Widget Image
Follow PPD Social Media
Sunday, February 23, 2025
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 609)

Initialize ads

Vermont socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders had a clear message for superdelegates after landslide wins in 6 of the last 7 contests, including nearly 80% of the vote in Hawaii. In an interview with Jonathan Karl on ABC This Week,

“We’ve just won six out of the last seven contests,” Bernie said. “We have the momentum. We won three landslide victories yesterday. And the reason we’re doing well is that we are talking about the real issues facing the American people.”

“You’re assuming that every super delegate who now supports Secretary Clinton will stay with her… I think the super delegates are going to have make a very difficult decision and that is, if a candidate wins in a state by 40 or 50 points, who are you going to give your vote to?”

TRANSCRIPT

JONATHAN KARL, ABC NEWS: And that was Bernie Sanders, declaring victory last night in a rally in Wisconsin. The senator won three landslide victories last night out West in Washington State. He had a decisive nearly 50-point win in Alaska. The margin was even bigger. He scored over 80 percent of the vote and in Hawaii, another blowout.

But Sanders remains far behind in the total delegate count, trailing Hillary Clinton by over 700 delegates. Senator Sanders joins me right now.

Senator Sanders, congratulations. That was a big night.

SANDERS: Thank you very much.

KARL: So you’ve won big out there in those three states. You’re still way behind in the delegate count.

But does that — what does this mean for the race?

Does this mean you are absolutely —

(CROSSTALK)

SANDERS: Well —

KARL: — going through to the —

SANDERS: — what it — Jonathan, what it means is we won three landslides last night. We’ve won six out of seven contests in the last 11 days. We’ve cut Secretary Clinton’s lead by a third during that period of time.

A national poll just came out that had us 1 point ahead of Secretary Clinton, when we started 60 points behind. And every national and state poll that I have seen, virtually every one, has us defeating Donald Trump. CNN had us defeating him by 20 points.

Clearly we have the momentum. And I think, at the end of the day, we’re going to end up with more pledged delegates than Secretary Clinton.

And then I think the super delegates are going to have make a very difficult decision and that is, if a candidate wins in a state by 40 or 50 points, who are you going to give your vote to?

And, second of all, which candidate is better positioned to defeat Trump or any of the other Republican candidates?

I think a lot of the super delegates are going to conclude that it’s Bernie Sanders.

KARL: But you still need 73 percent of the delegates going forward, which is a huge —

(CROSSTALK)

SANDERS: No, we don’t. No, no, no.

KARL: Well —

SANDERS: No, I don’t accept that. That is not the case. You’re assuming that every super delegate who now supports Secretary Clinton will stay with her. You’re not taking into consideration the fact there are hundreds of delegates, super delegates, who have not yet made a decision. We think we can win many of them.

And what we showed yesterday is, in fact, the momentum is with us; we think we’re going to do well in Wisconsin. We think we got a real shot in New York. And then we go out to California. You go out to Oregon. That’s the most progressive part of America. We think we’re going to do very well there.

So I will not deny for one second that we still remain the underdogs, but we have come a long, long way, you will have to concede, in the last 10 months. We do have a path toward victory.

KARL: There were Democrats saying it’s time for you to lay off Senator Clinton — Secretary Clinton, keep this positive now, stop the attacks on her Wall Street ties, her super PAC, all of that.

Are you going to start laying off or are you going to, you know, put the pedal to the metal here?

SANDERS: We’ve just won six out of the last seven contests; we have the momentum. We won three landslide victories yesterday. And the reason we’re doing well is that we are talking about the real issues facing the American people. And campaign finance is one of them.

We have raised now 6 million individual campaign contributions averaging 27 bucks apiece. That’s unprecedented in American political history. Secretary Clinton has super PACs; she has raised some $15 million at least from Wall Street, money from the fossil fuel industry and the drug companies.

Do I think the American people need to know?

That, is that an important issue?

I think it is. Our vote’s on the wall: I voted against the war in Iraq. She voted for the war in Iraq. That’s an important issue. I am opposed to continuation of fracking. She supports fracking. Those are important issues. That’s what a campaign is about.

I do not run negative ads, but clearly contrasting my position with Secretary Clinton’s is what a campaign is supposed to be about.

KARL: So you said in an interview this week that she — suggested she may not be liberal enough to be in your cabinet.

So let me ask you now, after these wins, is she liberal enough to be your running mate?

Would you consider her?

SANDERS: That’s speculation. Hillary Clinton is a person who has enormous — I have enormous respect for, has a very distinguished career. We’re not into speculation right now.

The reason, Jonathan, we are doing so well is we are talking about not speculation, the issues impacting the American middle class, grotesque levels of income and wealth inequality, the decline of the American middle class, the fact that millions of kids are graduating college deeply in debt, the reality that climate change is a global crisis that we have got to deal with and have to take on the fossil fuel industry.

Those are the issues that I’m dealing with, not speculating at this point who my vice presidential nominee would be.

Sen. Bernie Sanders had a clear message

easter

On Easter, we examine public opinion on Jesus and the God of the Christian Bible.

Matthew 27:24 (NLT)
24 Pilate saw that he wasn’t getting anywhere and that a riot was developing. So he sent for a bowl of water and washed his hands before the crowd, saying, “I am innocent of this man’s blood. The responsibility is yours!”

Happy Easter or Resurrection Sunday to all Saints of all political persuasions!

The account of Pilate and his interactions with the Jewish leaders of his time was a very high-powered political struggle. Several times Pilate offered Jesus “a way of escape,” but of course Jesus’ plan was a plan for the ages. He was taking orders from our Heavenly Father. He was literally on a mission from God.

The Jewish leaders of His time viewed Him as a “non-conformant” revolutionary, who was a threat to their happy little world of power and control. It’s amazing how much nothing has changed in this crazy world we live in.

It’s time to stop “the Establishment.” I am tired of hearing pundits and establishment leaders trying to explain why evangelicals like myself, support Donald Trump or why we shouldn’t. First off you need to know scripture and biblical history and doctrine which many of these pundits and leaders don’t know. So stop trying to explain us away.

Before I came to know Jesus life was easy. I said what I wanted without thinking about the implications. Today I tread more softly, in a world that hates Christianity and that is quick to accuse “and you call yourself a Christian?” the minute you voice your personal opinion that happens to oppose the liberal norm.

Trump has not just won over Christians throughout the U.S., he’s also captured the spirit of secular people who operate in the realm of common sense. This is the pool of voters that only Trump has tapped into.

It’s time to stop Mitt and his band of crusaders who are out for Donald’s blood. What ever happened to losing gracefully? His speech was despicable and diabolical. Oh, do I dare say it? And he calls himself a Christian? (Tongue and cheek) He had his chance in the lime light and I reluctantly voted for him, too.

Pilate had the power to save Jesus. Historically speaking, there are those of us who have used their influence to do great good (like Donald Thump) and then there are those who use their influence to do great evil; like the Mitts, Hillary Clinton and other progressive liberals who think that taxpayer dollars are their personal slush fund.

Pilate thought by washing his hands ceremonially he would signify his desire to let Jesus go free, hence acquitting him. Wrong! To know what the right thing to do is, and yet not to do it, is the definition of sin. He had an army at voice range to command. A simple command would have dispersed the crowd. He’s no more innocent than Mitt, or you and I are innocent. All have sinned.

Romans 3:23 (KJV)
23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;

Jesus used His ability to perform the greatest miracle this world has ever seen. Reconciling all of humanity back to God, freeing us from sin, translating us from the kingdom of darkness and into the kingdom of light. While we know that Donald won’t achieve everything he’s promised, nor achieve all the things our precious Lord and savior has done, we do know he’s a unifier. The numbers don’t lie, he’s doing something right.

It’s time for the GOP to stand behind the clear leader, not the appointed one. It’s time for Mitt and his gang of followers to go wash their hands and pray for God’s forgiveness.

It’s time to bring the country together for one common goal. In the same way Jesus brought humanity “the right message from The Father,” So has Donald brought forth “The right message for American.” Let’s make America Great again, and better than ever before!

I’d like to say, “isn’t that what we all want?” but sadly there are those who have a death grip on tax payer dollars who will scratch, claw and hang on for the love of lining their pockets at our expense to the gruesome end! Like a cat scratching and clawing frantically to avoid getting wet!

It’s time America.

[mybooktable book=”letters-of-grace-a-true-life-devotional” display=”summary” buybutton_shadowbox=”true”]

It’s time to stop the Establishment. I

Barack-Obama-Tango-Argentina

At a State Dinner hosted by Argentine President Mauricio Macri, President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama took to the dance floor with professional dancers to do the tango. It came just after Islamic terrorists attacked Brussels, Belgium. (Photo: AP)

Over the years, Barack Obama has made some statements that indicate a very statist worldview.

Now he may have added to that list. Check out this excerpt from a report in theDaily Caller.

President Barack Obama downplayed the differences between capitalism and communism, claiming that they are just “intellectual arguments.” …Obama said…”I think for your generation, you should be practical and just choose from what works.”

It’s hard to object to the notion that people should choose “what works,” so perhaps there’s not a specific quote that I can add to my collection. However, the President’s implication that there’s some kind of equivalence between capitalism and communism, which both systems having desirable features, is morally offensive. Sort of like saying that we should “choose from what works” in Hitler’s national socialism.

Communism is a disgusting system that butchered more than 100,000,000 people.

It is a system that leads to starvation and suffering.

Communism produces Nazi-level horrors of brutality.

So what exactly “works” in that system, Mr. President? If you watch Obama’s speech, you’ll notice there’s not a lot of substance. There is a bit of praise for Cuba’s decrepit government-run healthcare system(you can click here, here, and here if you want to learn why the system is horrifying and terrible for ordinary citizens). And he also seems to think it’s some sort of achievement that Cuba has schools.

So let’s take a closer look at what Cuba actually has to offer. Natalie Morales is a Cuban-American actor, writer, and filmmaker. Here’s some of what she wrote about her country and her relatives still trapped on the island.

…we send money, medicine or syringes for the diabetic aunt (since the hospital doesn’t have any unused disposable ones), baby clothes, adult clothes, shoes, or food… a doctor, a lawyer, or another similar profession that is considered to be high-earning everywhere else in the world will make about twenty to thirty dollars per month in Cuba. Yet shampoo at the store still costs three dollars. This is because everything is supposed to be rationed out to you, but the reality is that they’re always out of most things, and your designated ration isalways meager. …if you’re a farmer and you’ve raised a cow, and you’re starving, and your family is also starving, and you decide to kill that cow and eat it? You’ll be put in jail for life. Because it’s not “your” cow, it’s everyone’s cow. That’s good ol’ Communism in practice.

Ms. Morales is especially irritated by Americans who fret that capitalism will “ruin” Cuba.

…picture me at any dinner party or Hollywood event or drugstore or press interview or pretty much any situation where someone who considers themselves “cultured” finds out I’m Cuban. I prepare myself for the seemingly unavoidable…“I have to go there before it’s ruined!”…I will say some version of this: “What exactly do you think will ruin Cuba? Running water? Available food? Freedom of speech? Uncontrolled media and Internet? Access to proper healthcare? You want to go to Cuba before the buildings get repaired? Before people can actually live off their wages? Or before the oppressive Communist regime is someday overthrown?”

Here’s more about Cuba’s communist paradise, including her observations of the healthcare system that Obama admires.

The very, very young girls prostituting themselves are not doing it because they can’t get enough of old Canadian men, but because it pays more than being a doctor does. Hospitals for regular Cuban citizens are not what Michael Moore showed you in Sicko. …That was a Communist hospital for members of the Party and for tourists… There are no janitors in the hospitals because it pays more money to steal janitorial supplies and sell them on the street than it does to actually have a job there. Therefore, the halls and rooms are covered in blood, urine, and feces, and you need to bring your own sheets, blankets, pillows, towels, and mattresses when you are admitted. Doctors have to reuse needles on patients. My mom’s aunt had a stroke and the doctor’s course of treatment was to “put her feet up and let the blood rush back to her head.”

She closes with a PG-13 request for idiotic westerners.

…for God’s sake, please don’t wear a fucking Che t-shirt.

Very well said.

By the way, none of this means we shouldn’t normalize relations with Cuba. There’s no longer a Soviet Union, so Cuba doesn’t represent a strategic threat. So, yes, relax restrictions on trade and travel, just like we have for China, Zimbabwe, Vietnam, Russia, Venezuela, and other nations that have unsavory political systems.

But the opening of relations doesn’t mean we should pretend that other systems are somehow good or equivalent to capitalism and classical liberalism.

Let’s close by sharing some news from another garden spot of communism.

If North Korea’s reputation as a place of hunger, hardship and repression was not bad enough, scientists have now discovered that it is too grim even for vultures. …Eurasian black vultures are no longer bothering to stop over in North Korea as they fly from their breeding grounds in Mongolia to their winter homes in South Korea. They concluded that food is so short under the communist regime that even the world’s best-known carrion birds cannot feed themselves. …Lee Han Su, of the institute, said: “This seems to happen because in North Korea the vultures can barely find animal corpses, which are major food resources for them.” Under the draconian regime of Kim Jong Un the country is unable to feed itself. International aid agencies report chronic malnutrition in some regions. …wild animals face the risk of being eaten by people. Defectors describe how victims of the famine were driven to eat dogs, cats, rats, grasshoppers, dragonflies, sparrows and crows. Vultures, for the time being at least, are off the menu.

I’m not sure what American leftists will say we can learn from North Korea. Even PETA presumably won’t be happy that starving North Koreans are eating sparrows and grasshoppers.

The bottom line is that there is zero moral equivalence between communism and capitalism. The former is based on servility to the state and the latter is based on liberty.

But if you’re amoral and simply want to know what works, compare the performance of North Korea and South Korea. Or look at the difference between Cuba and Hong Kong.

Very compelling evidence.

But this isn’t a matter for utilitarian comparisons. What should matter most is that communism is evil.

Over the years, Barack Obama has made

Initialize ads

Michael Savage, a talk radio giant and huge Trump supporter, said he knows that the Ted Cruz sex scandal story in the National Enquire is false. Citing a source inside the tabloid, he said he knows for a fact the story is “character assassination” and “garbage.”

Savage also said that he doesn’t blame Donald Trump for the story. However, because he knows David Pecker–the CEO of American Media, Inc., which publishes the Enquirer–if he finds out he was behind the story, then he might decide to withdraw his support.

Savage said he wouldn’t support anyone in the election if that turns out to be the case.

Pundit’s Perspective

richard-baris-thumbnailI personally know and have had the pleasure of interviewing Michael Savage in the past. If he says he trusts the source that is telling him the story isn’t true, then I believe him and would need overwhelming evidence to get me to change my mind.

Richard Baris — a.k.a. The People’s Pundit

Michael Savage, a talk radio giant and

Donald-Trump-Ted-Cruz

Donald Trump, right, during a campaign stop in Burlington, Vt., on Thursday, Jan. 7, 2016. (Photo: AP) Sen. Ted Cruz, right, speaks in Johnston, Iowa, December 4, 2015. (Photo: Reuters/Brian C. Frank)

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz accused Donald Trump of being behind a National Enquirer story claiming he cheated on his wife with five different women. Speaking to reporters in Oshkosh, Wisconsin, on Friday, Cruz accused “Trump and his henchmen” of pushing a story he called a “garbage” story and a “tabloid smear.”

Recently, Trump responded to Cruz’s allegations.

“I have no idea whether or not the cover story about Ted Cruz in this week’s issue of the National Enquirer is true or not, but I had absolutely nothing to do with it, did not know about it, and have not, as yet, read it,” Mr. Trump, the Republican front-runner said in a statement posted to Facebook. “Likewise, I have nothing to do with the National Enquirer and unlike Lyin’ Ted Cruz I do not surround myself with political hacks and henchman and then pretend total innocence.”

The “pretend total innocence” comment is a reference to an pro-Cruz and anti-Trump super PAC ad that showed a GQ photo of Melania Trump half naked from an issue with subtitle stating: “Meet the next first lady. Or, you could vote for Ted Cruz.”

Sen. Cruz claimed to have had no knowledge of or control over what the super PAC ran because federal election law prohibits coordination between PACs and campaigns. Newsflash: Every reporter and operative knows that law is broken everyday by everybody. On the flipside, Cruz’s allegation comes from Mr. Trump having known the head of the National Enquirer for years.

“Ted Cruz’s problem with the National Enquirer is his and his alone, and while they were right about O.J. Simpson, John Edwards, and many others, I certainly hope they are not right about Lyin’ Ted Cruz.”

“I look forward to spending the week in Wisconsin, winning the Republican nomination and ultimately the Presidency in order to Make America Great Again.”

Roger Stone, a former Trump adviser quoted in the report, suggested the accusations of adultery could have merit and hurt Cruz’s campaign. While the National Enquire is a tabloid, they did correctly report on the scandals Mr. Trump mentioned in his statement. But, thus far, at least one of the five women in the story, who is now Trump’s national spokeswoman, has denied the report.

“These stories have been swirling about Cruz for some time,” Stone said. “I believe where there is smoke there is fire. I have to believe this will hurt him with his evangelical Christian supporters.”

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz accused Donald Trump

Initialize ads

In Argentina, a state destroyed by socialism, President Barack Obama gave the same economic advice he apparently gave to Raul Castro in Cuba: “decide what works.” Obama, who has long been suspected of holding far more radical leftwing views than publicly portrayed, said during a visit to Argentina on Thursday that capitalism, socialism and other labels should be ignored.

“So often in the past there has been a division between left and right, between capitalists and communists or socialists, and especially in the Americas, that’s been a big debate,” President Obama. “Oh, you know, you’re a capitalist Yankee dog, and oh, you know, you’re some crazy communist that’s going to take away everybody’s property.”

The remarks were latest in a series of anti-capitalist comments made on his trip abroad that have been widely criticized. They were made in a country that is still suffering from the failed leftwing economic policies championed by Juan Perón. In 1946, when Perón came to power, Argentina was one of the 10-richest nations in the world. But Perón decided to conduct an experiment in statism, which The Economist recently noted made “its standing as one of the world’s most vibrant economies is a distant memory.”

But to an ideologue, data sets are irrelevant.

“Those are interesting intellectual arguments, but I think for your generation, you should be practical and just choose from what works. You don’t have to worry about whether it really fits into socialist theory or capitalist theory. You should just decide what works,” he added. “And I said this to President Castro in Cuba.”

Cuba, of course, hasn’t had any better luck with leftism. But sometimes the real cost of statism–whether it be socialism, fascism or communism–isn’t measurable. In the 20th century, alone, 262 million human beings were murdered by leftwing statist governments.

In Argentina, a state destroyed by socialism,

Donald-Trump-Ted-Cruz

Donald Trump, left, and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, right. (Photos: AP)

The establishment has lined up behind Sen. Ted Cruz in a last-ditch effort to stop front-runner Donald J. Trump from amassing enough delegates to clinch the Republican nomination. The plan, which uses both Sen. Cruz and Ohio Gov. John Kasich as pawns without a guarantee, is to prevent Mr. Trump from reaching 1,237 delegates on or before June 7, when key contests are held.

The conventional wisdom, which was recently outlined in National Review, holds a contested convention favors Sen. Cruz. Putting aside recent PPD reports underscoring how the Texas senator is nothing but a means rather than an end for those recently backing him, Mr. Trump does in fact have a detailed plan and team in place to lock up the nomination if he finishes shy of 1,237 delegates.

The campaign’s internal projections show Mr. Trump will finish the primaries with about 1,450 delegates, which is higher than the PPD Election Projection Model. According to the head of the model, the odds are still in his favor.

“To be clear, we believe Mr. Trump is more likely to clinch the nomination than not,” said PPD’s senior political analyst Richard Baris. “Our estimates put him over the top by 3 to 10 delegates. But I wouldn’t consider him a man without a plan if I was Sen. Cruz or the rest of the party elite.”

In fact, he does and it’s already on the move.

The team is led by Barry Bennett, the former campaign manager for Dr. Ben Carson. Bennett is in charge of a two-phase plan to ensure his nomination and works with a team that includes general counsel and former FEC commissioner Don McGahn, former aides to Dr. Carson such as Jason Osborne, who handled floor operations at past conventions, and Ed Brookover, a former RNC political director with deeply held ties to Washington Republicans.

The first phase focuses on the roughly 40-day window beginning after the last primary on June 7 and before the convention starts on July 18, which will be used to woo and lock down delegate commitments. The campaign will obtain signed, public commitments from those delegates in June, which will send a signal to the remaining anti-Trump forces that he will be the nominee and, frankly, to get over it and unify.

In this scenario, Mr. Trump would win a majority of delegates on the first ballot in Cleveland, thus, the nomination. Some members of the RNC rules committee are attempting to thwart this plan by nixing rule 40-b, which requires a candidate to win a majority of the delegates in eight contests in order to be considered on the ballot.

The second phase includes a plan to ensure every delegate pledged to Mr. Trump on “the first ballot stays a Trump delegate on the second ballot,” a source told PPD.

“I think the mistaken impression is that they weren’t playing by the traditional rules before,” a campaign staff member, who spoke on condition of anonymity told NBC News, as well. “One of the pleasant surprises I had, when I joined, was that the state directors were already engaged in the process.”

A large part of the process involves a battle of public perception, one which polls show he is already winning. The idea is to make any process that denies him the nomination be perceived by the public as unfair, which two polls–including one conducted by A-rated Selzer & Co. for Bloomberg–already confirm is the case.

As PPD reported last week, a growing number of RNC members believe that an electoral disaster is more likely to follow such a scenario than if Mr. Trump is nominated by the party.

In fact, internal polls conducted for the RNC show GOP candidates up and down the ballot performing worse with Sen. Cruz at the top of the ticket than Mr. Trump. The surveys, which are larger samples, make assumptions based on the actual voting patterns than traditional methods used by public pollsters.

The expectations game is starting to take a toll, even as figures such as Sen. Lindsey Graham and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush offer their endorsements. An RNC official working on convention planning told NBC News that party insiders increasingly expect Mr. Trump to be the nominee, which impacts how hard people really want to push a lost cause.

“Lee Atwater always told us, ‘If it’s happening, be for it,'” said the official, speaking on the condition of anonymity. “This is happening.”

The establishment has lined up behind Sen.

Gross-Domestic-Product-GDP-Reuters

File photo: Shipping cranes and containers at a U.S. port representing exports and imports factored in overall gross domestic product, or GDP. (Photo: REUTERS)

The final reading on fourth-quarter gross domestic product (GDP) showed the U.S. economy grew at an annualized pace of 1.4%, down from the third-quarter’s final reading of 2%, according to the Commerce Department.

Economists had forecast a 1% growth rate for the world’s biggest economy. While GDP was initially estimated to have risen at only a 0.7% rate and economy grew at a rate of 2.0% in the third quarter (2.4% for all of 2015), the pace continues a trend that underperforms the historical post-World War II average.

The upward revision was fueled by greater-than-expected consumer spending, which accounts for roughly two-thirds of all GDP. Consumer spending rose at a 2.4% pace rather than the 2.0% rate initially reported last month. Consumption increases came from services. However, corporate profits fell for a second straight quarter.

Profits after tax with inventory valuation and capital consumption adjustments fell by 8.4% annually, which is the steepest drop since the first quarter of 2014. They fell by 1.7% in the third quarter. Profits from current production decreased $159.6 billion after shedding $33.0 billion in the third quarter.

In 2015, profits fell 5.1%, the largest drop since 2008 and followed a 0.6% decline in 2014.

The manufacturing sector, which has shown both regional and national weakness in 2016, as it did in 2015, continues to be disproportionately impacted by global markets and domestic policy. Manufacturing profits declined $139.2 billion during the last quarter after falling $4.1 billion from July to September.

The final reading on fourth-quarter gross domestic

Jeb-Bush-and-Ted-Cruz

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush were shake hands before a Republican debate. Gov. Bush, who’s brother has been working for Sen. Cruz, endorsed his former rival in a last-ditch effort to stop Donald J. Trump. (Photo: Agence France-Presse/Robyn Beck)

It is time to address the canard that endorsements for Sen. Ted Cruz from establishment Republicans damage his credibility as an outsider. It is opportunistic and lazy thinking.

As the Republican presidential race has narrowed, it is inevitable that the only two viable contenders remaining, Cruz and Donald Trump, will be receiving more endorsements. This is especially true this year because the seriousness of the threats facing the nation and the presence of strikingly unconventional candidates make this the most important election in decades. With the stakes so high, there will be more endorsements from people who under less dire circumstances would remain neutral.

Who would have guessed that Sen. Lindsey Graham or former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush would endorse Cruz? Graham quipped that if someone murdered Cruz on the floor of the Senate and were tried in the Senate, he’d be acquitted. Likewise, there has been no love lost between Cruz and the Bushes. And who would have dreamed former presidential nominee Mitt Romney would record robocalls for Cruz in Utah?

Will Cruz be perceived as selling out his principles if he accepts the endorsements or just remains silent?

Latter-day establishment foe Donald Trump suggested that the endorsements hurt Cruz and he wouldn’t want them himself. But Trump met with a few dozen Republican congressmen recently, and he carted the Obama-hugging Chris Christie to campaign events all around the nation on his jet. What Trump said or did yesterday, last week or last month, however, has little bearing on what he says or does today, and it matters little to his infinitely forgiving supporters.

As with so many other issues, Trump will get a pass because he is held to a different standard. He has been in bed with and funded establishment and leftist honchos throughout his career, but that’s irrelevant because he talks loudly and carries a big stick. He’s an “outsider” because he’s never held public office and he’s not a lawyer, though he has boasted about buying insider influence and has been involved in more litigation than most seasoned trial lawyers. Even Trump’s shallowness on policy detail seems to work to his advantage, as his unwavering admirers must assume it’s because he has no access to secret knowledge that is accessible only to the evil insiders he seeks to depose.

Though I am well aware that Cruz will be judged differently than Trump, I still believe he should accept such endorsements graciously and, in any event, should not reject them.

Why shouldn’t Cruz accept support from people he’s been fighting, as long as the support comes without strings attached that would require him to compromise his principles? The Cruz team should view this support as a vindication of its campaign and as an indication that his intraparty foes prefer him to the other candidates.

Predictably, Trump supporters are already claiming that these endorsements prove that Cruz is an insider and that Trump is not. If Trump were the insider, he’d be getting these endorsements, they say. Establishment Republicans are scared to death of Trump, they contend, because they wouldn’t be able to control him because he can’t be bought.

But does that really pass the smell test? How many core beliefs does Trump have that are not negotiable? Trump has played footsie with them for years and has bragged that he’d be able to work with people but Cruz wouldn’t — “because no one likes Ted.” On the other hand, establishment types already know they can’t control Cruz, who has shown them, to their great distaste, that he won’t play establishment baseball with them.

Perhaps establishment Republicans are partially concerned that they wouldn’t have so much influence over the largely non-ideological Trump as they would over some politicians, but they know they’d have a much harder time seducing Cruz out of his core beliefs.

So, what are they so worried about with Trump? I don’t believe it has anything to do with his alleged outsider status or his policies, because they are just as concerned with Cruz’s as they are with Trump’s. Rather, it’s his perceived demeanor, his behavior, his stability and his radical unpredictability.

Even if they aren’t fans of Cruz personally, they know where he stands and they know what they’re getting with him. They know that he’s serious, that he would approach the presidency with deferential respect and that he is exceedingly knowledgeable and as capable as anyone has ever been to assume presidential power his first day in office. They know that he’s calm and steady and that he would not engage in erratic behavior. Even if Cruz is too conservative for their tastes, they believe he would conduct himself as an adult and not demean the office of the presidency.

Though establishment endorsements are finally coming Cruz’s way, he has not reciprocally endorsed the establishment or its centrist views in return. He remains true to his convictions, which is what matters.

Cruz has always maintained that he could reassemble the Reagan coalition by fiercely and clearly articulating the conservative message and that he wouldn’t have to drift to the center to win the general election. Yes, the nation’s demographics and culture have shifted, but Cruz conservatives believe that the majority of American voters are still receptive to an infectious conservative message if someone would finally present it enthusiastically.

We conservatives have always said that we believe in a big tent as long as we can build it without selling our political souls. So don’t fall for the nonsense that accepting endorsements necessarily compromises the endorsee. In the case of Ted Cruz, there is and will be no abandonment of principles, and I am confident that his establishment endorsers are more certain of that than anyone else. So I say to all of them, welcome aboard the Cruz Constitutional Express.

[mybooktable book=”the-emmaus-code-finding-jesus-in-the-old-testament” display=”summary” buybutton_shadowbox=”true”]

It is time to address the canard

People's Pundit Daily
You have %%pigeonMeterAvailable%% free %%pigeonCopyPage%% remaining this month. Get unlimited access and support reader-funded, independent data journalism.

Start a 14-day free trial now. Pay later!

Start Trial