Widget Image
Follow PPD Social Media
Saturday, February 8, 2025
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 475)

FBI Director James Comey, left, speaks during a press conference on July 5, 2016, while Hillary Clinton, right, followed by aide Huma Abedin, to her right, at Andrews Air Force Base on July 5, 2016. (Photos: AP)

FBI Director James Comey, left, speaks during a press conference on July 5, 2016, while Hillary Clinton, right, followed by aide Huma Abedin, to her right, at Andrews Air Force Base on July 5, 2016. (Photos: AP)

Sources at the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) say Director James Comey prevented agents from properly investigating former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton over her improper use of a private email server to transmit classified intelligence. Mr. Comey did not move forward with requests for subpoenas and refused a request to obtain Mrs. Clinton’s medical records to verify her answers during the roughtly 3-hour interview conducted at her home.

According to an interview transcript given to The Daily Caller, which was provided by an intermediary who spoke to two federal agents with the Bureau last Friday, Director Comey “stood in the way” of the investigation and a subsequent recommendation to the Justice Department by the FBI to prosecute Mrs. Clinton. The agents, which may or may not be the same sources for a separate report being developed by People’s Pundit Daily, are furious Director Comey has led the Bureau into an era of politicization.

Director Comey said during his press conference and again during his testimony to the Oversight Committee in the House of Representatives that the decision was unanimous. But sources tell People’s Pundit Daily, and apparently The Daily Caller, as well, the decision not to prosecute was far from unanimous.

“This is a textbook case where a grand jury should have convened but was not. That is appalling,” said one FBI special agent, who has public corruption and criminal cases under their belt. “We talk about it in the office and don’t know how Comey can keep going.”

Agents had also suspected from the unprecedented set of “do and do not” rules given to them during the probe that the fix was in and began leaking details to People’s Pundit Daily (among others) during the summer.

“All the trained investigators agree that there is a lot to be prosecuted but he stood in the way,” the agent said, adding that he left out standard procedures that are never ignored by federal investigators conducting such a probe.

“We didn’t search their house,” he lamented. “There should have been a complete search of their residence. That the FBI did not seize devices is unbelievable. The FBI even seizes devices that have been set on fire.”

As a result, the FBI failed to procure enough evidence to convene a grand jury, at least that was the excuse. According to the agent, the investigation should not have concluded as it did. As Judge Andrew Napolitano and others have repeatedly suggested, the director overstepped his authority and avoided the proper channels that would have taken the outcome out of his hands.

“This is a textbook case where a grand jury should have been convened, but was not,” the agent insisted.

According to another special agent, investigators were livid when Director Comey’ use of the word “we” when testifying to lawmakers in Congress following the decision. The agent for the bureau that worked counter-terrorism and criminal cases said he is offended by Comey’s saying “we” and “I’ve been an investigator.”

“Comey was never an investigator or special agent. The special agents are trained investigators and they are insulted that Comey included them in ‘collective we’ statements in his testimony to imply that the SAs agreed that there was nothing there to prosecute,” the second agent said. “All the trained investigators agree that there is a lot to prosecuted but he stood in the way.”

He added, “The idea that [the Clinton/e-mail case] didn’t go to a grand jury is ridiculous.”

Joe DiGenova, a D.C.-based attorney told WMAL radio’s Drive at Five last week that agents “are starting to talk” and more will become public soon.

“People inside the Bureau are furious. They are embarrassed. They feel like they are being led by a hack but more than that that they think he’s a crook. They think he’s fundamentally dishonest. They have no confidence in him. The bureau inside right now is a mess,” he said. “The most important thing of all is that the agents have decided that they are going to talk.”

Multiple sources at the FBI are have

Hillary_Clinton_Libya_Trip

Then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton works from a desk inside a C-17 military plane following her departure from Malta, in the Mediterranean Sea, bound for Tripoli, Libya, Oct.18, 2011. (Photo: Kevin Lamarque – Associated Press)

Newly obtained emails between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and IT specialist Bryan Pagliano contradict her sworn statement under oath. The emails, which were among those work-related and not handed in to the State Department by Mrs. Clinton, were recovered by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and obtained as a result of a September 3, 2015 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit.

“These new emails leave little doubt that Hillary Clinton was less than forthright and misled the public when she wrote, under oath, that she ‘couldn’t recall’ communicating with Bryan Pagliano about her email scheme,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “No wonder Clinton and her agents deleted these emails time and time again. And these smoking gun emails would never have seen the light of day but for Judicial Watch’s federal lawsuits.”

The lawsuit was filed by the government watchdog group Judicial Watch after the State Department failed to comply with an August 5, 2015 FOIA request seeking information about Mr. Pagliano’s involvement with Mrs. Clinton’s private email server. Mr. Pagliano pleaded the Fifth to Congress before the FBI gave him immunity for his cooperation. Last week, Secretary Clinton, now the Democratic nominee for president, claimed under oath to Judicial Watch that she “does not recall having communications” with Mr. Pagliano relating to the email system.

“Secretary Clinton states that she does not recall having communications with Bryan Pagliano concerning or relating to the management, preservation, deletion, or destruction of any e-mails in her clintonemail.com email account,” the former secretary’s sworn testimony reads.

Judicial Watch has also deposed Bryan Pagliano, and in June he again invoked his Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself. In fact, he did so more than 125 times, including:

Q. During your tenure at the State Department, did you communicate with Secretary Clinton by e-mail?

A. On the advice of counsel, I will decline to answer your question in reliance on my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

However, the emails to Mr. Pagliano, who installed and maintained the private “home brew” server in Mrs. Clinton’s New York home, were sent from Mrs. Clinton, herself. They relate to email management problems with Clinton’s BlackBerry, one of many that were smashed with hammers by aides ahead of the FBI investigation. The Bureau recovered these along with roughly 15,000 other emails that she failed to turn over to the State Department, despite her claims to the contrary.

These new emails are government documents and not personal emails as Mrs. Clinton had previously claimed.

On March 2012 Mrs. Clinton wrote to Mr. Pagliano, “Once again, I’m having BB [BlackBerry] trouble”:

From: H

Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 8:45 AM

To: Justin Cooper, Bryan Pagliano [Cooper was a senior advisor to Bill Clinton]

Cc: Oscar Floras [manager of Clinton’s New York home]

Subject: Help!

Once again, I’m having BB trouble. I am not receiving emails although people are getting ones I send but I get their replies on my IP. I’ve taken out the battery and done what I know to do but with no luck yet any ideas?

***

From: H

Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 8:54 AM

To: Justin Cooper

Cc: Bryan M. Pagliano, Oscar Flores

Subject: Re: Help!

Thanks, Justin. How does that happen.  do I need to do anything?

***

From: Bryan Pagliano

Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 10:32 AM

To: H

Cc: Justin Cooper, Oscar Flores

Subject: Re: Help!

Let me take a look at the server to see if it offers any insight. iPhone is not much different from iPad, however in both cases the security landscape is different from the blackberry.

-Bryan

***

From: H [email protected]

Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 11:44 AM

To: Justin Cooper

Cc: Bryan M. Pagliano, Oscar Flores

Subject: Re:

Thanks again. I’m back in business.

On October 13, 2016, Judicial Watch revealed Mrs. Clinton’s responses given under oath to 25 questions posed by Judicial Watch as ordered by U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan in separate litigation.

While the content of the 2012 email is not consequential, it contradicts sworn testimony and serves as the latest instance of her tendency to be less-than truthful and respectful of the law. House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, recently requested his office draft up a referral to the FBI to investigate Mrs. Clinton for perjury after she made several statements under oath to Congress that have been widely debunked as untrue.

Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign has yet to respond to a request for comment about this new email.

Newly obtained emails between former Secretary of

mid-atlantic-manufacturing-aluminium-raw-materials-reuters

A worker in the mid-Atlantic manufacturing sector works with raw aluminum materials. (PHOTO: REUTERS)

The Philadelphia Federal Reserve’s gauge of manufacturing activity in the Mid-Atlantic region slipped to 9.7 in October from a 12.8 the month prior. The median forecast for the Manufacturing Business Outlook Survey, which has remained at least slightly positive for three months, called for a reading of 5.3.

A reading above 0 indicates expansion, while those below suggest contraction.

The diffusion index of current activity remained positive, but the index edged down from 12.8 in September to 9.7 this month. While indexes for general activity, new orders, and shipments were all positive this month, firms reported continued weakness in overall labor market conditions.

philadelphia federal reserve manufacturing business outlook survey on mid-atlantic manufacturing

The new orders index increasing significantly from 1.4 in September to 16.3 in October, while the percentage of firms reporting increases in new orders this month rose to 40 percent from 30 percent. The current shipments index also improved, rising 24 points to 15.3. However, delivery times, unfilled orders, and inventories indexes remained weak, all registering in negative territory.

The manufacturing sector overall, which represents roughly 12.5% of the U.S. economy, has struggled to regain steam post the Great Recession. The Empire State Manufacturing Survey again contracted this month and the sector was on life support for much of 2015 to 2016.

The average capacity utilization rate reported by mid-Atlantic manufacturing firms was nearly 74%, lower than that from one year earlier (75%). For the U.S., the capacity utilization rate for the manufacturing sector, overall, is estimated to be almost 75%, also slightly lower than one year ago.

One of the 12 regional Banks that, together with the Board of Governors in Washington, D.C., make up the Federal Reserve System, the Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank serves eastern Pennsylvania, southern New Jersey, and Delaware.

The Philadelphia Federal Reserve's gauge of manufacturing

pending-home-sales-reuters

Existing and pending home sales reported by the National Association of Realtors. Photo: Reuters)

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) reported total existing home sales increased 3.2% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.47 million in September. After a two-month slump, existing home sales by first-time buyers hit a 34% market share, the highest in more than four years. Further, all regions saw an increase in closings last month and distressed sales fell to a new low of 4% of the market.

Total existing-home sales are completed transactions that include single-family homes, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops. The median forecast called for 5.35 million units

“The home search over the past several months for a lot of prospective buyers, and especially for first-time buyers, took longer than usual because of the competition for the minimal amount of homes for sale,” Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist said. “Most families and move-up buyers look to close before the new school year starts. Their diminishing presence from the market towards the end of summer created more opportunities for aspiring first-time homeowners to buy last month.”

Sales are at their highest pace since June (5.57 million) and are 0.6% above a year ago (5.44 million). While it’s a welcomed sign for many housing market analysts, it is only one piece of the puzzle for what is still a struggling sector. A report on new home construction and building permits was not optimistic, with starts plunging 9% over the last month.

“Inventory has been extremely tight all year and is unlikely to improve now that the seasonal decline in listings is about to kick in,” Mr. Yun said. “Unfortunately, there won’t be much relief from new home construction, which continues to be grossly inadequate in relation to demand.”

Mr. Yun said he is optimistic that the the gain in market share for first-time buyers can hold for the rest of the year and into next spring.

“The market fundamentals — primarily consistent job gains and affordable mortgage rates — are there for the steady rise in first-timers needed to finally reverse the decline in the homeownership rate,” he added.

But not everyone believes the spike in first-time buyers is all good news and certainly not a result of organic demand or strong market fundamentals. Edward Pinto, the former executive vice president and chief credit officer for Fannie Mae, says looser lending practices not only translates into more contracts but also more risk, which led to the housing bubble and fueled the Great Recession.

“As a result of loose lending and accommodative monetary policy, the nominal house price-to-income ratio stands at 3.34, up 10% since the early-2012 trough, thus retracing about a third of drop from the 2006 peak to the 2012 trough,” said Mr. Pinto, now the co-director of the American Enterprise Institute’s (AEI’s) International Center on Housing Risk.

Mr. Pinto is behind the National Mortgage Risk Index (NMRI), which measures how government-guaranteed loans with a first payment date in a given month would perform if subjected to the same stress as in the financial crisis that began in 2007. His views differ greatly than from those at NAR and Realtors, which he and his co-director Stephen Oliner, a senior fellow at UCLA’s Ziman Center for Real Estate, call “the housing lobby.”

“An increasing share of home buyers are taking out mortgages with burdensome monthly payments,” Mr. Oliner said. “Indeed, more than a quarter of recent government-guaranteed home purchase loans had a debt-to-income ratio that exceeded the limit set by the Qualified Mortgage rules in the wake of the financial crisis.”

NAR President Tom Salomone, broker-owner of Real Estate II Inc. in Coral Springs, Florida said government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have a duty to ensure there’s access to mortgage credit for creditworthy borrowers wanting to buy a home.

“Unfortunately, overly burdensome fees at the GSEs are making homeownership difficult for moderate-income buyers. Fannie and Freddie can reduce the cost of borrowing while still protecting taxpayers, and we’re hopeful they’ll take these steps to ensure prospective buyers are able to enter the market,” Mr. Salomone said.

Video and regional breakdown via the National Association of Realtors below:

[brid video=”69985″ player=”2077″ title=”Firsttime Buyers Steer ExistingHome Sales Higher in September”]

Regional Breakdown

September existing-home sales in the Northeast leapt 5.7 percent to an annual rate of 740,000, which is unchanged from a year ago. The median price in the Northeast was $261,600, which is 2.1 percent above September 2015.

In the Midwest, existing-home sales grew 3.9 percent to an annual rate of 1.32 million in September, and are now 2.3 percent above a year ago. The median price in the Midwest was $184,500, up 5.9 percent from a year ago.

Existing-home sales in the South in September ticked up 0.9 percent to an annual rate of 2.16 million, but are still 0.9 percent below September 2015. The median price in the South was $204,000, up 6.6 percent from a year ago.

Existing-home sales in the West jumped 5.0 percent to an annual rate of 1.25 million in September, and are now 1.6 percent higher than a year ago. The median price in the West was $345,400, up 8.1 percent from September 2015.

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) reported

Movements such as Ban the Box are helping ex-convicts find jobs upon their release from prison. (Photo: AP)

Movements such as Ban the Box are helping ex-convicts find jobs upon their release from prison. (Photo: AP)

The Labor Department reported weekly jobless claims increased by 13,000 to 260,000 for the week ending October 15, more than the estimate for 250,000. The prior week was revised higher by 1,000 at 247,000

No state was triggered “on” the Extended Benefits program during the week ending October 1, according to the Labor Department, and there were no special factors impacting this week’s initial claims.

The four-week moving average–which is widely considered a better gauge–was 251,750, an gain of 2,250 from the previous week’s revised average. The previous week’s average was revised up by 250 from 249,250 to 249,500. While the report marks 85 consecutive weeks of initial claims below 300,000, the longest streak since 1970, it is also the case that longterm unemployment and reduced labor participation has simply shrunk the eligible pool of first-time applicants.

The highest insured unemployment rates in the week ending October 1 were in Alaska (2.7), Puerto Rico (2.5), the Virgin Islands (2.2), New Jersey (2.1), California (2.0), Connecticut (2.0), Pennsylvania (1.8), West Virginia (1.7), Massachusetts (1.6), Nevada (1.6), and Wyoming (1.6).

The largest increases in initial claims for the week ending October 8 were in California (+5,141), Pennsylvania (+3,698), Texas (+2,558), New York (+2,093), and Washington (+2,069), while the largest decreases were in South Carolina (-17) and Maine (-8).

The Labor Department reported weekly jobless claims

Moderator Chris Wallace, of FOX News, turns towards the audience as he questions Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump during the third presidential debate at UNLV in Las Vegas, Wednesday, Oct. 19, 2016.(AP Photo/Julio Cortez)

Moderator Chris Wallace, of FOX News, turns towards the audience as he questions Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump during the third presidential debate at UNLV in Las Vegas, Wednesday, Oct. 19, 2016.(AP Photo/Julio Cortez)

At the final presidential debate in Las Vegas, Nevada, Republican Donald Trump hammered Democrat Hillary Clinton over damning revelations of fraud and colluding. While most Big Media outlets spent the night covering Trump refusing to say whether he will accept the outcome if he loses and concede, they will also be forced to cover the release of undercover videos that have already led to the firing of two Democratic campaign operatives.

I will tell you at the time,” Trump told moderator Chris Wallace during what analysts are saying was his best debate of the cycle. “I’ll keep you in suspense, okay?”

Hillary Clinton responded, “That’s horrifying.”

But Americans might also find it “horrifying” to here Democratic officials admitting to inciting violence at Trump rallies by paying “mentally ill people,” including a scheduled rally in Chicago that nearly turned into a riot, put the lives of police officers in danger and resulted in two being injured.

“If you look at what came out today on the clips,” he said, “I was wondering what happened with my rally in Chicago and other rallies where we had such violence. She’s the one, and Obama, that caused the violence. They hired people, they paid them $1,500, and they’re on tape saying, be violent, cause fights, do bad things.”

Scott Foval, the National Field Director at Americans United for Change, was fired after it was revealed Monday he admitted on video to sending agitators to Trump rallies and coordinating these efforts with Hillary Clinton’s campaign, the latter of which is a clear violation of federal election law. Federal campaign finance laws prohibit a candidate’s election campaign from coordinating with the candidate’s super PAC.

Foval worked under and for Bob Cramer, the founder and partner at Democracy Matters. Cramer, who is the husband of Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., who represents the district covering Chicago, is part of elaborate dark money operation funded by the Clinton campaign in what is a clear case of illegally coordinating with super PACs. The Democratic National Committee claimed Cramer, who visited the White House more than 200 times, stepped aside to prevent him from becoming a distraction following the videos.

“The campaign is fully in it,” Cramer says in the video. “Hillary knows what is going on through the chain of command.”

[brid video=”69893″ player=”2077″ title=”DNC Schemes to Bully Women at Trump Rally”]

According to a new Economist/YouGov poll following Trump’s recent claims that the November election is “rigged,” 72% of respondents said they were very or somewhat concerned about the security of the electoral system. Only 21% were either not very concerned or not concerned at all.

“She’s guilty of a very, very serious crime,” Mr. Trump said of Clinton at the debate. “She should not be allowed to run. And just in that respect I say it’s rigged.”

Following the debate, campaign manager Kellyanne Conway responded to Trump refusing to say whether he would accept the results.

“He said he’s going to take a look at the results,” she said. “Remember, Al Gore did concede. He conceded to Governor George W. Bush and then called and rejected the concession and went on to contest the results. It went all the way to the Supreme Court. Election day was early November. Maybe November 6 that year. And that case was decided on December 12.”

Sean Spicer, the Republican National Committee’s communications director, also said after the debate that Trump will “accept the results of the election. One hundred percent.”

“I think right now he’s very concerned about the bias that exists in the media,” Spicer said. “I think he wants to make sure people … are focused on the election. But he will accept the results. No question about it.”

“He’s going to win this election soundly,” Spicer added, “And this won’t be an issue.”

[caption id="attachment_46031" align="aligncenter" width="740"] Moderator Chris Wallace,

[brid video=”69868″ player=”2077″ title=”‘Youre Like a Thief’ Donna Brazile Lashes Out at Megyn Kelly When Asked About WikiLeaks”]

10/19/16 – “You’re Like a Thief ,” DNC Chair Donna Brazile lashed out at Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly when asked about WikiLeaks. Even CNN’s Jake Tapper admits the email clearly reveals Brazile, while working at the network, unethically gave Hillary Clinton debate questions ahead of the time.

DNC Chair Donna Brazile lashed out at

Statue-of-Liberty-New-York-background

Statue of Liberty in front of the New York City skyline.

What if the Declaration of Independence states that the purpose of government is to protect our natural rights? What if natural rights are the freedoms we enjoy without neighbors or strangers or government interfering? What if those freedoms are listed in part in the Bill of Rights? What if the government is supposed to keep its hands off those freedoms because they are ours, we have not surrendered them and we have hired the government to protect them?

What if the reason some of our rights are listed in the Bill of Rights was the fear the colonists had after the American Revolution that the new government here might become as destructive of freedom as the British king and Parliament — whose government they had just kicked out — were before the Revolution? What if it is impossible to list completely the freedoms that all people enjoy by reason of our humanity? What if the Framers — who wrote the Constitution and the Bill of Rights — understood that?

What if, in order to address the impossibility of listing all rights, the Framers ratified the Ninth Amendment? What if the Ninth Amendment declares that the enumeration of certain rights in the Constitution shall not be construed to deny or disparage other rights retained by the people? What if this amendment was the Framers’ way of recognizing the inherent attachment of our personal liberties to our individual humanity?

What if the government is supposed to protect those liberties — the ones that are enumerated in the Bill of Rights and the others that are too numerous to enumerate and are covered by the Ninth Amendment?

What if the government — no matter which party controls the White House or Congress — always claims that it is protecting personal freedoms? What if this is just an empty boast? What if there is a government within the government that never changes, never shrinks, answers only to itself, hates and fears personal freedoms, and is largely unrecognized by the Constitution?

What if that government, because of its secrecy, is largely unaccountable to the voters? What if it resides in the Federal Reserve, the military, federal law enforcement and intelligence establishments, and an enormous federal bureaucracy that regulates and spends in secret to a greater extent every year, no matter which party is in control?

What if the secret government commands the loyalty of the elected government by sharing secrets with it? What if the law requires those shared secrets to be kept secret? What if the elected government knows what the secret government is up to but cannot legally reveal it? What if members of Congress know why Hillary Clinton was not indicted but they learned it in secret and so cannot legally reveal it? What if members of Congress know the extent of the Donald Trump financial shell game but they learned that in secret and so cannot reveal it?

What if some personal courage has broken this mold? What if Edward Snowden revealed massive secret government spying on all Americans after the government had denied it? What if Sen. Dianne Feinstein revealed horrific torture by the federal government after the government had denied it? What if the elected government knew about the spying and the torture but was legally prevented from revealing it? What if Hillary Clinton was largely right when she said politicians have a public persona and a private persona? What if President Barack Obama has demonstrated his two sides by killing people in secret, with his undeclared wars, and denying it in public?

What if the interest rate you pay on your home mortgage or car loan is not established by the free market — or even reached by bankers looking for your business — but is fixed in private by the secret government? What if the secret government has decided that it prefers Clinton to succeed President Obama and so its agents in law enforcement will overlook all evidence of Clinton’s lawbreaking in order to bring that about? What if the secret government has given Trump an enormous pass on his financial behavior, a pass unavailable to the average voter, and it needs to keep that secret?

What if government has no interest in personal freedom, except perhaps as a catchy phrase around which to rally support? What if government nurtures having foreign adversaries — real and imagined — so that it has an excuse, in repelling or resisting those enemies, to exercise unlawful powers?

What if the presidential election this year has become a beauty contest — devoid of intellectual substance, without serious debate over the limited duties of government in a constitutional democracy, rolling in the gutter and largely motivated by hate and fear? What if both Clinton and Trump recognize the paradox that government is essentially the negation of personal liberty? What if whoever wins will largely use it for that purpose?

What if liberty really is attached to humanity? What if all rational people yearn for personal freedom? What if the government — in order to stay in power — has detached liberty from humanity and made it a gift of the state instead of a gift of God? What if government knows that by restricting and then expanding liberty, it can command loyalty?

What if there is a sense of hopelessness in the land? What if this hopelessness is bred by a government that kills, lies, steals, conceals and denies? What if that hopelessness is furthered by a rational fear that things will only get worse, no matter who wins the presidential election? What do we do about it?

What if there is a sense of

Hillary Rodham Clinton has a long record of using public service to enrich herself, sell out American interests and further her own political ambitions for power.

Hillary Rodham Clinton has a long record of using public service to enrich herself, sell out American interests and further her own political ambitions for power.

The 2016 presidential election has been an election of “firsts.” The first female nominee of a major political party; perhaps the first female president; the first time a non-politician dispatched a record number of professional political candidates to win a major party nomination; and, the first time a Republican candidate ever received more than 13 million votes during a presidential primary.

Unfortunately, if elected in November, Hillary Clinton would be America’s first illegitimate President of the United States. She will be the chief executive of a government stained by a crisis of credibility and it will most likely plunge the country into a period of civil turmoil she is wholly incapable of reversing. In an election of firsts, we make this first of a kind statement not with a vindictive intention to incite unrest but rather with a hope to avoid it.

This has been the first presidential election cycle in which Big Media finally dropped the false pretenses and phony claim to impartiality. Whether Donald Trump wins or loses, like the Old Guard in the Great Opportunity Party (GOP), their days are numbered.

Knowing what we know now, the election of Mrs. Clinton would fundamentally break the American social contract and put into question the very credibility of the U.S. government as a representative body of, by, and for the people.

The American social contract is predicated on equitable treatment under the law and, perhaps even more importantly, at least a minimal confidence in representative government. The vast majority of the citizenry must believe that the process of choosing who represents them in this government is fair. However, roughly half of Donald Trump’s supporters not only believe the entire process is rigged, but will not except the outcome the powers that be have worked so hard to achieve.

In truth, people have felt the system is rigged against them for quite sometime and with good reason. Whether we agree with his tactics or not, Donald Trump has done this country a great service by exposing what many already knew to be the truth.

“Should Hillary get ‘elected’ she is immediately delegitimized,” California RNC Committeeman Shawn Steel told the propaganda magazine Politico for a story meant to mock those with enough independent thought to see what is going on. “The 1% of Wall Street Bankers, Clinton Machine and [mainstream media] including your employer, Politico, is part of a massive Left Wing Conspiracy to rig this election.”

For the first time ever, millions of Americans have a legitimate claim. Their grievance that the government and Big Media have been so corrupted that the system no longer works for them is viable–the system is rigged. We now know that Mrs. Clinton is being protected by what is unquestionably a totally corrupt Fourth Estate, which our founding fathers viewed to be the only viable alternative to revolution and civil war.

“[A despotic] government always [keeps] a kind of standing army of newswriters who, without any regard to truth or to what should be like truth, [invent] and put into the papers whatever might serve the ministers,” Thomas Jefferson wrote in 1785 to Gijsbert Karel van Hogendorp, a conservative Dutch statesman. “This suffices with the mass of the people who have no means of distinguishing the false from the true paragraphs of a newspaper.”

The election of Hillary Clinton would prove that Americans–albeit uninformed and misguided by a corrupt press–have opted to submit to what Marcus Tullius Cicero called “tyranny by popular support.” But we fear greatly for such a future not only because of the realities of tyranny–whether by force or popular support–but because we recognize the true national identity still runs strong enough within the fiber of American society that millions will not stand idle in the face of it.

“This formidable censor of the public functionaries, by arraigning them at the tribunal of public opinion, produces reform peaceably, which must otherwise be done by revolution,” Jefferson wrote to Adamantios Coray in 1823.

We now know that Hillary Clinton mishandled classified information in a manner that would result in any other American being prosecuted, potentially incarcerated and certainly prohibited from ever obtaining federal employment ever again, let alone hold a security clearance.

We now know that Hillary Clinton repeatedly lied to the American public, and repeatedly revised those lies with evolving lies regarding her grossly incompetent and reckless use of a private email server to conduct official State Department business.

We now know that Hillary Clinton designed and pushed a secret war in Libya that was not authorized by Congress. We now know she waged this secret war against a compliant ally in the War on Terror and, after he was toppled, allowed State Department officials and CIA contractors to remain in harm’s way without adequate security, despite multiple requests, which resulted in the deaths of four Americans.

We now know that Hillary Clinton knowingly lied about the cause and circumstance of their deaths to protect her own political future. Rather than exposing those lies, Big Media at every turn helped to cover them up, even aiding in her shameful display during congressional hearings in which she flatly perjured herself.

How could the U.S. military faithfully serve such a leader with honor? They couldn’t. How could they trust she would hold their best interests at heart? They couldn’t. Of those we’ve spoken with, on both accounts they simply don’t.

How far we’ve fallen from our beginning. George Washington was unanimously chosen to serve as the executive in a new national experiment in self-governance. Perhaps no leader in the history of representative governments ever enjoyed more legitimacy and credibility. Yet, Washington knew better, which is why he refused another term in office and retired with grace to Mount Vernon.

Hillary Clinton is no George Washington. She is the opposite in legitimacy and virtue.

We now know, thanks only to undercover videos taken by independent journalists, that the Clinton campaign coordinated with and funded groups that paid activists to incite violence at Trump rallies and conduct massive voter fraud operations. Again, even in the face of video evidence, the corrupt Big Media refuse to show the American people the truth.

It leads us only to one natural, simple conclusion.

Under President Hillary Clinton, America would become no better than Vladimir Putin’s Russia, with power going to the highest bidder and one’s status dependent on one’s relationship with the queen. For million of Americans not in the good graces of the queen, a President Hillary Clinton will serve only as proof We the People are no longer in charge of our own government.

But for now we still are, America. And Donald Trump is right. It’s time to drain the swamp.

If elected, Hillary Clinton would be the

Donald Trump with mini-Trump at a rally in Wilkes-Barre, PA.

Donald Trump with mini-Trump at a rally in Wilkes-Barre, PA.

Generally speaking, the polls haven’t been looking to good for Donald Trump, with the exception of PPD (Clinton +2), Rasmussen (Tie) and the LA Times Poll (Tie). Now, going into the final debate in Las Vegas, Nevada, the IBD/TIPP presidential tracking poll gives Trump a 1-point edge over Hillary Clinton.

It should be a welcome piece of polling data for the candidate who has spent the last week on the campaign trail saying he no longer trusts the polls and believes the election is rigged. It’s certainly a true statement that not all polls are created equal–or, as the People’s Pundit likes to say, there are “too many polls and not enough pollsters.” That said, TIPP is overall the most accurate phone-based presidential election daily tracking poll, according to the PPD Pollster Scorecard.

After nearly two weeks of blistering attacks from Big Media, his Democratic rivals and even celebrities, Mr. Trump has pulled back ahead of Mrs. Clinton 41.3% to 40% in a four-way matchup. Libertarian Party candidate and former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson takes 8% and Green Party candidate Dr. Jill Stein 6%.

“From the results, it looks as if Gary Johnson and Jill Stein are drawing more support away from Clinton than Trump,” said Ragavan Mayur, president of TechnoMetrica Market Intelligence, which conducts the poll.

As mirrored by the People’s Pundit Daily Presidential Election Daily Tracking Poll and LA Times Poll, Trump voters are far less persuadable and far more enthusiastic than Clinton voters. In the IBD/TIPP poll, Trump scores higher on voter intensity, with 67% of his backers saying they strongly support him, compared with 58% of Clinton supporters who say they strongly back their candidate.

On the PPD Tracking Poll, roughly 60% of Trump voters say they are “extremely” enthusiastic juxtaposed to just 49% of Clinton voters. That’s compounded by another 22% who say they are “very” enthusiastic about voting for the Republican nominee and 20% who say the same about his rival.

“If Donald Trump is right and there is a mass Big Media conspiracy to depress his voters, it isn’t working yet,” said PPD’s editor-in-chief Rich Baris. “That may be the case if he falters tonight, but we’ve only seen modest and temporary decreases in voter enthusiasm for Mr. Trump, whereas, Hillary Clinton still has work to do exciting her base. The good news for her is that there are more Democrats than Republicans.”

The results are the first in the IBD/TIPP presidential tracking poll. Daily updates start Thursday and will continue until the election.

For the results released today, TechnoMetrica Market Intelligence conducted the Investor’s Business Daily/TIPP poll from Oct. 13 through Oct. 18, 2016. A total of 872 Americans age 18 or older participated in the nationwide survey. Of the 872 respondents, 825 were registered voters and 782 were likely voters. The story is based on the subsample of likely voters. The margin of error for the likely voters sample is plus or minus 3.6 percentage points at the 95% confidence level.

Going into the final debate in Las

People's Pundit Daily
You have %%pigeonMeterAvailable%% free %%pigeonCopyPage%% remaining this month. Get unlimited access and support reader-funded, independent data journalism.

Start a 14-day free trial now. Pay later!

Start Trial