Widget Image
Follow PPD Social Media
Saturday, February 8, 2025
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 476)

[brid video=”69720″ player=”2077″ title=”Mark Levin “Rigged Election” Voter Fraud Issues Worse than Trump’s Claims”]

Conservative talk radio host Mark Levin, a frequent critic of Donald Trump, said the reality is worse than Trump’s “rigged election” charge suggests. With roughly 24 million registration issues, ranging from erroneous address to dead voters still actively voting, Levin says the reason voter integrity laws are opposed by the Left is “because they cheat.”

“It’s simple!”

As Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump warns voters about a “rigged election,” the election integrity group Project Veritas Action exposed on video how the Clinton campaign, super PACs and other organizations commit mass voter fraud. The video was the second explosive part of a multi-part series to be released leading up to Election Day, which implicates the Clinton campaign and her allies in mass fraud and illegal activities.

On Monday, People’s Pundit Daily reported on the first video proving illegal communication between the Clinton campaign, super PACs and other organizations. The officials admit to inciting violence at Trump rallies by using “mentally ill people” whom they pay, including a scheduled rally in Chicago that nearly turned into a riot and put the lives of police officers in danger.

Conservative talk radio host Mark Levin, a

housing-starts-new-home-construction

New home construction workers. (Photo: Reuters)

The Commerce Department said Wednesday housing starts in the U.S. plummeted to an annual rate of 1.047 million in September, missing the median forecast for 1.175 million. Fueled by a steep decline in the construction of multifamily homes, housing starts now tumbled 9% to a 1-1/2-year low in September.

Building permits, which indicate future housing market activity, came in at 1.225 million, above the estimate for 1.165 million. Construction of single-family units did give some hope for the housing market. The data indicate residential construction will remain a drag on gross domestic product (GDP) in the third quarter.

August’s starts were revised up to a 1.15 million-unit pace from the previously reported 1.14 million-unit rate. Last month’s drop left the overall housing starts in the third quarter well below their average for the second quarter.

Single-family home building, which represents the largest share of the residential housing market, did increase 8.1% to a 783,000-unit pace in September, the highest level since February.

Housing starts for the volatile multi-family segment plunged 38.0% to a 264,000-unit pace in September. But with rents rising at their fastest pace in 10 years, last month’s drop is likely to be temporary.

But it is possible to rebound in the coming months, as permits for future construction surged 6.3% in September. Single-family permits inched up 0.4% last month. Building permits for multi-family units sharply increased 16.8% in September.

The Commerce Department said housing starts plummeted

Libertarian Party candidate and former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson.

Libertarian Party candidate and former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson.

Hillary Clinton is a manipulative, power-mad liar. Donald Trump is a selfish, sexist, narcissistic bully. These are our choices Nov. 8? The leading candidates’ avarice is bad enough. Their ideas are worse.

Clinton wants to micro-regulate America into poverty and stagnation. Trump would start a trade war, if not an actual war.

While America is going bankrupt, both candidates brag that they will spend more — Trump on the military and his pointless wall, Clinton mostly on social programs.

Both promise a new child care entitlement: paid maternity leave. I’d think a Republican presidential candidate would resist promising more “free” stuff. But Trump, with daughter Ivanka standing behind him, offers Clintoncare “lite”: paid leave for six weeks instead of 12.

Naturally, the Clinton media want more . Socialist cheerleaders at Fortune complain that Trump’s proposal is stingy compared to Clinton’s and very stingy compared to real family leave, offered by civilized nations in Europe — especially Greece.

Hello? Have you not noticed how Greece suffers largely because of “generous benefits” like that? You think it’s a coincidence that Greece’s unemployment rate is 25 percent? Why would employers hire workers if they must later give them 12 weeks of pay not to work?

I’d think Fortune writers and Democratic and Republican presidential candidates would understand that “free” benefits come with nasty costs. But they don’t understand. Or if they do, they just ignore it.

Libertarian Party candidate Gary Johnson doesn’t ignore these problems. He promises to avert America’s bankruptcy by cutting spending 43 percent.

But the candidate of the third party (I should call Libertarians the first party, since they respect the Constitution) is in a tough spot. He must both convince voters that he has better ideas — and that he’s not strange. That’s tough to do when you’re a politician who stumbles over words and the RepubliDems won’t allow you into the debates. Recent polls show that almost 40 percent of Americans don’t even know that Johnson’s running.

That’s too bad. If there were ever a year for a third party to thrive, this was it. Most voters — from both major parties — are unhappy with their party’s nominee.

Sadly, they are not unhappy enough to vote for Gary Johnson. I have to respect the betting; bettors give Johnson just a .1 percent chance.

The bettors also say Clinton is favored 84 percent to 15 percent over Trump. Get ready for President Clinton. Sigh.

Polls suggest about 6 percent of Americans will vote Libertarian.

Some will be Bernie Sanders supporters. How can that be? Sanders is a socialist! He’s an economic illiterate who wants government to control more !

But on civil liberties, Sanders is better than Trump and Clinton.

Both Sanders and Johnson are sympathetic to immigrants. Johnson knows that most become workers, customers and entrepreneurs who boost economic opportunities for everyone.

Like Sanders, Johnson wants to avoid getting bogged down in foreign wars.

Like Sanders, Johnson has long been in favor of marriage equality, whereas Clinton only recently decided it was politically safe to endorse it.

Like Sanders, Johnson knows that some complaints from the Black Lives Matter movement are valid and that the drug war does more harm than good.

Obviously, those positions upset some conservatives, but Johnson still has plenty to offer Republicans. He’s more sensible than Donald Trump.

Unlike Trump, Johnson knows that free trade decreases poverty and makes the world a better, happier place. He understands that the minimum wage makes most people poorer and that free speech is a good thing.

Like Trump, Johnson opposes gun control, Obamacare and increasing regulation.

A vote for Johnson will give Americans more choices and freedom in the future. Johnson getting 6 percent of the vote this election means easier ballot access, more money and more advertising next time. More people would know that there are other — better — options.

That’s why I’ll vote for Gary Johnson. He did a good job as governor of New Mexico. He vetoed the excesses of power-hungry state legislators 750 times. He’d stand up for limited government in Washington, too.

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton won’t.

Hillary Clinton is a manipulative, power-mad liar.

John Podesta, Campaign Manager, left, speaking to senior advisor Huma Abedin on the Hillary Clinton campaign plane from New York enroute to Miami, October 11, 2016. (Photo: Lucy Nicholson/REUTERS)

John Podesta, Campaign Manager, left, speaking to senior advisor Huma Abedin on the Hillary Clinton campaign plane from New York enroute to Miami, October 11, 2016. (Photo: Lucy Nicholson/REUTERS)

When the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks released thousands of emails from Clinton campaign manager John Podesta, they revealed what many of us already knew. The so-called mainstream media, which will hereto be referred to as Big Media at People’s Pundit Daily–is completely corrupt. Big Media outlets are not only trying to bury a slew headlines extremely damaging to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, but they are several of the headlines.

In an email thread labeled “Subject: Re: sorry to bother…,” Glenn Thrush, the Chief Political Correspondent at Politico, plays Podesta’s pet “hack” and uses him as a proofreader to his upcoming puff-piece on the Clinton campaign.

“Hey sir— sorry to bother — OTR question,” he writes in the thread. “Can I send u a couple of grafs, OTR, to make sure I’m not fucking anything up?”

On Apr 30, 2015, at 3:06 PM, John Podesta <[email protected]> wrote:

Sure. Sorry for the delay I was on a plane.

Thrush goes on to send him his entire story, which he acknowledges is unethical before requesting Podesta doesn’t tell anyone about his new role as a “hack” for the Clinton campaign.

On Apr 30, 2015 3:00 PM, “Glenn Thrush” <[email protected]> wrote:

No worries Because I have become a hack I will send u the whole section that pertains to u Please don’t share or tell anyone I did this

Tell me if I fucked up anything

After nearly six hours later, Podesta responded.

OTR: No problems here

“OTR” is shorthand for on the record.

The reason he was making it specifically clear the conversation was on the record was because he already laid out the ground rules for their relationship, which is not the adversarial relationship the press is supposed to have with those in power and those aspiring to be in power.

“I had an idea along the same lines – which was for John to invite the ten to fifteen reporters who will cover HRC everyday to his house for an off the record dinner with all of us,” Jennifer Palmieri, the communications director for the Clinton campaign wrote a month before. “We would be clear that this was a social, get to know you session, and not to expect any briefing on the campaign..”

“Defer to John and Robby as to whether they think this is right moment to undertake this kind of explicit effort.”

This isn’t the first time People’s Pundit Daily has revealed so-called “journalists” at Politico, as well as The Washington Post and NBC News, blatantly collaborating with Democrats.

Ken Vogel at Politico also used the Democratic National Committee (DNC) as a proofreader even before he handed work into his editor, an April 30 email from Mark Paustenbach, the National Press Secretary and Deputy Communications Director for the DNC revealed.

“Vogel gave me his story ahead of time/before it goes to his editors as long as I didn’t share it,” Paustenbach wrote. “Let me know if you see anything that’s missing and I’ll push back.”

Paustenbach was more an editor and handler than a party’s communications director, a role the Clinton campaign also decided they needed someone to fill. These journalists were all too happy to jump aboard.

“I think the best reporter to give the news to ahead of time is Greg Sargent at the Washington Post,” he writes in an email dated May 20. “But, the specific reporter is not as important as getting it to an outlet before the news breaks so we can help control the narrative on the front end. Otherwise this may likely get spun in a not-so-helpful way. We should also get Rep. Cummings on the phone with that reporter.”

Not a single “journalist” has been reprimanded by any of these pro-Hillary Clinton outlets, let alone reprimanded.

Breaking News: Big Media is Corrupt. So, Help Us Fight It!

In an email thread labeled "Subject: Re:

[brid video=”69534″ player=”2077″ title=”Rigging the Election Video II Mass Voter Fraud”]

The election integrity group Project Veritas Action exposes on video how the Clinton campaign, super PACs and other organizations commit mass voter fraud. In the second explosive video of a multipart series, project lead James O’Keefe explains how the group caught officials at the Democratic National Committee (DNC), Hillary Clinton campaign and Democratic party operatives telling everyone how to successfully commit voter fraud on a massive scale.

Scott Foval, the National Field Director at Americans United for Change, was fired after it was revealed Monday he admitted on video to sending agitators to Trump rallies and coordinating these efforts with Hillary Clinton’s campaign, the latter of which is a clear violation of federal election law. Federal campaign finance laws prohibit a candidate’s election campaign from coordinating with the candidate’s super PAC.

The video also exposes the role of Bob Creamer, the founder and partner at Democracy Matters and husband of Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., who represents the district covering Chicago.

“The campaign is fully in it,” Creamer said. “Well, I mean, Hillary knows what is going on through the chain of command.”

Creamer has not yet been fired, which is likely due his wife being a friend of Hillary Clinton.

The question is, whether when you get caught by a reporter, does that matter?” Foval mocks. “Because does it turn into an investigation or not? In this case, in this state, the answer is no, because they don’t have any power to do anything.”

What PPD found particularly damning was conversation regarding get out the vote activists’ registration efforts. Mass voter fraud People’s Pundit Daily has reported on and witnessed is committed on Election Day, or at least the final stage. The absentee ballots are filled out that night, despite the registrations being either phony or illegal in another manner. That’s why “Spigot Cities” in counties such as Fairfax County, Va., Loudoun County, Va., Broward County, Fla., Miami-Dade County, Fla., etc. all hold their vote totals back until the rural and suburban precincts report their results.

It’s simple. They are waiting to see how many more they need to overcome the Republican candidate’s advantage in the rest of the state.

On Monday, People’s Pundit Daily reported on the first video proving illegal communication between the Clinton campaign, super PACs and other organizations. The officials admit to inciting violence at Trump rallies by using “mentally ill people” whom they pay, including a scheduled rally in Chicago that nearly turned into a riot and put the lives of police officers in danger.

This video also stars Cesar Vargas, the founder of the Dream Action Coalition. Vargas works with Cramer, in fact, “is really good friends with him.” A “dreamer” born in Mexico, he is an undocumented alien and lawyer. He was the man the Clinton allies believed would be the one to pull off the voter fraud scheme.

“Yeah, for me I totally get it,” he says on the video. “This is illegal, this is something that can be done.”

The video comes as Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump is spending the final weeks of his presidential bid claiming there’s an unprecedented election fraud conspiracy to elect former Secretary Clinton.

Many top Republican Party officials agree and, with more videos to come, the outrageous evidence is beginning to pile up.

Rigging the Election: Part 1

[brid video=”69388″ player=”2077″ title=”Rigging the Election Video I Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies”]

The election integrity group Project Veritas Action

consumer-price-index-tv

(Photo: REUTERS)

The Labor Department reported Tuesday the consumer price index (CPI) increased 0.3% in September, matching the median forecast. Excluding the volatile food and energy components, consuemr prices rose 0.1%, slightly missing the media forecast for a 0.2% gain.

The report indicated inflation is slowly rising and could potentially lead the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates. However, the Fed is expected to delay raising interest rates at its policy meeting until after the 2016 presidential election, but indicated it could raise rates slightly in December.

The CPI, measuring what Americans pay for everything from dental care to cars, will be used to determine how much to increase federal benefits for millions of Americans who receive Social Security checks. The data from the report suggest benefits will likely rise 0.3% next year, under an annual cost-of-living adjustment that is tied to how much certain prices grew in July through September compared with 2014, the last year when benefits were adjusted.

The Social Security Administration will officially announce the adjustment later Tuesday.

Consumer prices have grown in six of the past seven months. Compared to a year earlier, overall prices grew 1.5% in September, the biggest gain over any 12-month period since October 2014, though still weak historically. Core prices grew 2.2% from a year earlier.

Higher oil prices are driving the latest growth. Energy prices climbed 2.9% since August–driven by higher gasoline costs–but were still down by 2.9% compared to a year earlier.

Food prices were flat from August and fell 0.3% from a year earlier.

The Fed’ using an in-house index that shows overall prices rose 1% in the year through August while core prices increased 1.7%. Inflation remained below the target for more than four years.

In a separate report released Tuesday, data showed that workers’ earnings barely grew last month. Americans’ average weekly earnings, after accounting for inflation, grew just 0.2% in September from a month earlier. Their inflation-adjusted hourly earnings fell, but the hours that they worked–the average workweek–increased.

The Labor Department reported Tuesday the Consumer

Hispanic-vote-activists-Phoenix

Members of Promise Arizona in Action volunteers cheer as they as they leave their headquarters to go canvass a neighborhood for voter registration Thursday, Oct. 25, 2012, in Phoenix.(AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)

It is never easy to tell what people’s motives are. But, when the political left proclaims their devotion to improving the lives of others in general, and of the poor in particular, we can at least get some clues from the way they go about it.

One of the first things the left does is take away the right of other people to make their own choices.

For example, under current California law, Hispanic school children cannot be taught in Spanish if their parents want them taught in English. Like parents in other immigrant groups before them, Hispanic parents tend to want their children to learn English, so that those children will have more opportunities when they become adults in an English-speaking country.

But the left in general, and Hispanic activists in particular, have fought against leaving Hispanic parents with that choice. At the heart of the left’s vision of the world — and of themselves — is that they know better what is good for other people. This means that the left sees itself as having both a right and a duty to take away other people’s options.

This issue was fought out 18 years ago, in a California referendum on so-called “bilingual education,” which in practice meant largely teaching Hispanic school children in Spanish. All the forces of political correctness, including the media and the educational establishment, argued in favor of teaching those children in Spanish, even when their parents wanted them taught in English.

Despite a barrage of propaganda from the media and other organs of the left, a majority of California voters sided with Hispanic parents, and passed a law forbidding schools from imposing Spanish on children whose parents wanted them taught in English.

But the left never gives up on their pet notions. This year there is a new proposition on the California ballot — Proposition 58, very misleadingly phrased — that would take that choice away from parents, and let schools impose teaching in Spanish to Hispanic children, whether the parents want it or not.

The Spanish language issue in the schools is just one example of the left’s vision, which applies to many other issues.

There is the same dogged resistance on the left to allowing black parents to choose to have their children educated in charter schools that are part of the public school system, but are not subject to all the bureaucratic rules that lead to such bad results in other public schools.

Many years ago, in a debate on William F. Buckley’s program “Firing Line,” I was told by a left-wing lawyer that black parents without a good education themselves could not make wise choices for their children’s education.

But hard evidence says otherwise. There are whole chains of charter schools, such as the KIPP (Knowledge Is Power Program) schools and the Success Academy schools, where ghetto kids have academic achievements equal to those of children in affluent suburbs — and sometimes higher achievements.

Many of these charter schools are located in the very same buildings in ghetto neighborhoods where children in the regular public schools are failing miserably. Black parents who enroll their children in charter schools have apparently made better choices than the know-it-alls on the left.

Meanwhile, black children by the tens of thousands in New York alone are on waiting lists for charter schools because politicians, beholden to teachers’ unions for money and votes, fight against the expansion of charter schools. Not all charter schools are successful. But at least unsuccessful charter schools can be shut down, while other failing public schools keep right on failing.

When it comes to crime and violence, the political left, including much of the media, are having a great time demonizing the police. Blacks are the biggest victims of the sharp upturn in murders that has followed. But, yet again, hard evidence carries very little weight when the left is feeling good about themselves, while leaving havoc in their wake.

The absurdity to which this kind of media frenzy about the police can lead is shown by the fact that a black policeman in Charlotte, North Carolina, shooting a black suspect who had a gun, has been blown up into a racial issue across the nation. Have we become so gullible that we are so easily manipulated and stampeded?

If the left proclaims their devotion to

American Loympic swimmers Ryan Lochte, left, and Jimmy Feigan, right.

American Loympic swimmers Ryan Lochte, left, and Jimmy Feigan, right.

Amanda Knox was innocent of the grisly murder for which she did time in an Italian jail. There was no DNA link suggesting that the student from Seattle had slit the throat of her English roommate. Other evidence at the crime scene had been contaminated.

Yet to the angry locals, it mattered not whether Knox had just been convicted or vindicated, both of which happened. They stood outside the Perugia courthouse yelling “shame” and “murderer” every time a dark van rushed Knox away. They clearly hated her guts.

A new Netflix documentary on this 9-year-old case, “Amanda Knox,” shows why. It deftly balances the miscarriage of justice with the American’s in-your-face contempt for Italian sensibilities.

Knox comes off as a type, the American who seems to regard other countries as amusement parks for their adventures. She’s not the only example here but certainly the most bizarre one.

From the moment British student Meredith Kercher’s brutalized body is found, Knox seems to take little interest in or even notice of the tragedy. It’s an inconvenience to her fun agenda.

We see the Italian police carrying the body bag out of the house. News cameras start flashing, and an official shouts to the media: “As a courtesy, please stop! Have some dignity!”

Then we see a blank-faced Knox standing nearby, smooching ostentatiously with her boyfriend.

At the police station, Knox throws the F-word around at authorities. In an exhibitionist display, she does cartwheels and stretching.

Italians thought she was crazy, evil or both. Crashing insensitivity is somewhat foreign to them.

“In Seattle, I was cute,” Knox tells the filmmakers. “In Italy, I was the beautiful blond American girl.” Italians, it turned out, were not quite so awed as she thought.

During the recent Rio Olympics, Americans swelled with pride at the performance of their athletes. But then a handful of their champion swimmers deflated the good feeling with their disgraceful behavior in the host country.

The details: Ryan Lochte had drunkenly vandalized a gas station bathroom as he and friends were returning from a party. They could have just apologized, having already paid to fix the damage, but no. Lochte and his three teammates cooked up phony stories about being held up at gunpoint. Lochte said the robbers wore police badges.

To beat the rap on their own minor criminality, the Americans were willing to exploit Brazil’s painful reputation for violent crime. Brazilians were enraged.

The last example involves no crime, just an obnoxious presumption of American superiority. Jonathon Dunne, a Coloradan, has been badgering London subway riders to talk to one another. Chatting up strangers is not the local custom in the Underground. Londoners generally regard their time in the Tube as “sacred space,” a British etiquette expert explained to media.

Nonetheless, Dunne stands outside subway stations handing out badges with the words “Tube chat?” Far worse, he’s at Covent Garden with a bullhorn barking, “It is time to make London the friendliest city in the world.”

Dunne acknowledges that many of the people he confronts with his pushy camaraderie are not amused. But, he told The Wall Street Journal, “I’m expecting to change the culture of London.”

Those are high expectations for … exactly who is this guy? What would happen if a foreigner stood in Dunne’s hometown of Durango and harangued passers-by not to talk so loudly? I’d hate to think.

What’s going on here? Rampant narcissism? Immaturity? Arrogance? There may be some or all of that. Let’s just say it’s doubtful that these individuals would have tried the same stunts back home in America. And if that’s the case, their behavior is not naive innocence but plain ugly.

Let's just say it's doubtful that Ryan

black-men-unemployment-line

Black men wait on an unemployment line in Atlanta, Ga. (Photo: Reuters)

The greatest moral claim of the political left is that they are for the masses in general and the poor in particular. That is also their greatest fraud. It even fools many leftists themselves.

One of the most recent efforts of the left is the spread of laws and policies that forbid employers from asking job applicants whether they have been arrested or imprisoned. This is said to be to help ex-cons get a job after they have served their time, and ex-cons are often either poor or black, or both.

First of all, many of the left’s policies to help blacks are disproportionately aimed at helping those blacks who have done the wrong thing — and whose victims are disproportionately those blacks who have been trying to do the right thing. In the case of this ban on asking job applicants whether they have criminal backgrounds, the only criterion seems to be whether it sounds good or makes the left feel good about themselves.

Hard evidence as to what actual consequences to expect beforehand, or hard evidence as to its actual consequences afterwards, seems to have had very little role in this political crusade.

An empirical study some years ago examined the hiring practices of companies that did a background check on all the employees they hired. It found that such companies hired more blacks than companies which did not follow that unusual practice.

Why? This goes back to decision-making by human beings in general, with many kinds of decisions in general. Since we seldom have all the facts, we are often forced to rely on generalizing when making our decisions.

Many employers, aware of higher rates of imprisonment among blacks, are less likely to hire blacks whose individual backgrounds are unknown to them. But those particular employers who investigate everyone’s background before hiring them do not have to rely on such generalizations.

The fact that these latter kinds of employers hired more blacks suggests that racial animosity is not the key factor, since blacks are still blacks, whether they have a criminal past or not. But the political left is so heavily invested in blaming racism that mere facts are unlikely to change their minds.

Just as those on the left were not moved by hard evidence before they promoted laws and policies that forbad employers to ask about job applicants’ criminal records, so they have remained unmoved by more recent studies showing that the hiring of blacks has been reduced in the wake of such laws and policies.

Moreover, the left is so invested in the idea that they are helping the disadvantaged that they seldom bother to check the actual consequences of what they are doing, whether that is something as specific as banning questions about criminal behavior or something as general as promoting the welfare state.

In the vision of the left, the welfare state is supposed to be a step forward, in the direction of “social justice.” Tons of painful evidence, from both sides of the Atlantic Ocean, that the welfare state has in fact been a step backward toward barbarism — among low-income whites in England and ghetto blacks in the United States — does not make a dent in the beliefs of the left.

The left’s infatuation with minimum wage laws has likewise been impervious to factual evidence that the spread and escalation of minimum wages have been followed by far higher rates of unemployment among young blacks, to levels some multiple of what they were before — and to a racial gap in unemployment among the young that is likewise some multiple of what it was before.

Those who doubt this need only turn to the data on page 42 of “Race and Economics” by Walter Williams, or to the diagram on page 98 of “The Unheavenly City,” written by Edward Banfield back in 1968. The facts have been available for a long time.

Surely the intelligentsia of the left have access to empirical evidence and the wit to understand such evidence. But the real question is whether they have the stomach to face the prospect that their crusades have hurt the very people they claim to be helping.

Examining hard evidence would mean gambling a whole vision of the world — and of their own role in that world — on a single throw of the dice, which is what looking at hard evidence amounts to. The path of least resistance is to continue going through life feeling good about themselves, while leaving havoc in their wake.

The greatest moral claim of the political

Donald Trump with mini-Trump at a rally in Wilkes-Barre, PA.

Donald Trump with mini-Trump at a rally in Wilkes-Barre, PA.

“Remember, it’s a rigged system. It’s a rigged election,” said Donald Trump in New Hampshire on Saturday.

The stunned recoil in this city suggests this bunker buster went right down the chimney. As the French put it, “Il n’y a que la verite qui blesse.” It is only the truth that hurts.

In what sense is the system rigged?

Consider Big Media — the elite columnists and commentators, the dominant national press, and the national and cable networks, save FOX. Not in this writer’s lifetime has there been such blanket hatred and hostility of a presidential candidate of a major party.

“So what?” They reply. “We have a free press!”

But in this election, Big Media have burst out of the closet as an adjunct of the regime and the attack arm of the Clinton campaign, aiming to bring Trump down.

Half a century ago, Theodore White wrote of the power and bias of the “adversary press” that sought to bring down Richard Nixon.

“The power of the press in America,” wrote Teddy, “is a primordial one. It sets the agenda of public discussion; and this sweeping power is unrestrained by any law. It determines what people will talk about and think about — an authority that in other nations is reserved for tyrants, priests, parties and mandarins.”

On ABC’s “This Week,” Newt Gingrich volunteered on Sunday that, “without the unending one-sided assault of the news media, Trump would be beating Hillary by 15 points.”

On this one, Newt is right.

With all due respect, as adversaries, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi are not terribly formidable. Big Media is the power that sustains the forces of globalism against those of Americanism.

Is the system rigged? Ask yourself.

For half a century, the U.S. Supreme Court has systematically de-Christianized and paganized American society and declared abortion and homosexual marriage constitutional rights.

Where did these unelected jurists get the right to impose their views and values upon us, and remake America in their own secularist image? Was that really the Court’s role in the Constitution?

How did we wind up with an all-powerful judicial tyranny in a nation the Founding Fathers created as a democratic republic?

There are more than 11 million illegal immigrants here, with millions more coming. Yet the government consistently refuses to enforce the immigration laws of the United States.

Why should those Americans whose ancestors created, fought, bled and died to preserve America not believe they and their children are being dispossessed of a country that was their patrimony — and without their consent?

When did the country vote to convert the America we grew up in into the Third World country our descendants will inherit in 2042?

In the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a Congressional majority voted to end discrimination against black folks.

When did we vote to institute pervasive discrimination against white folks, especially white males, with affirmative action, quotas and racial set-asides? Even in blue states like California, affirmative action is routinely rejected in statewide ballots.

Yet it remains regime policy, embedded in the bureaucracy.

In 2015, in the Democratic primaries, the big enthusiastic crowds were all for 75-year-old Socialist senator Bernie Sanders.

We now know, thanks to leaked emails, that not only the superdelegates and the Obama White House but a collaborationist press and the DNC were colluding to deny Sanders any chance at the nomination.

The fix was in. Ask Sanders if he thinks the system is rigged.

If there is an issue upon which Americans agree, it is that they want secure borders and an end to trade policies that have shipped abroad the jobs, and arrested the wages, of working Americans.

Yet in a private speech that netted her $225,000 from Brazilian bankers, Hillary Clinton confided that she dreams of a “common market, with open trade and open borders” from Nome, Alaska, to Patagonia.

That would mean the end of the USA as a unique, sovereign and independent nation. But the American press, whose survival depends upon the big ad dollars of transnational corporations, is more interested in old tapes of the Donald on The Howard Stern Show.

As present, it appears that in 2017, we may get a government headed by Hillary Clinton, and an opposition headed by Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell.

Is that what the people were hoping for, working for, voting for in the primaries of 2016? Or is this what they were voting against?

Big money and the media power of the establishment elites and the transnationals may well prevail.

And if they do, Middle America — those who cling to their bibles, bigotries and guns in Barack Obama’s depiction, those “deplorables” who are “racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic,” who are “not America” and are “irredeemable” in Hillary Clinton’s depiction — will have to accept the new regime.

But that does not mean they must love it, like it or respect it.

Because, in the last analysis, yes, Virginia, the system is rigged.

“Remember, it’s a rigged system. It’s a

People's Pundit Daily
You have %%pigeonMeterAvailable%% free %%pigeonCopyPage%% remaining this month. Get unlimited access and support reader-funded, independent data journalism.

Start a 14-day free trial now. Pay later!

Start Trial