Widget Image
Follow PPD Social Media
Friday, February 7, 2025
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 430)

President Barack Obama gives his farewell speech in Chicago on January 10, 2017. (Photo: 2017)

President Barack Obama gives his farewell speech in Chicago on January 10, 2017. (Photo: 2017)

President Barack Obama’s decision to commute the sentence of convicted traitor Chelsea Manning, formerly Bradley Manning, is earning bipartisan condemnation. Mr. Obama commuted Chelsea Manning’s 35-year sentence for leaking classified U.S. Army documents to WikiLeaks, making May 17, 2017 his new release date.

“I think it’s dead wrong. Absolutely dead wrong,” Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., told Chuck Todd on MSNBC’s “Meet the Press Daily” Tuesday night. “This is treason, espionage at the highest level. What Private Manning did, she should serve out her sentence. We’re going to give a green light to people basically with all the hacking going on.”

In 2010, Bradley Manning was arrested and later revealed after being convicted of espionage that he identified as a woman. Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., echoed his Democratic colleague and hails from a very different region of the country. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said the decision was a “grave mistake.”

“It is a sad, yet perhaps fitting commentary on President Obama’s failed national security policies that he would commute the sentence of an individual that endangered the lives of American troops, diplomats, and intelligence sources by leaking hundreds of thousands of sensitive government documents to Wikileaks, a virulently anti-American organization that was a tool of Russia’s recent interference in our elections.”

Manning has thus far served more than 6 years into his sentence at the military prison at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas for leaking classified government and military documents to the anti-secrecy group. The Obama administration originally weighed whether the U.S. government would seek the death penalty for Private Manning.

Bradley Manning, left, was arrested in 2010 and later revealed after being convicted of espionage that he identifies as a woman, Chelsea Manning, right.

Bradley Manning, left, was arrested in 2010 and later revealed after being convicted of espionage that he identifies as a woman, Chelsea Manning, right.

“It is shameful that President Obama is siding with lawbreakers and the ACLU against the men and women who work every day to defend our nation and safeguard U.S. government secrets,” Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla, said in a statement after the decision.

House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., blasted the decision, calling it “outrageous.”

“Chelsea Manning’s treachery put American lives at risk and exposed some of our nation’s most sensitive secrets. President Obama now leaves in place a dangerous precedent that those who compromise our national security won’t be held accountable for their crimes,” Speaker Ryan said in prepared statement.

The U.S. government confirmed that material leaked out by Bradley Manning was found in Osama bin Laden’s hideout during the raid that ended in his demise. The government has also operated under the assumption that the leak cost Americans their lives.

The Department of Justice also objected to the decision, responding with a request of two year sentence. They said employees of the U.S. government are entrusted each day with sensitive classified information and must be taught a lesson to prevent the loss of further life.

“They must understand that disclosing such information to persons not authorized to receive it has severe consequences,” prosecutors wrote in a sentencing memorandum filed this month.

The White House said that Manning is one of 209 inmates whose sentences President Obama is commuting only a few short days before leaving office. He is also pardoning 64 people, including retired Gen. James Cartwright, who was charged with making false statements during a probe into disclosure of classified information. But it also includes a Puerto Rican terrorist and toss to the Castro Regime in Cuba.

President Barack Obama's decision to commute the

In this April 2, 2016, file photo, former President George H. W. Bush waves as he arrives at NRG Stadium before the NCAA Final Four tournament college basketball semifinal game between Villanova and Oklahoma in Houston. Houston-area media are quoting former President George H.W. Bush's chief of staff as saying that Bush has been hospitalized in Houston. (Photo: AP)

In this April 2, 2016, file photo, former President George H. W. Bush waves as he arrives at NRG Stadium before the NCAA Final Four tournament college basketball semifinal game between Villanova and Oklahoma in Houston. Houston-area media are quoting former President George H.W. Bush’s chief of staff as saying that Bush has been hospitalized in Houston. (Photo: AP)

George H.W. Bush has been hospitalized at Houston Methodist Hospital in Texas, according to his Chief of Staff Jean Becker. The 43rd president is reportedly in stable condition and “doing fine.” He is expected to leave the hospital in a few days and was taken to the hospital after complaining of a shortness in breathe.

President Bush, 92, has a form of Parkinson’s disease and uses a motorized scooter or a wheelchair for mobility. He is the oldest living former president.

The Republican served two terms as Vice President to President Ronald Reagan before being elected as his successor president in 1988. He was defeated by former President Bill Clinton in 1992.

George H.W. Bush has been hospitalized at

[brid video=”106601″ player=”2077″ title=”Tucker Carlson Exposes Fake Protestor Group in Craziest Interview Yet”]

Tucker Carlson interviewed someone purporting to be from the web site DemandProtest.com, which is technically an actual website run by a fake company. According to the web site’s record on Whois.icann.org, it was created on 2 December 2016 and there is no such record for Demand Protest LLC, which the web site also claimed to be copyrighted under.

However, they’ve received an enormous amount of attention by a gullible mainstream media who didn’t bother to do any actual journalism before giving them a platform or a voice. They claimed to be paying $2,500 to people willing to protest against President-elect Donald J. Trump at the inauguration.

Not Tucker.

“So, this is a sham. Your company isn’t real. Your website is fake,”  Carlson said. “The claims you have made are lies. This is a hoax.”

When presented with the results of a background check, “Dom Tullipso” devolved into strange rantings about freeing Payton Manning, which of course is a play off of Chelsea Manning who was just commuted by President Barack Obama for leaking classified documents to WikiLeaks.

Tucker Carlson interviewed someone purporting to be

Markeith Loyd, 41, has been identified as the suspect in the murder of an Orlando police office outside of Walmart. (Photos: Courtesy of the Orlando Police Department)

Markeith Loyd, 41, has been identified as the suspect in the murder of an Orlando police office outside of Walmart. (Photos: Courtesy of the Orlando Police Department)

Markeith Loyd, the man suspected of shooting and killing Orlando police Master Sgt. Debra Clayton, has been arrested and is currently in custody. After a nine-day manhunt, authorities had just announced they increased the reward for his capture to $125,000 and the U.S. Marshals Service added Loyd to its top 15 most-wanted fugitives list.

“We’ve got him! Markeith Loyd in OPD Custody,” the OPD tweeted. “Details to come.”

“This is a man who gunned down a pregnant woman and a police officer who was doing her job to protect our community,” Chief John Mina said Tuesday afternoon. “I think every law enforcement officer in Central Florida is actively looking for him.”

The FBI, Homeland Security, Florida Department of Law Enforcement and U.S. Marshals Service are all involved in the effort along with local agencies to find Loyd, whom they believed might have changed his appearance to evade capture.

A shopper had tipped off Master Sgt. Clayton — who was putting bags in the trunk of her vehicle — that Loyd was in the Walmart waiting to check out. As the officer walked towards the store, the suspect barged out and fired at least 12 shots.

Loyd, 41, was accused of murdering his pregnant girlfriend Sade Dixon in December and a warrant had been issued for his arrest. The FBI, Homeland Security, Florida Department of Law Enforcement and U.S. Marshals Service are all involved in the effort along with local agencies to find Loyd.

Loyd has a long wrap sheet and extensive criminal history. On Nov. 30, he wrote on his Facebook page, “Goals!!!! To be on Americas most wanted.”

On Dec. 13, Loyd had gone to his girlfriend’s home on Long Peak Drive and began banging on the door. When Dixon answered, he shot her and her 26-year-old brother, Ronald Steward. He was critically wounded and five other people were home at the time of the shooting, including Dixon’s 5- and 7-year-old children.

Orange County Sheriff Deputy Jerry Demings said a motorcycle deputy was killed in a crash with a 78-year-old driver during the manhunt effort to capture the suspect. Worth noting, that particular Monday was Law Enforcement Appreciation Day. Master Sgt. Clayton was one of the first officers to respond to the mass shooting at the Pulse nightclub in June that left 49 people dead and more than 50 injured. Chief Mina called Clayton, a mother of two, a hero.

Chief Mina also maintained Loyd received help on the lamb even after detectives arrested three people just this week who are accused of helping him avoid arrest before Clayton was killed. Loyd’s niece, Lakensha Smith-Loyd, and his ex-girlfriend, Jameis Slaughter, each faces a charge of accessory after the fact to first-degree murder.

Markeith Loyd, the man suspected of shooting

Bradley Manning, left, was arrested in 2010 and later revealed after being convicted of espionage that he identifies as a woman, Chelsea Manning, right.

Bradley Manning, left, was arrested in 2010 and later revealed after being convicted of espionage that he identifies as a woman, Chelsea Manning, right.

President Barack Obama commuted Chelsea Manning’s 35-year sentence for leaking U.S. Army documents to WikiLeaks, making May 17, 2017 his release date. The release of the former solider is a stunningly hypocritical development at a time Democrats are crowing about protection of national security and condemnation of the anti-secrecy group.

In 2010, Bradley Manning was arrested and later revealed after being convicted of espionage that he identified as a woman. Manning has served more than 6 years into his sentence at the military prison at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas for leaking classified government and military documents to WikiLeaks. The Obama administration originally weighed whether the U.S. government would seek the death penalty for Manning.

House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said Mr. Obama’s decision was “outrageous” and Manning’s leak was an act of “treachery.”

“Chelsea Manning’s treachery put American lives at risk and exposed some of our nation’s most sensitive secrets,” he said in a statement. “President Obama now leaves in place a dangerous precedent that those who compromise our national security won’t be held accountable for their crimes.”

The Department of Justice also objected to the decision, responding with a request of two year sentence. They said employees of the U.S. government are entrusted each day with sensitive classified information and must be taught a lesson to prevent the loss of further life.

“They must understand that disclosing such information to persons not authorized to receive it has severe consequences,” prosecutors wrote in a sentencing memorandum filed this month.

The White House said that Manning is one of 209 inmates whose sentences President Obama is commuting only a few short days before leaving office. He is also pardoning 64 people, including retired Gen. James Cartwright, who was charged with making false statements during a probe into disclosure of classified information.

Meanwhile, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange finds himself in a precarious situation.

Last week, Mr. Assange said on that he would give up his sanctuary at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London if Barack Obama showed “clemency” to the whistleblower-leaker (debatable). He has been held up in the Embassy for more than four years to avoid extradition to Sweden, where he faces sexual assault charges. But he could also face possible espionage charges in the United States.

“If Obama grants Manning clemency Assange will agree to US extradition despite clear unconstitutionality of DoJ case,” WikiLeaks tweeted.

There was no word on whether or not he will be making good on that compromise. But the group did tweet out another statement claiming to be from the founder and editor, which thanked supporters.

“Thank you to everyone who campaigned for Chelsea Manning’s clemency,” WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said in a message posted to Twitter. “Your courage & determination made the impossible possible.”

In a conference call with White House reporters, an official said the decision to grant a commutation to Manning was not influence anyway by Mr. Assange.

President Barack Obama commuted Chelsea Manning's 35-year

Markeith Loyd, 41, has been identified as the suspect in the murder of an Orlando police office outside of Walmart. (Photos: Courtesy of the Orlando Police Department)

Markeith Loyd, 41, has been identified as the suspect in the murder of an Orlando police office outside of Walmart. (Photos: Courtesy of the Orlando Police Department)

Authorities are now offering a $125,000 reward for anyone who helps to capture the man suspected of shooting and killing Orlando police Master Sgt. Debra Clayton. The Orlando Police Department said Tuesday that investigators were still looking for Markeith Loyd, whom they believed may have changed his appearance to evade capture.

UPDATE: Orlando Cop-Killer Markeith Loyd Arrested

Chief John Mina said the U.S. Marshals Service has added Loyd to its top 15 most-wanted fugitives list, adding that he may have shaved his head since he was last seen. The above photo was provided by the Orlando Police Department as a rendering of what he may look like bald.

OPD released a “more complete physical description” of fugitive Loyd, estimating his height at 6′-6’3″ and weight between 180 to 200 pounds. They say he has a muscular build and a raised scar on left hand. Crimeline has received about 1,400 tips in the nine days following the murder.

Loyd, 41, was accused of murdering his pregnant girlfriend Sade Dixon in December and a warrant had been issued for his arrest. The FBI, Homeland Security, Florida Department of Law Enforcement and U.S. Marshals Service are all involved in the effort along with local agencies to find Loyd.

A shopper had tipped off Master Sgt. Clayton — who was putting bags in the trunk of her vehicle — that Loyd was in the Walmart waiting to check out. As the officer walked towards the store, the suspect barged out and fired at least 12 shots.

Loyd has a long wrap sheet and extensive criminal history. On Nov. 30, he wrote on his Facebook page, “Goals!!!! To be on Americas most wanted.”

On Dec. 13, Loyd had gone to his girlfriend’s home on Long Peak Drive and began banging on the door. When Dixon answered, he shot her and her 26-year-old brother, Ronald Steward. He was critically wounded and five other people were home at the time of the shooting, including Dixon’s 5- and 7-year-old children.

Orange County Sheriff Deputy Jerry Demings said a motorcycle deputy was killed in a crash with a 78-year-old driver during the manhunt effort to capture the suspect. Worth noting, that particular Monday was Law Enforcement Appreciation Day. Master Sgt. Clayton was one of the first officers to respond to the mass shooting at the Pulse nightclub in June that left 49 people dead and more than 50 injured. Chief Mina called Clayton, a mother of two, a hero.

Chief Mina also maintains Loyd continues to receive help on the lamb even after detectives arrested three people just this week who are accused of helping him avoid arrest before Clayton was killed. Loyd’s niece, Lakensha Smith-Loyd, and his ex-girlfriend, Jameis Slaughter, each faces a charge of accessory after the fact to first-degree murder.

The reward for Markeith Loyd, the suspect

President-elect Donald Trump, Vice-President-elect Mike Pence and House Speaker Paul Ryan wave at a rally Tuesday, Dec. 13, 2016, in West Allis, Wis. (Photo: AP)

President-elect Donald Trump, Vice-President-elect Mike Pence and House Speaker Paul Ryan wave at a rally Tuesday, Dec. 13, 2016, in West Allis, Wis. (Photo: AP)

In the world of tax policy, there’s an intense debate about the “border-adjustable” provision that is part of the tax plan put forth by House Republicans, which basically would tax imports and exempt revenues generated by exports.

It’s a bit wonky, but the simplest explanation is that GOPers want to replace the current corporate income tax with a “destination-based cash flow tax” (DBCFT) that would – for all intents and purposes – tax what is consumed in the United States rather than what is produced in the United States.

I’m very sympathetic to what Republicans are trying to accomplish, particularly their desire to eliminate the tax bias against income that is saved and invested. But I greatly prefer the version of consumption-base taxation found in the flat tax.

My previous columns on the plan have highlighted the following concerns.

  • Left-leaning advocates like “destination-based” tax systems such as the DBCFT because such systems undermine tax competition and give politicians more ability to increase tax rates.
  • The “border adjustability” in the plan is contrary to the rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and there’s a significant risk that politicians might try to “fix” the plan by turning it into a value-added tax.

Here’s what I said about the proposal in a recent interview for CNBC.

VIDEO

This provision is not in Trump’s plan, but I’ve been acting on the assumption that the soon-to-be President eventually would embrace the Better Way Plan simply because it presumably would appeal to his protectionist sentiments.

So I’m quite surprised that he’s just poured cold water on the plan. Here are some excerpts from a report in the Wall Street Journal.

President-elect Donald Trump criticized a cornerstone of House Republicans’ corporate-tax plan… The measure, known as border adjustment, would tax imports and exempt exports as part of a broader plan to encourage companies to locate jobs and production in the U.S. But Mr. Trump, in his first comments on the subject, called it “too complicated.” “Anytime I hear border adjustment, I don’t love it,” Mr. Trump said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal on Friday. …Retailers and oil refiners have lined up against the measure, warning it would drive up their tax bills and force them to raise prices because they rely so heavily on imported goods.

If we read between the lines, it appears that Trump may be more knowledgeable about policy than people think.

Proponents of the Better Way Plan sometimes use protectionist-sounding rhetoric to sell the plan (e.g., taxing imports, exempting exports), but they argue that it’s not really protectionist because the dollar will become more valuable.

But Trump apparently understands this nuance and doesn’t like that outcome.

Independent analyses of the Republican tax plan say it would lead the dollar to appreciate further—which would lower the cost of imported goods, offsetting the effects of the tax on retailers and others. In his interview with the Journal on Friday, Mr. Trump said the U.S. dollar was already “too strong” in part because China holds down its currency, the yuan. “Our companies can’t compete with them now because our currency is too strong. And it’s killing us.”

I don’t agree with Trump about trade deficits (which, after all, are mostly the result of foreigners wanting to invest in the American economy), but that’s a separate issue.

When I talk to policy makers and journalists about this issue, one of the most common questions is why the DBCFT would cause the dollar to rise.

In a column for the Wall Street Journal, Martin Feldstein addresses that topic.

…as every student of economics learns, a country’s trade deficit depends only on the difference between total investment in the country and the saving done by its households, businesses and government. This textbook rule that “imports minus exports equals investment minus savings” is not a theory or a statistical regularity but a basic national income accounting identity that holds for every country in every year. That holds because a rise in a country’s investment without an equal rise in saving means that it must import more or export less. Since a border tax adjustment wouldn’t change U.S. national saving or investment, it cannot change the size of the trade deficit. To preserve that original trade balance, the exchange rate of the dollar must adjust to bring the prices of U.S. imports and exports back to the values that would prevail without the border tax adjustment. With a 20% corporate tax rate, that means that the value of the dollar must rise by 25%.

This is a reasonable description, though keep in mind that there are lots of factors that drive exchange rates, so I understand why importers are very nervous about the proposal.

By the way, Feldstein makes one point that rubs me the wrong way.

The tax plan developed by the House Republicans is similar in many ways to President-elect Trump’s plan but has one additional favorable feature—a border tax adjustment that exempts exports and taxes imports. This would give the U.S. the benefit that other countries obtain from a value-added tax (VAT) but without imposing that extra levy on domestic transactions.

The first sentence of the excerpt is correct, but not the second one. A value-added tax does not give nations any sort of trade benefit. Yes, that kind of tax generally is “border adjustable” under WTO rules, but as I’ve previously noted, that doesn’t give foreign production an advantage over American production.

Here’s some of what I wrote about this issue last year.

For mercantilists worried about trade deficits, “border adjustability” is seen as a positive feature. But not only are they wrong on trade, they do not understand how a VAT works. …Under current law, American goods sold in America do not pay a VAT, but neither do German-produced goods that are sold in America. Likewise, any American-produced goods sold in Germany are hit be a VAT, but so are German-produced goods. In other words, there is a level playing field. The only difference is that German politicians seize a greater share of people’s income. So what happens if America adopts a VAT? The German government continues to tax American-produced goods in Germany, just as it taxes German-produced goods sold in Germany. …In the United States, there is a similar story. There is now a tax on imports, including imports from Germany. But there is an identical tax on domestically-produced goods. And since the playing field remains level, protectionists will be disappointed. The only winners will be politicians since they have more money to spend.

If you want more information, I also discuss the trade impact of a VAT in this video.

For what it’s worth, even Paul Krugman agrees with me on this point.

Part three of economist Dan Mitchell's look

Wall-Street-NYC

The corner of Wall Street in New York City.

Mancur Olson (1932-1998) was a great economist who came up with a very useful analogy to help explain the behavior of many governments. He pointed out that a “roving bandit” has an incentive to maximize short-run plunder by stealing everything from victims (i.e. a 100 percent tax rate), whereas a “stationary bandit” has an incentive to maximize long-run plunder by stealing just a portion of what victims produce every year (i.e., the revenue-maximizing tax rate).

Tyler Cowen of George Mason University elaborates on this theory in this very helpful video.

As you can see, Olson’s theory mostly is used to analyze and explain the behavior of autocratic governments. Now let’s apply these lessons to political behavior in modern democracies.

I wrote last year about a field of economic theory called “public choice” to help explain how and why the democratic process often generates bad results. Simply stated, politicians and special interests have powerful incentives to use government coercion to enrich themselves while ordinary taxpayers and consumers have a much smaller incentive to fight against that kind of plunder.

But what’s the best way to think about these politicians and interest groups? Are they roving bandits or stationary bandits?

The answer is both. To the extent that they think their power is temporary, they’ll behave like roving bandits, extracting as much money from taxpayers and consumers as possible.

Though if you think of democracies as duopolies, with two parties and rotating control of government, then each party will also behave like a stationary bandit, understanding that it’s not a good idea to strangle the goose that lays the golden eggs.

And this is one of the reasons why I’m a big fan of “tax competition.” Simply stated, politicians and special interests constrain their greed when they know that potential victims have the ability to escape.

Here’s a report from the Wall Street Journal that is a perfect example of my argument.

Germany could reduce its corporate tax rate in the wake of similar moves in the U.K. and the U.S., German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble said. Europe’s largest economy should simplify its complex tax system for companies in order to…remain competitive internationally, Mr. Schäuble told The Wall Street Journal in an interview. He also said that while Germany opposed beggar-thy-neighbor tax competition between mature industrial nations, Berlin would also consider cutting tax rates if necessary.

And such steps may be necessary. In other words, Germany may reduce tax rates, not because politicians want to do the right thing, but rather because they fear they’ll lose jobs and investment (i.e., sources of tax revenue) to other jurisdictions.

U.S. President-elect Donald Trump has said he would like to cut the corporate tax rate from 35% to 15% as part of a broader tax overhaul. In November, U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May said the main corporate rate there should fall from 20% to 17% by 2020. These followed announcements about corporate tax-rate cuts by Japan, Canada, Italy and France.

Let’s look at another example.

I made the economic case for Brexit in large part because the European Union is controlled by anti-tax competition bureaucrats and politicians in Brussels.

Well, it appears that the British vote for independence is already paying dividends as seen by comments from the U.K.’s Chancellor of the Exchequer.

Philip Hammond warned yesterday that the Government will come out fighting with tax cuts if the EU tries to wound Britain by refusing a trade deal. …Yesterday, Mr Hammond was asked by a German newspaper if the UK could become a tax haven by further lowering corporation tax in order to attract businesses if Brussels denies a deal. In his strongest language yet on Brexit, the Chancellor said he was optimistic a reciprocal deal on market access could be struck… But he added: …‘In this case, we could be forced to change our economic model and we will have to change our model to regain competitiveness. And you can be sure we will do whatever we have to do. …We will change our model, and we will come back, and we will be competitively engaged.’ …Earlier this year Mrs May committed Britain to having the lowest corporation tax of the world’s 20 biggest economies. The intention is a rate of 17 per cent by 2020.

In other words, yet another case of politicians doing the right thing because of tax competition.

The stationary bandits described by Olson are being forced to adopt better tax policy.

So it’s very appropriate to close with some wise counsel from a Wall Street Journal editorial.

The EU needs more tax competition from government vying to stimulate business investment. …The real tax-policy scandal is that so few European governments understand there’s a cause-and-effect relationship between oppressive tax rates and low economic growth.

P.S. Since we’re looking at tax competition, Europe, and bandits, keep in mind there’s considerable academic work showing that Europe became a rich continent precisely because there were many small nations that competed with each other. Those jurisdictions felt pressure to adopt good policy because the various leaders wanted lots of economic activity to tax. All of which helps to explain why modern statists are so hostile to decentralization and federalism.

The roving bandit (government) has an inventive

Travelers are evacuated out of the terminal and onto the tarmac after airport shooting at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport. (Photo: Reuters)

Travelers are evacuated out of the terminal and onto the tarmac after airport shooting at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport. (Photo: Reuters)

Fort Lauderdale, Florida (PPD)–Esteban Santiago, the man opened fire at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport killing 5 people, told told FBI agents he carried out the attack on behalf of ISIS. FBI special agent Michael Ferlazzo testified at the bond hearing Tuesday, at which he said only that Santiago claimed to be fighting for ISIS and had been in touch with like-minded people via jihadi chat rooms who were planning attacks as well.

“He has admitted to all of the facts with respect to the terrible and tragic events of Jan. 6,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Rick Del Toro told the court. “These were vulnerable victims who he shot down methodically.”

The charges against Santiago include performing an act of violence at an airport and three violations related to firearms, which could carry the death penalty if convicted. The defense did not argue the prosecution’s assertion that Santiago posed a flight risk, as well as a danger to the community. His public defender, Robert Berube, said Santiago would not contest the pretrial detention order.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Lurana Snow ruled Santiago would be held without bond and set a Jan. 30 arraignment date for him to enter a formal plea.

Santiago, 26, brought a gun in a checked bag on a Delta Airlines flight from Anchorage, Alaska, where he had been living after serving in the U.S. Army National Guard. National Guard spokesman Major Paul Dahlen said Santiago deployed to Iraq in 2010 as part of the Puerto Rico National Guard, spending a year with an engineering battalion.

People’s Pundit Daily reported he was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Division (CID) multiple times.  Sources said Santiago visited the FBI field office in Anchorage in November and told agents that U.S. intelligence agencies had infiltrated his mind and were forcing him to watch ISIS propaganda videos.

The FBI transferred him to law enforcement to be checked for mental health concerns. The complete results of the general welfare check are unknown, though the U.S. Department of Homeland Security was brought into a joint-agency background investigation.

Esteban Santiago, the man opened fire at

President-elect Donald Trump calls out to the media as he and Betsy DeVos pose for photographs at Trump National Golf Club Bedminster clubhouse in Bedminster, N.J., Saturday, Nov. 19, 2016. (Photo: AP)

President-elect Donald Trump calls out to the media as he and Betsy DeVos pose for photographs at Trump National Golf Club Bedminster clubhouse in Bedminster, N.J., Saturday, Nov. 19, 2016. (Photo: AP)

Betsy DeVos, President-elect Donald J. Trump’s nominee for education secretary, will face questions from the most liberal Democrats in the U.S. Senate.

On Tuesday, Mrs. DeVos will step into the spotlight before sitting in the hot seat to face off with the most leftwing members of the Senate HELP Committee. It will also be the first time she will speak publicly for the time on issues ranging from student loans to school choice. The Democratic names on the HELP committee include Sens. Al Franken, of Minnesota, Bernie Sanders, of Vermont, Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island and Tim Kaine of Virginia.

Ms. DeVos, a leader in the choice movement, education advocate and philanthropist, has pushed for national education reform for more than two decades. A Michigan native, she spent more than two decades helping unprivileged children gain quality education and advocating for school choice. DeVos served as the chairwoman of the American Federation for Children, whose mission is to “improve our nation’s K-12 education by advancing systemic and sustainable public policy that empowers parents, particularly those in low-income families, to choose the education they determine is best for their children.”

Yet, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren claimed in a letter to DeVos that she lacked the experience to lead the agency.

“There is no precedent for an Education Department Secretary nominee with your lack of experience in public education,” Sen. Warren wrote.

While it’s true DeVos has never held elected office, Democrats’ objections to Mrs. DeVos are less about her experience and more about their campaign contributions and ideological differences with her. Immediately after the president-elect confirmed the nomination, some of the party’s biggest donating organizations let loose.

“The president-elect, in his selection of Betsy DeVos, has chosen the most ideological, anti-public education nominee put forward since President Carter created a Cabinet-level Department of Education,” American Federation of Teachers (AFT) President Randi Weingarten said in a statement. “In nominating DeVos, Trump makes it loud and clear that his education policy will focus on privatizing, defunding and destroying public education in America.”

As a matter of fact, charter schools are in fact public schools, by definition. Further, even a brief look at the group’s recent press statements reveals they are in lock-step on leftwing issues far beyond those concerning education.

But Republicans on the Hill also feel the issue was litigated during the election and voters overwhelmingly made their decision, not only giving them the White House but full control of both houses of Congress. President-elect Trump made education reform an issue on the campaign trail, even repeatedly visiting inner-cities where he touted his plan to proliferate school choice programs.

“I share President-elect Trump’s view that it’s time to shift the debate from what the system thinks is best for kids to what moms and dads want, expect and deserve,” Mrs. DeVos said in a prepared response.

Yet, knowing the tough questions she is sure to face, a review of her prepared remarks makes clear DeVos will unapologetically call for major reforms to failing public schools.

“If confirmed, I will be a strong advocate for great public schools,” she says. “But, if a school is troubled, or unsafe, or not a good fit for a child – perhaps they have a special need that is going unmet — we should support a parent’s right to enroll their child in a high quality alternative.”

“It’s really pretty simple.”

Betsy DeVos, President-elect Donald J. Trump's nominee

People's Pundit Daily
You have %%pigeonMeterAvailable%% free %%pigeonCopyPage%% remaining this month. Get unlimited access and support reader-funded, independent data journalism.

Start a 14-day free trial now. Pay later!

Start Trial