On “What Are the Odds?” Monday, Robert Barnes and Rich Baris slam big tech for arbitrary social media bans, noting Collusion Hoaxers and Hamas have more free speech rights than Donald Trump.
Watch Full — Barnes and Baris Episode 32: What Are the Odds?
https://youtu.be/yzbZM9KPjCA
Support Locals Communities
Viva Barnes Law Community: https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/
People’s Pundit Community: https://peoplespundit.locals.com/
The most damning journalistic sin committed by the media during the era of Russia collusion…
The first ecological study finds mask mandates were not effective at slowing the spread of…
On "What Are the Odds?" Monday, Robert Barnes and Rich Baris discuss why America First…
Personal income fell $1,516.6 billion (7.1%) in February, roughly the consensus forecast, while consumer spending…
Research finds those previously infected by or vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 are not at risk of…
Initial jobless claims rose again for the week ending March 13, the previous week was…
This website uses cookies.
View Comments
Your writing is so excellent, I couldn't help but share it with everyone. We hope you will share more with us!
It's funny that big tech can ban social networks, we as users have the right to choose what we will use, right? Agree that content love tester should be censored, but not too abusive of such power
Barnes and Baris have recently shed light on the issue of Big Tech’s arbitrary social media bans, highlighting the significant impact these actions have on free speech. Their discussions reveal how platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube often enforce their policies inconsistently, leading to accusations of bias and censorship.
This raises concerns about control and bias in the management of content on social media platforms retro bowl, as well as the impact of these decisions on free speech.