Widget Image
Follow PPD Social Media
Wednesday, February 5, 2025
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 374)

In this Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2014 file photo, pedestrian walks past a sign for health insurer Aetna Inc., at the company headquarters in Hartford. (Photo: AP)

In this Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2014 file photo, pedestrian walks past a sign for health insurer Aetna Inc., at the company headquarters in Hartford. (Photo: AP)

Aetna (NYSE:AET), the nation’s third largest insurer, announced late Wednesday that it is leaving all ObamaCare exchanges next year. Last year, the company decided it would severely reduced its participation from 15 states to just 4 in 2017. In April, they pulled out of Virginia and last week, Iowa.

“At this time [we] have completely exited the exchanges,” Aetna said in a statement.

Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Tom Price said the development “adds to the mountain of evidence that Obamacare has failed the American people.”

“Aetna’s decision to completely withdraw from the ObamaCare exchanges adds to the mountain of evidence that ObamaCare has failed the American people,” Secretary Price said in a statement late Wednesday. “Repealing and replacing it with patient-centered solutions that stabilize the marketplace to bring down costs and increase choices is the only solution.”

Insurers have been opting out of ObamaCare exchanges to the point citizens in several states have little to no choices left in individual insurance markets. Medica recently indicated they would follow Aetna out of Iowa, leaving more than 70,000 Iowans who buy their own coverage without any options for 2018.

“Without swift action by the state or Congress to provide stability to Iowa’s individual insurance market, Medica will not be able to serve the citizens of Iowa in the manner and breadth that we do today,” the company’s statement said.

The Republican-controlled House of Representatives passed the American Health Care Act (AHCA) earlier this month, but “swift action” is not expected in the Senate where the GOP has a smaller majority.

“Our individual Commercial products lost nearly $700 million between 2014 and 2016, and are projected to lose more than $200 million in 2017 despite a significant reduction in membership,” Aetna added. “Those losses are the result of marketplace structural issues that have led to co-op failures and carrier exits, and subsequent risk pool deterioration.”

Aetna (NYSE:AET), the nation's third largest insurer,

Michael Flynn and Susan Rice shake hands at a January 10 event in Washington. (Photo: Reuters)

Michael Flynn and Susan Rice shake hands at a January 10 event in Washington. (Photo: Reuters)

The Senate Intelligence Committee has issued a subpoena for Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn for papers related to the meddling by Russia in the 2016 election. President Donald Trump’s former national security advisor was fired after it was revealed he misled Vice President Mike Pence regarding a phone call with the Russian ambassador.

Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., the chairman of the committee, and Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., the vice chairman, said the panel had previously requested the papers from Lt. Gen. Flynn on late on April 28. His lawyer Robert Kelner declined to comment to the newly issued subpoena.

Sen. Burr and Warner said in a joint statement Lt. Gen. Flynn “declined, through counsel, to cooperate with the Committee’s request.”

Democrats are hoping that the former DNI head under Barack Obama will tie the President to the idea of Russia collusion, which his replacement has said does not exist. Former Defense National Intelligence Director James R. Clapper twice testified at congressional hearings that he did not find evidence President Trump colluded with Russian officials to sway the outcome of the election.

[caption id="attachment_53285" align="aligncenter" width="1200"] Michael Flynn and

FBI Director James Comey testifies before the House Intelligence Committee hearing into alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. election, on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., March 20, 2017. (Photo: Reuters)

FBI Director James Comey testifies before the House Intelligence Committee hearing into alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. election, on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., March 20, 2017. (Photo: Reuters)

President Donald J. Trump fired James Comey after a review by the Department of Justice (DOJ) concluded he mishandled the Clinton email investigation. President Donald Trump not only made the right decision in firing Mr. Comey, but one that was necessary to preserve public trust in the social contract.

Any reasonable president should have and, hopefully would have, done the exact same thing. Any reasonable and objective person with knowledge of the facts in this case would agree it was unquestionably the right decision for both public perception and professional reasons.

Professional and Procedural

In a memo to Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein ran down a litany of breaches in DOJ protocol during the criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton mishandling classified information. The most basic of these is that the FBI isn’t even supposed to confirm or deny whether a probe is ongoing.

The first indicator to us that Mr. Comey was going to go somewhat rogue was when he told reporters last summer that the FBI was conducting a “security review” like Mrs. Clinton continuously claimed, it was a criminal investigation.

“I don’t even know what that means,” he said when asked about the term.

On July 5, 2016, Mr. Comey took it upon himself to exonerate Mrs. Clinton based solely on his own authority, which he never had. That should have been up to the attorney general, at the time Loretta Lynch, who had never recused herself even after meeting secretly with the husband (Bill) of the target of the investigation.

“It is not the function of the Director to make such an announcement,” Mr. Rosenstein wrote. “The Director now defends his decision by asserting that he believed Attorney General Loretta Lynch had a conflict. But the FBI Director is never empowered to supplant federal prosecutors and assume command of the Justice Department.”

Mr. Rosenstein said at his press appearance Mr. Comey “laid out his version of the facts for the news media as if it were a closing argument, but without a trial. It is a textbook example of what federal prosecutors and agents are taught not to do.”

That unprecedented event was followed by another 11 days before the election, which some Democrats and Mrs. Clinton’s herself blamed for her loss. In a letter, Mr. Comey told Congress he had reopened the investigation after finding emails that turned out to contain classified information on Anthony Weiner’s laptop (another crime).

We have shown over and over that the data disproves the “Comey effect” excuse, but it understandably angered a large percentage of the American public. Then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and now leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said they lost faith in the director and the former said he should resign.

Last week, Mr. Comey dropped more innuendo about the Trump campaign’s alleged ties to Russia in testimony to Congress, while also exaggerating the new evidence that led his agents to reopen the Clinton file. Jay Sekulow of the American Center for Law and Justice called it “selective disclosure disorder.”

“I agree with the nearly unanimous opinions of former Department officials. The way the Director handled the conclusion of the email investigation was wrong,” Mr. Rosenstein put it in his memo. “As a result, the FBI is unlikely to regain public and congressional trust until it has a Director who understands the gravity of the mistakes and pledges never to repeat them. Having refused to admit his errors, the Director cannot be expected to implement the necessary corrective actions.”

Public Perception

Democrats and their corporate media monopoly want the American people to believe President Trump fired Mr. Comey to cover up the findings of an investigation that doesn’t exist that could reveal potential crimes that there is no evidence to support.

Most polling shows the majority of the American public does not believe President Trump or close members of his campaign “colluded” with Russian officials to influence the election. Former Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper, who headed a probe for Barack Obama into the matter, has now twice testified before congressional committees to the fact no such evidence exists.

Mr. Comey has three times told the President he isn’t even the target of what is a counter-intelligence investigation–not a criminal investigation–which we heard before reading it in the firing letter. We also know Mr. Comey twice told Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, in private briefings that the FBI found no evidence warranting such a criminal investigation.

But that hasn’t stopped the media and their incessant drum beat to the crazy cadence of treason. Yet, they still have not convinced a majority of Americans that their narrative is valid.

Majorities still believe Mr. Comey should have prosecuted Mrs. Clinton, who they see as getting away with committing felonies because of her last name. Putting aside the phony standard of intent, we agree with Americans’ views. Frankly, we cannot fathom how anyone with any intellect whatsoever paired with the knowledge of the facts of this case could disagree.

Two of the members of this editorial board have personally held top secret security clearances. There is no doubt in our minds that we would be wearing orange jumpsuits and our return addresses would read U.S. Penitentiary, Leavenworth had we mishandled classified information with such “extreme carelessness.”

Mr. Comey’s actions have been helping to fuel an already justified belief that there are two different scales of justice in America–one that hands out get-out-of-jail free cards to the rich and powerful, and one that punishes the rest of us to the fullest extent of the law.

Worse still, a majority (52%) want the Clintons investigated for their ties to Russia given the uranium deal.

The American social contract is a unique, historically beautiful and fragile design. It was already dangerously close to breaking before Mr. Comey mishandled the Clinton case. We can ill afford to just pray someone like Mr. Comey doesn’t step on the glass trying to move forward.

The FBI was and remains the finest law enforcement and investigative agency in the history of the world. But under his leadership it has been tainted and compromised. He lost the trust of the public, the agents and politicians, making it impossible for him to “effectively lead the Bureau” back to their prior stature.

President Donald Trump not only made the

Kosovo's Prime Minister Isa Mustafa (L) and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry shake hands after speaking to reporters following their meeting at Pristina International Airport Adem Jashari in Pristina, Kosovo December 2, 2015.

Kosovo’s Prime Minister Isa Mustafa (L) and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry shake hands after speaking to reporters following their meeting at Pristina International Airport Adem Jashari in Pristina, Kosovo December 2, 2015. (Photo: Reuters)

The government in Kosovo fell on Wednesday after the parliament approved the opposition’s no-confidence motion against the current government with 78 votes. Tsarizm.com reported the vote was a surprise, as the government did not expect its allies to vote in favor of the measure.

After 3 hours of discussions and reciprocal accusations, the Assembly supported the motion for overthrowing Isa Mustafa’s coalition government of LDK and PDK. Even PDK, though part of the government, supported the opposition’s motion.

According to latest assessments, tomorrow the president of Kosovo will start consultations with parliamentary parties to decide on the date of the new elections.

The leader of AAK Ramush Haradinaj, in opposition, addressed the media through an extraordinary press conference in which he stated that the start and the end of the current government was much the same, full of shame and deceit.

Read Full Story on Tsarizm.com

The government in Kosovo fell on Wednesday

In this March 13, 2017, file photo, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of Calif., accompanied by Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer of N.Y., speaks to reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington. (Photo: AP)

In this March 13, 2017, file photo, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of Calif., accompanied by Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer of N.Y., speaks to reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington. (Photo: AP)

President Donald Trump called out Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., for hypocritically criticizing his decision to fire James Comey as the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Schumer, who has repeatedly called Comey’s integrity into question, said it was part of a “troubling pattern” with the Trump White House.

“Cryin’ Chuck Schumer stated recently, ‘I do not have confidence in him (James Comey) any longer,'” President Trump tweeted. “Then acts so indignant.”

But the top Senate Democrat was singing a totally different tune late last year when Comey sent a letter to Congress informing them the FBI had reopened the investigation into Clinton’s mishandling of classified information.

In October, Schumer said he did “not have confidence in him” and called his decision “appalling.” His predecessor, Harry Reid, D-Nev., called on the then-director to resign. His counterpart in the House, Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., told CNN during that time, “maybe he’s (Comey) not right for the job.”

President Trump fired the embattled Comey for blurring the lines between investigator and prosecutor. The President agreed with a recommendation from the Department of Justice (DoJ) after a review of how he conducted himself during the Clinton email case.

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said the decision was based on “the clear recommendations” of Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

“James Comey will be replaced by someone who will do a far better job, bringing back the spirit and prestige of the FBI,” President Trump also tweeted. “Comey lost the confidence of almost everyone in Washington, Republican and Democrat alike. When things calm down, they will be thanking me!”

President Donald Trump called out Senate Majority

FBI Director James Comey testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, May 3, 2017, before the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing: "Oversight of the Federal Bureau of Investigation." (AP Photo)
FBI Director James Comey testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, May 3, 2017, before the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing: “Oversight of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.” (AP Photo)

President Donald J. Trump has fired embattled FBI Director James Comey for violating the rule of law and blurring the lines between investigator and prosecutor. The decision comes in light of a recommendation from the Department of Justice after reviewing that concluded he mishandled the Clinton email case.

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said Trump informed Comey that he had been terminated and removed, adding the decision was based on “the clear recommendations” of Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

“The FBI is one of our nation’s most cherished and respected institutions, and today will mark a new beginning for our crown jewel of law enforcement,” President Trump said. “While I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation, I nevertheless concur with the judgement of the Department of Justice that you are not able to effectively lead the bureau.”

Worth noting, the President included the details of his private conversations with Mr. Comey in regard to the Russia probe. On several occasions, the former director also told Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, that President Trump is not the target of any criminal investigation and that there is no evidence of collusion with Russia as Democrats have alleged.

“A search for a new permanent FBI Director will begin immediately,” Mr. Spicer said.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., who has repeatedly called Comey’s integrity into question, said it was part of a “troubling pattern” with the Trump White House. But no one is buying.

“Chuck Schumer is just being a political hack,” Karl Rove, a “Never Trump” Republican strategist said. “There is ample reason to justify this decision. This is a smear and a libel from the minority leader.”

Former FBI assistant director James Kallstrom agreed with the decision. Mr. Comey, 56, was nominated by President Barack Obama for the FBI post in 2013 to a 10-year term. All the praised for his independence and integrity built during three decades in law enforcement went out the window with one press conference.

“He did the write thing,” Mr. Kallstrom said. “It was the correct thing to do.”

Bill Gavin, also a former assistant to the FBI, agreed with Kallstrom.

“As the head of the investigative agency, he [Comey] needed to toss that ball back into the Justice Department,” he told Fox News. “Not the best decision.”

President Donald Trump fired embattled FBI Director

Dick Carpenter, U.S. Army retired, right, and the cover of the book "Lost Bastards" by L. Todd Wood.

Dick Carpenter, U.S. Army retired, right, and the cover of the book “Lost Bastards” by L. Todd Wood.

Lost Bastards, the book that reveals the true story of how 28 U.S. soldiers defended “Hill 433” against a Chinese offensive during the Korean War, is hitting the big screen. It was a secret mission to test “battlefield radar” for the first time, but shortly after arriving thousands of Chinese soldiers overran their position.

Cut off from American forces, they were told to hold and defend their position at all cost. The Americans fought alongside Republic of Korea troops for survival for two weeks and only fourteen made it out alive.

The project will be produced and co-directed by Christopher HK Lee. He has produced and directed several award-winning feature and short films, including films that raise awareness of Korean history, culture and current affairs.

“South Korea has developed into a world leading economy not long after the Korean War. However, the war has not been completely over, yet it is becoming a ‘forgotten war’ among young generations,” Lee said. “Our perceptions about the issues of the war, national security, and unification are changing. It is our duty and imperative to give our voice of the history of the Korean War for the sacrifices made by our fathers as to how we wish to remember them.”

His work includes titles such as “I am Grace,” “Rescued by Fate,” “Hills of Arirang,” “Flight Buddies,” “Fading Away,” and “The Last Tear.”

“We are very excited to have Christopher H. K. Lee involved in the Lost Bastard’s project,” L. Todd Wood, author of the book and journalist said. “He brings a wealth of talent and passion that will ensure this movie honors the men of Hill 433. This story needs to be told but told well. Christopher is the man to do that.”

Wood, a graduate of the U.S. Air Force Academy who flew for the 20th Special Operations Squadron, tells the untold story of the soldiers on the hill who referred to themselves as the “lost bastards” of a mission that was kept a secret for over 50 years.

It’s a story of hardship, love, and heroism during the “Forgotten” Korean War as told by the children of Dick Carpenter, U.S. Army retired (deceased), his recollections, FOIA requests and discussions with veterans.

“What these men did should never be forgotten; they deserve our everlasting respect and gratitude.” said Richard Carpenter, Executive Producer and President of Lost Bastards Productions. He is also the son of the deceased hero of the story.

The radar tested eventually gave GIs the ability to spot the enemy and direct fire on the battlefield, providing a significant advantage during the war.

“Through this film, Lost Bastards, we wish to discover and remember the emotions of their past for the future of our new generation,” Lee added.

[mybooktable book=”lost-bastards” display=”summary” buybutton_shadowbox=”true”]

Lost Bastards, the true story of how

U.S. President Donald J. Trump (C), flanked by Gary Masino (L) of the Sheet Metal Workers Union, Telma Mata (2nd R) of the Heat and Frost Insulators Allied Workers Local 24 and United Brotherhood of Carpenters General President Doug McCarron (R), holds a roundtable meeting at the White House on Jan. 27. 2017. (Photo: Reuters)

U.S. President Donald J. Trump (C), flanked by Gary Masino (L) of the Sheet Metal Workers Union, Telma Mata (2nd R) of the Heat and Frost Insulators Allied Workers Local 24 and United Brotherhood of Carpenters General President Doug McCarron (R), holds a roundtable meeting at the White House on Jan. 27. 2017. (Photo: Reuters)

The National Federal of Independent Business (NFIB) said Tuesday its Small Business Optimism Index maintained most of its historic post-election gains. Still, the NFIB survey could weight heavy on the minds of senators as the hiccup in the House’s ability to repeal and replace ObamaCare in March clearly spooked owners.

“Small business owners were measurably shaken when Congress failed to address one of their most important concerns,” said NFIB President and CEO Juanita Duggan. “ObamaCare has crushed small businesses. Small business owners expected the White House and Congress to address that problem. Their failure to do so caused volatility in the Optimism Index.”

The index fell 0.2 points in April to 104.5, a smaller than expected decline from the highest level in 12 years.

“Expected business conditions is the most volatile component of the Index,” said NFIB Chief Economist Bill Dunkelberg. “Small business owners want Congress and the White House to address the high cost of health care, which has been their top concern for more than 30 years. When that effort failed in March, expectations for better business conditions collapsed.”

The Republican-controlled House narrowly passed the American Health Care Act (AHCA) last week to repeal most of ObamaCare. However, it remains to be seen if expectations for better business conditions will recover in the May.

“Congress and the White House must understand that small business owners are paying close attention, and they are making decisions that affect the economy based on how Washington performs,” said Duggan. “The drop in expected business conditions should be a warning to Washington that health care reform, regulatory reform, and tax reform have implications far bigger than politics.”

President Donald Trump quickly pushed the passage of the AHCA after it initially failed in order to move to tax reform, which Duggan said jumped to the top of the list of concerns among small business owners in the April survey. Twenty-one (21%) listed it as their single most important barrier to business growth.

“That should be a clear indication for Congress and the White House to finish health care reform and move quickly to tax reform,” she said. “The current tax code strongly favors large corporations over small businesses. Five of the top 10 concerns among small business owners are related to taxes. The tax system is a major burden for small businesses and an impediment to economic growth. Fixing that system must be an urgent priority for Congress and the White House.”

The National Federal of Independent Business (NFIB)

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., listens to questions on health care and the Republican effort to repeal ObamaCare. (Photo: Reuters)

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., listens to questions on health care and the Republican effort to repeal ObamaCare. (Photo: Reuters)

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kty., said “several sources” have told him that members of the Obama administration spied on him and other political opponents. The libertarian-leaning defender of privacy rights requested information from the intelligence community on whether he was surveilled, and asked President Donald J. Trump to “promptly investigate” the allegations in a formal probe.

“We’ve had several people come to us and say that it happened. I don’t have access to that information, but I’ve been very concerned that too many Americans’ information is being culled through without a warrant,” he told Breitbart News.

If true that political motivations were behind the surveillance, it would amount to a scandal that dwarfs Richard Nixon’s Watergate. Sen. Paul previously wrote a letter dated April 10 asking President Trump whether his name or the names of his congressional colleagues, their staffs or campaigns, were included in queries or searches of intelligence databases. He also asked if their identities were unmasked in any intelligence reports or documents.

“We have several sources telling us that members of the Obama administration were looking at politicians, particularly who were running for office,” Sen. Paul said previously at a CATO Institute speech.

Reports indicate Obama’s former national security advisor Susan Rice was at least behind the unmasking of her successor, Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, who was fired by President Trump after it was revealed he misled Vice President Mike Pence about a conversation he had with Russian Ambassador Sergei Kisylak. That information was illegally leaked to the Washington Post.

“How did General Flynn’s conversation get reported? They keep using the word incidental. Don’t let that let your guard down. There’s a million Americans having their phone calls recorded incidentally. It’s not just a no big deal to have your phone call recorded,” he said. “Particularly if someone in the intelligence community uses the media to destroy you. As an American citizen, I’m horrified that his private conversation was leaked.”

[brid video=”138602″ player=”2077″ title=”Rand Paul Several Sources Say Obama Spied on Me Political Candidates”]

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., the chairman of the subcommittee, had requested Rice participate in the hearing on Russia meddling in the U.S. election Monday, but she refused. James R. Clapper, the former Director of National Intelligence, did appear and stood by his previous assessment that there is no evidence of collusion between President Trump and Russia during the 2016 presidential election.

Sen. Paul had also called on Rice to testify to the dozens of requests she made to “unmask” the names of Trump’s transition officials caught up in surveillance. The intelligence reports in which Trump transition members were “unmasked” by Rice involve personal details unrelated to national security, PPD confirmed and reported in early March.

The content of the “highly detailed” reports are significant as congressional investigators probe whether the Obama administration used the cover of the legitimate surveillance to spy on the incoming administration. Circa News recently reported that members of Congress and their staffs have also been unmasked in NSA intelligence reports as frequently as once a month since President Obama loosened privacy protections back in 2011.

“I think it’s especially egregious if it’s happening to another branch of government, that one branch of government is spying on the other branch of government and you don’t really have checks and balances,” Sen. Paul said. “I can’t for the life of me think of any reason why I would be part of an investigation. And it also goes further to prove that maybe we have an intelligence community run amok if they’re looking at political figures, because I had nothing to do with any of the other things.”

An exclusive Circa report earlier last week revealed that DNI data show the Obama administration conducted more than 35,000 searches on NSA intercepts seeking information about Americans during the 2016 election cycle. Data from the DNI shows these requests increased more than 300% during the election, indicating intelligence officials were either dealing with an increased threat level or intelligence was being collected against political opponents.

[brid video=”138610″ player=”2077″ title=”Circa News Reporters on Potential Spying on Political Opponents By Obama Administration”]

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kty., said "several sources"

Former acting Attorney General Sally Yates and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper are sworn in before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on May 8. (Photo: Reuters)

Former acting Attorney General Sally Yates and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper are sworn in before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on May 8. (Photo: Reuters)

On Monday, James R. Clapper, the former Director of National Intelligence, and former acting attorney general Sally Yates testified at the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism.

It was a circus, a sideshow.

The House and Senate investigations into Russia meddling in the 2016 presidential election have officially become a total charade. In a very short time, it has done enormous damage to the nation and lawmakers should leave all further inquiries to the professionals at the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).

Military-industrial complex Republicans are shamefully using it as a false Crisis and Leviathan to gin up support for making an already out-of-control surveillance state even more dangerous to U.S. citizens. Worse still, Democrats have failed to prove their grossly premature and outrageous claim there was collusion between President Donald Trump and Russian officials.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., should be ashamed of charges he leveled against Roger Stone and others during his opening statement. There is something fundamentally anti-American about cowardly hiding behind Senate slander protections and trashing U.S. citizens who you won’t even permit to face their accusers at a hearing.

As has been established, this claim Stone suspiciously predicted hacks and documents dumps is flimsy, irresponsible and beneath the history of the upper chamber.

The only crimes discussed during the Senate hearing were the illegal leaks of classified information to The Washington Post, and what is increasingly likely to be unlawful unmasking of U.S. citizens caught up in shady surveillance. Recent revelations that the Obama Administration may have used the cover of legitimate surveillance to spy on political opponents is an affront to the Fourth Amendment.

Yet, the person we know has knowledge of at least one of these crimes, Susan Rice, refused to appear before the subcommittee.

Americans would never know it from the media coverage, but the major headlines out of the hearing came from Mr. Clapper. America’s former top spy who headed up the probe ordered by Barack Obama stood by his previous assessment that there is no evidence of collusion between President Trump and Russia during the 2016 presidential election.

If there’s evidence, we want to see it. There’s isn’t any, which is why Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, did not even bother to bring it up. They also sit on the Senate Intelligence Committee and have access to raw data, which he said helps to fill in the gaps, but what he really means is that it exposes

Feinstein admitted as recent as last week that the story is a fiction.

But Democrats just want us to forget their delusional allegations of treason and calls for impeachment over something that never happened. At this point, they are just throwing $h!t at the wall to see if it sticks.

Think about how crazy this is, America. This truly fake news story started with Democrats alleging the Russians “hacked the election,” which they did not. At what point do we say they are no longer permitted to write and rewrite history? What will Democrats and the corrupt corporate media do with this hate and division that they have sown during their twisted search of facts to support their premature conclusions?

With the “collusion” claim blowing up in their face, Democrats are now trying to pivot to Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn misleading Vice President Mike Pence over his call with a Russian ambassador. Flynn, who was cleared by the FBI on this matter, is completely irrelevent to the current discussion. He’s been fired, ousted, run out of town.

Yates pretended for hours at the hearing that her main concern was whether Mr. Flynn had been truthful to Mr. Pence.

Is anyone really that stupid to think Pence’s ignorance was her top concern? Yates is an Obama loyalist who has the dubious distinction of being the first attorney general or acting AG ever to be fired for overruling the Office of Legal Counsel at the Department of Justice (DoJ). She didn’t refuse to defend the President’s executive order out of principle.

She’s a partisan hack. Nothing more, nothing less.

This nation has become so paralyzed by politics we are now incapable of addressing any serious issue in the public forum in a bipartisan manner. Russia has long tried to interfere with U.S. elections and we have long done the same to them. Mr. Clapper was right to suggest the U.S. treat it’s electoral system as “critical infrastructure,” but that will never happen.

Ironically, Democrats have given Vladimir Putin exactly what he wanted.

Rival nation states seek to destabilize the domestic politics of their rivals and call into question the credibility of the regime.

To that end: Well done, Mr. Putin.

The House and Senate investigations into Russia

People's Pundit Daily
You have %%pigeonMeterAvailable%% free %%pigeonCopyPage%% remaining this month. Get unlimited access and support reader-funded, independent data journalism.

Start a 14-day free trial now. Pay later!

Start Trial