on preexisting conditions, lower premiums for middle-class families and no life-time caps.

“Your child with the pre-existing condition will get the care he needs if – and only if – his father is Jimmy Kimmel. Otherwise, you might be screwed,” Kimmel told his audience Tuesday night, adding that Sen. Cassidy “lied to my face.”

Sen. Cassidy told Fox News’ Bill Hemmer on “America’s Newsroom” Wednesday morning that Kimmel was misinformed.

“I wish he understood completely. There’ll be those in states like Maine and Virginia in which there’s resources to care for those who are currently uninsured,” he said. “We protect those with preexisting conditions. If a state applies for a waver, it specifically says that the State must establish that there’s adequate and affordable coverage for those with preexisting conditions.”

When Hemmer asked if the senator believes Jimmy Kimmel just wasn’t telling the truth, he repeated that he was just misinformed.

“One, he is wrong. It increases coverage and protects those with preexisting conditions particularly in states who have not have the benefits of Medicaid expansion,” he said. “We help those in those states and that’s millions of Americans.”

“Not only did Bill Cassidy fail the Jimmy Kimmel test, he failed the Bill Cassidy test,” he added. “He failed his own test.”

The legislation repeals the individual and employer mandates and the 2.3% medical device tax. The Cassidy-Graham bill replaces money spent on tax credits and Medicaid expansion with block grants to states, which would allow governors to experiment with insurance reforms. South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., backed up his colleague’s claim, noting not only do waivers need to meet strict guidelines but also that the program was tailored toward the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP).

Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., responded to accusations

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., speaks to reporters at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, May 10, 2017. (Photo: AP)

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., speaks to reporters at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, May 10, 2017. (Photo: AP)

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., is running out of excuses not to support Republicans’ last-ditch efforts to replace ObamaCare. The bill introduced by Sens. Bill Cassidy, R-La., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., the latter being a longtime friend of Sen. McCain, picked up the support of his state governor on Monday.

Arizona Governor Doug Ducey, who Sen. McCain cited as a reason not to support previous ObamaCare replacement bills, announced Monday afternoon that he supported Graham-Cassidy legislation. He was concerned the American Health Care Act and the Better Care Reconciliation Act didn’t do enough to protect those with preexisting conditions. The

“Graham-Cassidy is the best path forward to repeal and replace ObamaCare,” Gov. Ducey said in a statement. “I will continue to work with Congress and the Administration to give states more flexibility and more options moving forward. Congress has 12 days to say ‘Yes’ to Graham-Cassidy. It’s time to get the job done.”

The legislation repeals the individual and employer mandates and the 2.3% medical device tax. The bill replaces money spent on tax credits and Medicaid expansion with block grants to states, which would allow Governors to experiment with insurance reforms.

Yet, Sen. McCain ran to the Huffington Post to say the endorsement doesn’t make him anymore inclined to vote for the bill. Sen. Graham also noted Tuesday morning that his last holdout hope had been dashed.

“He was waiting to see if there was a bipartisan alternative,” Sen. Graham said. “Sen. Alexander had been working with Sen. Murray and nothing came of it.”

The South Carolina senator was optimistic about the bill’s chances, predicting it will eventually get 50 Republican votes in the U.S. Senate and potentially even bipartisan support.

“There will be a lot of Democratic senators struggling with a ‘No’ vote,” he said. “This is a choice between socialism and federalism.”

Sen. McCain was 1 of 7 Republican senators who rejected a “straight repeal” of ObamaCare in July. He survived a primary challenge from Dr. Kelli Ward in 2016 by claiming he would repeal ObamaCare, and used the issue in the general election, as well. But he was 1 of 3 Republicans senators who also voted against a “skinny repeal” just one day later.

House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows, R-N.C., also predicted on Monday that the Graham-Cassidy bill would pass the House of Representatives, with conservative support.

“It’s fundamentally our last chance to make a legislative fix to Obamacare, and if it doesn’t happen, then the chances of it happening in the future are slim to none,” he said. “And so, I fully expect that if it makes it out of the Senate, the pressure will be so great — from moderates to conservatives — to get it passed.”

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., is running out

U.S. President Donald Trump addresses the 72nd United Nations General Assembly at U.N. headquarters in New York, U.S., September 19, 2017. (Photo: Reuters)
U.S. President Donald Trump addresses the 72nd United Nations General Assembly at U.N. headquarters in New York, U.S., September 19, 2017. (Photo: Reuters)

President Donald Trump in his first address at the UN General Assembly that socialism brings “devastation and failure,” a fact most delegations in largely leftwing body didn’t want to hear. His remarks came as he turned his fire toward Venezuelan President NicolĂĄs Maduro, whom he called a “socialist dictator.”

The Trump Administration has unilaterally leveled two rounds of sanctions in response to the oppressive actions of the regime, one against Maduro himself and another again the regime. He called for the full restoration of democracy in Venezuela.

“Maduro has inflicted pain and suffering of the good people of this country,” President Trump said, adding that the situation in Venezuela is unacceptable.

While he thanked the UN for condemning those actions and for providing support to the people of Venezuela, he sent a clear message to the 150 international delegations.

“The problem in Venezuela is not that socialism has been poorly implemented. It’s that socialism has been faithfully implemented,” he said, a remark that received a tepid response from members of the leftwing globalist body. â€œWherever true socialism and communism has been adopted it has brought true devastation and failure.”

Aside from the economic devastation and failure that has followed socialist governments, regime brutality is also unmatched. Socialist governments killed hundreds of millions of people in the 20th century, alone. Marxist regimes, those “given power” who practiced the most deadly form of socialism, murdered nearly 110 million people from 1917 to 1987.

And they continue to do so in North Korea, Latin America and elsewhere without resistance from the United Nations (UN). In July, Maduro responded to opposition protests with violence that left 120 people dead, including a 13-year-old and a 17-year-old.

Ironically, the UN was established after World War II, a global conflict started by socialist regimes with dreams of regional and global hegemony.

President Donald Trump told the globalist UN

U.S. President Donald Trump addresses the 72nd United Nations General Assembly at U.N. headquarters in New York, U.S., September 19, 2017. (Photo: Reuters)

U.S. President Donald Trump addresses the 72nd United Nations General Assembly at U.N. headquarters in New York, U.S., September 19, 2017. (Photo: Reuters)

President Donald Trump addressed more than 150 international delegations at the UN General Assembly for the first time on Tuesday, laying out the tenets of what he calls principled realism.

He began the clearly-themed speech by explaining America first in a way members have not yet heard.

“As President of the United States, I will always put America first just like you, the leaders of your countries, should put your countries first,” President Trump explained.

The roughly 40-minute address defined the United States (US) as a nation reluctant but not unwilling to use its massive military power, and urged the UN to adopt reforms that will make it more effective in realizing the goals of its Charter. It placed a strong emphasis on international cooperation to combat shared threats on a rational basis, while respecting individual national sovereignty.

“The UN was founded after two world wars to better shape the world,” he said. “Our success depends on a coalition of strong and independent nations that embrace their sovereignty to promote security, prosperity and peace for themselves and for the world.”

Burden Sharing & Cooperation

As he did on Monday, President Trump told the international delegations at the assembly they should no longer expect hollow demands for burden sharing.

“The United States will forever be a great friend to the world and especially to its allies,” he said. “But we can no longer enter into a one-sided deal where the U.S. gets nothing in return.”

The U.S. is far and away the largest provider of financial contributions to the UN. In 2015, the U.S. provided 22% of the UN budget and 28% of the peacekeeping budget. Meanwhile, China pays just 8% and Russia pays around 3%. The disparity gives the U.S. great leverage over the UN, which past presidents have been hesitant to use.

“This is our hope: we want harmony and friendship, not conflict and strife,” he said. “We are guided by our outcomes not our ideology.”

Continuing his call for fairness, Mr. Trump mentioned global trade deals that cost millions of American jobs.

“The U.S. middle class, once the bedrock of society, has been left behind,” he said. “They have been forgotten and they will never be forgotten again.”

Threats to Sovereignty “From Ukraine to the South China Sea”

North Korea, Iran and radical Islamic terrorism are lines in the sand in the Trump Doctrine of principled realism.

“We must reject threats of sovereignty from Ukraine to the South China Sea,” he said.

Threat – North Korea

President Trump argued that North Korea’s ballistic missile and nuclear weapons programs threaten the entire world. He called out cheater nations who violate unanimously passed UN Security Council resolutions imposing embargoes and trade restrictions on Pyongyang.

“It is an outrage that some nations will trade with the country and arm supplies to the country,” he said, warning if the regime continues to threaten the U.S. and to destabilize East Asia, the Trump Administration would be prepared to use overwhelming force.

“We will have no choice but to totally destroy North Korea,” President Trump said before calling against Kim Jong Un by a nickname he gave the leftwing communist dictator on Twitter last weekend.

“Rocket Man is on a suicide mission for himself.”

President Trump said the UN was founded to respond to and de-escalate these exact kinds of threats. The U.S. hopes force will not be necessary and that the UN will be effective.

“Let’s see how they do,” he said. “It is time for North Korea to realize that denuclearization is the only acceptable future.”

Threat – Iran

President Trump then took aim at the Iranian government who masks “corrupt dictatorship” while its oil profits go to Hezbollah and other terrorists who kill innocent Muslims and attack their peaceful Arab and Israeli neighbors. He said the Iran Nuclear deal was one of the “worst and most one-sided transactions the United States has ever done.”

“We cannot let a murderous regime continue these destabilizing activities and abide by an agreement if it provides for an eventual nuclear program.”

He called the Iran nuclear deal one of the “worst and most one-sided transactions the United States has ever done.” Thus far, the Trump Administration has reaffirmed the deal in the hopes the UN makes strides in confronting Iran’s terror-sponsorship. Iran is the leader in state-sponsored terrorism.

“Frankly, that deal is an embarrassment to the United States,” he said, indicating he will soon reverse his affirmation of the deal if progress is not made.

Threat – Venezuela

The president turned his attention to Venezuelan President NicolĂĄs Maduro, whom he called a “socialist dictator.” He called for the full restoration of democracy in Venezuela.

“Maduro has inflicted pain and suffering of the good people of this country,” Mr. Trump said, adding that the situation in Venezuela is unacceptable.

“We and all others have a goal,” he said. “That goal is to help them regain their freedom and restore their democracy.”

He thanked the UN for condemning the regime and providing support to Venezuela. The Trump Administration has unilaterally leveled two rounds of sanctions related to the crisis, one against Maduro himself and another again the regime.

“The problem in Venezuela is not that socialism has been poorly implemented. It’s that socialism has been faithfully implemented,” he said, a remark that received a tepid response from members of the leftwing globalist delegation. “Wherever true socialism and communism has been adopted it has brought true devastation and failure.”

Refugees

On refugee resettlement, the President said the U.S. is a compassionate nation that has pledged billions of dollars, but the preferable policy would be to relocate those fleeing their homes to safe zones.

“We support the recent agreements of the G20 nations that will seek to host refugees as close to their home countries as possible,” the president said.

He argued that uncontrolled migration is “deeply unfair” to both the receiving and sending countries. It drains home nations of the human capital badly-needed to motivate leaders to implement stabilizing reforms.

Duty to Act

It defined this moment in history as one in which a failure to meet current challenges will not be met with mercy by the tide of events. He said leaders have a duty to fulfill their sovereign duties to the people they represent, which includes meeting threats head on.

“We live in a time of extraordinary breakthroughs in technology,” President Trump said. “It is entirely up to us to whether we lift the world to new heights or let it fall into a valley of disrepair.”

Trump says after we and our allies emerge from the bloodiest war in history, we did not seek territorial expansion or attempt to impose our way of life on others but we instead help build institutions like the UN.

“We will slide down the path of complacency or do we have enough strength and pride to confront those dangers today so our citizens can live safely.

Trump says we must fulfill our sovereign duties to the people we represent.

“If the righteous many do not confront the wicked few, then evil will triumph,” he said, warning that the world cannot afford civilized nations to become “bystanders to history.”

American Exceptionalism

President Trump closed out his address to the UN General Assembly by asking a question: “Are we still patriots?” He asked leaders if they all revere their country’s citizens enough to take action He said Americans have demonstrated that they will rise to meet threats when they realize what they’ll give up as a result of inaction. Its people will give their lives to defend its values.

“The American story is the story of what is possible when people take ownership of their future,” he said. “Our hope is a world and world of proud independent nations trying to make this world a better place to the people on this earth.”

Read Also – Trump to United Nations: Socialism Brings ‘Devastation and Failure’

President Donald Trump addressed more than 150

Cargo containers sit idle at the Port of Los Angeles as a back-log of over 30 container ships sit anchored outside the Port in Los Angeles, California, February 18, 2015. (Photo: Reuters)

Cargo containers sit idle at the Port of Los Angeles as a back-log of over 30 container ships sit anchored outside the Port in Los Angeles, California, February 18, 2015. (Photo: Reuters)

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics said import prices and export prices both gained 0.6% in August, easily beating the 0.4 and 0.2 forecasts, respectively. The gains followed 3 previous months of declines in the Import Price Index, and a 0.5% in the Export Price Index in July.

Worth noting, Hurricane Harvey did not impact the collection of the import and export price index data for August because the reference period for the data is the first week of the month.

The rise in import prices is the first since a 0.2% gain in April. They haven’t recorded a larger increase since the 0.7% boost in June 2016. Both fuel and non-fuel price gains contributed to the rise in August.

Over the past 12 months, import prices for U.S. imports have increased 2.1%.

The gain in export prices in August was the largest monthly rise since the index jumped 0.8% in June 2016. Both agricultural export prices and nonagricultural export prices fueled the August and 12-month increases for overall export prices.

Over the past 12 months, export prices advanced 2.3%.

Read full report, here.

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics said

A completed house (rear) is seen behind the earthworks of a home currently under construction at the Mid-Atlantic Builder's 'The Villages of Savannah' development site in Brandywine, Maryland May 31, 2013. (Photo: Reuters)

A completed house (rear) is seen behind the earthworks of a home currently under construction at the Mid-Atlantic Builder’s ‘The Villages of Savannah’ development site in Brandywine, Maryland May 31, 2013. (Photo: Reuters)

New residential construction data from the U.S. Census Bureau was solid August, as both housing starts and building permits beat the median forecast. The report is decisively stronger than what economists had expected.

Housing starts in August came in at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1,180,000, or 0.8% (Âą9.6%)* below the revised July estimate of 1,190,000. However, it is 1.4% (Âą8.9%)* above the August 2016 rate of 1,164,000. Single-family housing starts in August came in at a rate of 851,000, or 1.6% (Âą9.0%)* higher than the revised 838,000 in July.

The August rate for units in buildings with five units or more was 323,000.

Building permits in August were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1,300,000, or 5.7% (Âą2.0%) higher than the revised rate of 1,230,000 in July and 8.3% (Âą1.6%) higher than the August 2016 rate of 1,200,000. Single-family authorizations in August came in at a rate of 800,000, or 1.5% (Âą1.3%) below the revised 812,000 in July.

Authorizations of units in buildings with five units or more were at a rate of 464,000 in August.

Housing completions were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1,075,000 in August, down 10.2% (Âą12.3 percent)* from the revised estimate of 1,197,000 for July. But it is still 3.4% (Âą13.0%)* higher than the August 2016 rate of 1,040,000. Single-family housing completions came in at a rate of 724,000 in August, down 13.3% (Âą14.7%)* from the revised July rate of 835,000.

The August rate for units in buildings with five units or more was 348,000.

New residential construction data from the U.S.

Keynesian Economics

Keynesian Economics

Keynesian economics is like Freddie Krueger, constantly reappearing after logical people assumed it was dead. The fact that various stimulus schemes inevitably fail should be the death knell for the theory, which is basically the “perpetual motion machine” of economics. Indeed, I’ve wondered whether we’ve reached the point where the “debilitating drug” of Keynesianism has “jumped the shark.”

Yet Keynesian economics has “perplexing durability,” probably because the theory tells politicians that their vice of profligacy is actually a virtue.

But there are some economists who genuinely seem to believe that government can artificially boost growth. They claim terrorist attacks and alien attacks can be good for growth if they lead to more spending. They even think natural disasters are good for the economy.

I’m not joking. As reported by CNBC, the President of the New York Federal Reserve actually thinks the economy is stimulated when wealth is destroyed.

Hurricanes Harvey and Irma actually will lead to increased economic activity over the long run, New York Fed President William Dudley said in an interview. …”The long-run effect of these disasters unfortunately is it actually lifts economic activity because you have to rebuild all the things that have been damaged by the storms.”

I’m always stunned when sentient adults make this kind of statement.

Should we invite ISIS into the country to blow up some bridges? Should we dynamite new buildings? Should we pray for an earthquake to destroy a big city? Should we have a war, featuring lots of spending and destruction?

All of those things, along with hurricanes and floods, are good for growth according to Keynesian theory.

Jeff Jacoby explains why this is poisonous economic analysis.

Could anything be more absurd? The shattering losses caused by hurricanes, earthquakes, forest fires, and other calamities are grievous misfortunes that obviously leave society poorer. Vast sums of money may be spent afterward to repair and rebuild, but society will still be poorer from the damage caused by the storm or other disaster. Every dollar spent on cleanup and reconstruction is a dollar that could have been spent to enlarge the nation’s reservoir of material assets. Instead, it has to be spent replacing what was lost. …No, hurricanes are not good for the economy. Neither are floods, earthquakes, or massacres. When windows are shattered, all of humanity is left materially worse off. There is no financial “glint of silver lining.” To claim otherwise is delusional.

By the way, I don’t think any Keynesians actually want disasters to happen.

They’re simply making a “silver lining” argument that a bad event will lead to more spending. In their world, what drives the economy is consumption, and it’s the role of government to either consume directly or to give money to people so they will spend it.

In a recent interview, I pointed out that investment and production are the real keys to growth, which is why I prefer GDI over GDP). Increased consumption, I explained, is a result of growth, not the cause of growth.

You’ll notice I also threw in a jab at the state and local tax deduction, a loophole that needs to be abolished as part of tax reform.

But let’s not get sidetracked.

For those who want to do some additional reading on Keynesian economics, I recommend this new study by a couple of professors. Here’s a blurb from the abstract.

…Keynesians assert that even wasteful government spending can be desirable because any spending is better than nothing. This simple Keynesian approach fails to account, however, for several significant sources of cost. In addition to the cost of waste inherent in government spending, financing that spending requires taxation, which entails an excess burden. Furthermore, the employment of even previously idle resources involves opportunity costs.

I’ll close by augmenting theory and academic analysis with some real-world observations. Keynesian economics didn’t work for Hoover and Roosevelt, hasn’t worked for Japan, didn’t work for Obama, and didn’t work in Australia. Indeed, Keynesians can’t point to a single success story anywhere in the world at any point in history.

Though they always have an excuse. The government should have spent more, they tell us.

Keynesian economics is like Freddie Krueger, constantly reappearing

(4:13) Laura Ingraham appears on Sean Hannity to discuss the media attacks on Donald Trump and Melania Trump during his handling of Huuricane Harvey on Aug. 29, 2017.

(4:13) Laura Ingraham appears on Sean Hannity to discuss the media attacks on Donald Trump and Melania Trump during his handling of Huuricane Harvey on Aug. 29, 2017.

Laura Ingraham will anchor “The Ingraham Angle” on the Fox News Channel beginning October 30 in a big shakeup of the network’s primetime lineup. Ingraham, a talk radio giant and early supporter of President Donald Trump, will takeover the 10:00 PM EST slot currently occupied by Sean Hannity, who will move back to his original time at 9:00 PM.

Fox News said that the show will “aim to cut through the Washington chatter to speak directly with unexpected voices and the actual people who are impacted by the news of the day” and focus on stories and issues related to “hard working Americans.”

”The Five,” which previously occupied the 9:00 PM hour, will return to its original 5:00 PM time, pitting Hannity against Rachel Maddow at MSNBC. The changes will take place next Monday, and covering hosts are going to rotate the 10:00 PM hour until “The Ingraham Angle” starts with its new anchor.

“I look forward to informing and entertaining the audience and introducing new voices to the conversation,” Ingraham, a longtime Fox contributor said in a statement.

In addition to hosting a popular radio show, Ingraham is also the editor-in-chief at Lifezette, a political and cultural news website. She is expected to continue hosting “The Laura Ingraham Show” on the radio and in her role as editor of the website.

Laura Ingraham will anchor "The Ingraham Angle"

Boston Mayor Marty Walsh speaks after a meeting on gun violence prevention outside the White House in Washington, U.S., May 24, 2016. (Photo: Reuters)

Boston Mayor Marty Walsh speaks after a meeting on gun violence prevention outside the White House in Washington, U.S., May 24, 2016. (Photo: Reuters)

A new Emerson College Poll finds Boston Mayor Marty Walsh is very popular and enjoys a 31-point lead over his closest primary challenger Councilor Tito Jackson. Mayor Walsh’s lead in the race, which is set for September 26, is fueled largely by his 72% favorability rating.

The poll of likely voters has Mayor Walsh at 52% juxtaposed to Councilor Jackson at just 21%, with 16% undecided.

Mr. Jackson has a solid 43% favorable ranking, while 33% view him unfavorable. However, Walsh’s 72%/18% numbers mean the challenger has to fill a tall order. Most concerning for Councilor Jackson is that he’s losing his home district 44% to 30%. Black voters also back Mayor Walsh nearly 3 to 1, 66% to 21%.

There are some bright spots for Jackson.

He leads among voters 18 to 34 years old 37% to 17%, though he trails among voters 35 to 74 year olds by roughly 35 points. The challenger also trails the incumbent among those over 75 years old by 54 points, 65% to 11%.

In a hypothetical general election match-up, Mayor Walsh leads Councilor Jackson 55% to 26%, with 19% of registered voters still undecided.

As Emerson College Polling Society Director Professor Spencer Kimball notes, there is an opening for Councilor Jackson to at least chip away at Mayor Walsh’s lead. Seventy-one percent (71%) said the cost of housing in Boston was unaffordable, while only 22% said it was affordable. Those voters currently still back the incumbent, but that’s more indicative of a messaging flaw in the Jackson campaign.

Further, 38% said Boston is overdeveloped, while just 15% said it was under-developed. Among those who say the city is overdeveloped, Councilor Jackson only trails Mayor Walsh by 12 points, 41% to 29%.

All respondents interviewed in this study were part of a fully representative sample using an area probabilistic sample of registered voters from Aristotle International. The overall sample size was N= 529 with a margin of error of +/-4.2 percentage points in 19 of 20 cases. In the Primary the sample was n= 396 with a MOE of +/-4.9 percentage points. It is important to remember that subsets based on gender, age and party breakdowns carry with them higher margins of error, as the sample size is reduced. Data was collected using an Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system of landlines only and was conducted September 14-16, 2017.

This survey uses statistical weighting procedures to account for deviations in the survey sample from known population characteristics, which helps correct for differential survey participation and random variation in samples. The overall adult sample is weighted to recent Census and voting behavior data using a sample balancing procedure to match the demographic makeup with district, party affiliation, ethnicity, age and gender. Margins of sampling error for this survey are not adjusted for design effect.

A new poll finds Boston Mayor Marty

People's Pundit Daily
You have %%pigeonMeterAvailable%% free %%pigeonCopyPage%% remaining this month. Get unlimited access and support reader-funded, independent data journalism.

Start a 14-day free trial now. Pay later!

Start Trial