Widget Image
Follow PPD Social Media
Wednesday, March 5, 2025
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 833)

Selma-Edmund-Pettus-Bridge

The Obamas and the Bushes continue with the foot soldiers across the Edmund Pettus Bridge. (Official White House Photo by Lawrence Jackson)

The morning after President Barack Obama delivered his soaring speech in Selma, former Gov. George Wallace’s 65-year-old daughter stood on the steps of the Alabama Capitol and — in a soft, sometimes quivering voice — renounced the acts of hate committed there by her father.

“It was here,” Peggy Wallace Kennedy said, “that I heard my father say the words ‘segregation now, segregation tomorrow and segregation forever.’

“It was here that my father fought to support a culture of exclusion, riding on the wings of fear rather than seeking justice on the wings of eagles.”

The Faith and Politics Institute had organized the weekend pilgrimage to Alabama for the 50th commemoration of Selma. The crowd in Montgomery included civil rights activists and their survivors, the current governor of Alabama and members of Congress, including Freedom Rider John Lewis, who 50 years ago was nearly beaten to death by state troopers on the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma. “My friend,” he called her. “My sister.”

Twice the audience rose to its feet in applause for this gentle, petite woman, who only in recent times has found the courage to speak publicly about the truths she has imparted to her children for years.

“For so long, I’ve been somebody’s daughter, somebody’s wife,” she said in a telephone interview the next day. “I stayed home and took care of the children. I was always in the crowd, never a leader; always learning, never teaching.”

Her life changed, she said, after she endorsed Obama in 2008. “He inspired me. He gave me a lot of courage to find my own voice and speak out. My children were older. I wanted to leave for them a legacy different from the one my father left for me.”

That legacy includes the 1963 image of her father blocking the doors at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, vowing to prevent integration of the campus and then stepping aside for federal troops. Such an ugly public history was bound to catch up with her children.

When her son Burns was a little boy, Kennedy and her husband, Mark, took him to visit the Martin Luther King Jr. National Historic Site in Atlanta. The child, she said in her speech, “stood still as the truth of his family’s past washed over him.” He turned to her and asked, “Why did Paw Paw do those things to other people?”

George Wallace’s daughter became the mother who dared to hope. She knelt down beside her son and pulled him close. “Paw Paw never told me why he did those things,” she said, “but I know that he was wrong. So maybe it will just have to be up to me and you to help make things right.”

One of those things was trying to make amends for the harm her father had rained down on Lewis. Her voice trembled but never broke, and she glanced at Lewis and thanked him for the gift of forgiveness in taking her hand in 2009 and walking with her across the Edmund Pettus Bridge.

“Fifty years ago,” she said, “you stood here in front of your state capitol and sought an opportunity as a citizen of Alabama to be recognized and heard by your governor, and he refused. But today, as his daughter and as a person of my own, I want to do for you what my father should have done and recognize you for your humanity and for your dignity as a child of God, as a person of goodwill and character, and as a fellow Alabamian and say, ‘Welcome home.'”

The standing ovation was long and loud. A few minutes later, Kennedy locked arms with Lewis and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and led a two-block march up Dexter Avenue to the Southern Poverty Law Center, where children would lay a wreath.

The march the day before on the Edmund Pettus Bridge had been boisterous, full of chatter and laughter against a backdrop of loud music. This time, the march was virtually silent except for the whir of media cameras and shoes meeting the pavement.

The crowd walked past Dexter Avenue King Memorial Baptist Church, where the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. used to preach. In 1979, George Wallace showed up unannounced at the church to ask for forgiveness for his racist past.

As Peggy Wallace Kennedy approached the church, John Lewis leaned in to whisper in her ear: “Your father would be very proud of you today.”

“That’s all he had to say,” she said later. “That was all I needed to hear. I wanted to pick up where my father left off. I wanted to step out of the shadow of that schoolhouse door.”
On she marched, head high and the sun at her back in Montgomery.

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist and an essayist for Parade magazine. She is the author of two books, including “…and His Lovely Wife,” which chronicled the successful race of her husband, Sherrod Brown, for the U.S. Senate.

The morning after President Barack Obama delivered

Mark Steyn railed against “Queen Hillary” Clinton during an appearance on “Hannity” Tuesday night, saying her EmailGate excuse was “not even good spin” and “doesn’t pass the smell test.”

“Well, this is Queen Mary Antoinette,” Steyn said. “Instead of ‘let them eat cake,’ it’s ‘let them eat spin,’ and not even good spin at that.”

In her first public comments since the EmailGate scandal broke last week, Clinton claimed that it “would have been better” to have used an official government account, but she used the personal one as a “matter of convenience.” Clinton said she wanted to use one phone, though did not explain why she couldn’t set up separate emails in one phone, something reporters took a few seconds to digest when she first uttered the excuse.

“This doesn’t pass any kind of smell test,” he continued. “We’re supposed to be impressed because she turned over 55,000 emails. That works out to about 38 a day while she was secretary of state. The average person in business receives something like 121 business emails a day. So this supposedly high number of emails that she’s turned over doesn’t sound right to me, doesn’t pass the smell test.”

Clinton made her remarks Tuesday afternoon at the United Nations following an event on women’s empowerment, which have already fallen apart in the face of media and Republican scrutiny.

“And everything else, she says she deleted after the State Department requested her emails!” Steyn said. “So she, rather than any government guidelines, has been the arbiter of what emails she’s willing to let into the public record. And Americans are the chumps of the planet for putting up with this.”

Mark Steyn railed against "Queen Hillary" Clinton

elgin-afb-blackhawk-ap

A Blackhawk at Eglin Air Force Base on May 12, 2012 (Photo: AP)

Military officials now say the seven Marines and four soldiers who were on board a helicopter that crashed in the Florida panhandle are “presumed dead.” The training area includes 20 miles of pristine beachfront that has been under the control of the military since before World War II.

Search crews struggled to locate the 11 servicemen due to weather conditions Wednesday morning, including dense fog. However, they were able to locate debris from the Army National Guard helicopter– a UH-60 Black Hawk– that crashed in the Florida panhandle during a routine exercise at about 8:20 p.m. Tuesday.

“At this time all are missing,” Eglin Air Force Base spokesman Andy Bourland said.

Bourland had earlier characterized the search as an “extremely challenging” situation, but still a “search and rescue” nonetheless.

The names of the Marines and soldiers involved in the crash are being withheld pending notification of next of kin. Military officials confirmed the Marines are part of a special operations group based at Camp Lejeune in North Carolina, and the soldiers are from a Hammond, Louisiana-based National Guard unit.

The helicopter went down on a remote swath of beach between Pensacola and Destin, which is owned by the military and frequently used for test missions. Military police keep a close watch on the area and have been known to run off private vendors who rent jet skis or paddle boards without permission.

Test range manager Glenn Barndollar told The Associated Press in August that the beach provides an ideal training area for special operations units from all branches of the military to practice over the water, on the beach and in the bay.

Bourland said the helicopter took off from Destin’s airport and joined other aircraft in the exercise, which are all unharmed and accounted for. There were no actual mid-air collisions as other news outlets have incorrectly reported.

Search-and-rescue crews are looking for seven Marines

Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, said former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton didn’t clear up the email controversy.

“If possible, I have more questions now than I did this time yesterday,” Gowdy said during an interview with Greta Van Susteren Tuesday on “On the Record.”

“We don’t get to grade our own papers in life,” Gowdy said of Clinton’s claim she decided what emails should and should not have been deleted. “She doesn’t get to make that call.”

When asked by Greta if her explanation had satisfied him, Gowdy made it quite clear he was not.

GRETA VAN SUSTEREN, FOX NEWS: Are you satisfied with what she said?

REP. TREY GOWDY (R-SC): No, ma’am, if possible I have more questions than I did this time yesterday. Before she spoke, we’ll take them in the order in which she gave them to us, Greta. I don’t know how the president is able to function if convenience is the reason she used one phone. I mean, the president is the busiest person in the world and he manages to preserve all of his e-mails and I don’t think he has his own server. And Condi Rice didn’t have her own server. I don’t think Madeleine Albright had her own server. So the convenience thing — if she wants somebody to show her how to put two e-mail accounts on one phone, I am happy to do it because even I have managed how to do that and I have two calendars on one phone. So that’s not tough.

Greta, this is solely her doing. She is the reason you and I are having this conversation. We cannot simply take her word that whoever we is, she said we went through and separated the public from the private, who is we? Who gets to make that determination? The best thing to do, I have no interest in her yoga routine. Trust me. I have no interest in that. But I have every interest in public record whether it’s related to Libya or not, and I have no interest in her personal attorney determining what is a public record and what is not a public record. That should be done by a neutral detached person.

Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., chairman of the House

donald-trump-cpac-2015

Donald Trump, billionaire and potential 2016 presidential candidate, speaks Friday at CPAC 2015 in National Harbor, Maryland. (Photo: Getty)

Donald Trump’s kids and Paris Hilton’s siblings were born rich. That gave them a big advantage in life. Unfair!

Inequality in wealth has grown. Today the richest 1 percent of Americans own a third of the assets. That’s not fair!

But wherever people are free, that’s what happens.

Some people are luckier, smarter or just better at making money. Often they marry other wealthy, well-connected people. Over time, these advantages compound. Globalization increases the effect. This month’s issue of Forbes says the world now has 1,826 billionaires, and some struggle to find enough parking places for their jets.

President Obama calls inequality “the defining issue of our time.” Really? Not our unsustainable debt? Not ISIS? The president also said, “No challenge? poses a greater threat to future generations than climate change!”

Politicians constantly find crises they will solve by increasing government power. But why is inequality a crisis?

Alexis Goldstein, of a group called The Other 98%, complains that corporations got richer but workers’ wages “are lower than they’ve been in 65 years.”

That’s a common refrain, but it’s wrong. Over the past 30 years, CBO data shows that the average income of the poorest fifth of Americans is up by 49 percent. That doesn’t include all the innovations that have dramatically improved everyone’s life. Today even the poorest Americans have comforts and lifespans that kings didn’t have a century ago.

George Mason University economist Garett Jones says, “If I was going to be in the bottom fifth in the America of today versus the bottom fifth of America in 1970 or 1960, it’s hard to imagine that anybody would take that time machine into the past.”

And despite America’s lousy government schools and regulations that make it tough to start a business, there is still economic mobility. Poor people don’t have to stay poor. Sixty-four percent of those born in the poorest fifth of the U.S. population move out of that quintile. Eleven percent of them rise all the way to the top, according to economists at Harvard and Berkeley. Most of the billionaires atop the Forbes richest list weren’t born rich. They got rich by innovating.

Rich people aren’t guaranteed their place at the top, either. Sixty-six percent fell from the top quintile, and eight percent fell all the way to the bottom.

That mobility is a reason most of us are better off than we would have been in a more rigid society, controlled by central economic planners.

Life will always be unfair. I want to play pro basketball. It’s unfair that LeBron James is bigger and more talented! It’s also unfair that George Clooney is better looking! It’s unfair that my brother is smarter than me.

Jones points out, “I was born with an advantage, too. Being born in the United States … totally unfair.” He also has two married parents — another huge advantage.

The question is not whether people start out life in homogeneous circumstances, he adds. “The question is whether government policies that try to fix this actually make things better or worse.”

Worse, in most cases. Government “help” encourages poor people to be dependent and passive. Dependent, people stay poor. Also, most government handouts don’t even go to the poor. They go to the middle class (college loans, big mortgage tax deductions, Medicare) and the rich (corporate welfare, bailouts to banks “too big to fail”).

Instead of making government more powerful, let’s get rid of those handouts. Left and right ought to agree on that.

America has prosperity and innovation because we have relatively free markets.

Progressives say, “Keep the innovation but have government make us more equal.” But that doesn’t work. It’s been tried. Government-enforced equality — socialism — leaves everybody poor.
Equality is less important than opportunity. Opportunity requires allowing people to spend their own money and take their own risks.

Instead of talking about “fairness,” it would be better to talk about justice: respecting other people, respecting their freedom and their property rights.

Real fairness requires limiting government power.

John Stossel is host of “Stossel” on Fox News and author of “No They Can’t! Why Government Fails, but Individuals Succeed.”John Stossel is host of “Stossel” on Fox News and author of “No They Can’t! Why Government Fails, but Individuals Succeed.”

Inequality in wealth has grown. Today the

atf-seal-over-rifles-and-handguns

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) seal atop of rifles and various firearms. (Photo: AP)

The Obama administration has for the time being rescinded their unpopular order to ban AR-15 ammunition, after 80,000 opposition comments poured to ATF. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives said they plan more study before they propose a new ban the 5.56 M855 “green tip” ammo, but the National Rifle Association and other groups intend to make sure they follow through.

“They’ve gone away for now. We know they’re coming back and we will be ready,” said Wayne LaPierre, executive vice president of the NRA.

In a tweet, ATF said, “You spoke, we listened. @ATFHQ plans more study on the proposed AP Ammo exemption framework.” It added in a statement:

“Although ATF endeavored to create a proposal that reflected a good faith interpretation of the law and balanced the interests of law enforcement, industry, and sportsmen, the vast majority of the comments received to date are critical of the framework, and include issues that deserve further study,” the statement read.

Gun rights advocates still plan to flood ATF mailboxes with opposition letters just to make sure they go through with their withdrawal.

“Accordingly, ATF will not at this time seek to issue a final framework,” the agency added. “After the close of the comment period, ATF will process the comments received, further evaluate the issues raised therein, and provide additional open and transparent process (for example, through additional proposals and opportunities for comment) before proceeding with any framework.”

While many groups jumped to oppose the rule, it was the NRA that pushed with the chairmen of the House and Senate Judiciary committees to put together majorities of members to oppose the ban.

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman wrote a letter to ATF, which warned that the bullet ban could lead to deeper restrictions of the Second Amendment.

“Second Amendment rights require not only access to firearms but to bullets,” Sen. Grassley said in the letter. “If law-abiding gun owners cannot obtain rifle ammunition, or face substantial difficulty in finding ammunition available and at reasonable prices because government entities are banning such ammunition, then the Second Amendment is at risk.”

The Obama administration proposed in the ATF ban under the guise of protecting police, but lawmakers and activists said the proposal was a backdoor effort to impose gun control and limit use of the AR-15, a popular semi-automatic weapons liberals continuously and inaccurately call a “fully automatic assault weapon.”

“The AR platform is the semi-automatic version of the M16 machine gun originally designed for and used by the military,” the framework ATF proposal read. “The AR-based handguns and rifles utilize the same magazines and share identical receivers. These AR-type handguns were not commercially available when the armor-piercing ammunition exemption was granted in 1986. To ensure consistency, upon final implementation of the sporting purpose framework outlined above, ATF must withdraw the exemptions for 5.56 mm ‘green tip’ ammunition, including both the SS109 and M855 cartridges.”

However, law enforcement officials and police groups, said the AR-15 pistol, which can weigh as few as five pounds, isn’t even being used against police. The relatively newly designed pistol, which costs roughly $1,000 or more, is changed out by criminal who prefer cheaper and easy-to-conceal handguns.

James Pasco, executive director of the Washington office of the Fraternal Order of Police, which is the world’s largest organization of sworn law enforcement officers with more than 325,000 members, also said the ammunition wasn’t even an issue.

“It’s not something that’s necessary at this time,” he told.

The Obama administration has for the time

john-bolton

Former United States ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton speaks during the Republican Jewish Coalition spring leadership meeting at The Venetian Las Vegas on March 29, 2014 in Las Vegas, Nevada. (Photo: Ethan Miller/Getty Images/AFP)

The political firestorm over Senate Republicans writing a letter to Iran regarding the nuclear talks continued Tuesday, with Vice President Biden releasing a statement he claimed “offends me as a matter of principle” and was “beneath the dignity of an institution I revere.”

“In thirty-six years in the United States Senate, I cannot recall another instance in which senators wrote directly to advise another country — much less a longtime foreign adversary — that the president does not have the constitutional authority to reach a meaningful understanding with them,” Biden said in his statement.

The letter signed by Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., and 46 of his Senate colleagues pointed out that President Obama needs congressional approval in order to get a lasting deal with the regime in Tehran, stating Iran would be left with is a “mere executive agreement” between Obama and Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in the absence of such approval.

“We hope this letter enriches your knowledge of our constitutional system and promotes mutual understanding and clarity as nuclear negotiations progress,” the letter stated.

In a response posted on the website of Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Foreign Minister Javad Zarif echoed the same arguments coming from the White House and some, but not all, Democratic lawmakers.

“It is very interesting that while negotiations are still in progress and while no agreement has been reached, some political pressure groups are so afraid even of the prospect of an agreement that they resort to unconventional methods, unprecedented in diplomatic history,” Iran’s top diplomat added.

But former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton said the faux Democratic outrage doesn’t address the substance of the Senate letter, but rather chooses to focus on a petty, insignificant question of whether the Republican senators offended the president’s and the Iranian regime’s sensibilities.

“This isn’t a question of whether Republicans violated protocol, or whether Sen. Cotton used a salad fork instead of a dinner fork,” Bolton said Tuesday in an interview with Bill Hemmer on America’s Newsroom. “The administration believes it’s negotiation posture is so weak, this could upset a deal. And if the deal is that fragile, they don’t have a deal.”

Sen. Cotton defended the letter in an interview Monday following immediate blowback from the Obama administration and media allies.

“We’re simply trying to say that Congress has a constitutional role to approve any deal, to make sure that Iran never gets a nuclear weapon,” Sen. Cotton said on ABC. “Not today, not tomorrow, not ten years from now.”

Cotton also said that the Senate’s Iranian experts say the regime isn’t at all proficient on the U.S. Constitution or the system of checks and balances, thus doesn’t realize the fragility of whatever deal they may strike with the Obama administration.

“We’re on the verge of a deal that could allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon in as little as ten years, so it’s important that Iran realize that Congress will not allow that outcome to happen,” Cotton said.

But Ambassador Bolton says the political firestorm is working as the Democrats intended, drawing attention from the real substance of the issue.

“Again, this is like arguing whether they used a salad fork instead of a dinner fork,” Bolton repeated. “They are worried about the impact this will have on the regime in Tehran, and that speaks to the fundamental mistrust.”

The political firestorm over Senate Republicans writing

egypt-el-sisi-interview

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi speaks to Fox News’ Bret Baier in Cairo, Egypt, in March, 2015. (Photo: FOX News Channel)

In an exclusive interview with Fox News, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi called for the creation of an “Arab ready force” backed by the U.S. to defeat ISIS. The Egyptian president first called for such a regional coalition in a speech last month, but stressed in the interview with Bret Baier a need for the U.S. to play a greater role in helping his country fight terrorism.

When asked to define the Middle East’s perceptions of the Obama administrations leadership, el-Sisi said it was a “difficult question” in English only after a long pause.

“The suspending of equipment, weapons and arms was a negative indication to the public opinion that the United States is not standing by the Egyptians,” el-Sisi said.

He addressed the need for what he called a religious “revolution,” urging moderate Muslims in Egypt and around the world to “stand up” against terrorists hijacking their religion. According to the Egyptian leader, there is a real fear among Muslims that fanatical religious leadership and oppression can become the norm in the region.

“We have to admit that terrorism is now a major threat not only to Egypt or even the immediate region, but it is a threat to the stability and security of the whole world,” the Egyptian leader said. “We can also see that the map of terrorism and extremism is expanding, it is not recessing.”

He said current U.S. policy toward Egypt is fostering a negative opinion among people, who feel that “the United States is not standing by the Egyptians.”

“For example, the suspending of equipment, weapons and arms was a negative indication to the public opinion that the United States is not standing by the Egyptians,” el-Sisi said. “13 June 2013 until now is a long time now, more than a year and a half now. We thought that the United States would take time to understand what really happened in Egypt but we need really to understand that it was and has been the will of the Egyptians.”

El-Sisi took power after former Muslim Brotherhood-backed President Mohammed Morsi was overthrown in 2013. While el-Sisi acknowledged that Morsi came to power as a result of “free and fair elections,” he said leadership must acknowledge that millions of Egyptians took to the streets to remove the extremist leadership that was leading them into a “vicious cycle of civil war.”

Though the U.S. still gives roughly $1.5 billion a year to Egypt, who is second only to Israel in U.S. foreign aide, mostly military shipments have been ceased since the military leadership overthrew Morsi cracked down on radical Islamist groups, including the Muslim Brotherhood. The U.S. held back deliveries of F-16 fighter jets, M1A1 tanks and Harpoon missiles.
He spoke out against what he described as “political Islam,” a term often used by Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, the president of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy. President el-Sisi said the people of Egypt have a “real fear of this kind” of system, adding they feel “these people have turned their lives into a living hell.”

He made these remarks in the course of defending the ouster of Morsi, who had been aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood. Responding to characterizations of his removal as a “coup,” el-Sisi acknowledged that “free and fair elections” resulted in Morsi’s election. But he said millions of Egyptians took to the streets when they wanted to remove that leadership — he claimed the country was headed into a “vicious cycle of civil war,” at the time he and other military leaders intervened.

Meanwhile, amid some concerns expressed by el-Sisi about the U.S. commitment to his country, Secretary of State John Kerry announced Monday he will travel to Egypt on March 12 to attend an economic development conference. Kerry plans to meet with el-Sisi and other senior Egyptian leaders to discuss various issues including efforts to fight ISIS.

In an exclusive interview with Fox News,

obama-holder-fast-and-furious-scandal

President Obama, left, and Attorney General Eric Holder, right, respond to reporters at a press conference.

The U.S. Department of Justice issued two reports last week, both growing out of the Ferguson, Missouri shooting of Michael Brown. The first report, about “the shooting death of Michael Brown by Ferguson, Missouri police officer Darren Wilson” ought to be read by every American.

It says in plain English what facts have been established by an autopsy on Michael Brown’s body — by three different pathologists, including one representing the family of Michael Brown — by DNA examination of officer Darren Wilson’s gun and police vehicle, by examination of the pattern of blood stains on the street where Brown died and by a medical report on officer Wilson, from the hospital where he went for treatment.

The bottom line is that all this hard evidence, and more, show what a complete lie was behind all the stories of Michael Brown being shot in the back or being shot while raising his hands in surrender. Yet that lie was repeated, and dramatized in demonstrations and riots from coast to coast, as well as in the media and even in the halls of Congress.

The other Justice Department report, issued the same day — “Investigation of the Ferguson Police Department” — was a complete contrast. Sweeping assumptions take the place of facts, and misleading statistics are thrown around recklessly. This second report is worth reading, just to get a sense of the contrast with the first.

According to the second report, law enforcement in Ferguson has a “disparate impact” on blacks and is “motivated” by “discriminatory intent.”

“Disparate impact” statistics have for decades been used, in many different contexts, to claim that discrimination was the reason why different groups are not equally represented as employees or in desirable positions or — as in this case — in undesirable positions as people arrested or fined.

Like many other uses of “disparate impact” statistics, the Justice Department’s evidence against the Ferguson police department consists of numbers showing that the percentage of people stopped by police or fined in court is larger than the percentage of blacks in the local population.

The implicit assumption is that such statistics about particular outcomes would normally reflect the percentage of people in the population. But, no matter how plausible this might seem on the surface, it is seldom found in real life, and those who use that standard are seldom, if ever, asked to produce hard evidence that it is factually correct, as distinct from politically correct.

Blacks are far more statistically “over-represented” among basketball stars in the NBA than among people stopped by police in Ferguson. Hispanics are similarly far more “over-represented” among baseball stars than in the general population. Asian Americans are likewise far more “over-represented” among students at leading engineering schools like M.I.T. and Cal Tech than in the population as a whole.

None of this is peculiar to the United States. You can find innumerable examples of such group disparities in countries around the world and throughout recorded history.

In 1802, for example, czarist Russia established a university in Estonia. For most of the 19th century, members of one ethnic group provided more of the students — and a majority of the professors — than any other. This was neither the local majority (Estonians) nor the national majority (Russians), but Germans.

An international study of the ethnic makeup of military forces around the world found that “militaries fall far short of mirroring, even roughly, the multi-ethnic societies” from which they come.
Even with things whose outcomes are not in human hands, “disparate impact” is common. Men are struck by lightning several times as often as women. Most of the tornadoes in the entire world occur in the middle of the United States.

Since the population of Ferguson is 67 percent black, the greatest possible “over-representation” of blacks among those stopped by police or fined by courts is 50 percent. That would not make the top 100 disparities in the United States or the top 1,000 in the world.

Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. His website is www.tsowell.com.

"Disparate impact" statistics have for decades been

government-solutionsI periodically share this poster, in part because it’s funny, but mostly because it’s true. After all, can you think of many “success stories” involving government?

When I pose this question to my statist friends, I usually get a blank stare in response. Though some of them will offer answers such as the GI Bill, interstate highways, and landing on the moon.

But even if you accept that those policies were successful, it’s rather revealing that folks on the left have a very hard time identifying any success stories from recent decades.

On the other hand, we have a never-ending and ever-growing list of government failures, boondoggles, and screw-ups. And that’s our focus today. We’re going to look at all levels of government for new examples that confirm Bastiat was right.

frederic-bastiat-quote-government-great-fiction

Let’s start with Montgomery County in Maryland, where bureaucrats are waging a legal battle against parents who – gasp! – allow unsupervised play for their children.

Here are some troubling passages from a Washington Post report.

The Maryland parents investigated for letting their young children walk home by themselves from a park were found responsible for “unsubstantiated” child neglect…the finding of unsubstantiated child neglect means CPS will keep a file on the family for at least five years and leaves open the question of what would happen if the Meitiv children get reported again for walking without adult supervision. The parents say they will continue to allow their son, Rafi, 10, and daughter Dvora, 6, to play or walk together, and won’t be swayed by the CPS finding. …The case dates to Dec. 20, when police picked up the two Meitiv children walking in Silver Spring on a Saturday afternoon after someone reported them. …The Meitivs said they would not have allowed the one-mile outing from Woodside Park to their home if they did not feel their children were up to it. …The Meitivs, both scientists by training, embrace a “free-range” philosophy of parenting, believing that children learn self-reliance by being allowed to make choices, build independence and progressively experience the world on their own. …Danielle Meitiv said when she first read the decision, she felt numb. As she reread it, she recalled turning to her husband and saying: “Oh my God, they really believe we did something wrong.” …Danielle Meitiv said that in spite of the decision, her children played at a nearby park by themselves Monday, when schools were closed for the snow day.

I confess that I was more paranoid than the Meitivs when my kids were young, so I can’t claim to have followed the same “free-range” approach.

But I also tried to avoid being a “helicopter” parent.

Not that my decisions on child rearing matter. What’s important from the perspective of public policy is that the Montgomery County bureaucracy is trying to dictate how to raise kids. And there’s a very clear implicit threat that it will arrest the parents and/or confiscate the children if the Meitivs don’t acquiesce.

And if you think I’m exaggerating and governments don’t behave this way, check out the story of the mom who was jailed overnight because her kids played outside – while she was watching them!

All of us should be outraged, regardless of our parenting approach. Now let’s look at an example of a state government in action.

As reported by the Washington Post, the Georgia State Patrol enjoyed a Keystone Cops moment when it raided an old man because…drum roll, please…he was growing okra.

Georgia police raided a retired Atlanta man’s garden last Wednesday after a helicopter crew with the Governor’s Task Force for Drug Suppression spotted suspicious-looking plants on the man’s property.A heavily-armed K9 unit arrived and discovered that the plants were, in fact, okra bushes. …Okra busts like these are good reason for taxpayers to be skeptical about the wisdom of sending guys up in helicopters to fly around aimlessly, looking for drugs in suburban gardens. And that’s not to mention the issue of whether we want a society where heavily-armed cops can burst into your property, with no grounds for suspicion beyond what somebody thought he saw from several hundred yards up in a helicopter.

In some sense, this is an amusing story of government incompetence.

But military-type raids, when the supposed offense involves a possible “crime” with no victims, are a recipe for disaster. Let’s be glad that the cops didn’t accidentally kill anybody in this raid.

By the way, this isn’t the first time cops have seized okra bushes. Or looked foolish because of an inability to identify marijuana leaves.

At the point, I don’t want to miss an opportunity to say that it’s time to end the foolish Drug War. People who abuse drugs may be stupid, but they’re not infringing on the rights of others. The War on Drugs, by contrast, has led to all sorts of policies that do infringe on our rights, from disgusting asset forfeiture policies to pointless snooping on our bank accounts. Or, as we just read, raids on okra growers.

Time now for a look at an example of federal government fecklessness.

But this story from the Washington Times won’t surprise anybody. Because anybody with a pulse already knows that there is a lot of waste in Washington.

Federal agencies across the board are continuing to waste tens of billions of taxpayer dollars on duplicative spending efforts, even after Congress‘ official watchdog has made hundreds of recommendations for cutting back. The spending issues, ranging from Medicare and Medicaid mismanagement to transportation programs to weapon systems acquisitions, cost taxpayers $125 billion in improper payments in 2014 alone, as highlighted in a new report from the Government Accountability Office. …GAO investigators noted in the report that the government can’t continue to sustain its wasteful spending habits… “The federal government faces an unsustainable long-term fiscal path. Changing this path will require difficult fiscal policy decisions to alter both long-term federal spending and revenue,” the GAO analysts concluded. …The GAO report targeted both the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Health and Human Services for mismanaging programs that saw rampant wasteful spending. …“These programs combined account for over 76 percent of the government-wide estimate. We have made numerous recommendations that if effectively implemented, could help improve program management, reduce improper payments in these programs, and achieve cost savings.”

Notice that HHS and the IRS win the prize for wasteful incompetence.

But don’t laugh. After all, those are the two bureaucracies that got lots of new power and authority as a result of the costly Obamacare boondoggle. So the joke’s on us.

By the way, the GAO’s definition of waste is very narrow. It merely applies to funds that are improperly disbursed.

If you also include monies that are squandered, then the amount of waste includes every penny at the Department of Agriculture, Department of Education,Department of Housing and Urban Development, Department of Transportation, etc.

Last but not least, let’s look at a great moment in foreign government.

I’ve written about the crazy Greek government on many occasions. And given that this collection of misfits does utterly bizarre things (such as giving handouts to pedophiles and requiring stool samples when setting up online companies), I’m never surprised to learn when they adopt foolish policies.

But even I was taken aback to learn about the latest gimmick they concocted to “solve” the nation’s fiscal crisis. Here are some excerpts from a report in the U.K.-based Guardian.

The Greek government has told its eurozone creditors it has a novel way of tackling the country’s chronic tax evasion culture – wiring students, tourists, and housewives for sound and video to spy on tax dodgers while posing as shoppers and customers. …Varoufakis’s plans for a new government-sponsored amateur snoopers’ charter…attracted most attention.…He said the prospects of successfully countering tax dodging were dismal because of the demoralised and understaffed state of the tax inspection service. Instead, he proposed recruiting large numbers of “non-professional inspectors” on short-term casual contracts of no longer than two months who would be paid by the hour. They would be “wired for sound and video”, trained to pose as “customers” and “will be hard to detect by offending tax dodgers.” …Varoufakis said the launch of the amateur snoopers would act as a deterrent, “engendering a new tax compliance culture” in Greece. He added that Athens would need to ask eurozone partners for help with the equipment and the training. Germany has previously offered to send 500 tax inspectors to Athens. …In Athens, news of the undercover tax agents was quick to spark ridicule and widespread disbelief.

Hmmm….so the Germans offered to send 500 tax inspectors? Sounds like a perfect job for ex-Stasi officials.

And there are some bureaucrats in Chicago who almost surely would want to helpimplement this snitch-on-your-neighbor scheme. And the governor of New York has related experience, though his police-state policy focused on guns rather than tax revenue. Let’s also not overlook the U.K. politicians who have a tax-enforcement-über-alles mentality.

Never mind that all the research shows that low rates are honest government are the best ways of getting high compliance.

So I’m not holding my breath expecting success from this latest Greek scheme.

But I can say it’s a perfect example of how governments operate. Screw up, grab for more money, screw up some more. Lather, rinse, repeat.

It’s almost a shame that there’s no life on Mars. We could make today’s list even longer if there was another layer of government.

Now you know why it’s almost always the right time to mock politicians.

I periodically share this poster, in part

People's Pundit Daily
You have %%pigeonMeterAvailable%% free %%pigeonCopyPage%% remaining this month. Get unlimited access and support reader-funded, independent data journalism.

Start a 14-day free trial now. Pay later!

Start Trial