Widget Image
Follow PPD Social Media
Tuesday, February 25, 2025
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 680)

Suspects Had Large Cache at Home, in Rental Car

San-Bernardino-Shooting-Syed-Farook

Syed Farook, left, was described by coworkers as a “devout” Muslim. Law enforcement, right, searches for a suspect in a mass shooting at a social services center Wednesday in San Bernardino, Calif. (Photo: Chris Carlson/AP/Courtesy of Family) )

Officials said they recovered the following inside of the home of the San Bernardino shooting suspects, which was leased under both of their names: 12 pipe bombs, hundreds of tools used to make IEDs, more materials to make would-be bombs, 2,000 9MM rounds for their handguns, 2,500 .223 caliber rounds used in AR-15 rifles, as well as long rifle rounds.

In the suspects’ rental vehicle, law enforcement found 3 pipe bombs taped together with remote control car parts in what police say was an effort to make one larger explosive munition. They also found 76 rifle rounds that were fired by the suspects, 1,400 .223 caliber rounds and 200 9MM rounds. Consequently, police confirmed that all of the weapons were purchased legally, which is an intellectual hinderance to the gun control argument made by many on the left only moments after the shooting on Wednesday.

The vests used by the suspects were tactical, or designed to hold large amounts of ammunition, but they were not bullet proof. Worth noting, the signature for the remote control bomb-making technique points to “Inspire,” a periodical magazine published by Al Qaeda. It is also very similar to the device design used by Chechen brothers Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who killed 3 people and injured 264 others when they detonated two pressure cooker bombs during the Boston Marathon on April 15, 2013.

The police confirmed the two suspects in the California shooting, which killed 14 and injured 17, are Syed Rizwan Farook, 28, and his wife Tashfeen Malik, 27. San Bernardino Police Chief Jarrod Burguan said authorities are “pretty comfortable” Farook and Malik, who were killed in a shootout with police Wednesday afternoon, were the only two shooters in the attack at an office building where Farook’s employer, the County Department of Public Health was having a Christmas party.

Farook, who was a Pakistani-American, married Malik, also from Pakistan, roughly six months ago. Malik was in the United States on a K-1 visa, which is issued to the fiancé or fiancée of a United States citizen. A K-1 visa requires a foreigner to marry his or her U.S. citizen petitioner within 90 days of entry, or depart the United States.

Federal law enforcement sources tell PPD the investigation is now focusing on who helped the couple carry out the attacks.

Officials said they recovered the following inside

Britain Targets ISIS-Controlled Oil Fields in Eastern Syria

David-Cameron-Chatham-House

Britain’s Prime Minister David Cameron delivers a speech on EU reform, at Chatham House in London, Britain November 10, 2015. Cameron said he hoped to make good progress with reforms of the European Union when leaders from the bloc meet next month, but he gave no fresh sign of when he plans to hold Britain’s EU membership referendum. (Photo: Reuters/Kirsty Wigglesworth)

Warplanes from Britain commenced the country’s first airstrikes against the Islamic State (ISIS, ISIL) in Syria just one day after lawmakers voted to approve the action. The airstrikes, which targeted ISIS-controlled Omar oil fields in eastern Syria on Wednesday, were conducted by four Royal Air Force Tornados and are just the beginning of the campaign.

“There are plenty more of these targets throughout eastern, northern Syria which we hope to be striking in the next few days and weeks,” Defense Secretary Michael Fallon said.

While the United Kingdom has been previously contributing to the effort to “degrade and destroy” the Islamic State in the rather feeble 65-nation coalition put together by U.S. President Barack Obama, the effort has been minimal to say the least. Britain’s participation in the U.S.-led operation has been only in Iraq. RAF Tornado GR4 surveillance jets and armed Reaper drones have been conducting daily flights over Iraq for weeks. The mission was gathering intel for coalition strikes while also providing close air support for Iraqi ground units.

Meanwhile, the vote came in the wake of the recent Paris attacks that killed 130 people. France has asked for unity among Europe’s military powers to expand the scale of military action against the militant group.

Warplanes from Britain commenced the country’s first

Police Chiefs are Calling More Greater Citizen Activism, Defense Against Terror. Not Gun Control

Obama-Detroit-Police-Chief-Gun-Control

President Barack Obama, left, pauses while making a statement on Wednesday’s mass shooting in San Bernandino, Calif., Thursday, Dec. 3, 2015, in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington. Detroit Police Chief James Craig, right, speaks in disagreement of gun control. (Photos: AP /Evan Vucci)

A couple of radical Islamists murdered a bunch of people in California and, even before any details were available, some politicians sought – once again – to exploit a tragedy.

Here’s a short excerpt from USA Today about Hillary Clinton’s response.

Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton took to Twitter on Wednesday to…call for stricter gun control measures.

And Huffington Post reports that President Obama also seized the opportunity to push his gun control agenda.

President Barack Obama commented Wednesday on the shooting in San Bernardino, California… “there’s some steps we could take, not to eliminate every one of these mass shootings, but to improve the odds that they don’t happen as frequently, common-sense gun safety laws, stronger background checks,”

This is nonsense. Terrorists obviously don’t care whether there are laws against guns. Heck, just look at the evidence from Europe, where there are very restrictive laws, yet radical Islamists obviously are able to get weapons on the black market.

So, the net effect of these laws is to make it just about impossible for law-abiding people to defend themselves. Even if they are being targeted by the terrorists!

Fortunately, there’s a growing recognition that it is absurd to disarm good people and make it easier for evil people to wreak havoc. And the government officials who are in charge of stopping mass shootings are among those who are now pushing for a common-sense approach.

The Detroit News reports that the city’s police chief has a very sensible attitude about how to discourage bad people.

The city’s police chief said he believes violent extremists would be reluctant to target Detroit, as they had Paris last month, for fear armed citizens would shoot back. “A lot of Detroiters have CPLs (concealed pistol licenses), and the same rules apply to terrorists as they do to some gun-toting thug,” Chief James Craig said. “If you’re a terrorist, or a carjacker, you want unarmed citizens.”

A local professor also has the same sensible viewpoint.

Oakland University criminal justice professor Daniel Kennedy agreed that terrorists would be reluctant to attack armed citizens.

I hope Prof. Kennedy already has tenure since he may get targeted by leftist students who might accuse him of common sense, which is a “microagression” that makes them feel “unsafe.”

In any event, terrorists surely would have an incentive (if they’re capable of passing my IQ test for criminals and liberals) to seek out a “gun-free zone” if launching an attack in Detroit.

More than 30,000 Detroit residents are legally armed, according to Michigan State Police. There were 6,974 concealed-pistol licenses issued to residents in 2013, more than double those in 2009, and 7,584 issued in 2012, the state police said. …Starting Tuesday, Michigan is making it easier for citizens to get concealed gun permits. …The National Rifle Association has said the new rules will eliminate licensing delays and arbitrary denials. Craig praised the new state law, and said they will help citizens fight back against criminals and terrorists. …“If you’re sitting in a restaurant, and you aren’t allowed to have a gun, what are you supposed to do if someone comes in there shooting at you? Throw a fork at them?”

Which, of course, is why gun-free zones are so foolish. The only people who obey are the law-abiding people. Yet those are precisely the people who could be helpful if some nutjob launched an attack. After all, terrorists wouldn’t get the chance to do much damage if they tried to shoot up this neighborhood.

So kudos to Chief Craig.

But he’s not the only senior law-enforcement official who recognizes that it’s time to put aside empty political correctness.

Amazingly, the Chief of Police in Washington, DC, also has decided that common sense should triumph. Here’s some of what was reported by the Washington Post.

D.C. Police Chief Cathy L. Lanier is urging that civilians confronted by an active shooter in some cases try to stop the gunman before law enforcement authorities arrive, saying quick action could save lives. …“I always say if you can get out, getting out’s your first option, your best option. If you’re in a position to try and take the gunman down, to take the gunman out, it’s the best option for saving lives before police can get there.” …“For a major city police chief to say that is breaking new ground,” said Chuck Wexler, who runs the Police Executive Research Forum… “if you’re dealing with suicide bombers or terrorists, it’s a completely different dynamic,” Wexler said. “I think that because so much can happen in so few seconds, intervention by citizens can make a big difference.”

Remember, though, that an effective response by citizens is only possible if they’re armed.

So the top cop in DC is basically acknowledging that gun control empowers the bad guys.

The chief acknowledged that advising confrontation is “kind of counterintuitive to what cops always tell people.” Cooper said, “You’re telling them that now though?” Lanier answered: “We are.”

By the way, the Sheriff of Milwaukee County in Wisconsin also believes armed citizens are necessary and desirable.

And regular cops overwhelmingly agree that gun control doesn’t deter bad people.

For further information, I invite you to peruse some serious articles on gun control, featuring scholars such as John Lott and David Kopel, along with some very persuasive information from an actual firearms expert.

Most of all, though, I recommend you read what Jeffrey Goldberg and Justin Cronin wrote about guns. They’re both self-confessed leftists, but they also decided that rationality and common sense should take precedence over anti-2nd Amendment ideology.

Leftwing politicians reflexively call for gun control

Female-Soldier-Military

(Photo: Stephen B. Morton/AP)

Under President Obama’s direction, Defense Secretary Ash Carter will order the military to open up all combat jobs to women, despite objections from the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

The Associated Press reported on Thursday Carter, who is expected to make his announcement Thursday, is giving the armed services until Jan. 1 to submit plans to make the historic change.

“There will be no exemptions,” Mr. Carter told reporters at a press conference. “To succeed in our mission of national defense, we cannot afford to cut ourselves off from half the country’s talents and skills. We have to take full advantage of every individual who can meet our standards.”

The Obama administration’s decision ignores arguments from the Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman that the Marine Corps should be allowed to exclude women from certain front-line combat jobs, citing studies showing that mixed-gender units aren’t as capable as all-male units.

In September, the Marines released a study that found that all-male infantry units performed at a higher-level than units with women in them. Worth noting, both the study and the AP report confirm some of the accusations made by military sources to PPD on the issue of women in combat. The study found that the all-male units are more mobile (quicker), are more lethal largely because they fire their weapons more accurately, could carry significantly more weight and suffered fewer injuries than co-op or “gender-integrated” units.

The injuries suffered by female Marines, none of which were able to pass basic infantry training at Parris Island without significantly reducing the physical standards expected of male Marines, included stress fractures that were likely the result of carrying heavy loads (such as weaponry and rucksacks). However, the report did acknowledge that “female Marines have performed superbly in the combat environments of Iraq and Afghanistan and are fully part of the fabric of a combat-hardened Marine Corps after the longest period of continuous combat operations in the Corps’ history.”

Critics point to a 25-year-old report cited in the study, and have argued the data is outdated. Proponents of the prohibition, however, argue the data is more reliable because it was gathered in an era absent of PC influence.

Defense Secretary Ash Carter will order the

Why The Washington Times, Mediate, and FOX News Followed LA Times Right Off the Cliff

Syed-Farook

Syed Farook was described by coworkers as a “devout” Muslim. (Photo: Courtesy of Family)

Every now and then we get to report a story featuring the story-makers that underscores why People’s Pundit Daily was founded several years ago. That is, the truth is truly a commodity in modern American politics. Some of this–well, most of it–is due to cultural and institutional bias in journalistic academia that fills future ranks in the Fourth Estate. However, some stories underscore another reason the American “mainstream” media have become untrustworthy–organizational bias.

Organizational bias, which is a fancy name we at PPD use for what used to be known as a “boys club,” comes in part from competition. They simply do not like company in the industry, no matter how legitimate that organization’s reporting proves to be.

When reports of the deadly San Bernardino shooting first started trickling in on Wednesday, Fox News anchor Shepard Smith repeatedly cited the LA Times as “the most credible source we have” to bring the latest details to consumers. However, that’s not really the truth. While Fox News bills itself as the conservative alternative to an otherwise liberal-dominated media, the fact is that they don’t like company in their field of business anymore than the leftwing members of the Fourth Estate.

Let’s take a look at some of the fine reporting from the Gold Standard of West Coast journalism, as Shepard Smith made them out.

Rick Serrano, a LA Times reporter who covers the FBI in his crime and justice beat, tweeted out a completely erroneous report regarding the name of one of the suspects in Wednesday’s apparent terror attack.

LATimes-Rick-Serrano-Tweet1

Notice how Serrano alleges that the police gave him that information, i.e. the suspect was a citizen from Qatar (he’s is not) and his name is Tayyeep Bin Ardogan (it isn’t). His tweet implies he just got off the phone with one of his beat sources, but he didn’t. In fact, Serrano simply copied and pasted the erroneous report word-for-word from some random Twitter account he saw, and it was noticed by another Twitter user/journalist.

LATimes-Rick-Serrano-Tweet

They decided, for good measure, to put up Serrano’s tweet side-by-side with another that had posted the erroneous information five hours earlier. Rather than check on the information, The Washington Times (right) and Mediate (left) just ran with Serrano’s tweet, despite its factual inconsistencies.

Coincidentally, shortly after the Paris terror attacks two weeks ago, PPD broke the story with witnesses confirming the shooters yelled “Allah Akbar” as they sprayed down the Bataclan. Shepard, the resident liberal at Fox was also on the air as that attack unfolded. Ironically, he dismissed the report without even naming it, stating instead his team was not able to confirm it through “credible” sources.

Then again, unfortunately for Mr. Smith, we didn’t mess this up like his outlet did. Cue Fox News…

Times spokeswoman Hillary Manning has since told TheBlaze the mistake was shared with “relevant editors” and the LA Times were “trying to determine the original source of the apparent hoax.”

Don’t hold your breathe.

For the record, police confirmed the two suspects in the San Bernardino shooting, which killed 14 and injured 17, are Syed Rizwan Farook, 28, and his wife Tashfeen Malik, 27.

Further, San Bernardino Police Chief Jarrod Burguan said authorities are “pretty comfortable” Farook and Malik, who were killed in a shootout with police Wednesday afternoon, were the only two shooters in the attack.

Rick Serrano, a LA Times reporter, tweeted

Service Sector Activity Declines After Manufacturing Contracts

service-sector-hospital-nurse-reuters

Service sector employee, nurse at a hospital. (Photo: REUTERS)

The Institute for Supply Management’s Non-Manufacturing Business Survey, a gauge of service-sector growth fell to 55.9 in November from 59.1 in October. The reading was below expectations for a shallower drop to 58, and the lowest since May. Readings above 50 indicate expansion, while those below point to contraction.

“According to the NMI, 12 non-manufacturing industries reported growth in November,” said Anthony Nieves, chair of the Institute for Supply Management Non-Manufacturing Business Survey Committee. “After a strong month of growth in October, the non-manufacturing sector’s rate of growth slowed in November. Most respondents are still positive about business conditions.”

ISM® NON-MANUFACTURING SURVEY RESULTS AT A GLANCE
COMPARISON OF ISM® NON-MANUFACTURING AND ISM® MANUFACTURING SURVEYS*
NOVEMBER 2015
Non-Manufacturing Manufacturing
Index Series
Index
Nov
Series
Index
Oct
Percent
Point
Change
Direction Rate
of
Change
Trend**
(Months)
Series
Index
Nov
Series
Index
Oct
Percent
Point
Change
NMI®/PMI® 55.9 59.1 -3.2 Growing Slower 70 48.6 50.1 -1.5
Business Activity/Production 58.2 63.0 -4.8 Growing Slower 76 49.2 52.9 -3.7
New Orders 57.5 62.0 -4.5 Growing Slower 76 48.9 52.9 -4.0
Employment 55.0 59.2 -4.2 Growing Slower 21 51.3 47.6 +3.7
Supplier Deliveries 53.0 52.0 +1.0 Slowing Faster 6 50.6 50.4 +0.2
Inventories 54.5 52.5 +2.0 Growing Faster 8 43.0 46.5 -3.5
Prices 50.3 49.1 +1.2 Increasing From Decreasing 1 35.5 39.0 -3.5
Backlog of Orders 51.5 54.5 -3.0 Growing Slower 6 43.0 42.5 +0.5
New Export Orders 49.5 54.5 -5.0 Contracting From Growing 1 47.5 47.5 0.0
Imports 51.0 54.5 -3.5 Growing Slower 5 49.0 47.0 +2.0
Inventory Sentiment 63.5 63.0 +0.5 Too High Faster 222 N/A N/A N/A
Customers’ Inventories N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 50.5 51.0 -0.5
Overall Economy Growing Slower 76
Non-Manufacturing Sector Growing Slower 70

* Non-Manufacturing ISM® Report On Business® data is seasonally adjusted for Business Activity, New Orders, Prices and Employment Indexes. Manufacturing ISM® Report On Business® data is seasonally adjusted for New Orders, Production, Employment and Supplier Deliveries.

** Number of months moving in current direction.

COMMODITIES REPORTED UP/DOWN IN PRICE, AND IN SHORT SUPPLY

Commodities Up in Price

Butter (3); Dairy Products; Food Products (2); Labor (7); Lettuce; Lumber Products – Pine, Spruce, and Treated; Produce; and Strawberries.

Commodities Down in Price

Aluminum; Beef; Chicken; Copper; #1 Diesel Fuel (4); #2 Diesel Fuel (3); Fuel (4); Gasoline (5); Lab Supplies; Natural Gas; Oil; Shrimp; Software Related; and Soybean Meal.

Commodities in Short Supply

Labor (2); and Turkey (2).

Note: The number of consecutive months the commodity is listed is indicated after each item.

The Institute for Supply Management’s Non-Manufacturing Business

Suspects ID’ed as Syed Rizwan Farook, and Saudi Wife Tashfeen Malik

San-Bernardino-Shooting

Law enforcement searches for a suspect in a mass shooting at a social services center Wednesday in San Bernardino, Calif. (Photo: Chris Carlson/AP)

The police confirmed the two suspects in the San Bernardino shooting in Calif., which killed 14 and injured 17, are Syed Rizwan Farook, 28, and his wife Tashfeen Malik, 27. San Bernardino Police Chief Jarrod Burguan said authorities are “pretty comfortable” Farook and Malik, who were killed in a shootout with police Wednesday afternoon, were the only two shooters in the attack at an office building where Farook’s employer, the County Department of Public Health was having a Christmas party.

Here is what we know about the San Bernardino shooting suspects, what we don’t know and why we don’t know it yet. While the FBI officially refused to rule out terrorism without ruling out workplace violence, most law enforcement officials who spoke to PPD tell us there is something else at play.

“The lack of details, that is out of an abundance of political correctness,” one federal law enforcement source told PPD. “Not caution.”

The Joint Terrorism Task Force was called on Wednesday to aide in the investigation, which was also being assisted by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF).

“They came prepared to do what they did, as if they were on a mission,” San Bernardino Police Chief Jarrod Burguan said.

Indeed, the two suspects plotted out a well-planned attack for sometime, the evidence suggests. They used what appear to be two legally purchased assault rifles, two legally purchased handguns, pipe bombs, tactical gear and even Go-Pro cameras. The latter is typically used by Islamic terrorists for the purpose of using in recruitment propaganda video at some point in the future. Investigators also found Farook’s home to be booby-trapped prior to the attack.

Read Also — San Bernardino Shooting Suspects Had This Arsenal in “IED Factory” at Home

Syed-Farook

Syed Farook was described by coworkers as a “devout” Muslim. (Photo: Courtesy of Family)

Farook, who lived in nearby Redlands only 2 miles from the conference building he shot up, worked at the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health for five years and was described by co-workers as a “devout” Muslim. However, coworkers say the Pakistani-American citizen only began to grow his beard out after he returned from Saudi Arabia, where he traveled in April. Family members told The Associated Press Farook married Malik, who is reportedly Pakistani, in Saudi Arabia, though they met on the Internet prior.

“He was very religious. He would go to work, come back, go to pray, come back. He’s Muslim,” his estranged father of the same name told the New York Daily News.

A source called the suspects’ house “an IED facility,” as investigators found multiple pipe bombs and small explosives that were strapped to remote-controlled cars. The vests used by the suspects were tactical, or designed to hold large amounts of ammunition, but they were not bullet proof. Worth noting, the signature for the remote control bomb-making technique points to “Inspire,” a periodical magazine published by Al Qaeda. It is also very similar to the device design used by Chechen brothers Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who killed 3 people and injured 264 others when they detonated two pressure cooker bombs during the Boston Marathon on April 15, 2013.

Police and federal law enforcement officials are still piecing together a timeline of events, but here is how they believed it all unfolded.

The initial shooting happened shortly before 11 a.m. local time at the state-run center, which includes three buildings where developmentally disabled people of all ages are treated. It was initially reported that Farook left the facility angry prior to returning with Malik, prompting initial claims that the incident was nothing more than workplace violence. Police now concede a coworker, now deceased, did get into a heated debate with Farook.

READ ALSO — LA Times Damages Credibility Covering San Bernardino Shooting, Several Outlets Followed Suit

However, law enforcement officials don’t put too much stock in this theory as a motive, as the evidence and weaponry more than suggests a well-thought out, pre-planned attack. In fact, officials do not believe that the Christmas party was the initial target for the couple.

Approximately four hours after the shooting, police were already looking for a dark SUV and staking out his home. When they saw a vehicle matching that description, law enforcement pursued the SUV and a gun battle ensued at roughly 3 p.m. local time. One officer suffered a minor injury, and investigators are privately weighing the theory that the couple was returning for more weapons and ammunition before going back to the complex to engage authorities.

Yet, publicly they are taking a very different position on whether this was a preplanned act of terrorism, despite stressing they will follow the evidence.

“It is a possibility, but we don’t know that,” said Assistant Regional FBI Director David Bowdich. “It’s possible it goes down that road. It’s possible it does not.”

Meanwhile, a neighbor said Farook lived with his wife, mother and their 6-month old baby, whom the couple had dropped off earlier that morning with a grandparent.

“I did notice there were lots of packages being dropped off and he was in the garage working on stuff,” the neighbor said. She also said that she thought about alerting the authorities to their suspicious activity, but was afraid to be labeled Islamophobic.

Here is what we already know about

Pfizer-HQ

Pfizer’s world headquarters in New York. (AP / Mark Lennihan)

It’s one thing for Pfizer (NYSE:PFE) to renounce its U.S. citizenship, moving its official residence to Dublin, Ireland, as a tax dodge — all the while continuing to run the business in the United States. That disgusting tactic happens to be disgustingly legal, thanks to our indolent Congress and its failure to fix the corporate tax laws.

It’s quite another to insult the public with blatant phoniness that avoiding billions in U.S. taxes gives the company “the strength to research, discover and deliver more medicines and therapies to more people around the world.” Those are the words of Pfizer’s chief executive, Ian Read, an accountant by training.

The Pfizer deal involves a merger with a much smaller Allergan, an Ireland-based company that happens to do its business in New Jersey. Wall Street analysts scoffed at the notion that the deal had any purpose other than to let the company avoid billions in U.S. taxes — billions that other American taxpayers will have to replace.

Since Read took the helm in 2010, Pfizer has slashed its research and development budget.

We assume the company will expect the United States to continue subsidizing research through the taxpayer-supported National Institutes of Health. We assume it wants the U.S. government to continue defending its intellectual property rights.

Pfizer made headlines more than a decade ago when it persuaded the city of New London, Connecticut, to use eminent domain to seize a working-class neighborhood around its shiny new headquarters — and replace it with an upscale shopping, hotel and office complex more to the company’s liking. Actually, it was a condition of its move to the city, according to The Day in New London.

The Supreme Court gave the controversial plan a green light in 2005. Four years later, Pfizer abandoned New London.

Yes, the drugmakers know how to make government work for them. Their lobbying group, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, leads efforts to ensure that Americans pay far more for their products than citizens of other countries.

The drugmakers’ crowning achievement was getting a Republican-controlled Congress to write a Medicare drug benefit law to their specifications. While funneling billions in taxpayer subsidies toward helping the elderly buy drugs, it forbade the U.S. government to negotiate the prices on behalf of said taxpayers.

No other Western country lets drug companies charge whatever they think they can get away with. This is why the government of Norway pays about $460 for an injection of the asthma drug Xolair and our Medicare pays about $860.

(Pfizer also lobbied against proposals to let Americans buy their drugs from other countries at these lower prices.)

These conversations always circle back to the drugmakers’ argument that Americans must pay their price to cover the high expense of developing wonderful life-enhancing products.

We can close that circle by asking: To the extent that high U.S. drug prices support research and development benefiting the world, why are Americans the only ones footing the bills?

The drugmakers don’t talk much about that publicly for a very simple reason. It is not in the interests of their executives and investors to stop Americans from playing the chump. If they can get the job done by writing checks to obedient U.S. politicians and the chumps keep re-electing them, why make trouble for themselves?

In a recent annual report, Read told shareholders of Pfizer’s desire to earn “greater respect from the public,” which entails “acting as a respectable corporate citizen.”

Read may have reason to take the American public for easily deceived children. Basic decency, however, demands that he limit such thoughts to private dinner parties.

Read Also — If You Think Corporate Inversions Are Bad, Blame Politicians Rather Than Pfizer

Drugmakers say avoiding billions in U.S. taxes

rand-paul-patriot-act-filibuster

Republican presidential candidate Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, speaks on the floor of the U.S. Senate on Wednesday May, 20, 2015, at the start of an almost 11-hour speech opposing the wholesale renewal of the Patriot Act. (Photo: Senate video feed)

In an effort to draw attention away from the intelligence failures that permitted the attacks of 9/11 and create the impression that it was doing something — anything — to avoid a repeat, the federal government tampered seriously with freedoms expressly guaranteed in the Constitution. Its principal target was the right to privacy, which is protected in the Fourth Amendment.

At President George W. Bush’s urging, Congress passed the Patriot Act in October 2001. This 315-page statute passed the House of Representatives with no debate, and there was very limited debate in the Senate. I have asked many members of Congress over the years whether they read this bill before they voted upon it, and I have yet to find a member who did. In the House, that would have been impossible; the bill was made available to representatives only 15 minutes prior to their vote.

This law permits FBI agents to write their own search warrants for business records, and it has been used to induce the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to issue warrants on a made-up basis to read emails and listen to telephone calls in real time. The members of Congress who voted for it were largely unaware of the liberties they were sacrificing.

The personal liberties that Congress surrendered have been a necessary bulwark against tyranny — the constitutional requirement of warrants as a precondition to searching homes and records, with warrants based on probable cause and specifically describing the place to be searched and the person or thing to be seized.

When Edward Snowden revealed the nature and extent of the domestic spying that the government unleashed upon us post-9/11 and made us all aware of its use of the Patriot Act to do so, the authors of the Patriot Act expressed outrage and anger.

What was the government doing?

The government was secretly gathering data on all of us and using warrants that were not based on probable cause and that did not specifically describe the place to be searched or the person or thing to be seized. When members of Congress realized that they, too, were being spied upon, the outrage grew. That outrage and anger metastasized into a new law enacted earlier this year, called the USA Freedom Act, which took effect this week. That law, its supporters have argued, will tame the National Security Agency into constitutional compliance and keep its 60,000 agents and contractors out of our private affairs. In fact, it is now worse.

The new law permitted the expiration of Section 215 of the Patriot Act — the section used by the NSA to justify its collection of undifferentiated bulk data about everyone. But it also requires the telecoms and Internet service providers to retain their records for five years, and it gives the NSA instant access to those records whenever it needs them.

How can the NSA get instant access to your emails and phone calls?

Quite easily. Both the Patriot Act and the USA Freedom Act unconstitutionally do away with the probable cause requirement for warrants. Those two laws permit the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to issue warrants based on the standard of “governmental needs” rather than probable cause. This is a profoundly unconstitutional standard, and one that has resulted in spying on all people all the time.

In reality, “governmental needs” is no standard whatsoever, as the government will always claim that it needs what it wants. “Governmental needs” is the hateful standard that was used by the British government when it secretly obtained warrants to enter the homes of the colonists. This provoked the Revolution and produced the Fourth Amendment.

Though Section 215 of the Patriot Act has expired, the NSA’s other authorities to spy have not. The propaganda that NSA computers have been shut down is false. Its computers are still in the telecom and Internet service providers’ facilities and are operated by NSA agents remotely.

Nevertheless, Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and an October 2001 executive order by President Bush are still valid, and both bypass the Constitution and continue to permit mass collection of bulk data. Section 702 permits warrantless surveillance on Americans who speak with foreigners, and the NSA has persuaded the FISA court to issue warrants to intercept the calls of the folks to whom those Americans speak, to the sixth degree. That alone encompasses everyone in the United States.

The Bush executive order was given to all military intelligence agencies — of which the NSA is but one. It instructed the military to intercept the telephone calls of anyone in America it wishes, without seeking any warrants.

Does all this unconstitutional spying — whether pursuant to the Patriot Act, the USA Freedom Act or an old presidential executive order — keep us safe? It certainly does not keep our liberties safe. It produces too much material for the government to evaluate. The recent Paris killers communicated with one another using ordinary cellphones and emails. Yet the French government, whose legal authority to spy is broader than our government’s, missed them. And the NSA, which spies on the French government, missed them.

The Fourth Amendment has numerous virtues, but foremost among them is a double-sided coin. One side is the requirement of individualized probable cause. When followed, that prevents the government from using general warrants (search wherever you want, and seize whatever you find), the hallmark of totalitarian governments. By confining the government’s authority to search only to those cases about which it has suspicion, the other side of that coin forces the government to focus on the bad guys.

When it does that, the government will be far likelier to stop them than when it gathers all it can about everyone.

Does all this unconstitutional spying--whether spies are

[brid video=”21320″ player=”2077″ title=”Trump Spokeswoman Battles CNNs Costello Your Networks Reporting Is Wrong!”]

Katrina Pierson, a spokeswoman for Republican frontrunner Donald Trump, confronted CNN anchor Carol Costello on network bias during an interview Wednesday. The fiery exchange begins at the onset of the interview when Pierson calls out Costello for running footage of Trump claiming he was “destroying” Hillary Clinton in a head-to-head matchup.

Trump made the claim at an event Tuesday night prior to a Quinnipiac University Poll, which was just released early Wednesday morning, showing Clinton ahead. However, the last two of three prior polls show Trump either tied with or defeating Hillary.

Then, the interview shifted to Trump’s claim that “thousands and thousands” of American Muslims in Jersey City, N.J., were celebrating the September 11, 2015 attacks.

“No one remembers seeing thousands and thousands of Muslims celebrating in the United States after 9/11,” Costello said

“You guys changed it and made it out of quantity instead of quality,” Pierson shot back.

While PPD has held from the beginning that that Trump was likely exaggerating domestic reports or conflating international reports when he made those claims, the media have undoubtedly engaged in a full blown coverup regarding the rather concerning behavior of many American Muslims.

Read Latest: FBI: “Swarms” of American Muslims Cheered September 11 on Rooftop in Jersey City

Katrina Pierson, a spokeswoman for Republican frontrunner

People's Pundit Daily
You have %%pigeonMeterAvailable%% free %%pigeonCopyPage%% remaining this month. Get unlimited access and support reader-funded, independent data journalism.

Start a 14-day free trial now. Pay later!

Start Trial