Widget Image
Follow PPD Social Media
Tuesday, February 11, 2025
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 511)

Donald Trump isn’t known for apologies and mea culpas, let alone expressing regret. Yet, Thursday night in Charlotte, North Carolina–in the first major speech under new campaign management–Donald Trump expressed regret over statements that may have caused pain to people.

“Sometimes in the heat of debate and speaking on a multitude of issues, you don’t choose the right words or say the right thing,” Trump told the crowd at the Charlotte Convention Center. “I have done that and, believe it or not, I regret it. And I do regret it. Particularly where it may have caused personal pain.”

It was the new Trump Republicans had been waiting for and he brought with him a new theme. The New York businessman vowed to lead a unified nation into a “New American Future” and characterized the nation’s challenges as a common struggle, using the word “together” seven times.

“We are one country, one people, and we will have together one great future,” he said. “I’d like to talk about the New American Future we are going to create together.”

“This isn’t just the fight of my life, it’s the fight of our lives — together — to save our country,” Trump said. “We are going to bring this country together.”

“Together, we will make America strong again.”

The dramatic pivot did have one vintage Trump component–it defied conventional wisdom. The campaign shakeup demoting Paul Manafort and promoting Breitbart executive Steve Bannon–who advocates letting the political incorrect Trump be Trump–was widely viewed in D.C. and by mediates as a signal the candidate would double-down on controversy. Kellyanne Conway, a pollster and campaign advisor who specializes in making Republican candidates more appealing to women, was promoted to campaign manager.

“We cannot make America Great Again if we leave any community behind,” Mr. Trump said. “Nearly four in ten African-American children are living in poverty. I will not rest until children of every color in this country are fully included in the American Dream. Jobs, safety, opportunity. Fair and equal representation. This is what I promise to African-Americans, Hispanic-Americans, and all Americans.”

Trump also made another the appeal to black voters that he made Tuesday night at a speech in West Bend, Wisconsin, in which he noted how Hillary Clinton and Democrats have taken black support for granted. He rattled off statistics on poverty, education and crime, vowing reform and opportunity after decades of Democratic leadership with no result.

“If African-American voters give Donald Trump a chance by giving me their vote, the result for them will be amazing … Look at how badly things are going under decades of Democratic leadership … It is time for a change … What do you have to lose?”

A statement by the Clinton campaign dismissed the speech as a “teleprompter apology,” something of a strange response considering the Democratic candidate never speaks without a teleprompter.

“The American people are still waiting for Hillary Clinton to apologize for all of the many lies she’s told to them,” Trump said. ‘Tell me, has Hillary Clinton ever apologized for lying about her illegal email server and deleting 33,000 emails? Has Hillary Clinton apologized for turning the State Department into a pay-for-play operation where favors are sold to the highest bidder? Has she apologized for lying to the families who lost loved ones at Benghazi?”

Mr. Trump continued to slam job-killing trade deals, which his opponent called the “gold standard” and now opposes, a corrupt political, economic and immigration system. But the “champion of the little guy” message was expanded and he said as president he would “refuse to let another generation of American children be excluded from the American Dream.”

“Let our children be dreamers, too.”

Donald Trump isn't known for apologies and

Democratic President Barack Obama, left, embraces Hillary Clinton, right, after speaking to the Democratic National Convention at the Wells Fargo Arena in Philadelphia. (Photo: AP)

Democratic President Barack Obama, left, embraces Hillary Clinton, right, after speaking to the Democratic National Convention at the Wells Fargo Arena in Philadelphia. (Photo: AP)

It’s one thing for “Never Trump” Republicans to criticize Donald Trump, but Democrats, the liberal media and pedestal-perched professors who have enabled President Obama and now support Hillary Clinton have no standing to do so.

President Obama set out to fundamentally transform America (read: systematically destroy America as founded). Measured in terms of accomplishing this goal, Obama has been one of the most successful presidents in history. Measured in terms of doing what is best for America, Obama undeniably ranks among the worst.

Obama’s progressive defenders whitewash his record, but it is objectively horrible — unless you either are in a fantasy world or truly consider America’s comeuppance and its economic, military and cultural decline glorious developments.

With just a little more time — darn that 22nd Amendment — Obama could hammer those last few nails in the nation’s coffin, but not to worry; he is backing a successor who promises to double down on his mischief, and he will be covering her flank as a civilian community organizer writ large — agitating in the private sector on the national stage. What a duo!

Liberals scoff at our supposed sensationalism in depicting Obama’s record, but they are the ones in fantasyland — not us. Their judgment is so skewed that they wouldn’t recognize a disastrous, perennially sluggish economy if it hit them in the face — because it has. They wouldn’t see it if Islamists were waging war on the United States, because they are and they don’t. They wouldn’t be alarmed if the Constitution and rule of law were under ongoing assault, because they are and they aren’t. They don’t care that the nuclear family is in peril, because they favor diluting traditional and gender distinctions. And they wouldn’t care if the federal government were deliberately fostering dependency addiction among its citizenry and demonizing work, the work ethic, productivity and business, because it is and they enable it.

President Obama couldn’t be more of a menace to this nation’s interests if he were trying to be — and thus, coupled with his stated intentions, it is reasonable to assume he is and irresponsible to downplay the suspicion.

I jampacked two long, well-documented books chronicling Obama’s reign of terror, and he was just getting started. There is easily enough material for two more equally comprehensive books.

In fact, Obama has done so much that I fear the electorate will tend to forget the extent of it. When I occasionally go back and review it, I realize that half of it has disappeared from my active memory. But revisiting it is enough to make your blood boil — and more than enough to make you understand that Hillary Clinton, the personification of Obama’s third term on steroids and independently terrible in her own right, must be defeated at all costs.

In every subcategory of domestic and foreign policy, Obama has damaged America. He has turned everything upside down. Wrong is right. Bad is good. Strength is weakness. Culturally sound is culturally taboo. Economic decline is economic growth. Deliberately exploding the national debt is reducing the deficit. Destroying health care, qualitatively and quantitatively — and as a matter of cost and choice — is progress. Demonizing victims of terrorism and excusing terrorists is enlightened. Opening our borders to those with hostile intent toward Americans and America is compassion. Releasing coldblooded terrorist killers helps show the world how wonderful we are. Facilitating the world’s evilest regime’s acquiring nuclear weapons and capital to fund terrorism is a triumph of diplomacy and world peace. Fostering a war on law enforcement is an achievement for justice.

Flouting the Constitution and the rule of law shows executive leadership. Implementing provisions of the DREAM Act that Congress not only didn’t approve but explicitly rejected is humanitarianism. Intervening in Libya in defiance of Congress is laudable leadership. Repeatedly apologizing for America here and on foreign soil is commendable. Smothering the economy with taxes, spending, regulation and debt and punishing small business are prudent economic policies. Presiding over the worst recovery in 70 years is sagaciously steering America out of a dire economic crisis. Perpetual malaise is a strong economic record. Impeding entitlement reform — and thereby guaranteeing the bankruptcy of Social Security, Medicare and the United States — is saving Social Security.

Regarding climate change as a greater threat than terrorism is sane thinking. Selectively compromising the First Amendment and gratuitously attacking the Second Amendment for the good of the cause are admirably nuanced. Squandering billions of dollars on environmental boondoggles proves good intentions. Undermining our military readiness and managing our national decline atones for our alleged misdeeds. IRS targeting of political enemies is just business as usual. Politicizing the Justice Department is social justice. Dismissing proven charges against the New Black Panther Party is racial justice. Converting NASA for Muslim outreach beats getting a man on Mars. Waging war on religious liberty releases us from the clutches of those crazy Christians. Dividing Americans on the basis of race, gender, religion and income is uniting America.

As tired as I am of the left’s Machiavellian euphemisms, I could go on for hours. But please understand: Everything Obama has done is fairly and necessarily imputable to Clinton because she participated in and ratified his policies and actions and promises to do worse. In a number of areas, she already has done worse.
On top of all this, Clinton is the most opportunistically ambitious, double-dealing, corrupt fraud in the modern era.

My fear is that some, by obsessing over Trump, are overlooking just how monumentally horrible Hillary Clinton would be as president. We can’t let that happen.

President Obama couldn't be more of a

Iranian-American-Prisoners

Three Iranian-American prisoners, Amir Mirzaei Hekmati, Jason Rezaian, and Saeed Abedini

The Obama administration admitted the $400 million airlifted to Iran this past January hinged on the release of four Americans detained in Tehran. The admission during a press briefing on Thursday marks the first time the U.S. government–either via the White House, the Pentagon or the State Department–linked the two events.

The White House originally pushed back on a Wall Street Journal report claiming the U.S. essentially paid a ransom to Iran, which is against longstanding U.S. policy. Critics and skeptics noted the money was airlifted just as the Americans were released by the Iranian regime and the hostages said they were told at first they could not depart on the awaiting plane until the money arrived.

“The negotiations over the [arms deal] settlement … were completely separate from the discussions about returning our American citizens home,” State Department spokesman John Kirby said in a statement. “Not only were the two negotiations separate, they were conducted by different teams on each side.”

Kirby, who denied the cash transfer was done to secure the release of the four Americans, said it was the first installment paid in a $1.7 billion settlement the Obama administration reached with Iran to resolve a failed 1979 arms deal dating from just before the Iranian Revolution. Officials referred to a statement released by Secretary of State John Kerry on January 17, 2016.

However, critics quickly noted that this version of events is not compatible with how these “settlements” are reached. Further, President Obama never disclosed the $400 million cash payment, which was exchanged by the Swiss government to allude prohibitions in U.S. law to transfer such payments to Iran, when he announced the Iran nuclear deal on January 17. He also did not disclose how the funds were paid. Now, with the follow up report claiming the money was not authorized for airlift until the hostages boarded the plane, the administration is beginning to show their hand.

“U.S. officials wouldn’t let Iranians take control of the money until a Swiss Air Force plane carrying three freed Americans departed from Tehran on January 17,” the Wall Street Journal reported.

While he held to the original story regarding the arms settlement, Mr. Kirby said the U.S. withheld the delivery of the cash as leverage until Iran permitted the Americans to leave the country.

A 2015 study conducted by People’s Pundit Daily using available data found paying ransoms to radicals holding Western hostages increases both kidnappings and death rates, rather than having the intended effect of saving lives.

The Obama administration admitted the $400 million airlifted

American Loympic swimmers Ryan Lochte, left, and Jimmy Feigan, right.

American Loympic swimmers Ryan Lochte, left, and Jimmy Feigan, right.

American gold-medal swimmer Ryan Lochte and three Olympic swimmer teammates lied about being robbed at gunpoint, Brazilian authorities said. Further, police say the athletes made up the story to cover up their damaging a bathroom door at a Rio gas station.

UPDATE: A security guard did point a gun at four American swimmers but there was no robbery, according to Rio de Janeiro chief of civil police Fernando da Silva Veloso, who adds that one or more of the U.S. Olympic athletes carried out acts of vandalism at a gas station; officials have not yet determined if charges will be filed against them.

However, Reuters reported a slightly different version of events, citing a police source claiming the CCTV video of the encounter does not show the swimmers causing any damage, only the store employees removing them from the bathroom. A security guard then stopped the group from leaving in a taxi as Lochte and the others offer money. Three swimmers are apparently told to sit on the ground with their hands in the air. Lochte stands up but is told to sit down again.

Neverthless, Chief Veloso said Jack Conger and Gunnar Bentz later told police during a four-hour interrogation that the robbery story had been fabricated by Lochte.

EARLIER: Jack Conger and Gunnar Bentz were taken off their homebound flight and not allowed to leave Brazil until they give testimony to investigators regarding an alleged robbery that targeted a group of swimmers, People’s Pundit Daily reported Thursday that police say they have a video proving the story was false.

An official with direct knowledge of the investigation, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the media, said Lochte, along with fellow swimmers Jack Conger, Gunnar Bentz and Jimmy Feigen, stopped at a gas station in Barra da Tijuca, a suburb of Rio around 6 a.m. on Sunday. One of the swimmers tried to open the door of an outside bathroom, but it was locked.

The swimmers then proceeded to push on the door until they broke it and, a security guard appeared and confronted them, but it wasn’t clear whether he ever took out his fireman or pointed it at anyone.

Ryan Lochte said he was with Conger, Bentz and Jimmy Feigen when they were robbed at gunpoint in a taxi by men with a police badge as they returned to the athletes’ village from a party. Lochte originally claimed he had a gun pointed at his head, but now says he only had a gun pointed at him. He also now says the taxi wasn’t pulled over by men with a badge, but that they were robbed after stopping at the gas station.

While Lochte made it back to the U.S., despite being told not to leave, he said he is cooperating with authorities. Mr. Feigen was also ordered to stay in Brazil. The office of Judge Keyla Blanc, who previously ordered the seizure of Lochte and Feigen’s passports, said in a statement that there were discrepancies in their statements. The U.S. Olympic Committee said police went to the athletes’ village to try to seize the passports, but the U.S. team had already moved out.

Meanwhile, Jeff Ostrow, Mr. Lochte’s attorney, said there is no question the robbery occurred and his client is sticking to his story.

“Why would anybody fabricate anything?” Steve Lochte said. “It’s just ridiculous.”

American gold-medal swimmer Ryan Lochte and three

Arizona-Immigration-Law-2010

April 23, 2010: Supporters of the illegal immigration enforcement law rallied at the state Capitol in Phoenix. (PHOTO: AP)

As a general rule, I like immigration and I don’t like redistribution. As such, I share the late Milton Friedman’s concern about the risks of having a welfare state combined with open borders. And based on many conversations all over the country, I think that’s a big reason why many people oppose amnesty (augmented by Republican partisans who fear, probably with some validity, that changing the political landscape of America is the real reason Senator Schumer is a big advocate of amnesty).

So how can we reap the benefits of immigration without the risk of a bigger welfare state?

In part, we should have programs designed to attract people with skills and education.

I’m a big advocate and defender, for instance, of the EB-5 program that gives a preference for foreigners who invest in America’s economy and create jobs.

And if you peruse Mark Perry’s chart, we must be doing something right. Look at all these immigrant groups that are boosting per-capita income for the United States (including people from Lebanon, home of the Princess of the Levant).

I’ve always thought far more Americans would be sympathetic to immigration if they could be convinced that people were coming to America for the right reasons – i.e., to earn money rather than mooch off taxpayers.

With that in mind, Professor Tyler Cowen of George Mason University has a Bloomberg column about Denmark that cites the great work of Nima Sanandaji about how Americans of Nordic descent have much higher incomes than the people remaining in Nordic nations. Tyler’s entire article is worth reading, but I want to focus on a quasi-open-borders proposal that he puts forth in his conclusion.

For all the anti-immigrant sentiment that is circulating at the moment, would it hurt the U.S. to have fully open borders with Denmark? It would boost American gross domestic product and probably also improve American education. History teaches that serious assimilation problems would be unlikely, especially since many Danes already speak English. Open borders wouldn’t attract Danes who want to live off welfare because the benefits are so generous at home. How’s this for a simple rule: Open borders for the residents of any democratic country with more generous transfer payments than Uncle Sam’s.

I can’t think of any reasonable objection to this idea. Everything Tyler says makes sense. People like “Lazy Robert” won’t be lining up to get plane tickets to America. Instead, we’ll get the young and aspirational Danes.

For what it’s worth, I even think he understates the case since the type of people who would migrate to America wouldn’t just boost GDP. They almost surely would do something arguably more important, which is to boost per-capita GDP.

Just think of all the productive entrepreneurs who would take the opportunity to escape over-taxed Denmark and come to the United States. Along with ambitious and skilled people from nations such as Italy, France, and Sweden (though our welfare state is very expensive, so I admit I’m just guessing at nations which would be eligible based on Tyler’s rule about “more generous transfer payments”).

By the way, Denmark apparently has learned a lesson about the risks of being a welfare magnet.

A story from Spiegel Online has the details.

Denmark’s strict immigration laws have saved the country billions in benefits, a government report has claimed. …The extremely strict laws have dramatically reduced the flow of people into Denmark in recent years, and many government figures are delighted with the outcome. “Now that we can see that it does matter who comes into the country, I have no scruples in further restricting those who one can suspect will be a burden on Denmark,” the center-right liberal integration minister, Søren Pind, told the Jyllands Postennewspaper. Pind was talking after the ministry’s report — initiated by the right-wing populist Danish People’s Party (DPP) — came to the conclusion that by tightening immigration laws, Denmark has saved €6.7 billion ($10 billion) over the last 10 years, money which otherwise would supposedly have been spent on social benefits or housing. According to the figures, migrants from non-Western countries who did manage to come to Denmark have cost the state €2.3 billion, while those from the West have actually contributed €295 million to government coffers.

Sounds like Danish lawmakers don’t want to add even more passengers to the nation’s already-overburdened “party boat.”

And who can blame them. The nation already has a crippling problem of too many people depending on government.

P.S. If you want to enjoy some immigration-related humor, we have a video about Americans migrating to Peru and a story about American leftists escaping to Canada.

P.P.S. For those interested in the issue of birthright citizenship (a.k.a. anchor babies), I’ve shared some interesting analysis from Will Wilkinson and George Will.

CATO economist Daniel Mitchell examines and advocates

Aug. 18, 2016: Turkish authorities search outside the damaged building of the police headquarters after an explosion in Elazig, eastern Turkey. (Sahismail Gezici/DHA via AP)

Aug. 18, 2016: Turkish authorities search outside the damaged building of the police headquarters after an explosion in Elazig, eastern Turkey. (Photo: Sahismail Gezici/DHA via AP)

Two car bombs targeting police stations in Turkey this week killed at least six people and wounded at least 219 others, officials said Thursday. A police officer and two civilians were killed by a car bomb on a police station in the eastern province of Van late Wednesday, and at least 73 other people–including 53 civilians and 20 police officers–were wounded.

Authorities claim the attack was perpetrated by the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, or the Islamo-leftist group known as PKK. PKK commander Cemil Bayik last week threatened to increase the number of targeted attacks against police in Turkish cities. Gov. Murat Zorluoglu said early Thursday that another car bombing struck police headquarters in the eastern Turkish city of Elazig, killing at least 3 police office officers and wounding 146 others. At least 14 of them were listed as being in serious condition.

Elazig Deputy Mayor Mahmut Varol said the explosion went off on the grounds of the police headquarters and set cars parked nearby on fire. Video footage showed cars were overturned and the windows of the four-story building was blown out, while smoke filled the streets in the area. The violence has escalated since the peace process failed to secure an agree between the PKK and Turkey’s security forces last year.

According to state-run Anadolu Agency, more than 600 Turkish security personnel and thousands of PKK members have been killed. Human rights groups say hundreds of civilians have also died as a result of being caught in the middle of the violence. Turkey and its allies characterize the PKK, which began fighting for autonomy in southeast Turkey in 1984, a terrorist organization.

Two car bombs targeting police stations in

Former President Bill Clinton, Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and Vice Chair of the Clinton Foundation Chelsea Clinton, discuss the Clinton Global Initiative University during the closing plenary session on the second day of the 2014 Meeting of Clinton Global Initiative University at Arizona State University in Tempe, Arizona March 22, 2014. (PHOTO: REUTERS)

Former President Bill Clinton, Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and Vice Chair of the Clinton Foundation Chelsea Clinton, discuss the Clinton Global Initiative University during the closing plenary session on the second day of the 2014 Meeting of Clinton Global Initiative University at Arizona State University in Tempe, Arizona March 22, 2014. (PHOTO: REUTERS)

The Clinton Foundation has hired a private cyber security firm to investigate its servers for signs it was potentially hacked, Reuters reported. The request comes as the Democratic National Committee, the State Department and other players around Hillary Clinton have been plagued by scandal following the release of hacked materials by WikiLeaks and the hacker known as Guccifer 2.0.

Reuters said one of their sources and two U.S. security officials told them the hackers used “spear phishing” techniques to get access to the foundation’s systems. It’s the same technique the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) said was used on Mrs. Clinton and her State Department aides. It involves creating fake emails or websites in order to get access to the foundation staffers’ emails and then to the organization’s network.

The Clinton Foundation has not yet responded to a request for comment on the report and the security company, FireEye, told Reuters they don’t comment on their clients. Reuters also reported that the cyber attacks have put Democrats, including many in the Clinton campaign, into panic mode over what materials the hackers could’ve obtained.

Regarding Mrs. Clinton in particular, emails have surfaced revealing a “play-for-play” operation between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department during her tenure as secretary. For instance, an email sent by Jacquelyn Lopez from Perkins Cole law firm to the DNC on May 18, 2016 reveals pay for play activities. WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange made the bold claim recently the next email release will lead to Mrs. Clinton’s indictment.

Perkins-Cole

Can we set up a time for a very brief call to go over our process for handling donations from donors who have given us pay to play letters? Want to make sure we have a robust process in place to make sure that donations that come in from those donors, in any form, get put into the operating account.

Let me know when would be a good time for you all.

Thanks, Jackie”

As People’s Pundit Daily previously reported, Attorney General Loretta Lynch at least twice refused a referral from the FBI to further probe the Democratic presidential candidate and others at the Clinton Foundation on charges of public corruption. Now, the Bureau has decentralized their investigation and is working with the U.S. District Attorney in New York in an effort to circumvent the Justice Department.

WATHC: Clinton allied journalist Ron Fournier discusses “pay for play” email hacked and released

[brid video=”59460″ player=”2077″ title=”Ron Fournier Clinton Emails Blur The Lines Between Their Political And Personal Lives”]

The Clinton Foundation has hired a private

Weekly-Jobless-Claims-Graphic

Weekly Jobless Claims Graphic. Number of Americans applying for first-time jobless benefits.

The Labor Department reported Thursday weekly jobless claims fell by 4,000 to 262,000 for the week ending August 13, lower than the estimate for 265,000. The prior week was unchanged at 266,000.

the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 262,000, a decrease of 4,000 from the previous week’s unrevised level of 266,000. The four-week moving average–widely considered a better gauge as it irons out volatility–was 265,250, an increase of 2,500 from the previous week’s unrevised average of 262,750.

There were no special factors impacting this week’s initial claims and no state was triggered “on” the Extended Benefits program during the week ending July 30. The report marks 76 consecutive weeks of initial claims below 300,000, the longest streak since 1970. However, long-term unemployment continues to shrink the weekly pool of eligible applicants.

The highest insured unemployment rates in the week ending July 30 were in Puerto Rico (3.5), Connecticut (2.7), New Jersey (2.7), Alaska (2.6), Pennsylvania (2.5), California (2.2), West Virginia (2.2), Rhode Island (2.1), Illinois (2.0), Massachusetts (2.0), and Wyoming (2.0.

The largest increases in initial claims for the week ending August 6 were in Pennsylvania (+2,359), Puerto Rico (+1,621), Texas (+1,196), Ohio (+952), and New York (+881), while the largest decreases were in Michigan (-2,186), Kentucky (-536), Kansas (- 283), Iowa (-280), and West Virginia (-124).

The Labor Department reported Thursday weekly jobless

mid-atlantic-manufacturing-aluminium-raw-materials-reuters

A worker in the mid-Atlantic manufacturing sector works with raw aluminum materials. (PHOTO: REUTERS)

The Manufacturing Business Outlook Survey, the Philadelphia Federal Reserve’s gauge of activity in the Mid-Atlantic region, rose to 2.0 in August, up from a -2.9 the month prior. The reading of the gauged matched the median economic forecast on Wall Street, but the share of firms reporting an increase in activity (35%) barely exceeded the share reporting a decrease (33%).

A reading above zero suggests expansion, while those below indicate contraction. The data also appear contradictory to a certain extent, as order indicate a further slowdown in future months but expectations are rosier. The current new orders index declined significantly from 11.8 in July to -7.2 in August, while the percentage of firms reporting an increase in new orders (27%) was less than 1 point lower than last month.

Over the next year (2016:Q3 to 2017:Q3), please list your expected
annual percent change with respect to the following:
Percent Change*
1. For your firm:
Prices your firm will receive (for its own goods and services sold). 1.0
Compensation your firm will pay per employee (for wages and benefits). 3.0
2. For your employees:
Prices your employees will pay (for goods and services where they live). 2.0
3. For U.S. consumers:
Prices U.S. consumers will pay (for goods and services). 2.0
For the next 10 years (2016 through 2025), what is your
expected annual average percent change with respect to the following:
4. For U.S. consumers:
Prices U.S. consumers will pay (for goods and services). 2.5
* Numbers represent median forecasts.

However, “the percentage of firms reporting a decrease (34%) was 18 points higher than last month,” the report said. The index of future manufacturing activity rose 12 points to 45.8 in August, indicating manufacturing firms believe that the current weakness is temporary.

Source: Philadelphia Federal Reserve -- August 2016 Manufacturing Business Outlook Survey

Source: Philadelphia Federal Reserve — August 2016 Manufacturing Business Outlook Survey

The Manufacturing Business Outlook Survey, the Philadelphia

American Loympic swimmers Ryan Lochte, left, and Jimmy Feigan, right.

American Loympic swimmers Ryan Lochte, left, and Jimmy Feigan, right.

Two American Olympic swimmers, Jack Conger and Gunnar Bentz, were taken off their homebound flight and not allowed to leave Brazil until they give testimony to investigators regarding an alleged robbery that targeted a group of swimmers, their attorney said Thursday.

Ryan Lochte said he was with Conger, Bentz and Jimmy Feigen when they were robbed at gunpoint–the details of which have now changed–in a taxi by men with a police badge as they returned to the athletes’ village from a party. Lochte originally claimed he had a gun pointed at his head, but now says he only had a gun pointed at him. He also now says the taxi wasn’t pulled over by men with a badge, but that they were robbed after stopping at a gas station.

Patrick Sandusky, U.S. Olympic Committee spokesperson, said Conger and Bentz were detained and “released by local authorities with the understanding that they would continue their discussions about the incident on Thursday. James Feigen is also communicating with local authorities and intends to make further statements regarding the incident on Thursday as well.”

While Lochte made it back to the U.S., despite being told not to leave, he said he is cooperating with authorities. Mr. Feigen was also ordered to stay in Brazil. The office of Judge Keyla Blanc, who previously ordered the seizure of Lochte and Feigen’s passports, said in a statement that there were discrepancies in their statements. The U.S. Olympic Committee said police went to the athletes’ village to try to seize the passports, but the U.S. team had already moved out.

Representatives from the U.S. consulate arrived at the airport shortly after the swimmers were stopped from leaving.

Meanwhile, Jeff Ostrow, Mr. Lochte’s attorney, said there is no question the robbery occurred and his client is sticking to his story.

“Why would anybody fabricate anything?” Steve Lochte said. “It’s just ridiculous.”

But police officials with knowledge of the investigation said they cannot find their taxi driver that drove the swimmers on the night in question or witnesses from the robbery. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the investigation is ongoing.

Lochte, during interviews with the police, said they were intoxicated and could not remember what type and color of taxi they rode in or exactly where the robbery took place. The swimmers also could not remember what time the robbery occurred.

Two American Olympic swimmers were taken off

People's Pundit Daily
You have %%pigeonMeterAvailable%% free %%pigeonCopyPage%% remaining this month. Get unlimited access and support reader-funded, independent data journalism.

Start a 14-day free trial now. Pay later!

Start Trial